Flat Earth - page 21. | Bitcointalksearch.org

TwitchySeal

legendary

Activity: 2716

Merit: 2093

Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!

Quote from: notbatman on December 13, 2019, 07:07:51 PM

the sun is 32 nautical miles wide.

Did you use a sextant measure the sun? lol

Quote from: notbatman on December 13, 2019, 07:07:51 PM

^^^ I'm saying that 3 nautical miles is the maximum distance a 6 foot observer can see a 1 foot object and, that the sun is 32 nautical miles wide.

Did you know that Joe Rogan being so short, has his horizon closer than yours? The man literally lives in a smaller world than everybody else.

Did you know Joe Rogan is taller than the average human?

HI-TEC99

legendary

Activity: 2772

Merit: 2846

Quote from: notbatman on December 12, 2019, 09:01:52 PM

@HI-TEC99,

The test relies on a landmark of known distance. I could pull the sensor from a PXL-2000 and still fail the globe with a lens made from coke bottles.

Proving the earth is flat with a P1000 is like exterminating a mouse with a rail gun.

Whitney (shot in Pixelvision) PXL 2000 -- https://youtu.be/bSu7NjC51Xs

The Fisher-Price PXL2000 toy black-and-white camcorder is superior to your shit P1000. It was produced in 1987, and over 30 years later they still work.

Your shit P1000 broke within a month of this reviewer buying it. Your shit camera's lens is probably defective, and that's why it passes your flat Earth "test".

https://www.consumeraffairs.com/cameras/nikon.html

Quote

Purchased Coolpix P1000 on Dec 3, 2018 and within a month lens seemed loose. Sent in for repair. Came back after 3 weeks. No problem found and factory reset. After receiving it back still same, lens loose and unable to zoom past 1200mm as picture was blurry and then it started to not turn off or lens retract.

The PXL2000 would probably fail your flat Earth "test" because it's not a shit defective camera.

Your camera is shit.

notbatman

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1038

^^^ I'm saying that 3 nautical miles is the maximum distance a 6 foot observer can see a 1 foot object and, that the sun is 32 nautical miles wide.

Did you know that Joe Rogan being so short, has his horizon closer than yours? The man literally lives in a smaller world than everybody else.

TwitchySeal

legendary

Activity: 2716

Merit: 2093

Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!

Quote from: notbatman on December 13, 2019, 01:30:49 PM

^^^ The angular resolution limit of the human eye is 1 minute, which corresponds to 1 foot at a 1/2 nautical mile distance. For a 6 foot observer, this equates to a horizon only 3 nautical miles away. This is that farthest the human eye can see.

Then add the limiting effects of the atmosphere to a locally illuminating 32 nautical mile wide sun.

The earth is large, the sun is small and we can only see so far.

Are you saying the sun is only 3 miles away?

notbatman

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1038

^^^ The angular resolution limit of the human eye is 1 minute, which corresponds to 1 foot at a 1/2 nautical mile distance. For a 6 foot observer, this equates to a horizon only 3 nautical miles away. This is that farthest the human eye can see.

Then add the limiting effects of the atmosphere to a locally illuminating 32 nautical mile wide sun.

The earth is large, the sun is small and we can only see so far.

nebtheweb

newbie

Activity: 4

Merit: 0

notbatman said

Quote

The sun is a close small object made from electrical plasma and it travels in a circle above us around the north pole. The earth is large enough that the sun only lights up part of the surface at once. The sun also has a yearly bi-annual lateral movement that accounts for the seasons.

No, it isn't close. Even on your flatopian fantasy earth if your itty bitty Sun is few thousand miles above your flat world it can NEVER EVER get close to the ground. You should be able to see it all 24 hours because flatopia can never get in the way to block its light. It should also shrink down to a small point of light if it is as ridiculously small as you believe, but it doesn't because the size of the Sun does not ever change during the day. In other words, Da Earf is not Phlat. There are more than a few problems with Flatopia and it's silly Sun and Moon as demonstrated.https://youtu.be/uexZbunD7Jg

notbatman

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1038

^^^ Knowing the earth is flat isn't a belief. It's like discovering your spouse sleeps around and that you're a massive cuckold. You can't ever go back to believing their lies.

DaveWave

sr. member

Activity: 806

Merit: 250

CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!

Quote from: josephsonand on December 13, 2019, 04:24:25 AM

Quote from: hornetsnest on December 11, 2019, 06:46:31 AM

Go on a first date with a girl in such a car

It is some kind of funny but it could do just fine if both are also flat earth believers. If not, it is hard to imagine how it works out. Unless you are changing the car into a Lamborghini, the other one might adjust. Cheesy

josephsonand

member

Activity: 273

Merit: 14

Quote from: hornetsnest on December 11, 2019, 06:46:31 AM

Go on a first date with a girl in such a car

notbatman

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1038

@HI-TEC99,

The test relies on a landmark of known distance. I could pull the sensor from a PXL-2000 and still fail the globe with a lens made from coke bottles.

Proving the earth is flat with a P1000 is like exterminating a mouse with a rail gun.

Whitney (shot in Pixelvision) PXL 2000 -- https://youtu.be/bSu7NjC51Xs

Cryptotourist

hero member

Activity: 1204

Merit: 755

Homo Sapiens Bitcoinerthalensis

Quote from: HI-TEC99 on December 12, 2019, 04:00:49 PM

Your camera is shit.

You're talking to Batty here, shit for brains - shit for camera, check. Lips sealed

HI-TEC99

legendary

Activity: 2772

Merit: 2846

Quote from: notbatman on December 12, 2019, 11:44:59 AM

Quote from: HI-TEC99 on December 11, 2019, 11:38:48 PM

...
So a basketball is round despite the P900 "evidence", but the Earth is flat because of your P1000 shit camera "evidence"?

The earth is not a globe, it fails a distance to the horizon test with a wide margin of error when a zoom lens is employed

Your P1000 only has a big zoom because it has a shit sensor. I bet you haven't even tried your "test" with a ‎$89,579 USD Canon EF 1200mm f/5.6 L USM.

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskPhotography/comments/8zk20g/do_you_think_the_nikon_coolpix_p1000_is_a_little/e2jk5g2/

Quote

The small sensor on the p1000 makes the ridonkulous focal length possible. If the sensor were bigger, the lens would have to be much, much bigger to cover it.

With that said, the sensor is "shitty" in the sense that a $200 D3100 will outperform it

Your camera is shit.

notbatman

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1038

Quote from: HI-TEC99 on December 11, 2019, 11:38:48 PM

...
So a basketball is round despite the P900 "evidence", but the Earth is flat because of your P1000 shit camera "evidence"?

The earth is not a globe, it fails a distance to the horizon test with a wide margin of error when a zoom lens is employed; the default is flat. The close-up of a basketball is a failed attempt a mockery, it literally shows a curve.

FDSS is bad, but it's the only one that works.

BTW I can fail the globe with any zoom lens that an angular resolution limit of less than 1 minute.

Cryptotourist

hero member

Activity: 1204

Merit: 755

Homo Sapiens Bitcoinerthalensis

Quote from: notbatman on December 11, 2019, 11:33:41 PM

I'm gonna call you out on that one.

You can't call anything, even if it was sitting on your nose.

I hope your charting is not as bad as your Photoshop skills, you extraordinary cunt.
The basketball is undeniably, observable & measurable flat - as is the Death Star, and anyone who that can't see that, better rope himself or bake in an oven. Roll Eyes

~ Sorry guys ~

On the other hand, our planet Earth is not flat - but rather a blue marble spinning into space.

HI-TEC99

legendary

Activity: 2772

Merit: 2846

Quote from: notbatman on December 11, 2019, 11:33:41 PM

@HI-TEC99,

I'm gonna call you out on that one.

So a basketball is round despite the P900 "evidence", but the Earth is flat because of your P1000 shit camera "evidence"?

notbatman

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1038

@HI-TEC99,

I'm gonna call you out on that one.

HI-TEC99

legendary

Activity: 2772

Merit: 2846

Quote from: notbatman on December 09, 2019, 10:48:27 PM

@HI-TEC99,

Canon EF 1200mm f/5.6 L USM
MSRP: ‎$89,579 USD

vs.

Nikon P1000 | Focal length (equiv.): 24–3000 mm
MSRP: $999.95 USD

Cheapskate, what's up with the $89,579 USD one?

These reviews all say your cheap camera is shit.

https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4351947

Quote

photo quality just seems to be utter crap

https://www.amazon.ca/gp/customer-reviews/R2CT25VVPCK8FT/ref=cm_cr_dp_d_rvw_ttl?ie=UTF8&ASIN=B07FMZF4Y7

Quote

the images are awful, this camera has wayyyyyy to small of a sensor, cell phones have a bigger better sensor than this has

https://www.amazon.ca/gp/customer-reviews/R3KLDU8ZQL3BNC/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_rvw_ttl?ie=UTF8&ASIN=B07FMZF4Y7

Quote

Picture quality is not very good and grainy. Forget low light photography with this one. They need to put in a better sensor

It's predecessor was so shit that someone used it to "prove" a basketball is flat.

Remind you of anything?

Is the death star flat too?

hornetsnest

hero member

Activity: 1466

Merit: 973

ComaWombat

member

Activity: 89

Merit: 11

I've never understood flat eathers' boners for cheap compact cameras like the Nikon P900 or its successor. They're hailed as the holy grails of cameras and when they're not able to focus correctly because of their cheap electronics and optics, the non-focused blurry images are considered to be the "true" forms of planets and stars by flat earthers. And vice versa, truly sharp pictures which are shot with better equipment and focused correctly are considered to be fakes produced by the illuminati or something.

Most sensible people would consider badly focused images as crap, but ghost hunters, flat eathers and UFO nuts thrive on crappy, shaken, badly focused and blurry images which are believed to show the "truth".

notbatman

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1038

@HI-TEC99,

Canon EF 1200mm f/5.6 L USM
MSRP: ‎$89,579 USD

vs.

Nikon P1000 | Focal length (equiv.): 24–3000 mm
MSRP: $999.95 USD

Topic: Flat Earth - page 21. (Read 1095196 times)