Topic: [DVC]DevCoin - Official Thread - Moderated - page 6. (Read 1058927 times)

The latest wallet works fine so why do we need to copy what bitcoin is doing anyway? That devcoin logo looks a bit complicated for normies to remember if you are using it for marketing the coin. Complicated designs never work,genius in simplicity.

Dear community,

I'm glad to announce that the Devcoin's development team (currently @Qtera and me) started to work on new implementation of the native wallet. We are forking Bitcoin Core 22.0.0 and merging into the source code that makes Devcoin what it is, along the work contributed by Sidhujag and Belovachap. I kindly invite you to follow progress here https://github.com/devcoin/core/issues/73. The bounty is set at 100 million Devcoins!

Status:

- Branding... [DONE]
- Blockchain parameters... [In progress]
- Testnets... [Pending]
- Beta builds... [Pending]
- Release builds... [Pending]

Go for it Devcoin Community! No time is better than NOW!

- develCuy

I usually just move my wallet.dat but I've done that as well - I use Windows 11 like a non-cool novice that I am. BTW, don't be fooled by these market prices. There's so much more to these revolutionary blockchain networks, protocols, unique hashed data on chain, yet to be read, or resurfaced, or maybe just dusted off an put into the machine where the hard disk belongs.

Switzerland is where its at for "real world" value. MarkM's doing a great job with the metagame economics, and develCuy is making sure our blockchain where worlds will collide or MESH will save humanity at the very least. 2022 the year of GameFi, new 5G-Open RAN Dish Network's and the Scandinavians are still so much closer to 6G as usual



https://imgur.com/a/Eaa1X60

EDIT: If you're short sighted don't forget the transition to "web 3.0" or whatever the heck that is has been gradual. If you didn't know or forgot, speculators valued $DVC and will again.

https://web.archive.org/web/20140529035406/http://coinzen.org:80/index.php?topic=53.0

Pattern of web sites and web exchanges going down who cares? All the information that's needed for a market in the future is already on chain. The Web 2.0 is a false flag.

Just send your coins to an address on a newly generated client and retain your private key for the new address.

Virtually, some say that all those digiDVC and other factors that would make Devcoin's value real, are not real at all. I think we're stuck in a game, a simulation, or just alpha testing. Either way - we endure. And we're gonna come together to prove it to the world.


"listing" is for chumps not people of our beliefs. We value things for what they're creating each day and not for their presence on a web-based "exchange" or "listing"... We very well have one thing that may just not be visible at the moment. Much of that is the history of our co-founder and developers work pre-Bitcoin genesis and the other is the value of time and effort especially in terms of Virtual Game economics. I tweeted a new york times article from 2005 about how people who put the time in to earn in game items or currency make real world profits on places like eBay way back when for the social world meets virtual world games of that time. The market for the buyer was the fact it took the seller much time and commitment to acquire the in game goods the buyer valued enough to buy with real world money. The seller regardless of liking the game or not put in their TIME to make real world profit from the transaction on the secondary markets those social network virtual world games had/have. Second Life was on mentioned. It's open ended with no end goal - and it gives people freedom to do what they please. To me, that sounds a lot like this project. It's not just marks game or develCuy's valiant efforts to fund OS initiatives and grow the market. It's everyone's collective contributions to ethical decentralized and open ended acceptance of anything that takes the control of the internet and its development BACK from companies like Facebook, Google, and others that sell you and data mine you to stuff their pockets. No more.

To me our collective identity is our most valuable quality metaphorically. Our SHA-256 MM OGs - its written all over our chains, the network is still strong as ever, secure as ever. Maybe just not visible to people who think $ = value and $value = visible on websites/aggregators of fiat prices. ID will be huge, just as the value to those efforts of developers who made the internet of blockchains and their efforts in OSI and transparency/decentralization of power. The money will become real when the network effect of our collective trumps that of Facebook, Google, etc when they try to keep up. The population isn't aware of us, but we have powerful allies that people will recognize within our realm - bank on that. Then they will all want a piece of the FOSS blockchain world you all made happen. Don't worry about those coins just hold them with your private keys and keep running nodes.

When trying to figure out a private key for an address the dumpprivkey [address] command in the console won't work?  Private key for address [address] is not known (code -4)

My wallet.dat was generated in the old client so would there be an issue recovering the private keey through the console on the latest version? I generated a new empty wallet.dat in the new client and there was no issue but when I put in the old wallet.dat the error shows.

Thanks Dan. I will try it again with the new version but having to resync the whole blockchain is not easy for me because I have a very bad internet speed making it take a day or two and sometimes it disconnects before it syncs causing it to go back to the beginning which is very frustrating so I wanted to just load up new wallet with all the old executable files in the appdata folder and work from that but it wouldnt work the few last times I tried so just stayed with the old wallet.

Happy new year to you and all the Devcoin team.

Dear Devcoin community,

As the head of Devcoin Foundation, and lead developer of Devcoin I should inform you the following:

I have been trying for the last 2 years to list Devcoin in centralized exchanges, we had many great opportunities but never enough funding. I did a last try recently to finally understand that "listing" is a business only for the exchanges and not for a project like Devcoin. They charge huge amounts of money only to use those same funds for providing liquidity! From now on, any listing effort should come from exchanges themselves, if they want to make money with OUR project, they should invest their own money. The Devcoin project only cooperates with individuals and organizations willing to work as hard as we do, risks included.

Thank you!

- develCuy

Good post Dan but regarding the ~$4k.  I’m wondering if the best thing to do is to do a massive buyback and lower that 2 trillion mofo coin max supply.  If I were dev that’s what i would do.   Or donate it to the ixc dev since he seems to really need it.  Just sayin’.


~ Apocalipsa

I thought the seeds were hardcoded the newest version works fine with me. You could also try syncing clean with the new then importing your private keys into it so the balance would be in your new wallet then backup and save the wallet.dat?

EDIT: happy new years MFs!

develCuy has a link on Syscoin NEVM to the Devcoin Foundation account where former Devcoin Project developer sidhujag (now lead of Syscoin Project) donated 3443 SYS to the DF account! Today in fiat that value = $4062 USD

I am on the old wallet also because when I put the wallet .dat in the new client it won't sync or even get a connection but old wallet is working.

Yes, you can, but it will not last long, we are enforcing https next round, if your wallet is too old, it will not be able to sync.

- develCuy

Can we still use the old client because it still works like a charm?

I’ve never done anything in my life no matter the odds without immediately thinking, who’s the best, I have to be first and I usually succeeded when I shouldn’t have. 

My end game with Ixcoin?  Complete global domination from the first day of IX. 

I don’t joke and I fully truly believe and see it happening.  If I can see it and believe it then the odds are great it comes true.  Historically speaking that’s been the case with me.  And I see and BELIEVE!

Game theory leads me to believe he is an emulation of a recurring theme in cryptocurrencies/blockchain coins and their network of leaders and participants. They "disappear"...

Here's some hopium for everything in MarkM's metagame treasury (IXC and DVC big parts of such a metagame):

https://bitcoinmagazine.com/culture/the-emergence-of-bitcoin-through-the-lens-of-austrian-economics

The hopium being, everyone chasing BTC because of its ability to be disposed of for what is now likely fiat (USD or EUR per say)... to buy goods of consumption (hard to buy cars and houses in BTC STILL ... compared to fiat currencies/legal tenders (having to be accepted by mandate)...

Ok so stay with me. What if DVC being the most granular currency and IXC being in its treasury and highly praised by MarkM and adopted for his Galactic Milieu game becomes adopted for the more publicly recognized (well yet to be recognized) system adopted (it is Open Source) for Facebook's (Meta Platforms Inc.) "Metaverse"... Markm says they keep coming around to his ideas and I agree with him. Maybe once those coins are able to be used inside of this 3 Trillion Dollar est. value Metaverse then they will be more sought than fiat currencies to be used in effort to buy Metaverse sought after consumables.

Not that hard to see now. Maybe not specifically our coins being used or adopted, but possible - because easy to see people's behavior changing with the times in terms of what they will exchange their BTC or maybe onboard their $ for if "x"-coin (just a variable meaning a main metaverse coin denomination) is the base of exchange to acquire all  these Metaverse consumables. Idk, might be a long shot but why not. plenty of security in those chains. Plenty of reason for Facebook to bring "in" external blockchain coins for use in their "game"/"verse" FB-verse/meta-verse... It's actually something looking back at prototypes for Huntercoin and similar post-Galactic milieu blockchain space games that a few Bitcoiners even recommended. Like Luke Dash Jr. - fellow warrior in Christ, seems like a wingnut but is prob a genius and we're all stupid - he recommended that external currencies be used by the eventual person responsible for launching Huntercoin. But I digress..

Save me some time here...

What's your end game Vlad?

I asked where’s our coins but Archimedes just ignored the question. 

Syscoin had a Syscoin-Old chain run too after a fork... hrmmm. If you didn't get the new coins then maybe it was a network fork and not a chain fork?

We did fork in 2 but we never got our equal amount like the other forks.  For a while there was a block explorer with the forked chain and it was being mined.  

I think we’ll merge eventually and have a dual coin wallet (duality) ix/xi.  So I doubt anyone hijacjed it, out of site out of mind.  Good deductions tho, Dan.  Now I’m excited to work with you.  And I see triggering me wasn’t you, I just underestimated you and you got me.  Lol

Vlad

Web 2.0/3.0 is starting to reveal in the media things on OUR SHA-256 MM "dead chains" but we are just now seeing mainstream reporting on the "Twitter Eggs from Namecoin" with its EmblemVault wallet on Namecoin blocks and the ERC-721 Container or the Vault created on Emblem.Finance - it's "wrapped on Namecoin blocks" it gets sold for 15-80 ETH on OpenSea.

So here's another thing that is tied to the fact these chains at the base layer 1 of SHA-256 and blockchain security, with long "uptime" 11+ years, and heck, useable in game and out of game. I don't read block hashs but I know protocols well. Merge Mining first - Syscoin 4.0 becoming much like our chains all along using the same merkle root as Block 0 for Bitcoin when it launched 4.0 in 2017 and SHA-256 MM now its own bridge to its own separate almost "built from scratch" solidity smart contract chain that can do Ethereum anything but with Bitcoin L1 security. And that security in the words of Satoshi AUGMENTS Bitcoin security/higher difficulty. All benefit. All help secure. All have their own use and all have their own blocks on eachothers.

https://www.godaddy.com/domainsearch/find?checkAvail=1&domainToCheck=bitcoin

suggestions when you search bitcoin give available ancient coins but none of the supposed good and valuable ones hmmmm. i0coin.com then ixcoin.com SOLIDCOIN.com I know my history.

---

Remember bitcoin.com is the for profit biz...

Bitcoin.org is just the first supposedly "satoshi site"...

But I side with Hal Finney. How do we know on these message boards if they didn't get impersonated or if they were one person or even on an email list. Hal Finney first post on the [email protected] mailing list October 10, 1992 (October 10 someone call the Economist!)

https://mailing-list-archive.cryptoanarchy.wiki/archive/1992/10/a7deae21289e64af8c4c457307bdf1c62cbeb469f75b1613a3ed1a9dfa73b939/

---

Not to spam, and MOD gfy if I can't post three different times all I do to pimp this opportunity. But...

Remember Ixcoin 0.14.1 changed blocksize and added SegWit? Even possibly giving back the merge mined coins for a subsidy=1. Well... all those make a Hard Fork. Then you dev disappears. I think that's why old software and CEX purposely hold the valuable UTXO base layer chains with the most hash hostage. They need to bridge those coins perhaps. Maybe there is something when you take a "pre-mine" which was done with code for Ixcoin when it was using Multicoin by sacarlson thru a wallet that didn't hardcode but changed the CONF file to make Ixcoin work in Multicoin. It would do what TBX did, Subsidy=570000 or whatever premine was but it would be on a block and then the next block would be the part when the post_Subsidy=96 per block would begin. So essentially someone who gave it back had to have a key... but I think you definitely forked. And there's an old Ixcoin chain out there maybe detracting from your value, maybe even renamed to something like BCH because ixcoins could work on any bitcoin third party app... that similar.

I still feel crazy, but maybe once my predictions start happening, which already has but not an avalanche, I’ll feel better. 

Dan Treccia, you’ve been studying the past 4 years cause you’ve been posting some serious top notch posts.  You deserve a lot of merit points but I’m trying to help the bsv guys who get no credit.  But I’ll keep you in my really poor memory. 


~ Vlad -