Author

Topic: ⚽ Football Transfers Speculation, Odds and Predictions - page 3457. (Read 475609 times)

legendary
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1302
...Kepa is being sold because Lampard doesn’t trust him, and further it looks like Lampard has the final say on who goes and stays at Chelsea.
If Lampard has been allowed to make decisions on transfers ( both buying and selling) on his own and with the members of his coaching staff, that's a change to how things work or how i knew things worked at Chelsea fc.

The Blues, just like Real madrid usually have the board (Presidenti, owner, chairman) make big money signings for the team even when the coach at that time may not want those players. I feel Lampard will be successful at Chelsea if be continues to get the backing of the board to make his decisions. On Kepa, Franky will be right to sell him, he is not good imo, but maybe he should be replaced with someones better than Onana.
hero member
Activity: 1274
Merit: 646
Doesn't Dortmund have a 'matching right' for A. Hakimi? So when Real Madrid wants to sell him, they have to inform Dortmund about every bid they received for him and give them time to make a counter offer? The 40 million doesn't sound like a bid, Dormund can't outbid, right? Or does Hakimi wants to leave the BVB? He has a regular place in the starting eleven of Dortmund and I had always the impression that he likes it there.
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1517
#1 VIP Crypto Casino

looks like the deal is about to close and A. Hakimi will move to inter

Quote
Hakimi on verge of joining Inter: Serie A instead of BVB or Real - Fee €14m below market value?

https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/news/view?id=363926

I don't know how it is even possible while big teams are on him and they will sell him for only 40m.
I'm very salty about this.
legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1084
zknodes.org
When brought in by Liverpool from Hull City in the 2017 summer transfer window, Andrew Robertson was initially doubtful for being able to show his consistent performance at Anfield Stadium.

Facts on the ground, in fact say differently. The Scottish player, was able to silence criticism and gain many achievements such as winning the 2019 Champions League and 2019/20 English League.
legendary
Activity: 3304
Merit: 8633
icarus-cards.eu

looks like the deal is about to close and A. Hakimi will move to inter

Quote
Hakimi on verge of joining Inter: Serie A instead of BVB or Real - Fee €14m below market value?

https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/news/view?id=363926
hero member
Activity: 2646
Merit: 686
Kepa (Chelsea) to Valencia and Onana (Ajax) to Chelsea?? https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-8463129/Valencia-want-Chelseas-Kepa-two-year-loan-deal-exit-open-Ajax-keeper-Onana.html

sweet deal for Chelsea...damn! their board is killing it! Havertz, Chidwell and Onana all very possible signings  Shocked


^

I couldn't agree more, they board are indeed making good deals, and Chelsea could be terrific and a team to beat come next season. However, I'm not seeing much positivity with the Kepa sale and Onana as replacement, except if they're making some financial profits with the trade.

@tomahawk9 I don’t think that Chelsea will buy them as they have already bought Werner, and on top of that they have some talented youths around whom they can build their team.

@Harkorede Kepa is being sold because Lampard doesn’t trust him, and further it looks like Lampard has the final say on who goes and stays at Chelsea.

Sources:

https://www.football.london/chelsea-fc/players/frank-lampard-chelsea-james-mount-18233106

https://www.goal.com/en-in/news/kepa-knows-he-cant-outlast-lampard-at-chelsea-71m-keeper/1gh5sfzjnmpdf1986hz2j1l561

https://www.football.london/chelsea-fc/transfer-news/chelsea-transfer-news-zaha-sancho-17419503
legendary
Activity: 3304
Merit: 1617
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
^

I couldn't agree more, they board are indeed making good deals, and Chelsea could be terrific and a team to beat come next season. However, I'm not seeing much positivity with the Kepa sale and Onana as replacement, except if they're making some financial profits with the trade.

I think Chelsea will be much better next season, they can definitely compete for the title, unsure if they could definitely win it though.
copper member
Activity: 2044
Merit: 793
^

I couldn't agree more, they board are indeed making good deals, and Chelsea could be terrific and a team to beat come next season. However, I'm not seeing much positivity with the Kepa sale and Onana as replacement, except if they're making some financial profits with the trade.
hero member
Activity: 2086
Merit: 994
Cats on Mars
Kepa (Chelsea) to Valencia and Onana (Ajax) to Chelsea?? https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-8463129/Valencia-want-Chelseas-Kepa-two-year-loan-deal-exit-open-Ajax-keeper-Onana.html

sweet deal for Chelsea...damn! their board is killing it! Havertz, Chidwell and Onana all very possible signings  Shocked

WHAT the hell? 40 milions? WHAT THE F..?
what a bargain considering he was one of the best (if not THE best) right back in the bundesliga this season, and he's prolly the most promising right back in europe right now. Amazing signing that would be for Inter.
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1517
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
legendary
Activity: 3556
Merit: 9709
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
some international clubs are interested in Mattéo Guendouzi from arsenal

Quote
Guendouzi puts in transfer request - Arsenal want five times the purchase price


https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/news/view?id=363891

He’s a good player, I wouldn’t mind Liverpool going in for him, he’s still so young. I think he could have a really big future if he trains hard & lives clean.
legendary
Activity: 3304
Merit: 8633
icarus-cards.eu
some international clubs are interested in Mattéo Guendouzi from arsenal

Quote
Guendouzi puts in transfer request - Arsenal want five times the purchase price


https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/news/view?id=363891
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1517
#1 VIP Crypto Casino

 It looks like the Arthur-Pjanic deal is a done deal however I do not understand why Barcelona has to sell any players for financial fair play rules? At the end of the day they are getting someone cheaper and there is a trade between two players and Barcelona is making 10 million euro in profit, they are not spending any, which means they shouldn't have to sell anyone to cover the difference since its a positive for them.

 I still think its a huge ripoff by Juventus, Arthur is much better and he loves playing in Barcelona and he was just 23 years old, now they will get Pjanic who is totally not needed in Barcelona and old, why are they even doing this trade? What is Barcelona making from this trade to begin with? Do they really think that Pjanic will bring more to Barcelona than Arthur was bringing? I think this is a very bad move on their behalf.

Is a lot more.

Example with easy number.

They bought Arthur for X milions (assuming 50) 3 years ago with a 5 years contract.
Every year Arthur will cost 50/5=10 milions in the balance

After 3 years they will have 20 left to pay so... if they will sell him for 70

For the financial Fair Play they will have done 50 (cost) -30 (paid) + 70 = 90 milions to sign as a + in the balance

If they will buy Pjanic for 60 they will have done in the end 90-60= +30

Numbers are random but this is an example
legendary
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1302
Lampard's decision to release the Spaniard does not sound surprising. Because in this 2019/20 season, Pedro has rarely gotten minutes to play because only recorded nine matches in the Premier League.
His age does not favor him at all, we all understand what Lampard is trying to do and that's build the team around young players like Mount. Pulisic, Tammy, Werner etc, Pedro is 33 years old i think and even though he hasn't had any great season with Chelsea, the last two have more or less being poor.

I thought Pedro would go back to Spain when his time at Chelsea expires, i must say I'm surprised with the move to Italy (Roma) imo he does not look like a player that will shine in the Seria A.  
legendary
Activity: 3710
Merit: 1170
www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games
The thing is Harry Kane is only 26 years old right now, and I am sure winning a trophy is a very very valuable thing in life, probably not just emotionally but also financially as well since most teams wants a big winner striker and willing to pay for him.

However I can't stop but think that Spurs could offer Kane only so much, this is a striker that is amazing and could literally play anywhere in the whole world, you can put him at Real Madrid instead of Benzema, you can put him at Barcelona instead of Suarez, you can put him at PSG along with Neymar and Mbappe and make a deadly trio, this dude could play anywhere. It means teams would be willing to pay him insane amount of salary to get him but it is hard to get him when the team doesn't sell for a logical price. So when his contract is over, his agent has a lot of work to do.
hero member
Activity: 2086
Merit: 994
Cats on Mars
• Meunier (PSG) to Dortmund done deal. (source)

• Pedro (Chelsea) to Roma almost done deal. (source)

• Barcelona keen on Ndombele (Tottenham). Possible swap deal [Coutinho or Semedo]. (source)

Deal 99% done as told you days ago  Wink
no surprises here...as soon as every big newspaper reported it at the same time, it was crystal clear that deal was pretty much closed. Pjanic is a good player, but getting rid of Arthur is hands down one of Barca's worst deals in years.
hero member
Activity: 2156
Merit: 575

 It looks like the Arthur-Pjanic deal is a done deal however I do not understand why Barcelona has to sell any players for financial fair play rules? At the end of the day they are getting someone cheaper and there is a trade between two players and Barcelona is making 10 million euro in profit, they are not spending any, which means they shouldn't have to sell anyone to cover the difference since its a positive for them.

 I still think its a huge ripoff by Juventus, Arthur is much better and he loves playing in Barcelona and he was just 23 years old, now they will get Pjanic who is totally not needed in Barcelona and old, why are they even doing this trade? What is Barcelona making from this trade to begin with? Do they really think that Pjanic will bring more to Barcelona than Arthur was bringing? I think this is a very bad move on their behalf.
legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1084
zknodes.org
Already brought two players, now the Blues decided to release one of the wing attackers who have defended the team for five seasons, Pedro Rodriguez to AS Roma on a free transfer.

Lampard's decision to release the Spaniard does not sound surprising. Because in this 2019/20 season, Pedro has rarely gotten minutes to play because only recorded nine matches in the Premier League.
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1517
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
Deal 99% done as told you days ago  Wink



source

https://twitter.com/DiMarzio/status/1276159392409366528

https://twitter.com/romeoagresti/status/1276157737701912578


Barcelona still needs to sell 1 player before 30/06.
Juventus is ok with money for the financial fair play of this year now.
legendary
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1604
hmph..
Kane for instance is not looking at the Champions league imo, any trophy will do for him, he's a world class striker and he can brings goals along with him to any club, if spurs do not win any trophy next season, be it even the carabao or Fa cup, i can see Harry leaving.

Yes, I understand Kane doesn't just want to win the trophy or target it. He just wants whatever title it is. However, above I only gave an example of what happened to Ibrahimovic. Even if he joins a big club as you mentioned, he may not necessarily be able to get the trophy. Therefore I say not a guarantee of moving the club can bring him the title.
Jump to: