They don't have to give them directly, they can easily get hacked like Binance did and all information will end up being sold and released in public.
Since many of exchanges listed on BestChange website are already using third party exchanges, risk is much higher if customers send them kyc documentation.
Nobody knows what really happens when documents are sent and if they are being protected or how... no guarantees at all.
If something goes wrong, customers will receive banana apology from safu ''reliable exchanger''
It’s about exchangers in our listing, although the data can be requested by custodial services in which they keep their cryptocurrency. We would like to quote our reply to a similar question asked earlier:
Until the world has come up with an alternative to the standard KYC procedure (although something interesting is happening around Polygon ID if it will be "fine-tuned" and scaled in the future), one has to take such risks, as with any other financial services around the world.
What about data leaks from banks, insurance companies, mobile operators, trading platforms, and payment systems? Quantitatively, there are even more of them than there are leaks from crypto exchanges and their counterparties, simply because the crypto industry is obviously more advanced and is "obsessed" with protection, and the organizations themselves are much smaller.
But we are in no way defending Binance and others, they took on the obligation to store the most valuable thing that their customers have, but they did not cope with this and should have been held accountable to the fullest extent. But the world has not yet rebuilt under the concept that personal data is most valued, for about the last 20 years inside Web2.0 it has been the hottest commodity, and until the mass adoption of Web3.0 principles, the safety of our data will be neglected, this is a fact.
However, all of the above is not a reason to ignore the principles of working with finance accepted by the world community. You do not prove to the bank that they do not have the moral right to check your passport in order to open an account? Motivating, for example, by the fact that Capital One was hacked in 2019.
What do you suggest as an alternative to standard KYC-procedures?