Do you agree in death penalty? - page 47.

Matcuda

full member

Activity: 490

Merit: 100

Quote from: cryptoon007 on October 19, 2017, 02:26:51 AM

I don't agree with the death penalty if the criminal hasn't taken any life-like in Sharia law. The only reason I'd condone its application is when the accused has killed another person, and there is proof beyond doubt. It's God who has the right to kill, but sometimes we also need to act.

You can kill a man by accident. Do you really think that such "killers" just as deserve to die as serial maniacs? I'm against the death penalty. It can not be used for anyone

cryptoon007

newbie

Activity: 53

Merit: 0

I don't agree with the death penalty if the criminal hasn't taken any life-like in Sharia law. The only reason I'd condone its application is when the accused has killed another person, and there is proof beyond doubt. It's God who has the right to kill, but sometimes we also need to act.

Sithara007

legendary

Activity: 3346

Merit: 1352

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: Eric Nelson on October 18, 2017, 02:07:22 AM

In addition, Racial discrimination is also the problem some judge based their verdict on the color, race, and nationality of a person (suspect).

The issue of racial discrimination in the judiciary is just an urban myth. If you check the conviction and punishment rates in the United States, then it is clear that the non-Hispanic whites are the ones who receive the harshest punishment for any offense. However, the number of convictions may be low because the crime rate among this demographic group is lower than the national average.

Eric Nelson

newbie

Activity: 12

Merit: 0

I agree and disagree. I agree for the fact that all people who committed such crime like murder and rape should be perished in this world. I don't believe that they will change. A killer and/or rapist that are pardoned or paroled and released, once the got out they have the tendency to get back on their past life in just one snap. I disagree in some case where in no proper judicial proceedings where handle out by the judge and the verdict is Death penalty even though the evidences are not that clear. In addition, Racial discrimination is also the problem some judge based their verdict on the color, race, and nationality of a person (suspect).

Sithara007

legendary

Activity: 3346

Merit: 1352

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: alj024 on October 17, 2017, 11:56:54 PM

i agree for death penalty for the rape cases

Not just rape. IMO, either the death penalty (or life without parole in a penal colony) must be mandatory for the following crimes: first-degree murder, stealing of government funds over $1 million, attempted rape of a minor, high treason, and trafficking of hard drugs. That said, I would still prefer life w/o parole in a penal colony over death sentence, since the latter option is too soft and lenient when compared to the former. Let the criminals rot and suffer for the rest of their lives.

alj024

jr. member

Activity: 52

Merit: 10

i agree for death penalty for the rape cases

faraon

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

god give us the life so i m not open this option

Sithara007

legendary

Activity: 3346

Merit: 1352

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: vivilast on October 17, 2017, 04:22:00 PM

Do not directly to execute someone then we must first know the problem, if it must be put to death there must be a very big problem whether it is corruption Which is detrimental to state money and must be put to death

I support giving death penalty for those who are involved in large-scale corruption. Because when you steal a large amount of government funds, you are indirectly causing the deaths of a large number of people. For example, here in India recently more than 100 kids died in a hospital because the supplies of oxygen cylinders ran out. The money which was supposed to purchase these cylinders was stolen and as a result a large number of children lost their lives.

Maren

full member

Activity: 304

Merit: 105

Thu number of pro death sentence people is too damn high! The developed world is developed because one of the core beliefs is the belief in the sanctity of human life. Every human life is sacred. Really bad people should be put away for life, so they can't harm anyone, but they can't be killed.

Once you start justifying murder, where do you stop? The only legitimate murder is when you save lives doing it. But even this has to be anchored in the immediate, if you start generalizing it you can justify any war.

vivilast

newbie

Activity: 77

Merit: 0

Do not directly to execute someone then we must first know the problem, if it must be put to death there must be a very big problem whether it is corruption Which is detrimental to state money and must be put to death

RamBahadur.Gurung

sr. member

Activity: 457

Merit: 262

The last time someone was executed in my country was long back, in 1979. For the last four decades there have been no executions. But a lot of us now feel the need to bring back the death penalty. The incidence of brutal crime is rising every year. There needs to be a strong deterrent.

striker7334 2.0

sr. member

Activity: 560

Merit: 300

Unprofessional shitcoin trader since 2011

Here in the US it's a torn subject for most citizens for a variety of different reasons. For me, yes I agree with the death penalty some people just don't deserve to live for the things they've done and I would sleep better at night knowing the world is a slightly better place with their death; but do I actually support it in legislative practice...no. The reason that finally changed my stance is the fact there is a high percentage of people that are innocent on death row like I believe its around 4% maybe more its been awhile since I've looked into it but regardless we can't have a fair justice system that kills X% of the population by mistake it's just not humane and acceptable for a civilized society imo. Now if we ever do figure out a way to ensure 100% accuracy you bet your ass I'm onboard with the death penalty.

xebecstyx

member

Activity: 168

Merit: 10

That is a very sensitive and critical question to ask. It would not only touch one's belief in religion but his moral values as well. At plain view, you can easily say that death penalty is bad because it is tantamount to taking one's life in replacement for a crime he committed. The operative word there is replacement; however, I believe that in a crime, for a victim or a victim's family's point of view, mere incarceration is not enough. To me, it depends on the effect of the crime committed and the crime in general as well. There are some people that really needs to be punished in a capital way to make sure that what they did won't happen again to other individuals. However, giving chance at life and for a person to change is always the best way to go.

kii552007

newbie

Activity: 41

Merit: 0

I agree we should have death penalty, but I don't think every evil criminal should be sent to death penalty.
I think it depends on what's the crime the criminal conducted, and why he did it.
For example, someone conducted a crime just because he want people to end his life,
and I think instead of send him to death penality, life sentence will give him more pain/punishment.

inoymuninoy

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

No, because in any circumstances spilling of blood and killing other people must be a last resort rather than first option

Xester

hero member

Activity: 994

Merit: 544

Quote from: Corporatocracy on October 16, 2017, 10:41:22 PM

Depends on how good the evidence against them and what the crime is. The punishment might not be enough to completely stopping crime, but if it saves just one future victim, it's worth the deterrent effect.

I believe that those criminals and crimes which was subjected for death penalty will be judged fairly. They will undergo the due process and will not just be sentenced to death penalty. I agree with the death penalty especially now that people are so heartless. Just this day, I heard that a group of 19 years old were inquested for the crime of murdering a 32 year old security guard. It was so devastating that at that young age, people are ready to do such crimes without thinking and analyzing things.

xvids

sr. member

Activity: 1176

Merit: 301

Quote from: bebejhen on July 23, 2017, 12:03:45 AM

I believe that we just borrow our lives from God. And He is the only one who have right to take them away from us.

I’m kind of caught in the middle with this topic. I also believe in God and I also don’t think we have any right to take away anyone’s life. However, it’s kind of hard to stick to this religious principle, when you put yourself in the victim’s shoes. What if the victim was a close family member? I bet the next thing you’ll have in mind is to purchase a gun kill the person and obtain justice for your loved one, especially if it was a child or worse, your own child. I’m talking about rape, murder, cannibalism, child molestation, etc.

kabzon_btw

member

Activity: 476

Merit: 10

If you killed someone, you should die, too. I agree to bring back death penalty

Jgatsby

full member

Activity: 265

Merit: 100

Pretty kewl right?

I do, specially when the convict did extremely cruel things like rape, murder, felony murder, capital sexual battery, etc., I think it gives justice to the victims and their family and it makes people think twice before doing something bad.

SingAlong

full member

Activity: 294

Merit: 100

Quote from: bebejhen on July 23, 2017, 12:03:45 AM

I believe that we just borrow our lives from God. And He is the only one who have right to take them away from us.

Exactly! That's why we just punish them with life in imprisonment rather than death penalty which is more effective so that they will be forever be hunted with their conscience and forever be replayed in their minds the faces of the people they did wrong.

Topic: Do you agree in death penalty? - page 47. (Read 33419 times)