DNR patients should be treated unless they are in need to be resuscitate, it is in the medical books and should be followed by any practitioners. Disregarding this medical laws can lead to the banishment of their license, so probably they were treated, just that it is not enough to make the patients alive factoring their age as a major concern.
without knowing the specifics of each residents bespoke personal care plan. we cant judge.
yes im too of the belief that if all thats signed is a DNR then other medical interventions should be used.
but it could be a case of care plans noting:
only provide pain relief and no oxygen therapy.
only treatments available to residential care(avoid hospital treatment and only offer palliative care)
or the situation is of gross misconduct in residents care of those having reactions..
but speaking about prior to vacinations:
residential homes should know all about their residents ailments and allergies and should have listed which residents should not receive the vaccine.
i know on the balance of risks it is a complicated decision about the risks of getting covid due to no vaccine or getting adverse reaction due to vaccine for the certain few that are allergic to things.
but decisions should be made. or atleast have reports show that the decision to give it to a frail person was on the bases of risk management of vaccine less harmful than covid. where the result was just bad luck of the odds.. and not some gross misconduct situation of just jabbing everyone without concern
