First BFL ASIC! - page 12. | Bitcointalksearch.org

BR0KK

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 500

Quote from: Gator-hex on April 03, 2013, 05:40:47 PM

Quote from: bittenbob on April 03, 2013, 05:20:40 PM

Quote from: Gator-hex on April 03, 2013, 04:56:59 PM

LOL it's 100% of a 25GH/s Mini Rig (FPGA) Wink

Would it be possible to take an IR photo of the device hashing? Most IR cameras I have used have PIP or SBS with standard digital cameras. You could quickly dispel this rumor by taking an IR photo with the same setup in the picture (showing hashrate).

I'd like to see a video of it mining, showing first the usb lead being connected at both ends, and the mining program being started from scratch.

Ohhh a real wild ASIC: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aPeen7AJA-o
No fake or is it?

Would you believe this if they do this given their history?

Gator-hex

hero member

Activity: 490

Merit: 500

Quote from: bittenbob on April 03, 2013, 05:20:40 PM

Quote from: Gator-hex on April 03, 2013, 04:56:59 PM

LOL it's 100% of a 25GH/s Mini Rig (FPGA) Wink

Would it be possible to take an IR photo of the device hashing? Most IR cameras I have used have PIP or SBS with standard digital cameras. You could quickly dispel this rumor by taking an IR photo with the same setup in the picture (showing hashrate).

I'd like to see a video of it mining, showing first the usb lead being connected at both ends, and the mining program being started from scratch.

muyuu

donator

Activity: 980

Merit: 1000

I think the whole discussion is bollocks.

Shipped means shipped to customers. This product is not finished.

Minor Miner

legendary

Activity: 2464

Merit: 1020

Be A Digital Miner

Luke: When do you expect to get the unit? Wouldn't it be easier if you had it there to tinker with? Do you have to call them each time you need to cycle something? I would think they should just ship it to you?

BR0KK

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 500

Quote from: SgtSpike on April 03, 2013, 05:22:05 PM

Quote from: BR0KK on April 03, 2013, 05:06:15 PM

Quote from: Unacceptable on April 03, 2013, 04:11:30 PM

Quote from: Syke on April 03, 2013, 04:06:09 PM

Quote from: Luke-Jr on April 03, 2013, 01:44:44 PM

Although... I'd have expected a competent judge to contact me and ask my opinion on whether the device is capable of the 27 Gh/s required, in case my current results were the result of software issues. But it's immaterial, since as best as I can tell so far, I'm getting the most performance out of it that it can handle.

75% of 40 GH/s is 30 GH/s. The device didn't come close to the required speed for the bet. The bet was clearly won.

It was a 30GH unit (Little SC),not the 40 or 60GH unit..............................

Does this make this any better? Was the little SC even included in the bet? Common opinion is that this is not the case?!

Well, I'm not sure anyone confirmed how many chips were in it either. If they were running a full 8 chips @ 25GH/s, then it doesn't come close to 75%.

Sad thing with their information politics we will never know .... Speculating is all we have :/

SgtSpike

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1005

Quote from: BR0KK on April 03, 2013, 05:06:15 PM

Quote from: Unacceptable on April 03, 2013, 04:11:30 PM

Quote from: Syke on April 03, 2013, 04:06:09 PM

Quote from: Luke-Jr on April 03, 2013, 01:44:44 PM

Although... I'd have expected a competent judge to contact me and ask my opinion on whether the device is capable of the 27 Gh/s required, in case my current results were the result of software issues. But it's immaterial, since as best as I can tell so far, I'm getting the most performance out of it that it can handle.

75% of 40 GH/s is 30 GH/s. The device didn't come close to the required speed for the bet. The bet was clearly won.

It was a 30GH unit (Little SC),not the 40 or 60GH unit..............................

Does this make this any better? Was the little SC even included in the bet? Common opinion is that this is not the case?!

Well, I'm not sure anyone confirmed how many chips were in it either. If they were running a full 8 chips @ 25GH/s, then it doesn't come close to 75%.

bittenbob

hero member

Activity: 560

Merit: 500

Quote from: Gator-hex on April 03, 2013, 04:56:59 PM

LOL it's 100% of a 25GH/s Mini Rig (FPGA) Wink

Would it be possible to take an IR photo of the device hashing? Most IR cameras I have used have PIP or SBS with standard digital cameras. You could quickly dispel this rumor by taking an IR photo with the same setup in the picture (showing hashrate).

BR0KK

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 500

Quote from: Unacceptable on April 03, 2013, 04:11:30 PM

Quote from: Syke on April 03, 2013, 04:06:09 PM

Quote from: Luke-Jr on April 03, 2013, 01:44:44 PM

Although... I'd have expected a competent judge to contact me and ask my opinion on whether the device is capable of the 27 Gh/s required, in case my current results were the result of software issues. But it's immaterial, since as best as I can tell so far, I'm getting the most performance out of it that it can handle.

75% of 40 GH/s is 30 GH/s. The device didn't come close to the required speed for the bet. The bet was clearly won.

It was a 30GH unit (Little SC),not the 40 or 60GH unit..............................

Does this make this any better? Was the little SC even included in the bet? Common opinion is that this is not the case?!

Gator-hex

hero member

Activity: 490

Merit: 500

Quote from: FreshJR on April 03, 2013, 04:26:04 PM

Quote from: Unacceptable on April 03, 2013, 04:11:30 PM

Quote from: Syke on April 03, 2013, 04:06:09 PM

Quote from: Luke-Jr on April 03, 2013, 01:44:44 PM

Although... I'd have expected a competent judge to contact me and ask my opinion on whether the device is capable of the 27 Gh/s required, in case my current results were the result of software issues. But it's immaterial, since as best as I can tell so far, I'm getting the most performance out of it that it can handle.

75% of 40 GH/s is 30 GH/s. The device didn't come close to the required speed for the bet. The bet was clearly won.

It was a 30GH unit (Little SC),not the 40 or 60GH unit..............................

LittleSC was not mentioned in the bet or announced when the bet was created.

3 products were mentioned in the yahoo artical libked from the bet.

LOL it's 100% of a 25GH/s Mini Rig (FPGA) Wink

FreshJR

member

Activity: 65

Merit: 10

Quote from: Unacceptable on April 03, 2013, 04:11:30 PM

Quote from: Syke on April 03, 2013, 04:06:09 PM

Quote from: Luke-Jr on April 03, 2013, 01:44:44 PM

Although... I'd have expected a competent judge to contact me and ask my opinion on whether the device is capable of the 27 Gh/s required, in case my current results were the result of software issues. But it's immaterial, since as best as I can tell so far, I'm getting the most performance out of it that it can handle.

75% of 40 GH/s is 30 GH/s. The device didn't come close to the required speed for the bet. The bet was clearly won.

It was a 30GH unit (Little SC),not the 40 or 60GH unit..............................

LittleSC was not mentioned in the bet or announced when the bet was created.

3 products were mentioned in the yahoo artical libked from the bet.

eldentyrell

donator

Activity: 980

Merit: 1004

felonious vagrancy, personified

Quote from: GenTarkin on April 03, 2013, 12:51:36 AM

a fucking draw?! wow...thats sad.

And this is why betsofbitcoin is a total joke.

Every time their website's name is used in the same sentence as the phrase "prediction market" baby jesus cries.

Unacceptable

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1001

Quote from: Syke on April 03, 2013, 04:06:09 PM

Quote from: Luke-Jr on April 03, 2013, 01:44:44 PM

Although... I'd have expected a competent judge to contact me and ask my opinion on whether the device is capable of the 27 Gh/s required, in case my current results were the result of software issues. But it's immaterial, since as best as I can tell so far, I'm getting the most performance out of it that it can handle.

75% of 40 GH/s is 30 GH/s. The device didn't come close to the required speed for the bet. The bet was clearly won.

It was a 30GH unit (Little SC),not the 40 or 60GH unit..............................

Syke

legendary

Activity: 3878

Merit: 1193

Quote from: Luke-Jr on April 03, 2013, 01:44:44 PM

Although... I'd have expected a competent judge to contact me and ask my opinion on whether the device is capable of the 27 Gh/s required, in case my current results were the result of software issues. But it's immaterial, since as best as I can tell so far, I'm getting the most performance out of it that it can handle.

75% of 40 GH/s is 30 GH/s. The device didn't come close to the required speed for the bet. The bet was clearly won.

Dalkore

legendary

Activity: 1330

Merit: 1026

Mining since 2010 & Hosting since 2012

Quote from: Luke-Jr on April 03, 2013, 01:44:44 PM

Quote from: Phinnaeus Gage on April 03, 2013, 12:55:00 PM

Quote from: ebildude123 on April 03, 2013, 12:50:20 PM

Won the bitbet bet for those who bet on that,
sorry for those who bet on bestofbitcoin Tongue

Am I reading this correctly? Two different sites with the same bet, but one awards and the other declares a draw?

The bitbet one was clearly won by those betting against BFL. It only allowed +/- 10% of hashrate, which BFL has failed to meet so far.

Although... I'd have expected a competent judge to contact me and ask my opinion on whether the device is capable of the 27 Gh/s required, in case my current results were the result of software issues. But it's immaterial, since as best as I can tell so far, I'm getting the most performance out of it that it can handle.

Thank you Luke-Jr. I am surprised that you did not get contacted.

BR0KK

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 500

Quote from: Luke-Jr on April 03, 2013, 01:44:44 PM

Quote from: Phinnaeus Gage on April 03, 2013, 12:55:00 PM

Quote from: ebildude123 on April 03, 2013, 12:50:20 PM

Won the bitbet bet for those who bet on that,
sorry for those who bet on bestofbitcoin Tongue

Am I reading this correctly? Two different sites with the same bet, but one awards and the other declares a draw?

The bitbet one was clearly won by those betting against BFL. It only allowed +/- 10% of hashrate, which BFL has failed to meet so far.

Although... I'd have expected a competent judge to contact me and ask my opinion on whether the device is capable of the 27 Gh/s required, in case my current results were the result of software issues. But it's immaterial, since as best as I can tell so far, I'm getting the most performance out of it that it can handle.

How about making a good introduction post like you should have done in the first place?

Rampion

legendary

Activity: 1148

Merit: 1018

Quote from: Luke-Jr on April 03, 2013, 01:44:44 PM

Quote from: Phinnaeus Gage on April 03, 2013, 12:55:00 PM

Quote from: ebildude123 on April 03, 2013, 12:50:20 PM

Won the bitbet bet for those who bet on that,
sorry for those who bet on bestofbitcoin Tongue

Am I reading this correctly? Two different sites with the same bet, but one awards and the other declares a draw?

The bitbet one was clearly won by those betting against BFL. It only allowed +/- 10% of hashrate, which BFL has failed to meet so far.

Although... I'd have expected a competent judge to contact me and ask my opinion on whether the device is capable of the 27 Gh/s required, in case my current results were the result of software issues. But it's immaterial, since as best as I can tell so far, I'm getting the most performance out of it that it can handle.

So you consider this as "BFL is shipping"?

Come one, there are customers that invested a lot of money and the only thing they got so far are stupid excuses and delay after delay.

This is outrageous,

tbd

newbie

Activity: 45

Merit: 0

Quote from: Luke-Jr on April 03, 2013, 01:44:44 PM

Quote from: Phinnaeus Gage on April 03, 2013, 12:55:00 PM

Quote from: ebildude123 on April 03, 2013, 12:50:20 PM

Won the bitbet bet for those who bet on that,
sorry for those who bet on bestofbitcoin Tongue

Am I reading this correctly? Two different sites with the same bet, but one awards and the other declares a draw?

The bitbet one was clearly won by those betting against BFL. It only allowed +/- 10% of hashrate, which BFL has failed to meet so far.

Although... I'd have expected a competent judge to contact me and ask my opinion on whether the device is capable of the 27 Gh/s required, in case my current results were the result of software issues. But it's immaterial, since as best as I can tell so far, I'm getting the most performance out of it that it can handle.

As devices were not delivered to customers, the hash rate is moot.

Luke-Jr

legendary

Activity: 2576

Merit: 1186

Quote from: Phinnaeus Gage on April 03, 2013, 12:55:00 PM

Quote from: ebildude123 on April 03, 2013, 12:50:20 PM

Won the bitbet bet for those who bet on that,
sorry for those who bet on bestofbitcoin Tongue

Am I reading this correctly? Two different sites with the same bet, but one awards and the other declares a draw?

The bitbet one was clearly won by those betting against BFL. It only allowed +/- 10% of hashrate, which BFL has failed to meet so far.

Although... I'd have expected a competent judge to contact me and ask my opinion on whether the device is capable of the 27 Gh/s required, in case my current results were the result of software issues. But it's immaterial, since as best as I can tell so far, I'm getting the most performance out of it that it can handle.

SgtSpike

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1005

Quote from: Phinnaeus Gage on April 03, 2013, 12:55:00 PM

Quote from: ebildude123 on April 03, 2013, 12:50:20 PM

Won the bitbet bet for those who bet on that,
sorry for those who bet on bestofbitcoin Tongue

Am I reading this correctly? Two different sites with the same bet, but one awards and the other declares a draw?

The betsofbitco.in bet seems to have been TOO specific.

tbd

newbie

Activity: 45

Merit: 0

Quote from: Phinnaeus Gage on April 03, 2013, 12:55:00 PM

Quote from: ebildude123 on April 03, 2013, 12:50:20 PM

Won the bitbet bet for those who bet on that,
sorry for those who bet on bestofbitcoin Tongue

Am I reading this correctly? Two different sites with the same bet, but one awards and the other declares a draw?

Quote

BFL will deliver ASIC devices before April 1st

Butterfly Labs aka BFL will deliver ASIC Bitcoin mining devices to their customers before 1st of April 2013. Devices must be in scope of +-10% of advertised performance in order to be accepted as valid.

Bet outcome: No

http://bitbet.us/bet/265/bfl-will-deliver-asic-devices-before-april-1st/

Topic: First BFL ASIC! - page 12. (Read 58307 times)