Actually if ill need some good ICO's i'm going to search them in the ICO ratings.
Because some them that have a high rate it will have a chance to be success of their project.
Topic: Do you believe in ICO Ratings? - page 32. (Read 6947 times)
I don't trust, when it comes to money. Analytics in ICO ratings are useful indicator because they show what people will think about the project. But they are not to be trusted. On the other hand information from such wevbsites like soft and hard caps, is there MVP and how much hype there is is worth checking and analysing.
Personally, I use such search engines only to find new ICO projects that appear. I think that such sites as ICOdrops or ICObench can conduct an independent evaluation, but for the money they will put such an estimate which is needed.
ICO opinions are simply objective exams. I think these checks are only for beginners and are the place to discover the quickest ICOs. The actual development of the project must be primarily based on community, improvement ideas, and improvement group.
No gain saying, ICO ratings are very important. it is a rating where the future ICO is being explained and rate, most people which are future investors of the ICO are reading it. Most of them based their decision on whether to invest or not and how much. ICO ratings are really important, they are the one who understands all corners of the prospective project. they study the presentations and make reviews of it. Though these ratings can't tell the outcome of the ICO.
I sometimes look at ico scores, but never follow them to make a decision . you have to make your own decision.
You can sometimes listen to ICO ratings, but you must make your own decisions based on the knowledge of the project that you have. Only you are responsible for your mistake.
I actually use these ratings for judgement on bounty campaigns to participate in. Although, for me these rating sites give subjective information-their opinion about the project,sometimes this opinion is paid, but it can be seen. I always read these opinions, sometimes you can find there interesting and needful information. And on these sites you can find the latest information on funds raised on the moment.
I believe ratings and have no reasons not to believe because they have been really helpful for me when I wanted to choose the best ico. i have checked ratings and reviews and made the right decision. I always check them now
Well, we have to check the truth. But we also believe all the ratings are there. But one thing, the success of each project is not based on how they rate the website. They are part of a stepping stone to have a good record and good value.
I believe ratings and have no reasons not to believe because they have been really helpful for me when I wanted to choose the best ico. i have checked ratings and reviews and made the right decision. I always check them now
Not all resources. For example, on the ICE Drops, the ratings of often true. Such a project as Spotcoin adequately assessed and the assessment corresponds to reality.
In my opinion, ICO Rating sites, ICO BENCH evaluate projects very good, we should trust and update. Also consider the other content in the projects to see if there is strong development or not.
I sometimes look at ico scores, but never follow them to make a decision . you have to make your own decision.
An ico rating website can be usee as a guide sometimes.
But you still have to do your own research anyway cos some of them are being paid by the project developers to make their project look good.
But I think a close to perfect website that I know whose ico rating is usually real is icodrops.com as they give accurate data
But you still have to do your own research anyway cos some of them are being paid by the project developers to make their project look good.
But I think a close to perfect website that I know whose ico rating is usually real is icodrops.com as they give accurate data
Yes I believe in ICO rating. I believe those that are into the rating are great specialist in the cryptocurrency and they know the parameters which are required to be put in place before an ICO project can be said to worth investing into. I really believe in them.
Ranked ICO actually really helps us in finding project ICO. But we should be able to re-checked because of not all the ICO project within this site properly. Because there have been many projects that do not fit in with the expectations. There is a project that runs only ICO is not until the end of ICO and the sale of tokens is very bad.
ICO Ratings is important for us to see what's best to invest and what's not but in my opinion I don't usually believe in ICO ratings because they some maybe paid by some one to promote it so that investors attracted to that ICO.for us to see in our own we should search that ICO if it has real rating before investing and take risk
You have to be careful because alot of ICO's pay these websites, if you're using a rating site, read the fine print. Find out how much coins are paying for their "grades".
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Some of the ICO ratings are not acting what they preached. Most of them are just paid shillers. But I see some paid shillers that somewhat broadcast a more reliable rating in icodrops.com . I mostly refer my ICO in that website, and luckily 80% of it never fails.
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
I think ICO rating is indispensable in the crypto world where more and more new ICOs are springing up to survive or rival some of the crypto currencies above. Because ICO ratings can not lie how their vision and mission for the future and we can see from it that if the rating of ICO is good, I think ICO is worth follow or we invest in it.
I like ico ratings because they give me a clue as to which project to look into. But i dont take the ratings as my main creteria for joining an ICO. After looking at the ratings, i still take my time to gi through a lot of things about the project before deciding what to do.
Jump to: