....if a user is smarter enough to find a way to make profit with those rules then they shouldn't block users withdrawals.
It would be nice if you could site an example of this user before we argue if he's really smart enough and operating within the casino rules. I've seen cases where users create different accounts so they could abuse the faucet. They cry or complain about it when they get caught by the casino's anti-fraud system.
Topic: Faucet and Bonus Farming - page 9. (Read 1231 times)
The casinos sets the rules of the game, and if a user is smarter enough to find a way to make profit with those rules then they shouldn't block users withdrawals.
So, what do you think about this?
So, what do you think about this?
Most casinos have some form of "fair use" clause in their terms of service. This means that if a casino believes a player is abusing their platform, they reserve the right to block or suspend any accounts. These clauses are often vague, so it's hard to know exactly what constitutes as "fair use", but faucet and bonus farming are two forms of abuse that are fairly common and clearly against the rules. While there's nothing wrong with playing the casino games for free, some people will go to great lengths to get as much money out of it as possible. This can include setting up multiple accounts and using them simultaneously, or opening new accounts every time they're blocked so that they can continue farming without having to wait for a cooldown period. Casinos are aware of these tactics, so they often employ algorithms that detect suspicious activity and suspend or ban players who abuse their platform. So it's important to know what qualifies as fair use before you start using a casino's services.
Here the gambling site should correct themselves than just stopping the withdrawal of the users who were able to claim bonus/faucets. This is wrong and it shouldn't be done. It is very rare to see similar incidents taking place with Casinos. These kind of errors mostly happen with Exchanges.
When a casino stops the withdrawal of an user, it should have the proper reason. These days the power of centralized system can be seen on gambling sites when a person experience big wins in a series and goes for withdrawal.
When a casino stops the withdrawal of an user, it should have the proper reason. These days the power of centralized system can be seen on gambling sites when a person experience big wins in a series and goes for withdrawal.
I have seen more than 2 casinos locking user accounts for this action, and is it really the users fault?
If the users claims tons of faucets or bonus is because the casino engine allows it, and if the casino is losing money with this action they should fix their code to avoid this problem and not steal users money.
The casinos sets the rules of the game, and if a user is smarter enough to find a way to make profit with those rules then they shouldn't block users withdrawals.
So, what do you think about this?
If the users claims tons of faucets or bonus is because the casino engine allows it, and if the casino is losing money with this action they should fix their code to avoid this problem and not steal users money.
The casinos sets the rules of the game, and if a user is smarter enough to find a way to make profit with those rules then they shouldn't block users withdrawals.
So, what do you think about this?
Jump to: