Do you believe in ICO Ratings? - page 36.

Coroline

sr. member

Activity: 1092

Merit: 256

Quote from: No Pain No blood on February 02, 2018, 10:00:46 AM

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

all valuations are not from sales but taken from several sides, such as team, ico profile, vision and product. it's all rated and accumulated. so not only from token sales alone

flying_bit

jr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 9

I believe that ICO rating have still impact with ICO but gone are the days that it's very valuable and ratings are honest. I have heard that most ico rating site we're asking fees for good feedback and so with this, I believe ICO rating are more of for marketing and advertising but still good to check out for more info since project are well explained there and also you see in one place almost all info you need to know.

nhoj25

member

Activity: 322

Merit: 10

For an ICO projects, having a third party rating your ICO means getting valuable and honest information on the quality and the potential of the ICO. If the outcome is positive, the results of the rating can be used for marketing purposes, since it transmits trust and transparency. Although not all highly rated ICO became sucessful. It is always better to make some self-resarch regarding the Project you will be participating

adamreb

member

Activity: 434

Merit: 10

In fact, I think such ratings are quite useful for understanding the overall picture. But in any case, do not unplug your head, keep thinking for yourself.

kudryas

newbie

Activity: 140

Merit: 0

Quote from: bountyhunter433 on July 07, 2018, 07:03:19 AM

I think ICO's rating can only be used for reference. After all, the ICO risk itself is huge. So still rely on their own analysis. If you say that rating agencies have insider. Then you will become a pig.

What was that about becoming a pig? Grin

ICO ratings are just a piece of information just alike any other that needs to be verified and checked not believed in without a second thought.

AndyKete

newbie

Activity: 83

Merit: 0

On regards to acceptable websites for investors searching for proper initial Coin Offerings these tend to be ICO Rating and veteran related specialised locations.

bountyhunter433

newbie

Activity: 70

Merit: 0

I think ICO's rating can only be used for reference. After all, the ICO risk itself is huge. So still rely on their own analysis. If you say that rating agencies have insider. Then you will become a pig.

strauberyg

newbie

Activity: 111

Merit: 0

I think a website like ICObench, ICOrating only as one of the reference factors when we will invest on a project. The best result is when we do our own research on the project that we will invest.

Best Coin8

member

Activity: 168

Merit: 10

I think basically, to have a good income, you need to choose a good ICO. It's hard to say and predict which ICO is now good, at least you should read White paper.

eolitic

member

Activity: 182

Merit: 10

I believe ratings that I can find on icodropds.com website. It is very convenient to use this website, cause you can find all the necessary information and links. The information about bounty campaigns and airdrops is also there. But there are lots of such websites, but I, personally, prefer this one. Besides, lots of telegram channels devoted to ico analysis are out there. Lots of information, lots of opportunities, you just have to be able to spend time reading and to make conclusions.

Bilipus

jr. member

Activity: 224

Merit: 5

To be honest, no, since I think all the ratings have been bought, it's not that much money compared to the millions that the project team builds on the ICO. I would not trust it. For me the component of the team and the technical documentation is more important.

Sevaev

full member

Activity: 406

Merit: 132

I think that there is some truth in them, but this truth is not enough that to trust projects. If there are honest ratings, then this is subjective opinion and experts, if they exist, assess projects on templates, without enthusiasm. Very questionable resources.

Tatzky

jr. member

Activity: 162

Merit: 1

Let me give you a hunch.... During airdrops some ICO requires participants to rate the token before they are qualified... This activity says that rating is somewhat 100% real....

buiviet173a

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

I usually look at the rating of "icodrops", but before the contribution of course I study the project personally, aspects such as the project team of their roadmap are very important and you can evaluate them yourself.

ivlvov

member

Activity: 140

Merit: 10

CRYPTASSIST.io

Quote from: No Pain No blood on February 02, 2018, 10:00:46 AM

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

Of course, it's best not to completely trust these sites and try to make their own assessment of the project. But the algorithm of such sites and their evaluation of ICO projects is easy to understand. They learn their business model, test the team and predict the value and innovation of the project.Although, it's obvious that such sites may take the money to promote the ICO, even if it could ruin their reputation.

lalunalaguna

member

Activity: 127

Merit: 43

Quote from: No Pain No blood on February 02, 2018, 10:00:46 AM

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

I don't generally confide in the rating of locales, yet I trust the live appraising of the members more. Great audits, high participation and positive surveys about the organization.

boblets243

newbie

Activity: 112

Merit: 0

Quote from: No Pain No blood on February 02, 2018, 10:00:46 AM

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

Usually I don’t rely on these websites because there are a lot of instances that the ratings are good but in actual it turns out bad. I believe these websites has something to improve on to increase their credibility. So the only way to make a research on your own instead of relying on these ratings.

iceblasto

full member

Activity: 462

Merit: 100

I use ico rank as a reference for what to see. Some of their ratings are not really done because they use predictions as well but yes I believe in ico rank because some of them really help us to join or where to join ico. but all back to you, Believe in yourself and I think check out ico yourself better

billbear

member

Activity: 294

Merit: 10

I tended to use them before but for now I think that making your own decisions and your own researches are way better, than to listen how somebody else is making decision about your money instead of you.

fivefingers

newbie

Activity: 84

Merit: 0

Quote from: dhemasm on February 02, 2018, 10:11:39 AM

I think a website like ICObench, ICOrating only as one of the reference factors when we will invest on a project. But we also should not be too trust in these websites. The best result is when we do our own research on the project that we will invest.

So the ico rating website is just one of our references when we going to do deeper research on a project. That's my opinion. Btw sorry for my bad english and thanks!

ICO Ratings are a good source of information and must be one of the considerations when looking at the ICO's. Whoever, the top criteria in determining the value of an ICO should not be based on this but rather, be based on your own research.

Topic: Do you believe in ICO Ratings? - page 36. (Read 6918 times)