Pages:
Author

Topic: Evolution is a hoax - page 81. (Read 108046 times)

hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 645
March 05, 2018, 08:57:24 AM
Quote
Where are your repeatability of god? Where is your observability of god? Where is your falsifiability of god? Again, this is the deep problem with your brain, you don't seem to ask these questions about your own beliefs, cognitive dissonance is a serious condition.

There is no problem in my brain because I do not call my beliefs science. There is something apparently wrong with you trying to imply I have ever called my beliefs to be science.

One does not have to be scientific to be proven. For example an innocence - does not have to be scientificly proven. To be proven innocent one should not be proven guilty. So to prove that creation is valid, one should have to simply not have an other valid proof. The statement is non contradictory hence it is assumed to be true.

And one thing does not have to be scientific to be theory.

For example an evolution does not have to be scientific to be a theory.

''So to prove that creation is valid, one should have to simply not have an other valid proof.'' - Przemax - 2018


''To be proven innocent one should not be proven guilty.'' Actually it's, ''everyone is innocent until proven guilty''

I created the universe and it's true until you can prove it wrong.


Yeah. A person can have benefit of a doubt it seems. You agree that people can have that towards the evolution don't you?

It is extremely easy to prove you are wrong. Childishly easy to prove you have not created the universe. Because the universe existed before you.

Poof. Your theory have been smashed to pieces. You think it is hard to prove something is impossible? Proving something being impossible is easy. At least if it is ridiculous like you claim God to be.


Quote
If there were all kinds of fossils out there, that were like missing links because of their similarities and slight differences, we still wouldn't know that they were part of evolution, or if they simply were all different species created by God.

God have created kinds at least according to the Bible and reality it seems. Noone argues about adaptation. We need to be sure what we call species. God have created for example a dog. If an evolutionist would found non existing race of a dog he could call it a missing link. It is no missing link. It is just a type of a dog. Why not assume its the same with all the fossils? It is just a variations of existing species that changed within the changing enviroment. Enviroment change so most animals probably have less or more fat storage or something like that to be able to adapt and the bones reflects that. Thats what adaptation is about.



''Because the universe existed before you.'' Prove it, I existed way before the universe traveling from body to body.

It would be easy to disprove. You should do it again if you have done it one time. Or at least ressurect one person or make at least one thing a new to show you have at least a little bit of your power left. You see? Faking religion is hard. Almost harder than faking science.

What?? Haven't you seen all the miracles? I personally resurrected jesus and I'm still currently performing all kinds of miracles. Now I can't go around here showing my powers directly because people would flip out, you just have to believe me, ok?

The more you invent stuff the easier it is to disprove. Now you have to show:

1. That you would not have anything against cutting your head off as it is just a flesh wound. Many Muslims would woulantary do that - just tell them you are a God. If I would see you speak to a group of Muslims that you are a creator of the universe. That would impress me.
2. You should know every detail about how people dress, eat, live, travel in every possible historical epoch and that should be accurate historicly. If you would write a book and that would be accurate you would be a very rich guy with this bestseller. Why do you waste your time on some cheap affiliation campaign?
3. You should know anything about Jesus that fail to see you do.
4. You must be quite famous speaking about you having enourmous powers like all prophets were. What prophet were you and why? You do not even know handful of them.
5. Still you have to know at least what miracles were there.
6. And if you claim not be Jesus so you know. His miracles does not count you would need to know other miracles. It so happens to be that I guess only 2 people in recorded history claimed to ressurected someone. Which one were you? You do not even know how you were named? Then you have problems with memory. If you have problems with memory you can't remember the begining.


And many many many ways to disprove your silliness the more you talk. You just make it easier. Stop it. You just make a fool out of yourself with each blasphemy you speak.

You didn't disproved anything tho, you are just asking me to do things. I can't show directly anything because I need you to believe in me but trust me, I am actually god. I have done plenty of miracles, I stopped the nazis personally and I created science. Stop saying I'm not god because that is blasphemy and I do not like that, you could go to hell forever if you make me mad so be careful next time you post.

Ok. Give me an address I will send muslims there. If not you have proven you are lying as simple as that. There are a lot of things one could do to prove you blaspheme. None of them you would like.

If one is asked and do not answer the question - it is safe to assume someone is lying. You lie. As simple as that. Bye. You have been debunked.

Until you can prove I did not create the universe what I said it's true, that's your logic. Do you have anything to debunk my claim? I don't think so buddy.
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
March 05, 2018, 06:51:50 AM
Quote
Where are your repeatability of god? Where is your observability of god? Where is your falsifiability of god? Again, this is the deep problem with your brain, you don't seem to ask these questions about your own beliefs, cognitive dissonance is a serious condition.

There is no problem in my brain because I do not call my beliefs science. There is something apparently wrong with you trying to imply I have ever called my beliefs to be science.

One does not have to be scientific to be proven. For example an innocence - does not have to be scientificly proven. To be proven innocent one should not be proven guilty. So to prove that creation is valid, one should have to simply not have an other valid proof. The statement is non contradictory hence it is assumed to be true.

And one thing does not have to be scientific to be theory.

For example an evolution does not have to be scientific to be a theory.

''So to prove that creation is valid, one should have to simply not have an other valid proof.'' - Przemax - 2018


''To be proven innocent one should not be proven guilty.'' Actually it's, ''everyone is innocent until proven guilty''

I created the universe and it's true until you can prove it wrong.


Yeah. A person can have benefit of a doubt it seems. You agree that people can have that towards the evolution don't you?

It is extremely easy to prove you are wrong. Childishly easy to prove you have not created the universe. Because the universe existed before you.

Poof. Your theory have been smashed to pieces. You think it is hard to prove something is impossible? Proving something being impossible is easy. At least if it is ridiculous like you claim God to be.


Quote
If there were all kinds of fossils out there, that were like missing links because of their similarities and slight differences, we still wouldn't know that they were part of evolution, or if they simply were all different species created by God.

God have created kinds at least according to the Bible and reality it seems. Noone argues about adaptation. We need to be sure what we call species. God have created for example a dog. If an evolutionist would found non existing race of a dog he could call it a missing link. It is no missing link. It is just a type of a dog. Why not assume its the same with all the fossils? It is just a variations of existing species that changed within the changing enviroment. Enviroment change so most animals probably have less or more fat storage or something like that to be able to adapt and the bones reflects that. Thats what adaptation is about.



''Because the universe existed before you.'' Prove it, I existed way before the universe traveling from body to body.

It would be easy to disprove. You should do it again if you have done it one time. Or at least ressurect one person or make at least one thing a new to show you have at least a little bit of your power left. You see? Faking religion is hard. Almost harder than faking science.

What?? Haven't you seen all the miracles? I personally resurrected jesus and I'm still currently performing all kinds of miracles. Now I can't go around here showing my powers directly because people would flip out, you just have to believe me, ok?

The more you invent stuff the easier it is to disprove. Now you have to show:

1. That you would not have anything against cutting your head off as it is just a flesh wound. Many Muslims would woulantary do that - just tell them you are a God. If I would see you speak to a group of Muslims that you are a creator of the universe. That would impress me.
2. You should know every detail about how people dress, eat, live, travel in every possible historical epoch and that should be accurate historicly. If you would write a book and that would be accurate you would be a very rich guy with this bestseller. Why do you waste your time on some cheap affiliation campaign?
3. You should know anything about Jesus that fail to see you do.
4. You must be quite famous speaking about you having enourmous powers like all prophets were. What prophet were you and why? You do not even know handful of them.
5. Still you have to know at least what miracles were there.
6. And if you claim not be Jesus so you know. His miracles does not count you would need to know other miracles. It so happens to be that I guess only 2 people in recorded history claimed to ressurected someone. Which one were you? You do not even know how you were named? Then you have problems with memory. If you have problems with memory you can't remember the begining.


And many many many ways to disprove your silliness the more you talk. You just make it easier. Stop it. You just make a fool out of yourself with each blasphemy you speak.

You didn't disproved anything tho, you are just asking me to do things. I can't show directly anything because I need you to believe in me but trust me, I am actually god. I have done plenty of miracles, I stopped the nazis personally and I created science. Stop saying I'm not god because that is blasphemy and I do not like that, you could go to hell forever if you make me mad so be careful next time you post.

Ok. Give me an address I will send muslims there. If not you have proven you are lying as simple as that. There are a lot of things one could do to prove you blaspheme. None of them you would like.

If one is asked and do not answer the question - it is safe to assume someone is lying. You lie. As simple as that. Bye. You have been debunked.
hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 645
March 05, 2018, 05:43:18 AM
Quote
Where are your repeatability of god? Where is your observability of god? Where is your falsifiability of god? Again, this is the deep problem with your brain, you don't seem to ask these questions about your own beliefs, cognitive dissonance is a serious condition.

There is no problem in my brain because I do not call my beliefs science. There is something apparently wrong with you trying to imply I have ever called my beliefs to be science.

One does not have to be scientific to be proven. For example an innocence - does not have to be scientificly proven. To be proven innocent one should not be proven guilty. So to prove that creation is valid, one should have to simply not have an other valid proof. The statement is non contradictory hence it is assumed to be true.

And one thing does not have to be scientific to be theory.

For example an evolution does not have to be scientific to be a theory.

''So to prove that creation is valid, one should have to simply not have an other valid proof.'' - Przemax - 2018


''To be proven innocent one should not be proven guilty.'' Actually it's, ''everyone is innocent until proven guilty''

I created the universe and it's true until you can prove it wrong.


Yeah. A person can have benefit of a doubt it seems. You agree that people can have that towards the evolution don't you?

It is extremely easy to prove you are wrong. Childishly easy to prove you have not created the universe. Because the universe existed before you.

Poof. Your theory have been smashed to pieces. You think it is hard to prove something is impossible? Proving something being impossible is easy. At least if it is ridiculous like you claim God to be.


Quote
If there were all kinds of fossils out there, that were like missing links because of their similarities and slight differences, we still wouldn't know that they were part of evolution, or if they simply were all different species created by God.

God have created kinds at least according to the Bible and reality it seems. Noone argues about adaptation. We need to be sure what we call species. God have created for example a dog. If an evolutionist would found non existing race of a dog he could call it a missing link. It is no missing link. It is just a type of a dog. Why not assume its the same with all the fossils? It is just a variations of existing species that changed within the changing enviroment. Enviroment change so most animals probably have less or more fat storage or something like that to be able to adapt and the bones reflects that. Thats what adaptation is about.



''Because the universe existed before you.'' Prove it, I existed way before the universe traveling from body to body.

It would be easy to disprove. You should do it again if you have done it one time. Or at least ressurect one person or make at least one thing a new to show you have at least a little bit of your power left. You see? Faking religion is hard. Almost harder than faking science.

What?? Haven't you seen all the miracles? I personally resurrected jesus and I'm still currently performing all kinds of miracles. Now I can't go around here showing my powers directly because people would flip out, you just have to believe me, ok?

The more you invent stuff the easier it is to disprove. Now you have to show:

1. That you would not have anything against cutting your head off as it is just a flesh wound. Many Muslims would woulantary do that - just tell them you are a God. If I would see you speak to a group of Muslims that you are a creator of the universe. That would impress me.
2. You should know every detail about how people dress, eat, live, travel in every possible historical epoch and that should be accurate historicly. If you would write a book and that would be accurate you would be a very rich guy with this bestseller. Why do you waste your time on some cheap affiliation campaign?
3. You should know anything about Jesus that fail to see you do.
4. You must be quite famous speaking about you having enourmous powers like all prophets were. What prophet were you and why? You do not even know handful of them.
5. Still you have to know at least what miracles were there.
6. And if you claim not be Jesus so you know. His miracles does not count you would need to know other miracles. It so happens to be that I guess only 2 people in recorded history claimed to ressurected someone. Which one were you? You do not even know how you were named? Then you have problems with memory. If you have problems with memory you can't remember the begining.


And many many many ways to disprove your silliness the more you talk. You just make it easier. Stop it. You just make a fool out of yourself with each blasphemy you speak.

You didn't disproved anything tho, you are just asking me to do things. I can't show directly anything because I need you to believe in me but trust me, I am actually god. I have done plenty of miracles, I stopped the nazis personally and I created science. Stop saying I'm not god because that is blasphemy and I do not like that, you could go to hell forever if you make me mad so be careful next time you post.
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
March 05, 2018, 04:50:44 AM
Quote
Where are your repeatability of god? Where is your observability of god? Where is your falsifiability of god? Again, this is the deep problem with your brain, you don't seem to ask these questions about your own beliefs, cognitive dissonance is a serious condition.

There is no problem in my brain because I do not call my beliefs science. There is something apparently wrong with you trying to imply I have ever called my beliefs to be science.

One does not have to be scientific to be proven. For example an innocence - does not have to be scientificly proven. To be proven innocent one should not be proven guilty. So to prove that creation is valid, one should have to simply not have an other valid proof. The statement is non contradictory hence it is assumed to be true.

And one thing does not have to be scientific to be theory.

For example an evolution does not have to be scientific to be a theory.

''So to prove that creation is valid, one should have to simply not have an other valid proof.'' - Przemax - 2018


''To be proven innocent one should not be proven guilty.'' Actually it's, ''everyone is innocent until proven guilty''

I created the universe and it's true until you can prove it wrong.


Yeah. A person can have benefit of a doubt it seems. You agree that people can have that towards the evolution don't you?

It is extremely easy to prove you are wrong. Childishly easy to prove you have not created the universe. Because the universe existed before you.

Poof. Your theory have been smashed to pieces. You think it is hard to prove something is impossible? Proving something being impossible is easy. At least if it is ridiculous like you claim God to be.


Quote
If there were all kinds of fossils out there, that were like missing links because of their similarities and slight differences, we still wouldn't know that they were part of evolution, or if they simply were all different species created by God.

God have created kinds at least according to the Bible and reality it seems. Noone argues about adaptation. We need to be sure what we call species. God have created for example a dog. If an evolutionist would found non existing race of a dog he could call it a missing link. It is no missing link. It is just a type of a dog. Why not assume its the same with all the fossils? It is just a variations of existing species that changed within the changing enviroment. Enviroment change so most animals probably have less or more fat storage or something like that to be able to adapt and the bones reflects that. Thats what adaptation is about.



''Because the universe existed before you.'' Prove it, I existed way before the universe traveling from body to body.

It would be easy to disprove. You should do it again if you have done it one time. Or at least ressurect one person or make at least one thing a new to show you have at least a little bit of your power left. You see? Faking religion is hard. Almost harder than faking science.

What?? Haven't you seen all the miracles? I personally resurrected jesus and I'm still currently performing all kinds of miracles. Now I can't go around here showing my powers directly because people would flip out, you just have to believe me, ok?

The more you invent stuff the easier it is to disprove. Now you have to show:

1. That you would not have anything against cutting your head off as it is just a flesh wound. Many Muslims would woulantary do that - just tell them you are a God. If I would see you speak to a group of Muslims that you are a creator of the universe. That would impress me.
2. You should know every detail about how people dress, eat, live, travel in every possible historical epoch and that should be accurate historicly. If you would write a book and that would be accurate you would be a very rich guy with this bestseller. Why do you waste your time on some cheap affiliation campaign?
3. You should know anything about Jesus that fail to see you do.
4. You must be quite famous speaking about you having enourmous powers like all prophets were. What prophet were you and why? You do not even know handful of them.
5. Still you have to know at least what miracles were there.
6. And if you claim not be Jesus so you know. His miracles does not count you would need to know other miracles. It so happens to be that I guess only 2 people in recorded history claimed to ressurected someone. Which one were you? You do not even know how you were named? Then you have problems with memory. If you have problems with memory you can't remember the begining.


And many many many ways to disprove your silliness the more you talk. You just make it easier. Stop it. You just make a fool out of yourself with each blasphemy you speak.
newbie
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
March 05, 2018, 04:35:51 AM
Funny how those who think evolution is a hoax are still happy to reap the benefits of scientific discovery and advances
hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 645
March 05, 2018, 04:22:14 AM
Evolution is a very simple concept to understand. It involves perfect common sense.

Yes. Lot's of other science fiction concepts can be difficult to understand.

Cool

God is the reason for evolution.

A lot of religious people, the majority, agree with you. I wouldn't mind that point of view, at least they are not totally insane to suggest that evolution is a hoax.
hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 645
March 05, 2018, 04:21:21 AM
Quote
Where are your repeatability of god? Where is your observability of god? Where is your falsifiability of god? Again, this is the deep problem with your brain, you don't seem to ask these questions about your own beliefs, cognitive dissonance is a serious condition.

There is no problem in my brain because I do not call my beliefs science. There is something apparently wrong with you trying to imply I have ever called my beliefs to be science.

One does not have to be scientific to be proven. For example an innocence - does not have to be scientificly proven. To be proven innocent one should not be proven guilty. So to prove that creation is valid, one should have to simply not have an other valid proof. The statement is non contradictory hence it is assumed to be true.

And one thing does not have to be scientific to be theory.

For example an evolution does not have to be scientific to be a theory.

''So to prove that creation is valid, one should have to simply not have an other valid proof.'' - Przemax - 2018


''To be proven innocent one should not be proven guilty.'' Actually it's, ''everyone is innocent until proven guilty''

I created the universe and it's true until you can prove it wrong.


Yeah. A person can have benefit of a doubt it seems. You agree that people can have that towards the evolution don't you?

It is extremely easy to prove you are wrong. Childishly easy to prove you have not created the universe. Because the universe existed before you.

Poof. Your theory have been smashed to pieces. You think it is hard to prove something is impossible? Proving something being impossible is easy. At least if it is ridiculous like you claim God to be.


Quote
If there were all kinds of fossils out there, that were like missing links because of their similarities and slight differences, we still wouldn't know that they were part of evolution, or if they simply were all different species created by God.

God have created kinds at least according to the Bible and reality it seems. Noone argues about adaptation. We need to be sure what we call species. God have created for example a dog. If an evolutionist would found non existing race of a dog he could call it a missing link. It is no missing link. It is just a type of a dog. Why not assume its the same with all the fossils? It is just a variations of existing species that changed within the changing enviroment. Enviroment change so most animals probably have less or more fat storage or something like that to be able to adapt and the bones reflects that. Thats what adaptation is about.



''Because the universe existed before you.'' Prove it, I existed way before the universe traveling from body to body.

It would be easy to disprove. You should do it again if you have done it one time. Or at least ressurect one person or make at least one thing a new to show you have at least a little bit of your power left. You see? Faking religion is hard. Almost harder than faking science.

What?? Haven't you seen all the miracles? I personally resurrected jesus and I'm still currently performing all kinds of miracles. Now I can't go around here showing my powers directly because people would flip out, you just have to believe me, ok?
newbie
Activity: 80
Merit: 0
March 04, 2018, 10:34:16 PM
Evolution is a very simple concept to understand. It involves perfect common sense.

Yes. Lot's of other science fiction concepts can be difficult to understand.

Cool

God is the reason for evolution.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
March 04, 2018, 10:17:45 PM
Evolution is a very simple concept to understand. It involves perfect common sense.

Yes. Lot's of other science fiction concepts can be difficult to understand.

Cool
newbie
Activity: 80
Merit: 0
March 04, 2018, 10:13:35 PM
Evolution is a very simple concept to understand. It involves perfect common sense.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
March 04, 2018, 10:11:36 PM
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
March 04, 2018, 10:02:13 PM
Of course! If it were not ‘within existing theory’, it would be irrelevant to evolution. A counterfeit dollar note is only counterfeit if it is meant to replicate what a person thinks characterizes a dollar bill. Thus Monopoly money is not counterfeit, because it was never intended to be used outside the game. In the same way, if a paleontological fraud were not within existing theory, it would be irrelevant to evolution

Then again, evolution theory is not relevant to reality.    Cool
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
March 04, 2018, 09:59:25 PM

''Because the universe existed before you.'' Prove it, I existed way before the universe traveling from body to body.

No universe, no body. Astargath... nobody.     Grin
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
March 04, 2018, 07:45:44 PM
Quote
Where are your repeatability of god? Where is your observability of god? Where is your falsifiability of god? Again, this is the deep problem with your brain, you don't seem to ask these questions about your own beliefs, cognitive dissonance is a serious condition.

There is no problem in my brain because I do not call my beliefs science. There is something apparently wrong with you trying to imply I have ever called my beliefs to be science.

One does not have to be scientific to be proven. For example an innocence - does not have to be scientificly proven. To be proven innocent one should not be proven guilty. So to prove that creation is valid, one should have to simply not have an other valid proof. The statement is non contradictory hence it is assumed to be true.

And one thing does not have to be scientific to be theory.

For example an evolution does not have to be scientific to be a theory.

''So to prove that creation is valid, one should have to simply not have an other valid proof.'' - Przemax - 2018


''To be proven innocent one should not be proven guilty.'' Actually it's, ''everyone is innocent until proven guilty''

I created the universe and it's true until you can prove it wrong.


Yeah. A person can have benefit of a doubt it seems. You agree that people can have that towards the evolution don't you?

It is extremely easy to prove you are wrong. Childishly easy to prove you have not created the universe. Because the universe existed before you.

Poof. Your theory have been smashed to pieces. You think it is hard to prove something is impossible? Proving something being impossible is easy. At least if it is ridiculous like you claim God to be.


Quote
If there were all kinds of fossils out there, that were like missing links because of their similarities and slight differences, we still wouldn't know that they were part of evolution, or if they simply were all different species created by God.

God have created kinds at least according to the Bible and reality it seems. Noone argues about adaptation. We need to be sure what we call species. God have created for example a dog. If an evolutionist would found non existing race of a dog he could call it a missing link. It is no missing link. It is just a type of a dog. Why not assume its the same with all the fossils? It is just a variations of existing species that changed within the changing enviroment. Enviroment change so most animals probably have less or more fat storage or something like that to be able to adapt and the bones reflects that. Thats what adaptation is about.



''Because the universe existed before you.'' Prove it, I existed way before the universe traveling from body to body.

It would be easy to disprove. You should do it again if you have done it one time. Or at least ressurect one person or make at least one thing a new to show you have at least a little bit of your power left. You see? Faking religion is hard. Almost harder than faking science.
hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 645
March 04, 2018, 02:23:41 PM
Quote
Where are your repeatability of god? Where is your observability of god? Where is your falsifiability of god? Again, this is the deep problem with your brain, you don't seem to ask these questions about your own beliefs, cognitive dissonance is a serious condition.

There is no problem in my brain because I do not call my beliefs science. There is something apparently wrong with you trying to imply I have ever called my beliefs to be science.

One does not have to be scientific to be proven. For example an innocence - does not have to be scientificly proven. To be proven innocent one should not be proven guilty. So to prove that creation is valid, one should have to simply not have an other valid proof. The statement is non contradictory hence it is assumed to be true.

And one thing does not have to be scientific to be theory.

For example an evolution does not have to be scientific to be a theory.

''So to prove that creation is valid, one should have to simply not have an other valid proof.'' - Przemax - 2018


''To be proven innocent one should not be proven guilty.'' Actually it's, ''everyone is innocent until proven guilty''

I created the universe and it's true until you can prove it wrong.


Yeah. A person can have benefit of a doubt it seems. You agree that people can have that towards the evolution don't you?

It is extremely easy to prove you are wrong. Childishly easy to prove you have not created the universe. Because the universe existed before you.

Poof. Your theory have been smashed to pieces. You think it is hard to prove something is impossible? Proving something being impossible is easy. At least if it is ridiculous like you claim God to be.


Quote
If there were all kinds of fossils out there, that were like missing links because of their similarities and slight differences, we still wouldn't know that they were part of evolution, or if they simply were all different species created by God.

God have created kinds at least according to the Bible and reality it seems. Noone argues about adaptation. We need to be sure what we call species. God have created for example a dog. If an evolutionist would found non existing race of a dog he could call it a missing link. It is no missing link. It is just a type of a dog. Why not assume its the same with all the fossils? It is just a variations of existing species that changed within the changing enviroment. Enviroment change so most animals probably have less or more fat storage or something like that to be able to adapt and the bones reflects that. Thats what adaptation is about.



''Because the universe existed before you.'' Prove it, I existed way before the universe traveling from body to body.
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
March 04, 2018, 11:40:52 AM
Quote
Where are your repeatability of god? Where is your observability of god? Where is your falsifiability of god? Again, this is the deep problem with your brain, you don't seem to ask these questions about your own beliefs, cognitive dissonance is a serious condition.

There is no problem in my brain because I do not call my beliefs science. There is something apparently wrong with you trying to imply I have ever called my beliefs to be science.

One does not have to be scientific to be proven. For example an innocence - does not have to be scientificly proven. To be proven innocent one should not be proven guilty. So to prove that creation is valid, one should have to simply not have an other valid proof. The statement is non contradictory hence it is assumed to be true.

And one thing does not have to be scientific to be theory.

For example an evolution does not have to be scientific to be a theory.

''So to prove that creation is valid, one should have to simply not have an other valid proof.'' - Przemax - 2018


''To be proven innocent one should not be proven guilty.'' Actually it's, ''everyone is innocent until proven guilty''

I created the universe and it's true until you can prove it wrong.


Yeah. A person can have benefit of a doubt it seems. You agree that people can have that towards the evolution don't you?

It is extremely easy to prove you are wrong. Childishly easy to prove you have not created the universe. Because the universe existed before you.

Poof. Your theory have been smashed to pieces. You think it is hard to prove something is impossible? Proving something being impossible is easy. At least if it is ridiculous like you claim God to be.


Quote
If there were all kinds of fossils out there, that were like missing links because of their similarities and slight differences, we still wouldn't know that they were part of evolution, or if they simply were all different species created by God.

God have created kinds at least according to the Bible and reality it seems. Noone argues about adaptation. We need to be sure what we call species. God have created for example a dog. If an evolutionist would found non existing race of a dog he could call it a missing link. It is no missing link. It is just a type of a dog. Why not assume its the same with all the fossils? It is just a variations of existing species that changed within the changing enviroment. Enviroment change so most animals probably have less or more fat storage or something like that to be able to adapt and the bones reflects that. Thats what adaptation is about.

newbie
Activity: 73
Merit: 0
March 04, 2018, 11:15:53 AM
Of course! If it were not ‘within existing theory’, it would be irrelevant to evolution. A counterfeit dollar note is only counterfeit if it is meant to replicate what a person thinks characterizes a dollar bill. Thus Monopoly money is not counterfeit, because it was never intended to be used outside the game. In the same way, if a paleontological fraud were not within existing theory, it would be irrelevant to evolution
newbie
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
March 04, 2018, 09:57:03 AM
In geology, we have found 2 or 3 times the number of fossils as there are living species. We really haven't found any missing links. But...

If there were all kinds of fossils out there, that were like missing links because of their similarities and slight differences, we still wouldn't know that they were part of evolution, or if they simply were all different species created by God.

You have to find living trans-species to know that fossils have evidence of evolution.

Evolution shoots itself down because it suggests a great expanse of time between changes that are recognizable as such. You might as well suggest that there isn't any evolution.
hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 645
March 04, 2018, 09:50:39 AM
Quote
Where are your repeatability of god? Where is your observability of god? Where is your falsifiability of god? Again, this is the deep problem with your brain, you don't seem to ask these questions about your own beliefs, cognitive dissonance is a serious condition.

There is no problem in my brain because I do not call my beliefs science. There is something apparently wrong with you trying to imply I have ever called my beliefs to be science.

One does not have to be scientific to be proven. For example an innocence - does not have to be scientificly proven. To be proven innocent one should not be proven guilty. So to prove that creation is valid, one should have to simply not have an other valid proof. The statement is non contradictory hence it is assumed to be true.

And one thing does not have to be scientific to be theory.

For example an evolution does not have to be scientific to be a theory.

''So to prove that creation is valid, one should have to simply not have an other valid proof.'' - Przemax - 2018


''To be proven innocent one should not be proven guilty.'' Actually it's, ''everyone is innocent until proven guilty''

I created the universe and it's true until you can prove it wrong.
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
March 04, 2018, 06:39:58 AM
Quote
Where are your repeatability of god? Where is your observability of god? Where is your falsifiability of god? Again, this is the deep problem with your brain, you don't seem to ask these questions about your own beliefs, cognitive dissonance is a serious condition.

There is no problem in my brain because I do not call my beliefs science. There is something apparently wrong with you trying to imply I have ever called my beliefs to be science.

One does not have to be scientific to be proven. For example an innocence - does not have to be scientificly proven. To be proven innocent one should not be proven guilty. So to prove that creation is valid, one should have to simply not have an other valid proof. The statement is non contradictory hence it is assumed to be true.

And one thing does not have to be scientific to be theory.

For example an evolution does not have to be scientific to be a theory.
Pages:
Jump to: