nobody has ever seen something evolving that they can prove is evolution and not something else
Apart from Shaposhnikov over 70 years ago, which was where I started this discussion, and the countless other examples I have provided you with.
I'm done with this argument. I have provided mountains and mountains of evidence which you have both failed to counter even once. The very fact you use words like "accident" and "random" shows that you have a deep,
deep ignorance about science and evolution, and zero willingness to learn. You can play your word games and make stupid points about World of Warcraft and students as long as you like, but until I see a
single piece of evidence that evolution is a hoax, I'll consider this argument won.
Exactly. Your ignorance about evolution, and your unwillingness to learn.
The failure of evolution is in two parts:
1. All the foundational evolution scientists always say in their basic, foundational evolution papers, wording to the effect of: "if, maybe, it looks like, possibly, probably," etc. This means that they do not know, and that they do not have proof;
2. All the scientists and people who build on this foundation of: "if, maybe, it looks like, possibley, probably," etc., are saying that they don't know and don't have proof, right along with the foundational papers they build on..
That's all there is for evolution. There is "if, maybe, it looks like, possibley, probably," etc., and those who base their stuff on the "if, maybe, it looks like, possibley, probably," etc.
There is no proof that says "definitely," that is not based on "if, maybe, it looks like, possibley, probably," etc.
Forget it.
Evolution is a hoax.