^ Do you actually have some kind of point?
The moon is a holographic object with an angular size of 32 minutes and 1 minute = 1 nautical mile.
If you want to describe perspective, why not do it correctly?
If you want to get technical some eminent theoretical physicists say the whole universe might be a two-dimensional surface, like a hologram. How can you describe 3D perspective correctly in a 2D universe? Flat universe thread anyone?
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/information-in-the-holographic-univ/...our universe, which we perceive to have three spatial dimensions, might instead be written on a two-dimensional surface, like a hologram. Our everyday perceptions of the world as three-dimensional would then be either a profound illusion or merely one of two alternative ways of viewing reality. A grain of sand may not encompass our world, but a flat screen might.
https://www.southampton.ac.uk/news/2017/01/holographic-universe.pageTheoretical physicists and astrophysicists, investigating irregularities in the cosmic microwave background (the ‘afterglow’ of the Big Bang), have found there is substantial evidence supporting a holographic explanation of the universe – in fact, as much as there is for the traditional explanation of these irregularities using the theory of cosmic inflation.
The researchers, from the University of Southampton (UK), University of Waterloo (Canada), Perimeter Institute (Canada), INFN, Lecce (Italy) and the University of Salento (Italy), have published findings in the journal Physical Review Letters.
A holographic universe, an idea first suggested in the 1990s, is one where all the information, which makes up our 3D ‘reality’ (plus time) is contained in a 2D surface on its boundaries.
Scientists have been working for decades to combine Einstein’s theory of gravity and quantum theory. Some believe the concept of a holographic universe has the potential to reconcile the two.
Your camera is shit.
dfak?? 
