All you are saying is that there isn't proof for anything, because things might be different somewhere else.
Right here, there isn't even one example of pure random or evolution. But there are lots of examples of C&E, adaptation, like-begets-like, and simple change.
You are certainly welcome to head out there to find some proof for random and evolution if you want. Have a nice journey.
Evolution is a hoax, and you are continuing to prove it.
There isn't "proof" of a scientific theory. You need to understand that scientific theories don't need to be something that we have proof of. The entire concept of science is crafting an explanation based on the evidence and all of the evidence supports the theory of evolution.
Evolution theory is just like that. Evolution theory takes a bunch of facts about nature, and tries to say that evolution is real. By the definition of science theory, evolution is real in science theory only... not in the reality of nature. So far, evolution is in the realm of science theory. It isn't a fact of nature. So, why is it touted as being a fact of nature?
Science still can't tell the difference between adaptation and "programmed" change in like-begets-like. However, if they DID find something that really could be classified as evolution in some petri dish, there is STILL no way to extrapolate backwards into the fossil record to show which of the creatures were evolving and which were not. The two basic reasons why evolution is not proven are: 1) no DNA to check it out the fossil record for sure; 2) C&E means programming, which means that everything was set up to act as it does, and evolution theory is exceptionally hazy on this reality.
Evolution theory is the best explanation we have for the diversity of life on Earth and how all life shares DNA and gets progressively more complicated. This theory is supported by a vast amount of observational data to a point that it is considered a fact by the scientific community.
If you have an alternative scientific theory, let's hear it.
Otherwise, I suggest you stop calling it a hoax. It is like calling the General Theory of Relativity or Theory of Gravity a hoax. This puts you in the notbatman bin.
If you think you are above the great scientific minds, prove it. Submit your paper and win a Nobel Prize.
PS. Just because it invalidates your Bible does not mean it is a hoax. It just means that your Bible got this scientific fact wrong, like many others. Don't be angry at science. Science does not care what anyone wrote in some book. Science uncovers the truth, whatever that truth is.