Topic: Evolution is a hoax - page 112. (Read 108046 times)
I did never beleive in evolution, becides this theory is not proven yet. I am not religious but strongly beleive that Earth and its life was created
Why there are still monkeys around if they were part of our evolutionary beginnings ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cz0gFarCfBE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cz0gFarCfBE
I do not believe in our evolution . I believe God Make Us With His own Image
I agree with BD that any imaginary god would have to exist outside the universe.
The law of evolution does not allow such a being to spontaneously create itself, or have always existed.
Badecker is a hoax.
The law of evolution does not allow such a being to spontaneously create itself, or have always existed.
Badecker is a hoax.
I don't believe in the evolution theory but I believe in adaptation. I strongly believe that all creatures are freated for a certain purpose and cannot decide on its own to change to something else.
So now we are back to cause and effect? Evolution does fit cause and effect because as you said god has no cause therefore everything he did is random.
Again, you show your deceptiveness. Just because we don't know much about the nature of God, doesn't mean that He doesn't use cause and effect, even if He, Himself, had no cause. It doesn't mean that He doesn't use random, either. But nature shows that random doesn't exist within it, simply by the fact that nature's cause was God.
And since god has no cause it renders everything random unless you now claim god has a cause. If the cause of everything is ultimately a causeless cause then everything is truly random.
God having no cause is simply something that shows that God is outside of the universe. C&E is a universe thing.
But you are not following the logic. Say a computer has a cause, the human that made it and the human itself has a cause and so on until god which is the cause of everything, right? However because god has no cause, as you claim, that makes everything else random in the sense that everything was created randomly by something with no cause. It doesn't matter that the computer had a cause because ultimately what made the computer exist in the first place is something without a cause therefore random. That's why evolution exists because mutations are essentially random.
You forgot to put "Evolution is a hoax" above the sunglasses smiley. Does the post still count as valid?
Hey, thanks. I'll do two of them here to make up.
Evolution is a hoax.
Evolution is a hoax.
You forgot to put "Evolution is a hoax" above the sunglasses smiley. Does the post still count as valid?
So now we are back to cause and effect? Evolution does fit cause and effect because as you said god has no cause therefore everything he did is random.
Again, you show your deceptiveness. Just because we don't know much about the nature of God, doesn't mean that He doesn't use cause and effect, even if He, Himself, had no cause. It doesn't mean that He doesn't use random, either. But nature shows that random doesn't exist within it, simply by the fact that nature's cause was God.
And since god has no cause it renders everything random unless you now claim god has a cause. If the cause of everything is ultimately a causeless cause then everything is truly random.
God having no cause is simply something that shows that God is outside of the universe. C&E is a universe thing.
So now we are back to cause and effect? Evolution does fit cause and effect because as you said god has no cause therefore everything he did is random.
Again, you show your deceptiveness. Just because we don't know much about the nature of God, doesn't mean that He doesn't use cause and effect, even if He, Himself, had no cause. It doesn't mean that He doesn't use random, either. But nature shows that random doesn't exist within it, simply by the fact that nature's cause was God.
And since god has no cause it renders everything random unless you now claim god has a cause. If the cause of everything is ultimately a causeless cause then everything is truly random.
So now we are back to cause and effect? Evolution does fit cause and effect because as you said god has no cause therefore everything he did is random.
Again, you show your deceptiveness. Just because we don't know much about the nature of God, doesn't mean that He doesn't use cause and effect, even if He, Himself, had no cause. It doesn't mean that He doesn't use random, either. But nature shows that random doesn't exist within it, simply by the fact that nature's cause was God.
Evolution isn't a theory.
Correct. Evolution is fact.
But only within your religion/cult, or in the so-called theory of it.
Withing the whole scientific community and really most people. Statistics showed that the majority of the religious people, even your religion accepted evolution.
Now we see clearly how much of a hoax you are.
As I have been showing you throughout many pages, here, my personal religion is totally against evolution, because there are too many facts against evolution, and none in favor of evolution.
As for my formal religion, how do you know? I have never told you what my formal religion is. So you don't know.
You are like this with regard to evolution. You simply accept what others say, and you guess when you don't know. Evolution is a religion of no facts for you.
Evolution is a hoax.
I see you are starting to give up by the lack of arguments.
For further idiotic creationism questions:
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/list.html
Badecker will soon admit he lost guys, stay tuned.
My points stand.
Essentially, the evidence and proof for evolution is so limited that if that was all there was, evolution doesn't deserve to even have a theory.
The evidence and proof against evolution is so strong, that evolution is impossible.
If you take the evidence for, and the evidence against, and applied it all in the quantum model, evolution would be out of sight. Perhaps you could find it if you looked real hard.
Oh, that's right. That's what evolutionists have been doing. Looking real hard, and then saying things like "if", "maybe", "perhaps", and all kinds of other limiting words, just to make people feel that there is something to evolution.
Provide evidence against evolution then, all of your arguments were debunked yet you still claim it's a hoax. You have no problems defending the theory of gravity in the flat earth thread. You claim here that evolution is just a theory yet in the other thread you oppose notbatman and defend gravity. Do you not believe in gravity? “Theory” is the best form of understanding we can every have about any process or model in the real world.
No matter what you randomly claim, the definition and meaning of a scientific theory is still that.
All you have to do is Google "evolution is impossible" to find all kinds of info that shows thatevolution is impossible.
When you look at how this information is rebutted, the rebuttals use all kinds of limiting words, such as if, maybe, perhaps, and many others. This shows that the rebuttals are simply so-called rebuttals.
Evolution is a hoax.
I just did.
http://www.icr.org/article/evolution-biologically-impossible/
http://www.icr.org/article/mathematical-impossibility-evolution/
These are the top searches, they are essentially the same argument, a wrong one by the way. It's explained here:
http://answers-in-reason.com/religion/mathematical-impossibility-evolution-debunked/
or here:
http://experimentalmath.info/blog/2012/01/does-probability-refute-evolution/
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=2384584
And since you don't like ''ifs'' There are plenty of those in the 2 ''arguments'' against evolution.
I know. You are simply getting away from the facts that you can't refute, like the fact that evolution theory doesn't fit cause and effect.
I guess we all have to look at the evidence (or not) and make up our own minds.
So now we are back to cause and effect? Evolution does fit cause and effect because as you said god has no cause therefore everything he did is random.
I don't have any followers. I don't have a cult.
You are all by yourself in your cult. :/
I haven't seen a single person who has been willing to say they believe in your fairy tale.
Quote
cult: a particular system of religious worship, especially with reference to its rites and ceremonies.
Evolution is not a religion and has no rites and ceremonies. A cult is made up of more members than just one.
If the members of the evolution cult who are studying it, don't obey their university leadership, they are kicked out of the university. Why? They haven't followed the rites and ceremonies of the university properly.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acceptance_of_evolution_by_religious_groups#Acceptance
And that was in 2007, imagine now. You are losing badecker.
LOL! Anybody can edit Wikipedia. If a group has the desire to maintain a certain topic on Wikipedia, all they have to do is have 3 people monitor it around the clock, in shifts, to edit it back any time an opposing group edits it.
Wikipedia is full of facts and non-facts. Determining which are which is often difficult.
When Wikipedia just knows which editorial is correct, and then limits certain articles, they are setting them up as a behind-the-scenes panel to direct the way people think. If they allowed all editorials, with links to each of them at the beginning of the article, they would be opening people up to a lot of facts that are otherwise thrown out.
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/10/30/5-facts-about-evolution-and-religion/
http://www.pewforum.org/2009/02/04/religious-groups-views-on-evolution/
Come on badecker, don't even try to attempt to say that religions don't accept evolution. Most of them do including yours.
Since you don't know what my religion is, why do you say "even yours?" This shows that you are acting deceptively.
What you believe is your religion. So, it is obvious that many religions believe in evolution. What's the point. Many religions are wrong... like the evolution religion.
Evolution is a hoax.
Evolution isn't a theory.
Correct. Evolution is fact.
But only within your religion/cult, or in the so-called theory of it.
Withing the whole scientific community and really most people. Statistics showed that the majority of the religious people, even your religion accepted evolution.
Now we see clearly how much of a hoax you are.
As I have been showing you throughout many pages, here, my personal religion is totally against evolution, because there are too many facts against evolution, and none in favor of evolution.
As for my formal religion, how do you know? I have never told you what my formal religion is. So you don't know.
You are like this with regard to evolution. You simply accept what others say, and you guess when you don't know. Evolution is a religion of no facts for you.
Evolution is a hoax.
I see you are starting to give up by the lack of arguments.
For further idiotic creationism questions:
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/list.html
Badecker will soon admit he lost guys, stay tuned.
My points stand.
Essentially, the evidence and proof for evolution is so limited that if that was all there was, evolution doesn't deserve to even have a theory.
The evidence and proof against evolution is so strong, that evolution is impossible.
If you take the evidence for, and the evidence against, and applied it all in the quantum model, evolution would be out of sight. Perhaps you could find it if you looked real hard.
Oh, that's right. That's what evolutionists have been doing. Looking real hard, and then saying things like "if", "maybe", "perhaps", and all kinds of other limiting words, just to make people feel that there is something to evolution.
Provide evidence against evolution then, all of your arguments were debunked yet you still claim it's a hoax. You have no problems defending the theory of gravity in the flat earth thread. You claim here that evolution is just a theory yet in the other thread you oppose notbatman and defend gravity. Do you not believe in gravity? “Theory” is the best form of understanding we can every have about any process or model in the real world.
No matter what you randomly claim, the definition and meaning of a scientific theory is still that.
All you have to do is Google "evolution is impossible" to find all kinds of info that shows thatevolution is impossible.
When you look at how this information is rebutted, the rebuttals use all kinds of limiting words, such as if, maybe, perhaps, and many others. This shows that the rebuttals are simply so-called rebuttals.
Evolution is a hoax.
I just did.
http://www.icr.org/article/evolution-biologically-impossible/
http://www.icr.org/article/mathematical-impossibility-evolution/
These are the top searches, they are essentially the same argument, a wrong one by the way. It's explained here:
http://answers-in-reason.com/religion/mathematical-impossibility-evolution-debunked/
or here:
http://experimentalmath.info/blog/2012/01/does-probability-refute-evolution/
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=2384584
And since you don't like ''ifs'' There are plenty of those in the 2 ''arguments'' against evolution.
I know. You are simply getting away from the facts that you can't refute, like the fact that evolution theory doesn't fit cause and effect.
I guess we all have to look at the evidence (or not) and make up our own minds.
I don't have any followers. I don't have a cult.
You are all by yourself in your cult. :/
I haven't seen a single person who has been willing to say they believe in your fairy tale.
Quote
cult: a particular system of religious worship, especially with reference to its rites and ceremonies.
Evolution is not a religion and has no rites and ceremonies. A cult is made up of more members than just one.
If the members of the evolution cult who are studying it, don't obey their university leadership, they are kicked out of the university. Why? They haven't followed the rites and ceremonies of the university properly.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acceptance_of_evolution_by_religious_groups#Acceptance
And that was in 2007, imagine now. You are losing badecker.
LOL! Anybody can edit Wikipedia. If a group has the desire to maintain a certain topic on Wikipedia, all they have to do is have 3 people monitor it around the clock, in shifts, to edit it back any time an opposing group edits it.
Wikipedia is full of facts and non-facts. Determining which are which is often difficult.
When Wikipedia just knows which editorial is correct, and then limits certain articles, they are setting them up as a behind-the-scenes panel to direct the way people think. If they allowed all editorials, with links to each of them at the beginning of the article, they would be opening people up to a lot of facts that are otherwise thrown out.
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/10/30/5-facts-about-evolution-and-religion/
http://www.pewforum.org/2009/02/04/religious-groups-views-on-evolution/
Come on badecker, don't even try to attempt to say that religions don't accept evolution. Most of them do including yours.
I don't have any followers. I don't have a cult.
You are all by yourself in your cult. :/
I haven't seen a single person who has been willing to say they believe in your fairy tale.
Quote
cult: a particular system of religious worship, especially with reference to its rites and ceremonies.
Evolution is not a religion and has no rites and ceremonies. A cult is made up of more members than just one.
If the members of the evolution cult who are studying it, don't obey their university leadership, they are kicked out of the university. Why? They haven't followed the rites and ceremonies of the university properly.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acceptance_of_evolution_by_religious_groups#Acceptance
And that was in 2007, imagine now. You are losing badecker.
LOL! Anybody can edit Wikipedia. If a group has the desire to maintain a certain topic on Wikipedia, all they have to do is have 3 people monitor it around the clock, in shifts, to edit it back any time an opposing group edits it.
Wikipedia is full of facts and non-facts. Determining which are which is often difficult.
When Wikipedia just knows which editorial is correct, and then limits certain articles, they are setting them up as a behind-the-scenes panel to direct the way people think. If they allowed all editorials, with links to each of them at the beginning of the article, they would be opening people up to a lot of facts that are otherwise thrown out.
Evolution isn't a theory.
Correct. Evolution is fact.
But only within your religion/cult, or in the so-called theory of it.
Withing the whole scientific community and really most people. Statistics showed that the majority of the religious people, even your religion accepted evolution.
Now we see clearly how much of a hoax you are.
As I have been showing you throughout many pages, here, my personal religion is totally against evolution, because there are too many facts against evolution, and none in favor of evolution.
As for my formal religion, how do you know? I have never told you what my formal religion is. So you don't know.
You are like this with regard to evolution. You simply accept what others say, and you guess when you don't know. Evolution is a religion of no facts for you.
Evolution is a hoax.
I see you are starting to give up by the lack of arguments.
For further idiotic creationism questions:
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/list.html
Badecker will soon admit he lost guys, stay tuned.
My points stand.
Essentially, the evidence and proof for evolution is so limited that if that was all there was, evolution doesn't deserve to even have a theory.
The evidence and proof against evolution is so strong, that evolution is impossible.
If you take the evidence for, and the evidence against, and applied it all in the quantum model, evolution would be out of sight. Perhaps you could find it if you looked real hard.
Oh, that's right. That's what evolutionists have been doing. Looking real hard, and then saying things like "if", "maybe", "perhaps", and all kinds of other limiting words, just to make people feel that there is something to evolution.
Provide evidence against evolution then, all of your arguments were debunked yet you still claim it's a hoax. You have no problems defending the theory of gravity in the flat earth thread. You claim here that evolution is just a theory yet in the other thread you oppose notbatman and defend gravity. Do you not believe in gravity? “Theory” is the best form of understanding we can every have about any process or model in the real world.
No matter what you randomly claim, the definition and meaning of a scientific theory is still that.
All you have to do is Google "evolution is impossible" to find all kinds of info that shows thatevolution is impossible.
When you look at how this information is rebutted, the rebuttals use all kinds of limiting words, such as if, maybe, perhaps, and many others. This shows that the rebuttals are simply so-called rebuttals.
Evolution is a hoax.
I just did.
http://www.icr.org/article/evolution-biologically-impossible/
http://www.icr.org/article/mathematical-impossibility-evolution/
These are the top searches, they are essentially the same argument, a wrong one by the way. It's explained here:
http://answers-in-reason.com/religion/mathematical-impossibility-evolution-debunked/
or here:
http://experimentalmath.info/blog/2012/01/does-probability-refute-evolution/
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=2384584
And since you don't like ''ifs'' There are plenty of those in the 2 ''arguments'' against evolution.
I don't have any followers. I don't have a cult.
You are all by yourself in your cult. :/
I haven't seen a single person who has been willing to say they believe in your fairy tale.
Quote
cult: a particular system of religious worship, especially with reference to its rites and ceremonies.
Evolution is not a religion and has no rites and ceremonies. A cult is made up of more members than just one.
If the members of the evolution cult who are studying it, don't obey their university leadership, they are kicked out of the university. Why? They haven't followed the rites and ceremonies of the university properly.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acceptance_of_evolution_by_religious_groups#Acceptance
And that was in 2007, imagine now. You are losing badecker.
Evolution isn't a theory.
Correct. Evolution is fact.
But only within your religion/cult, or in the so-called theory of it.
Withing the whole scientific community and really most people. Statistics showed that the majority of the religious people, even your religion accepted evolution.
Now we see clearly how much of a hoax you are.
As I have been showing you throughout many pages, here, my personal religion is totally against evolution, because there are too many facts against evolution, and none in favor of evolution.
As for my formal religion, how do you know? I have never told you what my formal religion is. So you don't know.
You are like this with regard to evolution. You simply accept what others say, and you guess when you don't know. Evolution is a religion of no facts for you.
Evolution is a hoax.
I see you are starting to give up by the lack of arguments.
For further idiotic creationism questions:
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/list.html
Badecker will soon admit he lost guys, stay tuned.
My points stand.
Essentially, the evidence and proof for evolution is so limited that if that was all there was, evolution doesn't deserve to even have a theory.
The evidence and proof against evolution is so strong, that evolution is impossible.
If you take the evidence for, and the evidence against, and applied it all in the quantum model, evolution would be out of sight. Perhaps you could find it if you looked real hard.
Oh, that's right. That's what evolutionists have been doing. Looking real hard, and then saying things like "if", "maybe", "perhaps", and all kinds of other limiting words, just to make people feel that there is something to evolution.
Provide evidence against evolution then, all of your arguments were debunked yet you still claim it's a hoax. You have no problems defending the theory of gravity in the flat earth thread. You claim here that evolution is just a theory yet in the other thread you oppose notbatman and defend gravity. Do you not believe in gravity? “Theory” is the best form of understanding we can every have about any process or model in the real world.
No matter what you randomly claim, the definition and meaning of a scientific theory is still that.
All you have to do is Google "evolution is impossible" to find all kinds of info that shows thatevolution is impossible.
When you look at how this information is rebutted, the rebuttals use all kinds of limiting words, such as if, maybe, perhaps, and many others. This shows that the rebuttals are simply so-called rebuttals.
Evolution is a hoax.
The popular definition of a scientific theory as you have been describing it, is simply political science, and doesn't have any validity in the real world.
I don't have any followers. I don't have a cult.
You are all by yourself in your cult. :/
I haven't seen a single person who has been willing to say they believe in your fairy tale.
Quote
cult: a particular system of religious worship, especially with reference to its rites and ceremonies.
Evolution is not a religion and has no rites and ceremonies. A cult is made up of more members than just one.
If the members of the evolution cult who are studying it, don't obey their university leadership, they are kicked out of the university. Why? They haven't followed the rites and ceremonies of the university properly.
Evolution isn't a theory.
Correct. Evolution is fact.
But only within your religion/cult, or in the so-called theory of it.
Withing the whole scientific community and really most people. Statistics showed that the majority of the religious people, even your religion accepted evolution.
Now we see clearly how much of a hoax you are.
As I have been showing you throughout many pages, here, my personal religion is totally against evolution, because there are too many facts against evolution, and none in favor of evolution.
As for my formal religion, how do you know? I have never told you what my formal religion is. So you don't know.
You are like this with regard to evolution. You simply accept what others say, and you guess when you don't know. Evolution is a religion of no facts for you.
Evolution is a hoax.
I see you are starting to give up by the lack of arguments.
For further idiotic creationism questions:
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/list.html
Badecker will soon admit he lost guys, stay tuned.
My points stand.
Essentially, the evidence and proof for evolution is so limited that if that was all there was, evolution doesn't deserve to even have a theory.
The evidence and proof against evolution is so strong, that evolution is impossible.
If you take the evidence for, and the evidence against, and applied it all in the quantum model, evolution would be out of sight. Perhaps you could find it if you looked real hard.
Oh, that's right. That's what evolutionists have been doing. Looking real hard, and then saying things like "if", "maybe", "perhaps", and all kinds of other limiting words, just to make people feel that there is something to evolution.
Provide evidence against evolution then, all of your arguments were debunked yet you still claim it's a hoax. You have no problems defending the theory of gravity in the flat earth thread. You claim here that evolution is just a theory yet in the other thread you oppose notbatman and defend gravity. Do you not believe in gravity? “Theory” is the best form of understanding we can every have about any process or model in the real world.
No matter what you randomly claim, the definition and meaning of a scientific theory is still that.
Jump to: