Pages:
Author

Topic: 📝[Discussion topic] Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns📝 - page 12. (Read 6461 times)

legendary
Activity: 3234
Merit: 1375
Slava Ukraini!
What are your thoughts about this campaign in the long run? For sure, local boards will become active again.
Oh, I just realized that I haven't saw their signatures for a while and that their previous campaign was closed. I agree with others that they barely can attract good posters with such low payment rates. Especially if you're in their lower tier. But where did you get that you can earn up to $40 week? I see that in tier A they pay 3500 Satoshi per post, it's almot $1 and if you will make 60 posts, you can earn $60.
But allowing to make up to 60 posts, damn, it leads to spam. I don't see how someone can make so many quality posts in just 1 week, especially considering that most of these users probably weren't accepted into higher paying campaigns. And we should expect that users will try to reach max allowed quota to maximize their earnings.
copper member
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1814
฿itcoin for all, All for ฿itcoin.
What are your thoughts about this campaign in the long run? For sure, local boards will become active again.
Their money, their rules  Smiley

But from what I can see they will most likely get applications from users who haven't been accepted in other campaigns such as
1. Accounts that have just woken up after long gaps without posting.
2. Low post quality users.
3. Users that are not so good with the English boards

Bitvest and 777coin signature campaign is one of the oldest campaigns. I have been a part of this campaign back in my early forum days. They used to pay this little amount at that time too. Well, $40 max pay for Legendary seems low though. If I'm correct, I used to get around $35 for 60 posts per week back in 2019/20.
In 2019, $50-$30 was normal pay for legendary ranks for most signature campaigns except for chipmixer and the likes, and there were very few live signature campaign during that bear market.
Today things are different, $70-$100 seems to be a common figure.
legendary
Activity: 3472
Merit: 3507
Crypto Swap Exchange

Spamfest is starting again, it's time for the sleeping alt accounts to wake up. It's incredible that in a short time, we have about 7 pages (~140) of applications here

What are your thoughts about this campaign in the long run? For sure, local boards will become active again.
Maybe they will plan for the long term again, so it's good that Bitvest is back active on the forum after being off for a long time.

It can be said that it will be a long-term campaign, given that the manager has enough funds for several months in escrow at the current payment rate.

Bitvest Escrow Address: bc1q00pyv4twqzj88525e2pfypf4m4d9kmpkgyqpje
Current balance:

hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 791
Bitcoin To The Moon 📈📈📈
Bitvest Plinko Signature Campaign is now open again. The campaign is paying very little, even before its reopening, with no limit on the number of campaign participants. Member rank to Legendary can join. You can also post a maximum of 60 local posts since local posts are counted. However, even if you post the maximum of 60 your earnings will still be lower compared to other campaigns.
This signature campaign follows the old payout levels in 2018 with no changes at all but the owner may just want what he wants.

As of now, 2400 satoshis are only worth $0.68 according to CoinMarketCap, which means a Legendary rank can only earn $40 per week. In my opinion, it's a bargain signature campaign.
I don't know if in this campaign there are Legendary places? In some 'Tier' lists there is no mention of legendary except just heroes, I think it is impossible for managers to miss that rank. Maybe specifically Hero to Member.

What are your thoughts about this campaign in the long run? For sure, local boards will become active again.
Maybe they will plan for the long term again, so it's good that Bitvest is back active on the forum after being off for a long time.
legendary
Activity: 1820
Merit: 1207
Bitvest and 777coin signature campaign is one of the oldest campaigns. I have been a part of this campaign back in my early forum days. They used to pay this little amount at that time too. Well, $40 max pay for Legendary seems low though. If I'm correct, I used to get around $35 for 60 posts per week back in 2019/20.
Because they deducted the payrate, it was 6,500 Satoshi + 500 Satoshi (bonus) for Hero tier A, so the maximum is 0.00397500 BTC/$110. If they use the old payrate, many good posters will try to join since it's still worth and long term.

But with the current payrate, I think they either only get spammer or AI poster.
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 2100
Marketing Campaign Manager |Telegram ID- @LT_Mouse
What are your thoughts about this campaign in the long run?
Bitvest and 777coin signature campaign is one of the oldest campaigns. I have been a part of this campaign back in my early forum days. They used to pay this little amount at that time too. Well, $40 max pay for Legendary seems low though. If I'm correct, I used to get around $35 for 60 posts per week back in 2019/20.
sr. member
Activity: 1638
Merit: 364
https://shuffle.com?r=nba
Bitvest Plinko Signature Campaign is now open again. The campaign is paying very little, even before its reopening, with no limit on the number of campaign participants. Member rank to Legendary can join. You can also post a maximum of 60 local posts since local posts are counted. However, even if you post the maximum of 60 your earnings will still be lower compared to other campaigns.

As of now, 2400 satoshis are only worth $0.68 according to CoinMarketCap, which means a Legendary rank can only earn $40 per week. In my opinion, it's a bargain signature campaign.

What are your thoughts about this campaign in the long run? For sure, local boards will become active again.


legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3878
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
I don't think you should base only on the opinion of the campaign participants. There are only a few rules for them. Number of posts they can/should write, payment rate and limitation in which boards it is desirable to be present or not. The Signature campaign serves the owner in building and promoting the business, and the brand and adapts to it.
It is best to contact one of the managers (why not more of them) and ask for specific suggestions based on their experiences. I noticed that Royse777 and icopress do some kind of analytics and monitor the final effect of the campaigns, so I believe they already have some conclusions about it.
Thank you for your advice. The first guy you mentioned we probably won't connect with as he has negative feedback and we don't like that in the campaign thread he also advertises his services. We spoke with the second one recently and he advised us to follow the trends of the forum, including current rates that will allow us to attract high-quality posters, so we will probably go with him.
That's what I received when Whirlwind management were very close to make a signature campaign deal with me :-D
They had this thought that the negative feedback left by JollyGood will effect their campaign so they decided to conduct it with someone else.

Anyway, icopress is also a good one to go with. Good luck.
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 7064
The first guy you mentioned we probably won't connect with as he has negative feedback
Don't just blindly look at negative feedback on member profiles, but look who wrote them.
One of members who gave him negative feedback should not be trusted, he has a long tradition of abusing trust system and he is part of my ignore list.
copper member
Activity: 90
Merit: 30
I don't think you should base only on the opinion of the campaign participants. There are only a few rules for them. Number of posts they can/should write, payment rate and limitation in which boards it is desirable to be present or not. The Signature campaign serves the owner in building and promoting the business, and the brand and adapts to it.
It is best to contact one of the managers (why not more of them) and ask for specific suggestions based on their experiences. I noticed that Royse777 and icopress do some kind of analytics and monitor the final effect of the campaigns, so I believe they already have some conclusions about it.
Thank you for your advice. The first guy you mentioned we probably won't connect with as he has negative feedback and we don't like that in the campaign thread he also advertises his services. We spoke with the second one recently and he advised us to follow the trends of the forum, including current rates that will allow us to attract high-quality posters, so we will probably go with him.
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 2213
Guys, since you're talking about signing campaigns, I would like to know what conditions are most acceptable for campaign participants? We would like to launch a campaign, but we are still thinking about which manager to choose and what campaign conditions will be most suitable for participants.
Royse777, icopress and Hhampuz are all good managers and they are most active at the moment.
If you ask me what terms and conditions I would like to see in campaign, than I can say that I like to have freedom to write as I usually do, without limitations for minimum and/or maximum number of posts.
Long term campaign with reasonbale amount of escrowed funds would probably attract more quality members, but you can always offer members individual deals without involving third party Wink

Personally I like icopress' total earnt merit ranking styled spreadsheets, rather than focusing simply on merit earnt in past 120 days. I think the idea of bonus' for having 2K, 4K, 6K etc merit for certain rewards will become the new norm over time, as it's more about quality of posting rather than quantity for these types of campaigns. I noticed Royse777 has also started using merit-based reward system with 4K getting considerably more than Legendary/Hero ranks, which also makes sense when their are less than 50 users in that position, so hopefully others will follow suit.

hero member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 785
I'm currently participating in a campaign managed by julers12, very solid and trusted guy who can provide all-round services including signature/avatar designs. His service advertisement topic: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/service-signaturebounty-campaign-management-2522224
Thank you. As far as I can tell this person is careless with money, so we'd rather choose someone else.
You can make payments with you, just like Coinomize signatures, the owner himself makes payments every week with his wallet address included.

But choosing someone else may be a good solution to eliminate your doubts, but the names mentioned are the best managers today.
legendary
Activity: 3472
Merit: 3507
Crypto Swap Exchange
Guys, since you're talking about signing campaigns, I would like to know what conditions are most acceptable for campaign participants? We would like to launch a campaign, but we are still thinking about which manager to choose and what campaign conditions will be most suitable for participants.

I don't think you should base only on the opinion of the campaign participants. There are only a few rules for them. Number of posts they can/should write, payment rate and limitation in which boards it is desirable to be present or not. The Signature campaign serves the owner in building and promoting the business, and the brand and adapts to it.
It is best to contact one of the managers (why not more of them) and ask for specific suggestions based on their experiences. I noticed that Royse777 and icopress do some kind of analytics and monitor the final effect of the campaigns, so I believe they already have some conclusions about it.
copper member
Activity: 90
Merit: 30
I'm currently participating in a campaign managed by julers12, very solid and trusted guy who can provide all-round services including signature/avatar designs. His service advertisement topic: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/service-signaturebounty-campaign-management-2522224
Thank you. As far as I can tell this person is careless with money, so we'd rather choose someone else.
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 7064
Guys, since you're talking about signing campaigns, I would like to know what conditions are most acceptable for campaign participants? We would like to launch a campaign, but we are still thinking about which manager to choose and what campaign conditions will be most suitable for participants.
Royse777, icopress and Hhampuz are all good managers and they are most active at the moment.
If you ask me what terms and conditions I would like to see in campaign, than I can say that I like to have freedom to write as I usually do, without limitations for minimum and/or maximum number of posts.
Long term campaign with reasonbale amount of escrowed funds would probably attract more quality members, but you can always offer members individual deals without involving third party Wink
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1561
Guys, since you're talking about signing campaigns, I would like to know what conditions are most acceptable for campaign participants? We would like to launch a campaign, but we are still thinking about which manager to choose and what campaign conditions will be most suitable for participants.

Best to look at this topic: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/overview-of-bitcointalk-signature-ad-campaigns-last-update-01-jan-23-615953
It summarises all active signature campaigns (that pay in BTC), so it gives a nice overview of pay rates and minimum rank requirements. You can click on each one to see more detailed rules and T&Cs.

As for the best managers, I don't think there's any up-to-date topic listing all the active ones, but most would advertise in Services board: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=52.0
You could also just post there an let them come to you.

I'm currently participating in a campaign managed by julers12, very solid and trusted guy who can provide all-round services including signature/avatar designs. His service advertisement topic: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/service-signaturebounty-campaign-management-2522224
copper member
Activity: 90
Merit: 30
Guys, since you're talking about signing campaigns, I would like to know what conditions are most acceptable for campaign participants? We would like to launch a campaign, but we are still thinking about which manager to choose and what campaign conditions will be most suitable for participants.
legendary
Activity: 3178
Merit: 1140
#SWGT CERTIK Audited
Anyway, it looks like Bitcointalk is still a great place to run ad campaign. Based on this discussion currently there's 32 active signature campaign paying bitcoins (if I'm not mistaken). I can't imagine there are many online gambling casino companies doing this sort of thing. Hopefully, this will last for a long period of time just like many others.

There are 28 active ones as per the Overview thread.
Are you guys aware of any other forum in the world that would have similar campaigns?
It's pretty crazy to think that there are people from poor countries making their living just by posting on bitcointalk. The highest-paid campaign currently pays $6/post, which converts to around $910/month. Not enough to survive in "the West" but there are plenty of countries you could live a comfy life with that kind of money.
Since it is a win win situation then I see no problems with that personally. To answer your question, there is (or there was since I am not sure if they continue to do it) some forums that do the same thing with a lower payments mostly. Honestly I don't recall since it has been a long time, the last one I remember is an ex signature campaign that opened up a forums with low payment per post.
For the money, it depends from the country you live on it but certainly in western one the payment won't make a living, maybe to buy additional stuff with it at best.
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1561
Anyway, it looks like Bitcointalk is still a great place to run ad campaign. Based on this discussion currently there's 32 active signature campaign paying bitcoins (if I'm not mistaken). I can't imagine there are many online gambling casino companies doing this sort of thing. Hopefully, this will last for a long period of time just like many others.

There are 28 active ones as per the Overview thread.
Are you guys aware of any other forum in the world that would have similar campaigns?
It's pretty crazy to think that there are people from poor countries making their living just by posting on bitcointalk. The highest-paid campaign currently pays $6/post, which converts to around $910/month. Not enough to survive in "the West" but there are plenty of countries you could live a comfy life with that kind of money.
sr. member
Activity: 1638
Merit: 364
https://shuffle.com?r=nba
New signature campaign managed by the great icopress:
CoinRoyale - Bitcoin Casino | Sig Campaign | Up to 0.0025 BTC/W looking for Sr/Hero/Legendary members.
-snip-
Link to signature thread : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/cfnp-coinroyale-bitcoin-casino-sig-campaign-up-to-25post-5465743

New signature campaign managed by the great Little Mouse:
COINS.GAME | Most Rewarding Crypto Casino | Signature Campaign Up to $100 looking for 15 forum members.
-snip-
Link to signature thread : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ended-coinsgame-most-rewarding-crypto-casino-signature-campaign-up-to-100-5465782.

I was about to post the same thing but then I read your post so I decided not to.

Anyway, it looks like Bitcointalk is still a great place to run ad campaign. Based on this discussion currently there's 32 active signature campaign paying bitcoins (if I'm not mistaken). I can't imagine there are many online gambling casino companies doing this sort of thing. Hopefully, this will last for a long period of time just like many others.

This is deleted post from this topic: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/overview-of-bitcointalk-signature-ad-campaigns-last-update-01-jan-23-615953
Pages:
Jump to: