Humans evolved a trick.
America's most famous ecologist Dr Is also a level of professional scientists have recently made a very shocked: after and a number of scientists' research, find the origin of human beings is not in the earth, but in 200000-60000 years ago was alien to the earth!
Topic: Evolution is a hoax - page 99. (Read 108046 times)
The theory of evolution might be true. Not only for human but for any species. In the theory, it states that individuals cannot evolve, they can only adapt to their environments. Those adaptations add up over time and, eventually, the entire species has evolved from what it was like earlier.
This can lead to new species forming and sometimes extinction of older species. When it comes to human, there might be evolution happened but I don't think we are really from monkey .
This can lead to new species forming and sometimes extinction of older species. When it comes to human, there might be evolution happened but I don't think we are really from monkey .
Humanity from hairy apes evolved into smooth skin according to the theory of evolution to explain the process of human is the original humans really evolve from land to sea, and later evolved to land from the sea, and then evolved into the ocean, with the three or four times and evolved as expected from the lungs and evolution in the gills breathe and evolution in the lungs, ancient people is too great, is too strong, too I drop a god, too want to evolve to evolve into what you, really I drop a god!
The Bible simply says: “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.” (Genesis 1:1)
Well, actually, the Bible says a little more than that. Go here http://www.albatrus.org/english/theology/creation/biblical_age_earth.htm to see how the Bible shows us that the earth is a little more than 6,000 years old.
If Evolution is a hoax, then how can carbon-14 say things like 80.000 old artifacts being found all over the world?
And it was proven that carbon-14 works.
Because otherwise, as some say, Earth is only 6000 years old.
Which also means that someone is wrong.
And it was proven that carbon-14 works.
Because otherwise, as some say, Earth is only 6000 years old.
Which also means that someone is wrong.
Especially when they find some objects that they carbon dating dates 10,000 years into the future
At the end of the day, we only know how we got here after we die.
After we die? We don't know anything - we don't exist any longer.
The proof of god being a hoax is confirmed at every death. Nothing happens to you after death. That is hard to understand for people who believe they are "special".
That's why God will raise us all in the Resurrection at the last day.
Evolution is made to discredit the majestic work of God the creator.
Yes, the entire argument comes down to science vs magic.
Hypocrites denounce science while they use it every minute. :/
God made science. If you renounce God, you are renouncing science.
This topic is not about EVOLUTION it's about religious people who cannot get over an imaginary brain friend ..
RELIGION IS FOR CABBAGES ..
Or really rich people OH I AM SO LUCK SOMEONE LOOKING DOWN ON ME..
Yes i feel the same when i get a 8 fold bet in ..
RELIGION IS FOR CABBAGES ..
Or really rich people OH I AM SO LUCK SOMEONE LOOKING DOWN ON ME..
Yes i feel the same when i get a 8 fold bet in
..Thank you, again, for finally admitting that evolution is a religion.
these religious groups are accepting evolution more and more if they truly believe in god?
Thank you for finally admitting that evolution is a religion.
You said:
''Yet, somehow, lots of non-scientists suddenly think that the scientists say that evolution is true''
I responded to that showing you statistics that we don't just think scientists say evolution is true, they actually do say evolution is true.
So, keep on talking religion. None of the speaking or writing scientists have any proof. The evidence fits creation better.
Evolution is a hoax.
If that was true we wouldn't have less than 5% of scientists that believe in creation.
But creation and religion aren't the point of this topic. Probably close to less than 5% of the scientists accept evolution theory as accurate. They have scientifically seen the flaws in it. They just don't know. But many of them are realizing that there is, scientifically understood, intelligent design shown in the universe. And they are beginning to realize that...
Evolution is a hoax.
Oh, they just don't know. You know better than them badecker, go tell them!!
Thank you for the compliment. But you are mistaken. They, themselves, say that they don't know.
Evolution is a hoax.
I mean I can link more data showing virtually every scientist and all science agrees that evolution is true but you are going to say something stupid so it's pointless.
You are going to link their signed affidavits, with locations to where these are recorded in government recording offices, as well?
Polls can be twisted to show anything. Websites can proclaim anything. We are looking for proof. Let's see their signed affidavits, for starters.
Evolution is a hoax.
Badecker is the type of guy that will say ''scientists do not believe in evolution'' without giving any type of evidence. I can link here 20 different polls and websites saying they do, can you link at least 1 that says most scientists think evolution is not true?
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/07/13/creationism-evolution-template-for-easing-divisions-tom-krattenmaker-column/467800001/
Even religious people like you have to accept evolution now, most religions do already. They are forced to because the science supporting it is too strong, otherwise why do you think all these religious groups are accepting evolution more and more if they truly believe in god?
Let's see BADecker's signed affidavit with the location where it is recorded in government recording offices, as well. Other than that, how would you know that BADecker says something like that? You might claim it, but if you do without in-context evidence, you are proving to be one of those jokers that twists things to suggest something different than what the speaker said.
Since this is what you so often do, you are showing us all that you can't find any practical thing that proves that evolution exists. When you rely on the sayings of others without understanding what you are talking about enough to speak about it clearly, you have a religion going for yourself. And that is what evolution is... a religion, at best. But really...
Evolution is a hoax.
Your site linked above debunks itself, it doesn't prove evolution is impossible. We have seen evolution in the peppered moth or the Live Birth in Three-toed Skinks.
https://listverse.com/2011/11/19/8-examples-of-evolution-in-action/
https://www.thoughtco.com/how-evolution-has-been-observed-249896
Say, thanks for the nice examples of complex cause and effect in action. If you want to call programmed C&E activity evolution, that's entirely up to you, of course. But it is in no way evolution as evolution scientists interpret evolution. And it isn't any greater than breeding, although it may be a little different. No proof of evolution in them.
Evolution is a hoax.
If you want to keep claiming that everything has a cause, you can but it wont make you right. You said that science supports this, yet you never shown a single scientist or a science field that says everything has a cause.
Badecker is a liar, he will often ignore past comments to fuel his delusion. What you are writing here is a hoax too because it has a cause.
If you want to claim that there is something that doesn't have a cause - AT LEAST ONE SOMETHING - perhaps you can suggest it to us? The only suggestion you have given so far, has something to do with radiation or radioactivity or radioactive half life. However, scientists have caused new radioactive materials/elements to exist in the lab, if only momentarily. So, it isn't radioactivity that doesn't have a cause.
We see that there are billions, or trillions, or countless numbers of things that have causes. But we haven't found even one thing that has no cause. The focus is, what does this have to do with evolution? Here's what.
There is no proof for evolution mutation that was not caused. If all the mutations were caused, the next step is to determine the fundamentals of mutation causality.
One simple determination is that the causes of mutations follow the laws of physics of the universe. If they didn't, they wouldn't be part of this universe.
Another determination has to do with exactness. Since the mutations were cause in exactly the way that they were caused, that means that their causes (which were effects of other causes) were placed into THEIR activities in exactly the way THEY were, by the causes that cause THEM. This goes all the way back to the Beginning, which is shown to exist (and not really that far back into the past) because entropy has barely reduced and dispersed complexity. We have no other evidence, and certainly no other proof.
Since we see no causative agent that could cause the universe (after looking all over the place; big bang is lacking in multitudes of areas regarding explaining observed complexity), the only conclusion we can draw is that it was something outside of the universe that was the Great First Cause.
Because of the great complexity necessary for causing a complex universe like ours, the Great First Cause matches our definitions of God, entirely negates the our evolution theory, and turns any thoughts of evolution into complex change. This matches the first of the two mutation determinations, above.
Evolution is a Hoax.
I read all twice, didn't understood a thing. A true politician you are.
How to tell if the earth is older than 6 thousand years..
Dig a big hole in the ground in a field keep digging and digging and the deeper you go you will find stones smooth and round?..
Just think they had to of been rolling to get the smooth and round effect so that means once water run
everywhere ..
So the deeper you go in a empty field and find round stones you can imagine how long must of took to cover the earth with mud then make that stone be round and smooth..
So with a bit of thinking you know for fact the earth way older than lets say 70 generations of humans..
Way way older ..
And even being a human you yourself know we wasn't the first living things here..
so many many questions come into play when thinking the earth to be 6 thousand years old..
So if it's not 6 thousand years old then the bible is bullshit
..
And who learn't me this GOD NO MY LOGICAL THINKING expert in life lived a bit..
Dig a big hole in the ground in a field keep digging and digging and the deeper you go you will find stones smooth and round?..
Just think they had to of been rolling to get the smooth and round effect so that means once water run
everywhere ..
So the deeper you go in a empty field and find round stones you can imagine how long must of took to cover the earth with mud then make that stone be round and smooth..
So with a bit of thinking you know for fact the earth way older than lets say 70 generations of humans..
Way way older ..
And even being a human you yourself know we wasn't the first living things here..
so many many questions come into play when thinking the earth to be 6 thousand years old..
So if it's not 6 thousand years old then the bible is bullshit
..And who learn't me this GOD
NO MY LOGICAL THINKING expert in life lived a bit.. If Evolution is a hoax, then how can carbon-14 say things like 80.000 old artifacts being found all over the world?
And it was proven that carbon-14 works.
Because otherwise, as some say, Earth is only 6000 years old.
Which also means that someone is wrong.
Because otherwise, as some say, Earth is only 6000 years old. WRONG And it was proven that carbon-14 works.
Because otherwise, as some say, Earth is only 6000 years old.
Which also means that someone is wrong.
they still think it's way older than 6 thousand years old..
Libby introduces radiocarbon dating 1947. In 1940 Martin Kamen discovered radioactive carbon-14 (an isotope of carbon) and found that it had a half-life of about 5,700 years. Scientists had also found that some of the nitrogen in the atmosphere was turned into carbon-14 when hit with cosmic rays. Thus, an equilibrium
1947 are you saying everyone thought the earth to be 6 thousand years old?..
Because otherwise, as some say, Earth is only 6000 years old.< A DILDO
So how old do YOU think the planet is then?
..If you walk in the night if you walk in the day if you smell the wind and feel the rain and play in the snow you know for fact the earth way way older than 6 thousand years old..
OH but you do
..I know so do the POW WOW Indians.. To smell the wind and feel the rain..See if you walk a lot and see many earth things like a broken rock that's turned round and smooth
you know it takes time..Just like a tree..
Pow wows would never say 6 thousand years old..They moved from place to place and that's how they would know by the earth changes..
Indian people believe that the Creator gave everything a spirit. The earth itself is alive. The earth is often called “Our Mother” because she gives us everything we need to live. The eagle is a bird of great strength. It can fly very high and it has very good eyes. We pray with our eagle feathers, so the spirit of the eagle can lift ...
THEY KNOW LIKE I DO...I feel it..
The earth itself is alive.
so recycle ..
The Bible simply says: “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.” (Genesis 1:1)
surely it is a hoax monkey will always remain to be a monkey it will only grow then die or even die while it is young just like men do
Evolution was just something they had to teach us in school to fill up the syllabus
Evolution was just something they had to teach us in school to fill up the syllabus
If Evolution is a hoax, then how can carbon-14 say things like 80.000 old artifacts being found all over the world?
And it was proven that carbon-14 works.
Because otherwise, as some say, Earth is only 6000 years old.
Which also means that someone is wrong.
Because otherwise, as some say, Earth is only 6000 years old. WRONG And it was proven that carbon-14 works.
Because otherwise, as some say, Earth is only 6000 years old.
Which also means that someone is wrong.
they still think it's way older than 6 thousand years old..
Libby introduces radiocarbon dating 1947. In 1940 Martin Kamen discovered radioactive carbon-14 (an isotope of carbon) and found that it had a half-life of about 5,700 years. Scientists had also found that some of the nitrogen in the atmosphere was turned into carbon-14 when hit with cosmic rays. Thus, an equilibrium
1947 are you saying everyone thought the earth to be 6 thousand years old?..
Because otherwise, as some say, Earth is only 6000 years old.< A DILDO
So how old do YOU think the planet is then?
If Evolution is a hoax, then how can carbon-14 say things like 80.000 old artifacts being found all over the world?
And it was proven that carbon-14 works.
Because otherwise, as some say, Earth is only 6000 years old.
Which also means that someone is wrong.
Because otherwise, as some say, Earth is only 6000 years old. WRONG And it was proven that carbon-14 works.
Because otherwise, as some say, Earth is only 6000 years old.
Which also means that someone is wrong.
they still think it's way older than 6 thousand years old..
Libby introduces radiocarbon dating 1947. In 1940 Martin Kamen discovered radioactive carbon-14 (an isotope of carbon) and found that it had a half-life of about 5,700 years. Scientists had also found that some of the nitrogen in the atmosphere was turned into carbon-14 when hit with cosmic rays. Thus, an equilibrium
1947 are you saying everyone thought the earth to be 6 thousand years old?..
Because otherwise, as some say, Earth is only 6000 years old.< A DILDO
If Evolution is a hoax, then how can carbon-14 say things like 80.000 old artifacts being found all over the world?
And it was proven that carbon-14 works.
Because otherwise, as some say, Earth is only 6000 years old.
Which also means that someone is wrong.
And it was proven that carbon-14 works.
Because otherwise, as some say, Earth is only 6000 years old.
Which also means that someone is wrong.
I guess these were only made as theories which does not prove how we were created at all.. At the end of the day, we only know how we got here after we die. That is if we go somewhere else and not just total darkness.
we only know how we got here after we die.NO NO NO 
CRAZY DUDE
Jump to: