I don't trusted their website even it has a good way of entertaining some investors just like the ICO I use to read last year and participated. Because it is really disgusting they almost run their ICO and their spreadsheet didn't even update then almost 2 months of participating I ask their manager on the telegram they said paused it without a announcement on thread but in the emails of their website are still ongoing.
Topic: Do you believe in ICO Ratings? - page 65. (Read 6918 times)
I believe just in ratings on ICObench - because they ask team to pass the Kyc, and it could be very effective to fight with scam!
I believe in the some ratings (for example from ICOdrops). But I don't ICObench. This rating site repeatedly seen in the paid review and paid experts. Nothing personal only business. Since on the ICObench I watch metrics and description onlyYes I will probably agree to that at some point, I dont believe in ICO ratings in a sense that there are some business that are in crypto and investing their resources in a right way of introducing products to the public, ratings is just a prediction must research everything before believing simply on ratings.
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
ICObench isn't good to find the x15 ICO, in fact for example Quarkchain has a rating og 3.1/5. I usually use those services only to find new projects, and following the thought that in this world the marketing is the 90% of success, I see "sponsored" ICOs and study if the project is good or not
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
I'm not sure, but I do not trust the rating of the ICObench.com project, lately I notice that companies agree on buying a fake rating, thereby fooling users and misleading them.
very believe because one way to get a good ico with meilhat rating ico it
Those who trust rating sites, open your eyes! This is selling resources, where for money you will write any feedback. Recently, I read the article with the exposure of one major site-rating. I trust these articles more than these sites.
I do not believe rating agencies on the fact that I'm sure that they are selling their ratings to the one who pays the most. This is not a very reliable source of information for me.
I believe just in ratings on ICObench - because they ask team to pass the Kyc, and it could be very effective to fight with scam!
I believe in the some ratings (for example from ICOdrops). But I don't ICObench. This rating site repeatedly seen in the paid review and paid experts. Nothing personal only business. Since on the ICObench I watch metrics and description only
no I don't believe the ICO ratings. if I am going to invest in ICO, I always study the project myself.
I believe just in ratings on ICObench - because they ask team to pass the Kyc, and it could be very effective to fight with scam!
Don't fully believe with that. Just make it as consideration when you will choose ICO. And you must research again that ICO before choose it. For me I just use ICO rating site as ICO list site.
I think ico rank is just a guide and I do not really believe how they rate some icons. But it still depends on the investor how they will trust this ranking.
Most people check the ico rank as one of their references where they will choose to invest
I think the website as you mentioned as one of the reference factors when we are going to invest in a back-end project decision in your hands of course the best for you to choose as ICO invested.
I think the experience that makes you mature to make decisions, if you already understand and believe then you avoid the loss in the future.
I think the experience that makes you mature to make decisions, if you already understand and believe then you avoid the loss in the future.
Definitely not, I also think that rating agencies completely manipulate the opinion of people and they very often pretend that people really do not make the right choice, because they get money from projects.
I dont believe in ICO ratings. I have seen too many shitty project getting great ratings. Probably those "experts" are later paid with that same tokens.
I am not looking ico ratings just I check their project and their team if this two are solid and if hype is high after that is good for inestment.
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Yes, i believe in ICO ratings, because they will rate the ICO fairly and all the information about the ICO is in the ratings, so i believe in ratings and it is a legit rate coming from that websites.
More than once they said here at the forum that all ratings can be bought, so it's better to be able to correctly analyze yourself, but for this it is necessary to have some experience of participation in ICO. In addition, some teams are trying to organize a buzz around the newly launched company, thereby raising the ratings and interest
some websites are credible like ICObench, it's where I get most of my bounty now a days. They also give what the company is targeting with the hard and soft cap, also the bounty counts, when it started and when it will end
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
yes it can not be our benchmark to choose the best ICO. the website may choose from the corresponding survey it has conducted. so I do not choose ICO based on the web, but choosing the best ICO in terms of his team in doing a good teamwork and many who joined the ICO. Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
since i've read this and another thread, i do not trust those pages anymore. i thought before, these pages can be trusted.
Jump to: