Topic: DisLedger sale ends at midnight UTC/8:00PM EDT... Join this incredible DLT now!! - page 16. (Read 28507 times)

Your statement doesnt make sense, do you want to charge fees for ico registration. it's not like you are offering escrow for the ico. Are  you the only one working in the company? I cant find any team member bio.

Any response would be pure speculation, and worthless.

Has anyone looked at this coin to see how high it can go if it starts at $30?

Thanks again to the hundreds of registrant!

If you haven't already yet, sign up now at DisLedger!

Unlike some escrow sites that charge over $100 AND 1-2% of your funds... DisLedger registration is totally free!

Confirmation emails were just sent to the first group of registrants that passed the AML check for DisLedger's token launch.

If you registered after 15 August your application is still in process.

Thanks to everyone that has registered!

Thanks for the article

More exchanges will start dropping 'security' coins which will immediately make those coins lose value. People that want tokens will become more selective and only buy non-security tokens. DisLedger is one of the few tokens that is not a security - there are not a lot of other options available.

DisLedger's IP token will be able to be listed on exchanges and be tradable without running into issues with the SEC so it will be in greater demand.

Why does that make yours more valuable?

ShapeShift is going to drop coins that are considered securities Coindesk article

DisLedger's token is NOT A SECURITY so it be even more valuable

Yes billy, glad you like it!

Our repository is GitHub

Do you have code on github?

I used the demo and it's really fast compared to other projects, good luck!

Lots of coins are pre-mined what's the problem with that?
If they need 30 million tokens why would they burn the unsold ones?
Investors get to buy the coins cheap then the company can sell the ones they own later so they are incentivized to keep the price high too.
Calling something a scheme is rude I can see why they don't like it.

No need to be so defensive, really. I just noted that, by holding tokens in a reserve for later re-selling them directly to customers, people that bought tokens during the ICO will have no guarantees on their future value. After the ICO, you will be able to sell your reserve at a judgmental price. If (for example) you may need some liquidity for business operations (or any other possible reason), you may want to incentive to buy part of your reserve at a lower price than the ICO or the market price, this will indirectly depreciate the tokens that have been bought during the ICO. This is just an example, my concern is regarding the risks related with the reserve. Normally other ICO projects "burn" unsold tokens to protect investors from this risk and avoid "pre-mine" accusations.

I am not saying yours is a scheme, I just said that it can be seen as a "pre-mined" scheme, I am just offering you the opportunity to clarify.
Regarding the spreading of FUD, this is not the case: I would not be here asking legitimate questions, otherwise.

There is nothing to be defensive about regarding the release of tokens over time as it is clearly articulated in the documentation. 15% of tokens are available on launch and 85% will be released from the reserve over time because we need a supply of approximately 30 million tokens (30 billion transactions). 

I will not accept the labeling of the company a scheme - it is not. I will push back forcefully against your inaccurate characterization because it does nothing to aid in the analysis of DisLedger's technology or token launch. DisLedger is a respected organization that has been in business for a long time (in DLT space) and will continue to provide service to our customers for a long time.

You are attempting to cast Fear Uncertainty and Doubt (FUD) on the company with vague assertions of 'legal consequences, unless you prove the contrary.' That's a ridiculous, unsupported statement, only intended to harm the company, and not a valid critique. There are actual attorneys, who are renowned in this space, working on the legal and regulatory issues related to the token launch. The attorneys will submit their analysis of the regulatory issues to document how DisLedger satisfies the requirements.

I only respond to this post to let other readers know that DisLedger is committed to transparency and abiding by applicable regulations. We like to discuss the technology and accept valid criticism of it... but in the future we won't be engaging with FUD or flame postings.

Then why don't you inform us, instead of being so defensive without proving the contrary?
Please clarify what you will do with all those "premined" unsold tokens you said "will be available to customers"

Yes using that metric we'll be 1/3 IOTA's valuation at launch, but that's not the greatest measurement of a product's capabilities.

The relevance of my previous work is that it involved complex systems analysis and design, technical project management, software development of high-reliability systems, and international business development - all in a heavily regulated industry. All of those characteristics are directly applicable to DisLedger's focus on financial transactions for payments and capital markets.

DisLedger has been under development since January 2016.

The U.S. Patent Office published DisLedger's patent application today. You can find it on U.S. PTO website try their application search feature using application number 15/429426

This direct link may work too: Direct link to application 
and a .PDF is uploaded to PDF on DisLedger's site

Hi, the first round of AML checks is nearly complete and we'll send emails verifying successful registration over then next few days.

Thanks!

looks a bit...very different from others for me

4.5M * 30$ = 135M  -- "market cap" of sold licences (and no news about exchanges)
30M * 30$ = 900 M  -- "total value" of issued licenses

IOTA market cap is 3000M now. So it is immediately 1/3 of IOTA

And we can't see any code of Disledger - only a statement about patents. Can we have any confirmation that u actually have a patent?

It looks like you aims to sold tokens\licenses only for companies who will use it or whales who can afford to spend $$$kk for nothing.
Plus you don't have any slack or telegram groups where we can discuss your product. (Telegram channel is not a group and also has only 13 people there)

You are also a President (and a single employee) of Packet Dynamics LLC --- http://www.packet-dynamics.com/ -- which has a very strange website with 3 html pages from previous era of the Internet. NP but it really looks strange.

everything is so strange...

I registered and i dont think i got an email notification