Pages:
Author

Topic: Evolution is a hoax - page 36. (Read 108046 times)

legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
December 17, 2018, 10:48:52 AM
Consider the power of the universities...


The Bizarre Viral Story Of The Professor Who Hired Mercenaries To Rescue A Student From ISIS



An epic and unheard of story of a rescue operation to free a graduate student from ISIS captivity is grabbing world headlines after it was revealed that a professor at a Swedish university financed and put together the whole plan by hiring mercenaries for the high risk venture of entering Islamic State territory.

In 2014 a chemistry PhD student named Firas Jumaah returned to his native Iraq while on break from Lund University, located outside of Malmo, Sweden. He returned in order to help his family escape ISIS, which at that time was sweeping northern Iraq, especially decimating the ethno-religious Yazidi community, to which Jumaah's family belonged.

...

Professor Turner said in interviews that she couldn't just let her student die without exhausting all measures: "What was happening was completely unacceptable," she told LUM. "I got so angry that IS was pushing itself into our world, exposing my doctoral student and his family to this, and disrupting the research."

...

A few days later two Landcruisers carrying four heavily-armed mercenaries roared into the area where Jumaah was hiding, and sped him away to Erbil Airport together with his wife and two small children.


The point is, universities have way more strength than one might think. And they use this strength to keep the evolution hoax alive, for money, and for indoctrination of the world.

Cool
hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 645
December 04, 2018, 03:57:15 PM

Theory: “a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural and subject to experimentation, in contrast to well-established propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact.”

You may need to review the "Scientific Method" again, then you will come to conclusion about the real meaning of a "Scientific Theory" and learn to differentiate facts from opinions.

See that's your issue, you searched for ''theory'' not ''scientific theory''.

''A scientific theory is an explanation of an aspect of the natural world that can be repeatedly tested and verified in accordance with the scientific method, using accepted protocols of observation, measurement, and evaluation of results. Where possible, theories are tested under controlled conditions in an experiment.[1][2] In circumstances not amenable to experimental testing, theories are evaluated through principles of abductive reasoning. Established scientific theories have withstood rigorous scrutiny and embody scientific knowledge.''

You seem to have forgotten, already, that the only difference between a theory and a scientific theory is a bunch of words and calculations.

Scientific theories can be changed with changing evidence just like other theories. The only difference is the amount of thought and calculation that usually goes into scientific theories.

Cool

Your point being? Scientific theories change just like everything else.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
December 04, 2018, 03:29:25 PM

Theory: “a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural and subject to experimentation, in contrast to well-established propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact.”

You may need to review the "Scientific Method" again, then you will come to conclusion about the real meaning of a "Scientific Theory" and learn to differentiate facts from opinions.

See that's your issue, you searched for ''theory'' not ''scientific theory''.

''A scientific theory is an explanation of an aspect of the natural world that can be repeatedly tested and verified in accordance with the scientific method, using accepted protocols of observation, measurement, and evaluation of results. Where possible, theories are tested under controlled conditions in an experiment.[1][2] In circumstances not amenable to experimental testing, theories are evaluated through principles of abductive reasoning. Established scientific theories have withstood rigorous scrutiny and embody scientific knowledge.''

You seem to have forgotten, already, that the only difference between a theory and a scientific theory is a bunch of words and calculations.

Scientific theories can be changed with changing evidence just like other theories. The only difference is the amount of thought and calculation that usually goes into scientific theories.

Cool
hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 645
December 04, 2018, 11:22:58 AM

Of course, we all know you are into propaganda rather than science. All the scientists who extrapolate into the past, state that they don't know if they missed something. They all state that it only looks like. That isn't proof. That is exactly the opposite of proof.

Regarding the eye witnesses, none of them paint an exact picture with all the details. Many of them explain what they saw with descriptions of what it looked like to them. But the genealogies and dating times are accurate.

Cool

No reason to trust ''eye witnesses'' Do you know someone that knew someone that knew someone, etc etc until God?

That's why the things the eye witnesses saw were immediately written down, and the writings were meticulously copied perfectly. Moses and the people saw and heard God on Mt. Sinai. Shortly after this, Moses wrote the whole thing down so that there would be a record. And the two stone tablets with the 10 Commandments written on them... the ones that wound up in the Ark of the Covenant... were written in stone by the finger of God.

Not so with the stuff that says that the universe is billions of years old. All of that is guesswork, and the scientists who made the guesses essentially say so in their writings about the subject.

Cool

''
That's why the things the eye witnesses saw were immediately written down'' How do you know LOL. How do you know what it's written down it's what happened?

Israel. It exists. The people stubbornly hang onto the Old Testament. They stubbornly exist after being gone as a nation for almost 1900 years. They are an extremely stubborn people. The 2000-y-o Dead Sea Scrolls show how stubborn Israel is, by the accuracy when comparing the Bible Scrolls to the O.T. of today.

Or are you trying to say that Israel and the Dead Sea Scrolls don't exist?

Cool

Yea they exist, so do Muslims, Hindus, etc etc. They all claim the same things for their gods but how do you know? What method are you using to verify their claims? Are all books then true? Science proves the earth is older than 10.000 years with many different methods.

Scientists don't know what went on 10,000 years ago, or even that 10,000 years ago existed. The best evidence they have for 10,000 years ago is backward extrapolation of things that go on today. But they don't know that things worked like they do today, beyond about 5,000 years ago. And even 5,000 years ago is partly guesstimation.

Dead Sea Scrolls evidence that the Bible is the same today as it was back then. There are billions of copies of the Bible, but only a few copies of other religious writings in comparison. There is strength in the Bible, as there is strength in the People of Israel, and strength in God.

Cool

How are Dead Sea Scrolls of anything? In any case you can say it's evidence that people wrote the stupid bible a few thousand years ago, the problem is, how do you know what they wrote is real?

Evolution? Can anyone prove it to me? Isn't it a theory? If there was proof wouldn't it be a law? Then please say again you base your opinions on science not on faith.

''Isn't it a theory? If there was proof wouldn't it be a law?'' Define for me Scientific theory, please. You can facepalm yourself now btw.

Theory: “a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural and subject to experimentation, in contrast to well-established propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact.”

You may need to review the "Scientific Method" again, then you will come to conclusion about the real meaning of a "Scientific Theory" and learn to differentiate facts from opinions.

See that's your issue, you searched for ''theory'' not ''scientific theory''.

''A scientific theory is an explanation of an aspect of the natural world that can be repeatedly tested and verified in accordance with the scientific method, using accepted protocols of observation, measurement, and evaluation of results. Where possible, theories are tested under controlled conditions in an experiment.[1][2] In circumstances not amenable to experimental testing, theories are evaluated through principles of abductive reasoning. Established scientific theories have withstood rigorous scrutiny and embody scientific knowledge.''
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
December 04, 2018, 10:08:56 AM

Of course, we all know you are into propaganda rather than science. All the scientists who extrapolate into the past, state that they don't know if they missed something. They all state that it only looks like. That isn't proof. That is exactly the opposite of proof.

Regarding the eye witnesses, none of them paint an exact picture with all the details. Many of them explain what they saw with descriptions of what it looked like to them. But the genealogies and dating times are accurate.

Cool

No reason to trust ''eye witnesses'' Do you know someone that knew someone that knew someone, etc etc until God?

That's why the things the eye witnesses saw were immediately written down, and the writings were meticulously copied perfectly. Moses and the people saw and heard God on Mt. Sinai. Shortly after this, Moses wrote the whole thing down so that there would be a record. And the two stone tablets with the 10 Commandments written on them... the ones that wound up in the Ark of the Covenant... were written in stone by the finger of God.

Not so with the stuff that says that the universe is billions of years old. All of that is guesswork, and the scientists who made the guesses essentially say so in their writings about the subject.

Cool

''
That's why the things the eye witnesses saw were immediately written down'' How do you know LOL. How do you know what it's written down it's what happened?

Israel. It exists. The people stubbornly hang onto the Old Testament. They stubbornly exist after being gone as a nation for almost 1900 years. They are an extremely stubborn people. The 2000-y-o Dead Sea Scrolls show how stubborn Israel is, by the accuracy when comparing the Bible Scrolls to the O.T. of today.

Or are you trying to say that Israel and the Dead Sea Scrolls don't exist?

Cool

Yea they exist, so do Muslims, Hindus, etc etc. They all claim the same things for their gods but how do you know? What method are you using to verify their claims? Are all books then true? Science proves the earth is older than 10.000 years with many different methods.

Scientists don't know what went on 10,000 years ago, or even that 10,000 years ago existed. The best evidence they have for 10,000 years ago is backward extrapolation of things that go on today. But they don't know that things worked like they do today, beyond about 5,000 years ago. And even 5,000 years ago is partly guesstimation.

Dead Sea Scrolls evidence that the Bible is the same today as it was back then. There are billions of copies of the Bible, but only a few copies of other religious writings in comparison. There is strength in the Bible, as there is strength in the People of Israel, and strength in God.

Cool

How are Dead Sea Scrolls of anything? In any case you can say it's evidence that people wrote the stupid bible a few thousand years ago, the problem is, how do you know what they wrote is real?

Evolution? Can anyone prove it to me? Isn't it a theory? If there was proof wouldn't it be a law? Then please say again you base your opinions on science not on faith.

''Isn't it a theory? If there was proof wouldn't it be a law?'' Define for me Scientific theory, please. You can facepalm yourself now btw.

Theory: “a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural and subject to experimentation, in contrast to well-established propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact.”

You may need to review the "Scientific Method" again, then you will come to conclusion about the real meaning of a "Scientific Theory" and learn to differentiate facts from opinions.

You wont believe the definition so called scientists give to scientific theory XD
newbie
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
December 04, 2018, 10:01:28 AM

Of course, we all know you are into propaganda rather than science. All the scientists who extrapolate into the past, state that they don't know if they missed something. They all state that it only looks like. That isn't proof. That is exactly the opposite of proof.

Regarding the eye witnesses, none of them paint an exact picture with all the details. Many of them explain what they saw with descriptions of what it looked like to them. But the genealogies and dating times are accurate.

Cool

No reason to trust ''eye witnesses'' Do you know someone that knew someone that knew someone, etc etc until God?

That's why the things the eye witnesses saw were immediately written down, and the writings were meticulously copied perfectly. Moses and the people saw and heard God on Mt. Sinai. Shortly after this, Moses wrote the whole thing down so that there would be a record. And the two stone tablets with the 10 Commandments written on them... the ones that wound up in the Ark of the Covenant... were written in stone by the finger of God.

Not so with the stuff that says that the universe is billions of years old. All of that is guesswork, and the scientists who made the guesses essentially say so in their writings about the subject.

Cool

''
That's why the things the eye witnesses saw were immediately written down'' How do you know LOL. How do you know what it's written down it's what happened?

Israel. It exists. The people stubbornly hang onto the Old Testament. They stubbornly exist after being gone as a nation for almost 1900 years. They are an extremely stubborn people. The 2000-y-o Dead Sea Scrolls show how stubborn Israel is, by the accuracy when comparing the Bible Scrolls to the O.T. of today.

Or are you trying to say that Israel and the Dead Sea Scrolls don't exist?

Cool

Yea they exist, so do Muslims, Hindus, etc etc. They all claim the same things for their gods but how do you know? What method are you using to verify their claims? Are all books then true? Science proves the earth is older than 10.000 years with many different methods.

Scientists don't know what went on 10,000 years ago, or even that 10,000 years ago existed. The best evidence they have for 10,000 years ago is backward extrapolation of things that go on today. But they don't know that things worked like they do today, beyond about 5,000 years ago. And even 5,000 years ago is partly guesstimation.

Dead Sea Scrolls evidence that the Bible is the same today as it was back then. There are billions of copies of the Bible, but only a few copies of other religious writings in comparison. There is strength in the Bible, as there is strength in the People of Israel, and strength in God.

Cool

How are Dead Sea Scrolls of anything? In any case you can say it's evidence that people wrote the stupid bible a few thousand years ago, the problem is, how do you know what they wrote is real?

Evolution? Can anyone prove it to me? Isn't it a theory? If there was proof wouldn't it be a law? Then please say again you base your opinions on science not on faith.

''Isn't it a theory? If there was proof wouldn't it be a law?'' Define for me Scientific theory, please. You can facepalm yourself now btw.

Theory: “a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural and subject to experimentation, in contrast to well-established propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact.”

You may need to review the "Scientific Method" again, then you will come to conclusion about the real meaning of a "Scientific Theory" and learn to differentiate facts from opinions.
hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 645
December 04, 2018, 09:25:03 AM

Of course, we all know you are into propaganda rather than science. All the scientists who extrapolate into the past, state that they don't know if they missed something. They all state that it only looks like. That isn't proof. That is exactly the opposite of proof.

Regarding the eye witnesses, none of them paint an exact picture with all the details. Many of them explain what they saw with descriptions of what it looked like to them. But the genealogies and dating times are accurate.

Cool

No reason to trust ''eye witnesses'' Do you know someone that knew someone that knew someone, etc etc until God?

That's why the things the eye witnesses saw were immediately written down, and the writings were meticulously copied perfectly. Moses and the people saw and heard God on Mt. Sinai. Shortly after this, Moses wrote the whole thing down so that there would be a record. And the two stone tablets with the 10 Commandments written on them... the ones that wound up in the Ark of the Covenant... were written in stone by the finger of God.

Not so with the stuff that says that the universe is billions of years old. All of that is guesswork, and the scientists who made the guesses essentially say so in their writings about the subject.

Cool

''
That's why the things the eye witnesses saw were immediately written down'' How do you know LOL. How do you know what it's written down it's what happened?

Israel. It exists. The people stubbornly hang onto the Old Testament. They stubbornly exist after being gone as a nation for almost 1900 years. They are an extremely stubborn people. The 2000-y-o Dead Sea Scrolls show how stubborn Israel is, by the accuracy when comparing the Bible Scrolls to the O.T. of today.

Or are you trying to say that Israel and the Dead Sea Scrolls don't exist?

Cool

Yea they exist, so do Muslims, Hindus, etc etc. They all claim the same things for their gods but how do you know? What method are you using to verify their claims? Are all books then true? Science proves the earth is older than 10.000 years with many different methods.

Scientists don't know what went on 10,000 years ago, or even that 10,000 years ago existed. The best evidence they have for 10,000 years ago is backward extrapolation of things that go on today. But they don't know that things worked like they do today, beyond about 5,000 years ago. And even 5,000 years ago is partly guesstimation.

Dead Sea Scrolls evidence that the Bible is the same today as it was back then. There are billions of copies of the Bible, but only a few copies of other religious writings in comparison. There is strength in the Bible, as there is strength in the People of Israel, and strength in God.

Cool

How are Dead Sea Scrolls of anything? In any case you can say it's evidence that people wrote the stupid bible a few thousand years ago, the problem is, how do you know what they wrote is real?

Evolution? Can anyone prove it to me? Isn't it a theory? If there was proof wouldn't it be a law? Then please say again you base your opinions on science not on faith.

''Isn't it a theory? If there was proof wouldn't it be a law?'' Define for me Scientific theory, please. You can facepalm yourself now btw.
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
December 04, 2018, 09:20:29 AM

Of course, we all know you are into propaganda rather than science. All the scientists who extrapolate into the past, state that they don't know if they missed something. They all state that it only looks like. That isn't proof. That is exactly the opposite of proof.

Regarding the eye witnesses, none of them paint an exact picture with all the details. Many of them explain what they saw with descriptions of what it looked like to them. But the genealogies and dating times are accurate.

Cool

No reason to trust ''eye witnesses'' Do you know someone that knew someone that knew someone, etc etc until God?

That's why the things the eye witnesses saw were immediately written down, and the writings were meticulously copied perfectly. Moses and the people saw and heard God on Mt. Sinai. Shortly after this, Moses wrote the whole thing down so that there would be a record. And the two stone tablets with the 10 Commandments written on them... the ones that wound up in the Ark of the Covenant... were written in stone by the finger of God.

Not so with the stuff that says that the universe is billions of years old. All of that is guesswork, and the scientists who made the guesses essentially say so in their writings about the subject.

Cool

''
That's why the things the eye witnesses saw were immediately written down'' How do you know LOL. How do you know what it's written down it's what happened?

Israel. It exists. The people stubbornly hang onto the Old Testament. They stubbornly exist after being gone as a nation for almost 1900 years. They are an extremely stubborn people. The 2000-y-o Dead Sea Scrolls show how stubborn Israel is, by the accuracy when comparing the Bible Scrolls to the O.T. of today.

Or are you trying to say that Israel and the Dead Sea Scrolls don't exist?

Cool

Yea they exist, so do Muslims, Hindus, etc etc. They all claim the same things for their gods but how do you know? What method are you using to verify their claims? Are all books then true? Science proves the earth is older than 10.000 years with many different methods.

Scientists don't know what went on 10,000 years ago, or even that 10,000 years ago existed. The best evidence they have for 10,000 years ago is backward extrapolation of things that go on today. But they don't know that things worked like they do today, beyond about 5,000 years ago. And even 5,000 years ago is partly guesstimation.

Dead Sea Scrolls evidence that the Bible is the same today as it was back then. There are billions of copies of the Bible, but only a few copies of other religious writings in comparison. There is strength in the Bible, as there is strength in the People of Israel, and strength in God.

Cool

How are Dead Sea Scrolls of anything? In any case you can say it's evidence that people wrote the stupid bible a few thousand years ago, the problem is, how do you know what they wrote is real?

Evolution? Can anyone prove it to me? Isn't it a theory? If there was proof wouldn't it be a law? Then please say again you base your opinions on science not on faith.
hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 645
December 04, 2018, 05:24:09 AM

Of course, we all know you are into propaganda rather than science. All the scientists who extrapolate into the past, state that they don't know if they missed something. They all state that it only looks like. That isn't proof. That is exactly the opposite of proof.

Regarding the eye witnesses, none of them paint an exact picture with all the details. Many of them explain what they saw with descriptions of what it looked like to them. But the genealogies and dating times are accurate.

Cool

No reason to trust ''eye witnesses'' Do you know someone that knew someone that knew someone, etc etc until God?

That's why the things the eye witnesses saw were immediately written down, and the writings were meticulously copied perfectly. Moses and the people saw and heard God on Mt. Sinai. Shortly after this, Moses wrote the whole thing down so that there would be a record. And the two stone tablets with the 10 Commandments written on them... the ones that wound up in the Ark of the Covenant... were written in stone by the finger of God.

Not so with the stuff that says that the universe is billions of years old. All of that is guesswork, and the scientists who made the guesses essentially say so in their writings about the subject.

Cool

''
That's why the things the eye witnesses saw were immediately written down'' How do you know LOL. How do you know what it's written down it's what happened?

Israel. It exists. The people stubbornly hang onto the Old Testament. They stubbornly exist after being gone as a nation for almost 1900 years. They are an extremely stubborn people. The 2000-y-o Dead Sea Scrolls show how stubborn Israel is, by the accuracy when comparing the Bible Scrolls to the O.T. of today.

Or are you trying to say that Israel and the Dead Sea Scrolls don't exist?

Cool

Yea they exist, so do Muslims, Hindus, etc etc. They all claim the same things for their gods but how do you know? What method are you using to verify their claims? Are all books then true? Science proves the earth is older than 10.000 years with many different methods.

Scientists don't know what went on 10,000 years ago, or even that 10,000 years ago existed. The best evidence they have for 10,000 years ago is backward extrapolation of things that go on today. But they don't know that things worked like they do today, beyond about 5,000 years ago. And even 5,000 years ago is partly guesstimation.

Dead Sea Scrolls evidence that the Bible is the same today as it was back then. There are billions of copies of the Bible, but only a few copies of other religious writings in comparison. There is strength in the Bible, as there is strength in the People of Israel, and strength in God.

Cool

How are Dead Sea Scrolls of anything? In any case you can say it's evidence that people wrote the stupid bible a few thousand years ago, the problem is, how do you know what they wrote is real?
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
December 03, 2018, 08:21:40 PM

Of course, we all know you are into propaganda rather than science. All the scientists who extrapolate into the past, state that they don't know if they missed something. They all state that it only looks like. That isn't proof. That is exactly the opposite of proof.

Regarding the eye witnesses, none of them paint an exact picture with all the details. Many of them explain what they saw with descriptions of what it looked like to them. But the genealogies and dating times are accurate.

Cool

No reason to trust ''eye witnesses'' Do you know someone that knew someone that knew someone, etc etc until God?

That's why the things the eye witnesses saw were immediately written down, and the writings were meticulously copied perfectly. Moses and the people saw and heard God on Mt. Sinai. Shortly after this, Moses wrote the whole thing down so that there would be a record. And the two stone tablets with the 10 Commandments written on them... the ones that wound up in the Ark of the Covenant... were written in stone by the finger of God.

Not so with the stuff that says that the universe is billions of years old. All of that is guesswork, and the scientists who made the guesses essentially say so in their writings about the subject.

Cool

''
That's why the things the eye witnesses saw were immediately written down'' How do you know LOL. How do you know what it's written down it's what happened?

Israel. It exists. The people stubbornly hang onto the Old Testament. They stubbornly exist after being gone as a nation for almost 1900 years. They are an extremely stubborn people. The 2000-y-o Dead Sea Scrolls show how stubborn Israel is, by the accuracy when comparing the Bible Scrolls to the O.T. of today.

Or are you trying to say that Israel and the Dead Sea Scrolls don't exist?

Cool

Yea they exist, so do Muslims, Hindus, etc etc. They all claim the same things for their gods but how do you know? What method are you using to verify their claims? Are all books then true? Science proves the earth is older than 10.000 years with many different methods.

Scientists don't know what went on 10,000 years ago, or even that 10,000 years ago existed. The best evidence they have for 10,000 years ago is backward extrapolation of things that go on today. But they don't know that things worked like they do today, beyond about 5,000 years ago. And even 5,000 years ago is partly guesstimation.

Dead Sea Scrolls evidence that the Bible is the same today as it was back then. There are billions of copies of the Bible, but only a few copies of other religious writings in comparison. There is strength in the Bible, as there is strength in the People of Israel, and strength in God.

Cool
hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 645
December 03, 2018, 12:11:28 PM

Of course, we all know you are into propaganda rather than science. All the scientists who extrapolate into the past, state that they don't know if they missed something. They all state that it only looks like. That isn't proof. That is exactly the opposite of proof.

Regarding the eye witnesses, none of them paint an exact picture with all the details. Many of them explain what they saw with descriptions of what it looked like to them. But the genealogies and dating times are accurate.

Cool

No reason to trust ''eye witnesses'' Do you know someone that knew someone that knew someone, etc etc until God?

That's why the things the eye witnesses saw were immediately written down, and the writings were meticulously copied perfectly. Moses and the people saw and heard God on Mt. Sinai. Shortly after this, Moses wrote the whole thing down so that there would be a record. And the two stone tablets with the 10 Commandments written on them... the ones that wound up in the Ark of the Covenant... were written in stone by the finger of God.

Not so with the stuff that says that the universe is billions of years old. All of that is guesswork, and the scientists who made the guesses essentially say so in their writings about the subject.

Cool

''
That's why the things the eye witnesses saw were immediately written down'' How do you know LOL. How do you know what it's written down it's what happened?

Israel. It exists. The people stubbornly hang onto the Old Testament. They stubbornly exist after being gone as a nation for almost 1900 years. They are an extremely stubborn people. The 2000-y-o Dead Sea Scrolls show how stubborn Israel is, by the accuracy when comparing the Bible Scrolls to the O.T. of today.

Or are you trying to say that Israel and the Dead Sea Scrolls don't exist?

Cool

Yea they exist, so do Muslims, Hindus, etc etc. They all claim the same things for their gods but how do you know? What method are you using to verify their claims? Are all books then true? Science proves the earth is older than 10.000 years with many different methods.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
December 03, 2018, 09:36:17 AM

Of course, we all know you are into propaganda rather than science. All the scientists who extrapolate into the past, state that they don't know if they missed something. They all state that it only looks like. That isn't proof. That is exactly the opposite of proof.

Regarding the eye witnesses, none of them paint an exact picture with all the details. Many of them explain what they saw with descriptions of what it looked like to them. But the genealogies and dating times are accurate.

Cool

No reason to trust ''eye witnesses'' Do you know someone that knew someone that knew someone, etc etc until God?

That's why the things the eye witnesses saw were immediately written down, and the writings were meticulously copied perfectly. Moses and the people saw and heard God on Mt. Sinai. Shortly after this, Moses wrote the whole thing down so that there would be a record. And the two stone tablets with the 10 Commandments written on them... the ones that wound up in the Ark of the Covenant... were written in stone by the finger of God.

Not so with the stuff that says that the universe is billions of years old. All of that is guesswork, and the scientists who made the guesses essentially say so in their writings about the subject.

Cool

''
That's why the things the eye witnesses saw were immediately written down'' How do you know LOL. How do you know what it's written down it's what happened?

Israel. It exists. The people stubbornly hang onto the Old Testament. They stubbornly exist after being gone as a nation for almost 1900 years. They are an extremely stubborn people. The 2000-y-o Dead Sea Scrolls show how stubborn Israel is, by the accuracy when comparing the Bible Scrolls to the O.T. of today.

Or are you trying to say that Israel and the Dead Sea Scrolls don't exist?

Cool
hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 645
December 03, 2018, 04:09:11 AM

Of course, we all know you are into propaganda rather than science. All the scientists who extrapolate into the past, state that they don't know if they missed something. They all state that it only looks like. That isn't proof. That is exactly the opposite of proof.

Regarding the eye witnesses, none of them paint an exact picture with all the details. Many of them explain what they saw with descriptions of what it looked like to them. But the genealogies and dating times are accurate.

Cool

No reason to trust ''eye witnesses'' Do you know someone that knew someone that knew someone, etc etc until God?

That's why the things the eye witnesses saw were immediately written down, and the writings were meticulously copied perfectly. Moses and the people saw and heard God on Mt. Sinai. Shortly after this, Moses wrote the whole thing down so that there would be a record. And the two stone tablets with the 10 Commandments written on them... the ones that wound up in the Ark of the Covenant... were written in stone by the finger of God.

Not so with the stuff that says that the universe is billions of years old. All of that is guesswork, and the scientists who made the guesses essentially say so in their writings about the subject.

Cool

''
That's why the things the eye witnesses saw were immediately written down'' How do you know LOL. How do you know what it's written down it's what happened?
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
December 02, 2018, 09:01:20 PM

Of course, we all know you are into propaganda rather than science. All the scientists who extrapolate into the past, state that they don't know if they missed something. They all state that it only looks like. That isn't proof. That is exactly the opposite of proof.

Regarding the eye witnesses, none of them paint an exact picture with all the details. Many of them explain what they saw with descriptions of what it looked like to them. But the genealogies and dating times are accurate.

Cool

No reason to trust ''eye witnesses'' Do you know someone that knew someone that knew someone, etc etc until God?

That's why the things the eye witnesses saw were immediately written down, and the writings were meticulously copied perfectly. Moses and the people saw and heard God on Mt. Sinai. Shortly after this, Moses wrote the whole thing down so that there would be a record. And the two stone tablets with the 10 Commandments written on them... the ones that wound up in the Ark of the Covenant... were written in stone by the finger of God.

Not so with the stuff that says that the universe is billions of years old. All of that is guesswork, and the scientists who made the guesses essentially say so in their writings about the subject.

Cool
full member
Activity: 574
Merit: 152
December 02, 2018, 05:18:30 PM
There might be hoaxes regarding evolution, but evolution itself isn't a hoax.

Evolution:
evolution
[ev-o-lu-tion]

noun

1. any process of formation or growth; development:
2. a product of such development; something evolved:
3. change in the gene pool of a population from generation to generation by such processes as mutation, natural selection, and genetic drift.
4. a process of gradual, peaceful, progressive change or development, as in social or economic structure or institutions.
5. a motion incomplete in itself, but combining with coordinated motions to produce a single action, as in a machine.
6. a pattern formed by or as if by a series of movements:
7. an evolving or giving off of gas, heat, etc.
8. the extraction of a root from a quantity.
9. a movement or one of a series of movements of troops, ships, etc., as for disposition in order of battle or in line on parade.
10. any similar movement, especially in close order drill.
All the things listed in the definition of evolution really exist and happen

You can call it evolution if you want, or if you want, you can call it by any of the words in any of the other languages that exist... what they call evoluton.

You can even make up your own word for evolution... like the biologist people want to use the word "natural selection."

It's simply that the people in the English language generally use the word "evolution."

Since all the things in the definition exist, at least as far as simple people who are not deep-thinking scientists are concerned, they have decided to use the word "evolution" to describe them. So, evolution exists.

R'amen.
hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 645
December 02, 2018, 04:58:24 PM
Science proved beyond a doubt that the earth and universe are far older than 10.000 years old, end of the debate, bible is fiction.

Now you are telling us that science has a time machine, or at least, a time viewer.

 Cheesy

Aren't you the one telling us you have a time machine? Have you seen God? Have you seen him create the universe?

Eye witness report called the Bible.    Cool

And science proves the earth is older than 10.000 years. Also, science/experiments > eye witnesses which are proven to be unreliable, specially when it's a long amount of time.

Of course, we all know you are into propaganda rather than science. All the scientists who extrapolate into the past, state that they don't know if they missed something. They all state that it only looks like. That isn't proof. That is exactly the opposite of proof.

Regarding the eye witnesses, none of them paint an exact picture with all the details. Many of them explain what they saw with descriptions of what it looked like to them. But the genealogies and dating times are accurate.

Cool

No reason to trust ''eye witnesses'' Do you know someone that knew someone that knew someone, etc etc until God?
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
December 02, 2018, 03:50:02 PM
Science proved beyond a doubt that the earth and universe are far older than 10.000 years old, end of the debate, bible is fiction.

Now you are telling us that science has a time machine, or at least, a time viewer.

 Cheesy

Aren't you the one telling us you have a time machine? Have you seen God? Have you seen him create the universe?

Eye witness report called the Bible.    Cool

And science proves the earth is older than 10.000 years. Also, science/experiments > eye witnesses which are proven to be unreliable, specially when it's a long amount of time.

Of course, we all know you are into propaganda rather than science. All the scientists who extrapolate into the past, state that they don't know if they missed something. They all state that it only looks like. That isn't proof. That is exactly the opposite of proof.

Regarding the eye witnesses, none of them paint an exact picture with all the details. Many of them explain what they saw with descriptions of what it looked like to them. But the genealogies and dating times are accurate.

Cool
hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 645
December 02, 2018, 08:08:35 AM
Science proved beyond a doubt that the earth and universe are far older than 10.000 years old, end of the debate, bible is fiction.

Now you are telling us that science has a time machine, or at least, a time viewer.

 Cheesy

Aren't you the one telling us you have a time machine? Have you seen God? Have you seen him create the universe?

Eye witness report called the Bible.    Cool

And science proves the earth is older than 10.000 years. Also, science/experiments > eye witnesses which are proven to be unreliable, specially when it's a long amount of time.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
December 01, 2018, 07:16:44 PM
Science proved beyond a doubt that the earth and universe are far older than 10.000 years old, end of the debate, bible is fiction.

Now you are telling us that science has a time machine, or at least, a time viewer.

 Cheesy

Aren't you the one telling us you have a time machine? Have you seen God? Have you seen him create the universe?

Eye witness report called the Bible.    Cool
hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 645
December 01, 2018, 07:05:45 PM
Science proved beyond a doubt that the earth and universe are far older than 10.000 years old, end of the debate, bible is fiction.

Now you are telling us that science has a time machine, or at least, a time viewer.

 Cheesy

Aren't you the one telling us you have a time machine? Have you seen God? Have you seen him create the universe?
Pages:
Jump to: