Evolution isn't a theory.
Correct. Evolution is fact.
But only within your religion/cult, or in the so-called theory of it.
Withing the whole scientific community and really most people. Statistics showed that the majority of the religious people, even your religion accepted evolution.
Now we see clearly how much of a hoax you are.
As I have been showing you throughout many pages, here, my personal religion is totally against evolution, because there are too many facts against evolution, and none in favor of evolution.
As for my formal religion, how do you know? I have never told you what my formal religion is. So you don't know.
You are like this with regard to evolution. You simply accept what others say, and you guess when you don't know. Evolution is a religion of no facts for you.
Evolution is a hoax.
I see you are starting to give up by the lack of arguments.
For further idiotic creationism questions:
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/list.html
Badecker will soon admit he lost guys, stay tuned.
My points stand.
Essentially, the evidence and proof for evolution is so limited that if that was all there was, evolution doesn't deserve to even have a theory.
The evidence and proof against evolution is so strong, that evolution is impossible.
If you take the evidence for, and the evidence against, and applied it all in the quantum model, evolution would be out of sight. Perhaps you could find it if you looked real hard.
Oh, that's right. That's what evolutionists have been doing. Looking real hard, and then saying things like "if", "maybe", "perhaps", and all kinds of other limiting words, just to make people feel that there is something to evolution.
Provide evidence against evolution then, all of your arguments were debunked yet you still claim it's a hoax. You have no problems defending the theory of gravity in the flat earth thread. You claim here that evolution is just a theory yet in the other thread you oppose notbatman and defend gravity. Do you not believe in gravity? “Theory” is the best form of understanding we can every have about any process or model in the real world.
No matter what you randomly claim, the definition and meaning of a scientific theory is still that.
All you have to do is Google "evolution is impossible" to find all kinds of info that shows thatevolution is impossible.
When you look at how this information is rebutted, the rebuttals use all kinds of limiting words, such as if, maybe, perhaps, and many others. This shows that the rebuttals are simply so-called rebuttals.
Evolution is a hoax.
I just did.
http://www.icr.org/article/evolution-biologically-impossible/
http://www.icr.org/article/mathematical-impossibility-evolution/
These are the top searches, they are essentially the same argument, a wrong one by the way. It's explained here:
http://answers-in-reason.com/religion/mathematical-impossibility-evolution-debunked/
or here:
http://experimentalmath.info/blog/2012/01/does-probability-refute-evolution/
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=2384584
And since you don't like ''ifs'' There are plenty of those in the 2 ''arguments'' against evolution.
..He wants to know EVERYTHING..And that means we will always be studying forever..
.. 
..
