No, they work off the electric field created by the dome, this is what defines up and down.
Again, a special circumstance that exists only to back up your lie, and nowhere else in the universe.
Topic: Flat Earth - page 403. (Read 1095196 times)
Again, a special circumstance that exists only to back up your lie, and nowhere else in the universe.
There's no proof of gravity, it's biggest load of scientific bull that's ever been sold. Density and buoyancy explain why objects fall.
Proof of gravity is all around us. Density and buoyancy work off gravity.
No, they work off the electric field created by the dome, this is what defines up and down.
There's no proof of gravity, it's biggest load of scientific bull that's ever been sold. Density and buoyancy explain why objects fall.
Proof of gravity is all around us. Density and buoyancy work off gravity.
No object Moon or otherwise could be seen passing in front of the Sun during the eclipse. Thousands of photos with all sorts of filters and cameras and nothing was in front of the Sun. The globe theory can't even model the eclipse, it's too fucking broken.
Your lie is very weak. Millions of people doctored photographs and videos?
Science predicted the eclipse from many decades ago.
The Black Sun a 3rd invisible celestial object interacting with the Sun is a much more reasonable explanation.
Invisibility? You'll notice you continue to make up new lies and make special exceptions that do not exist anywhere else in the universe.
A more reasonable explanation is gravity - explains everything nicely.
There's no proof of gravity, it's biggest load of scientific bull that's ever been sold. Density and buoyancy explain why objects fall.
I don't like the way you prop up bullshit arguments and present them as science/physics.
Millions of people much smarter than you and I created those "bullshit arguments" and they have never been disproven.
That's what science is - proof until it is disproven.
Try coming up with a reasonable argument for your flat earth before you leap for proof. It may take another 450 pages....
The Sun not being overhead, the light has been reduced in visual size and has to pass through a lot of crap.
Get a stack of glass and shine a light through it then view it from a mile away, not the best example but you get the idea.
Get a stack of glass and shine a light through it then view it from a mile away, not the best example but you get the idea.
I like the way you use physics to try and disprove physics.
I don't like the way you prop up bullshit arguments and present them as science/physics. The boat doesn't go over the curve, water doesn't curve or stick to a ball much less a spinning one, a hard vacuum can't exist next to a pressurize volume of air, the Sun's rays don't hit the Earth in parallel when claiming two sticks in the ground proves the Earth a globe then in the next breth claim they converge to form an umbra during the eclipse. I can go on an and on with the absolutly probably false bullshit the globalists claim...
No object Moon or otherwise could be seen passing in front of the Sun during the eclipse. Thousands of photos with all sorts of filters and cameras and nothing was in front of the Sun. The globe theory can't even model the eclipse, it's too fucking broken.
Your lie is very weak. Millions of people doctored photographs and videos?
Science predicted the eclipse from many decades ago.
The Black Sun a 3rd invisible celestial object interacting with the Sun is a much more reasonable explanation.
Invisibility? You'll notice you continue to make up new lies and make special exceptions that do not exist anywhere else in the universe.
A more reasonable explanation is gravity - explains everything nicely.
Flat earthers want you to believe the sunlight only goes as far as the north pole (magically), yet hits the moon.
This lie also cannot explain the recent solar eclipse, where millions of people saw the moon pass between the earth and sun.
No object Moon or otherwise could be seen passing in front of the Sun during the eclipse. Thousands of photos with all sorts of filters and cameras and nothing was in front of the Sun. The globe theory can't even model the eclipse, it's too fucking broken. The Black Sun a 3rd invisible celestial object interacting with the Sun is a much more reasonable explanation.
The Sun not being overhead, the light has been reduced in visual size and has to pass through a lot of crap.
Get a stack of glass and shine a light through it then view it from a mile away, not the best example but you get the idea.
Get a stack of glass and shine a light through it then view it from a mile away, not the best example but you get the idea.
I like the way you use physics to try and disprove physics.
Perspective and the atmosphere prevent the Sun from being visible across the entire planet. I believe I've answered and explained this in detail many times now.
See? Another lie to help makes sense of previous lies. I can see the sun every day through the atmosphere. What stops part of the planet from seeing the same light is the planet itself.
The Sun not being overhead, the light has been reduced in visual size and has to pass through a lot of crap.
Get a stack of glass and shine a light through it then view it from a mile away, not the best example but you get the idea.
Flat earthers want you to believe the sunlight only goes as far as the north pole (magically), yet hits the moon.
This lie also cannot explain the recent solar eclipse, where millions of people saw the moon pass between the earth and sun.
Perspective and the atmosphere prevent the Sun from being visible across the entire planet. I believe I've answered and explained this in detail many times now.
See? Another lie to help makes sense of previous lies. I can see the sun every day through the atmosphere. What stops part of the planet from seeing the same light is the planet itself.
The dome wall is electrically charged with trillions of volts, the field is too intense to even get close. How would you even travel the 6,000 miles across a region of nothing but ice that never sees light and is hundreds of degrees below 0?
See? You need to keep making up new lies to make sense of old lies.
Explain how a part of a flat region can receive sunlight when other parts cannot? You can't.
If one person on a flat earth can see the sun, literally every person on a flat earth can see the sun.
UNLESS you are going to make up a new lie as to why light doesn't work as we have observed it for thousands of years.
Perspective and the atmosphere prevent the Sun from being visible across the entire planet. I believe I've answered and explained this in detail many times now.
The truth is that earth is the center of the universe, and that the all stars and heavenly luminaries revolve around us
See, even nomind cannot keep his lies straight.
He used to claim the sun revolved around flat earth. Now he says it hovers above it (somehow) in a circle, and is invisible to the rest of the planet.
No no I'm not saying traveling through the ice, I mean travel besides the ice wall that contains the oceans, there is a big circle wall right, we don't need to travel past it, we just need to travel besides it and see it or film it, how come no one has done this?
Ever since these flat earthers lost the debate 500+ years ago, their lies have become more insane and unbelievable as they attempt to explain how previous lies work.
Lies propagate, that's what I'm saying. You've got to tell more lies to cover them up, lie about every fact that's connected to the first lie. And if you kept on lying, and you kept on trying to cover it up, sooner or later you'd even have to start lying about the general laws of thought. -- Eliezer Yudkowsky
You've summed up the state of modern science quite nicely.
No no I'm not saying traveling through the ice, I mean travel besides the ice wall that contains the oceans, there is a big circle wall right, we don't need to travel past it, we just need to travel besides it and see it or film it, how come no one has done this?
Ever since these flat earthers lost the debate 500+ years ago, their lies have become more insane and unbelievable as they attempt to explain how previous lies work.
Lies propagate, that's what I'm saying. You've got to tell more lies to cover them up, lie about every fact that's connected to the first lie. And if you kept on lying, and you kept on trying to cover it up, sooner or later you'd even have to start lying about the general laws of thought. -- Eliezer Yudkowsky
The flat earthers have no way of explaining how the recent solar eclipse happened either.
Why don't you brows the thread Vod, I've answered this question and every question you've asked many times over? Why I should I repeat myself for an idiot with no respect for the truth?
Just take a boat or a plane and show us the edge, all of it, is really simple or show us a video of someone doing it.
The dome wall is electrically charged with trillions of volts, the field is too intense to even get close. How would you even travel the 6,000 miles across a region of nothing but ice that never sees light and is hundreds of degrees below 0?
No no I'm not saying traveling through the ice, I mean travel besides the ice wall that contains the oceans, there is a big circle wall right, we don't need to travel past it, we just need to travel besides it and see it or film it, how come no one has done this?
The dome wall is electrically charged with trillions of volts, the field is too intense to even get close. How would you even travel the 6,000 miles across a region of nothing but ice that never sees light and is hundreds of degrees below 0?
See? You need to keep making up new lies to make sense of old lies.
Explain how a part of a flat region can receive sunlight when other parts cannot? You can't.
If one person on a flat earth can see the sun, literally every person on a flat earth can see the sun.
UNLESS you are going to make up a new lie as to why light doesn't work as we have observed it for thousands of years.
The flat earthers have no way of explaining how the recent solar eclipse happened either.
Why don't you brows the thread Vod, I've answered this question and every question you've asked many times over? Why I should I repeat myself for an idiot with no respect for the truth?
Just take a boat or a plane and show us the edge, all of it, is really simple or show us a video of someone doing it.
The dome wall is electrically charged with trillions of volts, the field is too intense to even get close. How would you even travel the 6,000 miles across a region of nothing but ice that never sees light and is hundreds of degrees below 0?
The flat earthers have no way of explaining how the recent solar eclipse happened either.
Why don't you brows the thread Vod, I've answered this question and every question you've asked many times over? Why I should I repeat myself for an idiot with no respect for the truth?
Just take a boat or a plane and show us the edge, all of it, is really simple or show us a video of someone doing it.
Jump to: