Topic: Do you believe in ICO Ratings? - page 67. (Read 6918 times)
I don't believe in ICO rating sites because there are many websites which give different rating about the project. And It's always better to do our own research for the ico because that way we can see directly what kind of ico it is.
There's many ICO Rating websites, and most give unbiased ratings and reviews. You should be able trust their rating score because at the end of the day you can review their rating by adding a post below the ICO they have rated. This way the Rating is real and not fake. If a rating or review has been given and it's inaccurate then that site would not be trusted anymore so most rating sites do their best to keep a rating and review as true as can be. Sites like icorating.com, icobench.com, icotoinvest.com are good sites to watch for ratings and reviews!!
I didn't believe that at all because ICO who are in ratings usually pay some money to get the good ratings. They are not objective and shouldn't be use as a reference.
It is difficult to navigate the ratings now. A lot of purchased ratings and a lot of undervalued ratings of companies.
I don't always believe in ico ratings. Because there are so many lies. Rating agencies can publish analysis of fraudulent investors at will.
Ahhh..... Actually I don't believe in ICO Rating because rate are obtainable. But I'm believe sometimes in ICO Rating it's depends on condition.
do not believe in absolute ICO rating pages only rated a small percentage. They rely on the team and the investor. white paper and roadmap. There is no guarantee that the project will scam.
i strongly believe in this website icorating.com their data analytics and price prediction and ico in-depth analysis we can relay on icorating.com website
Some of the sites there is a rating of ICO is not true. And they make research from sources which we don't know. So I am not convinced by them. I prefer to see ICO from a trusted source and we can do an analysis to ascertain the truth.
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Personally, I do not believe in them, absolutely. Practice shows that such coins as Golem, for example, have very low ratings, but a high level of capitalization. Most of the ratings are simply bought.
I believe in a website that creates a rating for an ico that is doing its sale. in my opinion there is no fraud in the rating, they give good rating if ico is indeed good. if you do not trust, maybe you have your own ico rating with some research you make
Not so, I think they have been paid by the developer before they list the project in there.
They gives a good rating to project that pays high and gives low rating to project that pay low.
I don't really care with ICO ratings right now, it is more better if you do your own research.
They gives a good rating to project that pays high and gives low rating to project that pay low.
I don't really care with ICO ratings right now, it is more better if you do your own research.
It seems that the ICO rating is not so influential with the success of ICO in the future. But when we look at ICO that has good ratings, it can affect our choice to make an investment. Perhaps a well-ranked ICO can ensure that its chances of success are greater and better than ICOs that have bad or low ratings.
I use the ico ratings as a reference to what to look at. Then when I find something interesting I always do my own research to not get burned. Too many ico get a score above 4.
I think a website like ICObench, ICOrating only as one of the reference factors when we will invest on a project. But we also should not be too trust in these websites. The best result is when we do our own research on the project that we will invest.
So the ico rating website is just one of our references when we going to do deeper research on a project. That's my opinion. Btw sorry for my bad english and thanks!
I think a website like ICObench, ICOrating only as one of the reference factors when we will invest on a project. But we also should not be too trust in these websites. The best result is when we do our own research on the project that we will invest.
So the ico rating website is just one of our references when we going to do deeper research on a project. That's my opinion. Btw sorry for my bad english and thanks!
no i dont care about ico ratings and i dont believe them all. beccause project teams can pay and get a high rank easily on those websites. i prefer to check the real rating and hype of the project my self due to conversations in telegram channels and reddit.
By paying money you can't increase the rank or rating. I don't know why everybody thinks like that. By paying money one can advertise their ico on the top of their website. That's it and nothing else. ICO teams do that for better exposure of their ICO .
It is hard to believe in ICO ratings after news of their deception. I recently read an article where it is told how one known ICO rating overestimated the rating for the blockchain project which turned out to be a Scam.
no i dont care about ico ratings and i dont believe them all. beccause project teams can pay and get a high rank easily on those websites. i prefer to check the real rating and hype of the project my self due to conversations in telegram channels and reddit.
Of course, I always look at a rating of ICO but to trust these estimates would not.Very often it happens that the score is high and in the end the project does not collect even soft cap.I still don't understand who runs these rating agencies.and how is the evaluation of the upcoming ICO
I would say yes. Not a 100%, but it's one of my basis in choosing projects to participate in. Ratings are done through research. So there is some accuracy in these ratings that we can rely on. Whether ratings turn out good or bad, these help investors and bounty hunters weigh their options when it comes to choosing the best ICO.
Sites that you have called really carry false information, the network has a lot of evidence that provide a rating for the money. For me, there is 1 codrops site without yting but all the projects that they publish collect a lot of money
Jump to: