Topic: Do you believe in ICO Ratings? - page 66. (Read 6918 times)
Yeah, I see the ratings by ico sites as a mere hype and not to be used as a yardastick or determinant to measure how successful the project would end up. I ve seen projects with low ratings perform extremely well while those with high rating end up flopping badly. So i just draw my judgement by my own personal research.
I think that ICO rating is good idea in general. Its mission is to provide consultation service and guidance for people in order to assist them in making the best financial decisions and to reach their investment and financial goals.
There is really such thing as ico rating because some website do that, their job is to review, assess, examine each ico this also helps to know which one is legit or not which one is good and poor but then this is not all that it can do this also help us not to lean too much on these but rather have our own examination and reviews.
no I don't believe the ICO ratings. if I am going to invest in ICO, I always study the project myself.
I believe that the ratings also help to choose a good ICO, you can not be 100% trusted, but the general opinion about the project can be learned
I don't trust the ICO ratings too because there is a possibility that those ratings were just paid. Of course, not all of them are biased but we should always be skeptic and do our own research if we wanted to invest in an ICO.
No I don't trust those ratings made by self-proclaimed experts. I'm sure there is a lot of bribes going on as well paying for good rating.
Yes i agree some of this big ico review will surely have an offer money of course to make their review will be more look realistic. The nature for us who doesn't really know (most of us) rely on other summarized reviews which is available on this ico reviewing and rating sites.
No I don't trust those ratings made by self-proclaimed experts. I'm sure there is a lot of bribes going on as well paying for good rating.
I think initial coin offerings becomes more and more every day. So ico rating sites can be very helpful. When i go threw their sites, i sort it to the ranks of their ratings. Then i can check the initial coin offerings with the highest rankings and then i know which of them could be a good investment. Even when theres a rating, i do not invest blind. First of all i do my own researches.
Well, I believe those ICO Ratings can be reference and can help judgment, but you should be responsible for final decisions.
Ratings can only help in the selection of projects that attract much attention. But this does not mean that they are good or will make a big profit. Before you make an investment, you yourself must conduct an analysis because all responsibility lies with you.
I don't normally believe in those their rating, who are the people doing the rating? they can be induced to give a good review about a particular ico and they will be paid for it. if they can pay bounty hunters to do a marketing then they can pay those people too. So i don't believe those ratings, I do my own research.
Personally, i don't believe in ICO rating 100% from most websites that do rate ICOs. I do carry out my personal research in my little way.
Well, I believe those ICO Ratings can be reference and can help judgment, but you should be responsible for final decisions.
I do not only trust certain websites which highlight some ICOs. If you want to make money in this sector, it is always about your own research and our own information you gathered. And most of there rating are based on there own investigations. I think this is the best ICO recourse now.
they give this ratings for some reason. but they can easily go wrong, never trust them completely.
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Honestly, I do not always believe in ICO rating site. ICO rating site only for hard measurement.
But for a deep result, I usually do my own research for the ICO project.
It depends on the ICO Rating Sites on how they can weed out fake ICO based on their Criteria. Famouse ICO Rating site should now be more strict.
I think the most of the ICO ratings sites are legit. Untill now. ICO ratings sites becomes more and more popular. ANd i think in future there will be a lot of project who pay the ratings sites for good ratings. This could be the next dirty business in the cryptocurrency world. So even when this sites are a big help for you, you should do some researches by yourself!
on the one hand, these ratings can be specially created to advertise a particular project. moreover, they are not biased. It is necessary to be guided only by the estimation according to recommendations. so as for me, I do not believe in these ratings.
It seems to me that these ratings are sold for money, so I do not believe them. There were many cases when a bounty campaign with high ratings turned out to be a scam.
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
I believe in some of them, for example www.icoguide.com, but for me this scores are some kind of filter to choose some projects among a lot ICOs in the market. And then I take some projects with high scores and start comparing them by myself, looking at team, whitepaper, idea and etc.
Jump to: