I thought I would have to listen to that automated voice in the audio you gave me. I dont have to because I know what a common sense is.
The trip was arranged by february. Who organise the polar trip just after the polar night at north pole? The day light is only 2-3 hours there in february. Thats highly unlikely. Its more likely to make a polar trip to south pole by february during the polar day.
Another proof how flat earthers dont use common sense.
That's what he wrote in his diary.!..He was a brave and highly honored man. He never spoke on camera about it. And one can understand why.!
I have a feeling you just make stuff up without doing any research. The only evidence for the flight into the interior comes from that diary so if you are trying to use that flight into the interior as evidence there is a "hole in the ground" in the south then this just shows how confused you really are!. And you do not have an ounce of common sense.
You talk of proof.?
Keep digging.
That's some great creative writing !
http://www.v-j-enterprises.com/byrdiar.htmlI can sense badly smelling hoax when I see one. And I call that fake document. Badly made hoax. All the cliches are made there. Its like a Space Oddysey 2001 scenario but badly written.
Some people for some weird reason want to impose in our brain the image of a good master race that will enslave/destroy us for our good. If thats not make red light of alert that its a hoax I dont know what will.
Destroying us so that we wont destroy ourself. Fucking briliant idea. Very convincing :/.
Flat earthers - quit calling me that Im not yet lost, and I might see the light of the Flat Earth. If I have not made my point clear:
FLAT EARTH IS AN IMPOSSIBILITY AND IN MY OPINION EVERYONE THAT DOES NOT SEE THAT IS AN UTTER MORON. AND ITS NOT AN OPINION BASED ON NOTHING BUT LOGIC. FLAT EARTH DEFIES LOGIC. AND EVERYTHING DEFILING LOGIC IS AN IMPOSSIBILITY. IF YOU CANT READ AN ARGUMENT AND ITS LOGIC YOU ARE A DEFINED MORON.
Have I made myself clear? Good.
By the way flat earthers call everyone a hoax but they are not calling an obvious hoax a hoax when it dont defies their point of view.
The serbad should be in wikipedia as a clear example of a biased opinion based on a world view.
P.S there is no explanation of anything in that "more true than truth" text about anything. No reasoning of a date, time, place. Nothing. Thats like the most important issue in a diary and its nonexistant there.
Do you even imagine you write a diary of doing something crazy and not explaining in full detail why you do that, not to be taken as an assylum patient? Thats like a lack of imagination on a part of a hoaxer.
For example a diary about jumping from a building hoping to fly and then writting about your flight in a diary. Thats utterly unrealistic. You must first explain why you think you can fly in a diary and how you are going to fly.
I think the story is somewhat true because the forgery has always some purpose, and for me this forged document has a purpose to mislead the reader and or ridicule the whole idea of holes to the outter earth.
Here is the guy talking about SOUTH POLE!!! Were you telling Byrd not appearing in front of the camera talking about this? You have got to believe the earrth is flat as well. Oh well. Yes you do.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czW0iRJuH1AHe tells us about the unexplored outside the earth area at the begining of the interview. He does not continue the subject because the reporters didnt knew what he was talking about so he understood not to talk about it. The guy is intelligent so he had quickly noticed he had told too much for too stupid people.
He had clearly said. There is a land beyond the south pole. There is a south pole (he destroys the flat earth there) and he says that there is a land beyond that ( meaning inside out).
There are no openings at the North pole. At least no explorer admitted there were. Admyral Byrd has not admitted that. You spread some scifi total bs.
