Topic: Evolution is a hoax - page 98. (Read 108046 times)

The goal of Pope Francis and the Church leaders is to rule the world as a nation under their control. They will say anything to achieve this goal.

Since, as Steven Gould said, there is so extremely little SOLID scientific evidence for evolution, and essentially no fact at all, we see that any Church that accepts evolution as fact, is simply a deceptive church.

This is the basis of the fact that evolution is a religion right along with the Pope who supports it. Evolution is part of the religion of the Church.

Wake up and see that you are part of the Church by believing the religion of evolution that the Church supports. And thank you for prompting me to bring the logic of this evolution/Church religion to light, along with the fact that you are a religious person, right in the wording that you used. You said it yourself.

Now that we know that the Church and evolution are not righteous...

Evolution is a hoax.

The theory of evolution is an invention to confuse people's brains

You keep saying that and yet you fail to provide any meaningful data to sustain your argument. I also pointed out numerous times that not only scientists say that evolution is a fact, religious people, like you, also accept evolution as fact. In fact more and more every year. Pope Francis and several other popes also accept evolution as a fact and why wouldn't they? It's really hard to keep denying evolution with all the evidence out there. Take a step back and think about that.

Ninety-five percent is way to generous of a number. It is actually so close to 100% that it is almost 100%. The thing that isn't said is that scientists who seem to believe in evolution, don't really. What they believe is that they have found evidence of evolution.

Zandar says it well when he says that they have found evidence of adaptation rather than evolution. If any and all scientists would examine their their so-called evolution in the light of adaptation, they would see that they are only attempting to believe.

If I were to show you and explain to you thousands of websites and books where so-called evolutionists were really only attempting to believe in evolution, but were not really believing it, according to the writings that they provided, you would only downplay the things that I showed you.

You are kinda right in talking religious talk. You are only doing the one thing that you can do... continue to promote evolution in a religious way. What else do you have? Certainly you don't have real evolution science on your side.

I am not going to provide you with more evidence for scientists who believe rather than know. Why not? Because essentially all evolution scientists are believers rather than those who know. Whatever of their writings you look at, you will find that the language they use shows that they are believers rather than knowledgeable "understanderers." It's in the language they use.

Evolution is a hoax.

Well, let's dissect the information given in your religious link shall we?

1. Michael Ruse acknowledges that evolution is religious.

Surely just because a professor in philosophy and history says he doesn't believe in evolution it doesn't mean that almost all scientists don't believe in it too.

2. But since evolution asks the same questions as religion—telling us where we came from, where we’re going, and what we should do on the way.

Does evolution tell us where we came from? Not really, that's still up to debate, there are various scientific fields trying to explain how we originated but that's not part of evolution.
It also doesn't tell us where we are going, no one knows what's going to happen, I don't really understand this point.
When does evolution tell you what to do along the way exactly? This is just plain stupid.


So to recap, you claim that 95% or more scientists do not believe in evolution yet you failed to provide evidence for it. The only thing you did is post a link of a religious websites that talks about 3-4 people that do not believe in evolution.

Evolution is indeed the biggest hoax there is. If there was it would still be ongoing and yet every human all over the planet is still the same. The changes in nature aren't evolution, it is adaptation. Most scientific facts turn out to be nonsense when examined closely anyway. They are just theories voted by other scientists to be promoted as facts.

Any website can post factual information... even a religious website. However, not all religious websites post factual information.

For example, the religious website that I posted (https://answersingenesis.org/public-school/religion-in-schools/the-religion-of-evolution/) has factual info in it. One of the pieces of factual info in it, is that honest evolutionists know that evolution doesn't really have a leg to stand on.

What does this mean? It means that all the websites and books that promote evolution as fact are religious websites and books. Why? Because they are promoting something (evolution) that doesn't have a leg to stand on.

The hoax of evolution isn't in the theory of evolution, or the talk about supposed evolution findings. The hoax is when the theory and the findings are promoted as fact by evolutionists who know that evolution doesn't have a leg to stand on. For people who believe that evolution is fact, without knowing it from personal observation, study, and thought... these people are religious people regarding evolution.

Evolution is a hoax.



EDIT: Btw, Astargath. Thank you for helping me to show folks that evolution is a hoax.

''It's hard to find a website that is not religious talking about how evolution is impossible, I wonder why...'' And what does badecker do, post a link of a creationist website, what a surprise eh?

You ask "Where is the evidence for this, though?" But your eyes forget to look at the post directly above the one wherein you ask this question, to find the answer.

That same post presents a smattering of evolutionists talking about how evolution is little more than faith in its theory. Evolution theory exists; that is fact. The other fact is that it is kept alive as a theory by people who want it to be true... not by any fact of the existence of evolution.

Tanner talks about evolution. He bases his points on the idea of evolution that has been shown to be a metaphysical thing rather than a factual thing. There are reasons other than evolution for Tanner's "For example, we have ample evidence of traits in populations becoming more or less common over time (evolution), so evolution is a fact..." The "overarching theories about evolution" are simply that so little evolution fact exists that evolution is a religion for lack of these fact. See https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.29686165, which is only a smattering of logic expressed by the great thinkers of evolution and science.

''But the scientists that are involved in evolution studies are finding that evolution doesn't work.'' Where is the evidence for this, though?

''We can see it in many of the books, and in websites that talk about the fallacies of evolution.'' It's hard to find a website that is not religious talking about how evolution is impossible, I wonder why...

Evolution is a fact, explained by the evolution theory which is a scientific theory. A hypothesis is an idea that hasn't been proven yet. If enough evidence accumulates to support a hypothesis, it moves to the next step — known as a theory — in the scientific method and becomes accepted as a valid explanation of a phenomenon.

Tanner further explained that a scientific theory is the framework for observations and facts. Theories may change, or the way that they are interpreted may change, but the facts themselves don't change. Tanner likens theories to a basket in which scientists keep facts and observations that they find. The shape of that basket may change as the scientists learn more and include more facts. "For example, we have ample evidence of traits in populations becoming more or less common over time (evolution), so evolution is a fact but the overarching theories about evolution, the way that we think all of the facts go together might change as new observations of evolution are made.

The Religion of Evolution:

Read more at https://answersingenesis.org/public-school/religion-in-schools/the-religion-of-evolution/.

Sometimes others evolve slowly than our race man The problem is that we can't evolve and apopt but you can't even see this because you are stupid haha.

Monkeys were created with body, head, eyes, ears, hairs, tongue, feet, heart and mind or simply like a human in physical matter. Animals were created first before human being in this planet. If man was from ape what ugly man kind is. Human is human after 10 years, 20 yrs, 50 yrs, 100yrs, 500yrs and 1000yrs. I didn't see anything man turn to ape, or ape turn to man. The beliefs of evolution can make the students to amiss miserable lie thruth forever. Evolution seems good when the student doesn't have any idea regarding of creation. Most acceptable to believe man is man forever and ape is ape forever. Unless science make involve with this, there will be a big change of discovery.

Heh. In reality we are characters inside some sort of simulation or videogame. Maybe some sort of jazzed up pixels, created to entertain our creators.  Or maybe I have been seeing too much Matrix and playing too much No Man's Sky...  

Evolution works. How? Understanding of evolution is evolving.

Scientists not involved in evolution studies simply accept the word of scientists that are. But the scientists that are involved in evolution studies are finding that evolution doesn't work. Their evolution of old evolution talk into new evolution talk simply hasn't come about in great detail yet. So, other scientists who are not evolution scientists continue to believe the unevolved word of the evolution scientists.

Evolution is evolving into something that is impossible in the minds of evolution scientists. These scientists are starting to accept evolution on faith that it MUST be real... rather than on knowledge. One of the rather out-in-the-open ways that I have shown in different posts in this thread is, dating of fossils is so mixed up that there is no clear pattern for how evolution might work by the physical evidence.

How do WE, the more-or-less laymen of science, know this is true? We can see it in many of the books, and in websites that talk about the fallacies of evolution. Once we look at the fallacies, even if we are layman, we in the same way as the scientists that are NOT evolution scientists, see that it takes a whole lot more faith to believe in evolution than it does to believe that evolution is a hoax.

Supposed evidence for evolution is evidence for ways other than evolution, way more than it is evidence for evolution. Evolution people are simply waking up to this fact that has been there all along.

Isn't it about time that you come out of evolution silliness? Join the many people - many of them evolution scientists - who are realizing that evolution has been a big mistake all along.

Evolution is a hoax.

''They, themselves, say that they don't know.''

''Probably close to less than 5% of the scientists accept evolution theory as accurate. They have scientifically seen the flaws in it.''

Yet you never provided anything close to evidence for these claims. You won't find any evidence because they are false.

''When you rely on the sayings of others without understanding what you are talking about '' I don't understand how computers work yet I don't deny their existence. I might not understand evolution with all the technical details but the concept is extremely easy to understand, you are the only one who denies it, the problem is that you deny it to be able to believe in your fictional god not because you actually thought it was wrong. You already had the idea that it has to be wrong because your god wouldn't exist if it wasnt.

The theory of evolution States that all living beings are multiform derived from one common ancestor. According to this theory, the appearance of living beings that are so diverse occurs through small variations and gradual in the span of a very long time. This theory States that the one-celled living things originally formed. For hundreds of million years later, this single-celled creatures turned into fish and animal invertebrates (spineless rear) that live in the sea. These fish then allegedly appeared to land and turned into reptiles. This fairy tale continues, and so on until the statement that birds and mammals evolved from reptiles.

I do not believe this theory either. But people in ancient times look like monkeys. Maybe that's why it's called theory.

Evolution is fictitious. God created humans . same way humans made cups,cars,aeroplane, etc

That is not how evolution works my friend. Evolution is more than just a theory, it is fact. One that is not only backed by science but also by logic. If you don't believe in evolution it simply means you haven't learned about it. Once you learn about it, denying seem absolutely ridiculous.