Topic: Do you believe in ICO Ratings? - page 64. (Read 6918 times)
Any rating is created by people. And all people want to get own profit. I see so few ratings in the net that think about own reputation. The most want money and much clients. Nothing more. I advise to think how to trust in this case?
No, I don't believe in all ICO Ratings, only some of them. But sometimes I use ICO ratings to assist me when doing ICO research. I take a look for different ratings, but I always make a decision based only on my own review.
Don't trust ICOBENCH- It's paid service. The TOP ICO's as Fantom or Quarckchain has 3-3.7 mark on it) Only own analysis can bring you money.
Almost all of the ICO ratings and reviews nowadays are being fabricated, wouldn't trust much everything it says. One thing though, menlo.one is something that differs these kinds of fabricated ICO ratings/reviews. They have introduced this thing "guild system" where investors can really benefit.
Yes Of Course I Do Believe To The Ratings Of A ICO Because It Is A Good Basing To Know If They Are Still Regulate Well In This Business And Also To Secured Your Investments,
In Short Ratings Means The Key To Know How The Business Is, Is It In The Bad Or Good Condition.
In Short Ratings Means The Key To Know How The Business Is, Is It In The Bad Or Good Condition.
Yes, I believe it, I usually rely on it to avoid some scams. But according to what you said, maybe I should not be so dependent on it.
In general, in choosing ICO, I rely on these ratings, and almost always this choice justifies itself. There were certainly a few cases when these ratings were wrong, but I think it's more randomness than the trend.
Yes I believe in ico ratings. It is the best factor to consider whether the ico you are going to invest is a legit one, or not, a hyped one or not. They give a rating in the ico to really filter the best of the best ico. And also, they give prior investigation to the ico to determine if the ico was a scam or not.
Personally, I do not really believe in the rating that is put up by the ICO, since they are all exposed to certain indicators, and they can sometimes be even good for bad projects.
This is only one agument for ICO but No, I don't believe the ratings. I myself conduct research and choose a good ICO.
Additionally expreinced friends advices is important.
Additionally expreinced friends advices is important.
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
I remember the case that the project on one of the above sites was rated by the author 4+ ( I can not say the exact figure) in the end, the project turned out to be fraudulent, but he collected millions. He was just removed from the rating list as if he wasn't there. Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
ico rating can not be trusted completely because now that determines the success of ico is not a rating but the performance of the team to promote the ongoing ico. so i think ico rating is just to attract the investors.
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Im not always believe in ICO ratings, but definetly checking them. I do invest only after my own researchs. Recently found Usechain ICO projects, good team,good advisors, some big funds joined too. Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
I think the rating of the reference only. Each ICO we join it is enough enough of my research, no view all of any ICO, also also see the review of your project and your company. If a project is a community is also a positive point to start.
Only slightly. I make my own analysis.
I think icobench and icodrops can be trusted. These time-tested resources and ratings there correspond to reality.
I don't trust most of ICO ratings as most of them are sponsored. Most of ICO rating websites earn money for listing and rating ICO projects, so such ratings can't be unprejudiced. So I usually check telegram chats where users discuss the most interesting projects and they make their own investigations and analysis.
To be honest, I do not really believe in ICO-rating, as the place in the rating can be bought and everyone will think that the project is promising. I believe that it is worth analyzing the project and making a final conclusion
For me ico ratings is just a guide and I am not really believing on how they rate some icos. But is still depends with the investors how they will believe this ratings. On rating , i think scitoken (scidex) is the best choice for investment. 
I think you always should check ICO after getting rating on any website. Check website, coin, team. whitepaper and roadmap.
Jump to: