The failure of evolution is in two parts:
1. All the foundational evolution scientists always say in their basic, foundational evolution papers, wording to the effect of: "if, maybe, it looks like, possibly, probably," etc. This means that they do not know, and that they do not have proof;
2. All the scientists and people who build on this foundation of: "if, maybe, it looks like, possibley, probably," etc., are saying that they don't know and don't have proof, right along with the foundational papers they build on..
That's all there is for evolution. There is "if, maybe, it looks like, possibley, probably," etc., and those who base their stuff on the "if, maybe, it looks like, possibley, probably," etc.
There is no proof that says "definitely," that is not based on "if, maybe, it looks like, possibley, probably," etc.
Forget it.
Evolution is a hoax.
1. All the foundational evolution scientists always say in their basic, foundational evolution papers, wording to the effect of: "if, maybe, it looks like, possibly, probably," etc. This means that they do not know, and that they do not have proof;
2. All the scientists and people who build on this foundation of: "if, maybe, it looks like, possibley, probably," etc., are saying that they don't know and don't have proof, right along with the foundational papers they build on..
That's all there is for evolution. There is "if, maybe, it looks like, possibley, probably," etc., and those who base their stuff on the "if, maybe, it looks like, possibley, probably," etc.
There is no proof that says "definitely," that is not based on "if, maybe, it looks like, possibley, probably," etc.
Forget it.
Evolution is a hoax.
THAT'S your argument? That scientific papers don't use the word definitely? I would probably believe creationism as well if I was this uneducated. You are even more clueless than the other guy. If the two of you could go back to elementary science classes for a couple of years, then come back and message me, that would be great.
Ok I will learn what you have wrote... You are so smart... Im amazed. Your intelligence is so awesome and your knowledge of not arguing with someone because he is not peer-reviewed is so absolutely amazing and is so useful. WOW.
After 5 seconds I learned what you had learned o master! I learned your words are not peer-reviewed so they are not facts. The only facts are peer reviewed. If a bicyckle is not peer-reviewed I find its existance not fact in our evolution matrix. in my amazing insight I learned the only way to safe my evolutionist beliefs is to ignore everything anyone else says.
You are genious! I belieeveeeee. I believe in evolution because im so scientifical. My science is better than your science because your science is not science because a group thinking was not willing to place a stamp of review on it.
Meh.... science is so science with scientific science in scientific scientism. Im so scientific now. Thank you for you awesome peer-reviewed insights.
This dialog is so useful for us evolutionist. Im evolutionist now - do you think im smart now? Yes I am so smart I feel it...
I take it back. You are equally clueless.
