Author

Topic: Forum ranks/positions/badges (What do those shiny coins under my name mean?) - page 164. (Read 2376960 times)

sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
10 BTC to become a recognised donor is pretty stiff at today's Bitcoin price...

It can all change... And change fast! Grin
Administrator all ready clear this its unchangeable so if you want to donor you must pay 10 BTC  Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 328
Merit: 250
34 activity still newbie Sad

Oh, it changed now Smiley
legendary
Activity: 3430
Merit: 1280
English ⬄ Russian Translation Services
10 BTC to become a recognised donor is pretty stiff at today's Bitcoin price...

It can all change... And change fast! Grin
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
what rank do you need to allow for pictures?
legendary
Activity: 3430
Merit: 1280
English ⬄ Russian Translation Services
10 BTC to become a recognised donor is pretty stiff at today's Bitcoin price...

Let's see what happens in the next month, lol... Cool
global moderator
Activity: 3794
Merit: 2615
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
I read somewhere that there's a script that would could down to the next activity update, but unfortunately I can't find it anymore.
Can someone give me the link?

It next updates on the 1st and then every two weeks after that.
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
Could someone please comment on my understanding of activity?

The way it's calculated:

time = number of two-week periods in which you've posted since your registration
activity = min(time * 14, posts)

My current activity is 84 and I have 436 posts. This must mean I have been posting 7 two-week periods in total since my registration * 14 which equals 84.
In order to become a full member (activity 120) I just have to post 1 reply every 2 weeks until I have been posting 9 two-week periods, as 9*14 equals 126 which is larger than 120?

Have a look at the post above I made a few weeks ago.
This calculation is also in the opening post of this topic.
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
Can someone please give an example of how the activity is calculated?
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
I read somewhere that there's a script that would could down to the next activity update, but unfortunately I can't find it anymore.
Can someone give me the link?
newbie
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
35k is about 1/3 of a annual salary in Singapore
legendary
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1053
Please do not PM me loan requests!
Finally a Sr. Member after some 9 months. Smiley
I love those coins under our names.
newbie
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
full member
Activity: 128
Merit: 100
thanks for the clarification mate!
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
I'm gonna clean up this town
Over 15% of the annual household income in the US - extremely stiff. I considered donating until I saw what they consider a reasonable minimum donation.

The VIP level they have set just proves neglect. If I donate $35,000 a half purple coin under my name isn't going to cut it - they better be curing cancer.

You need to realise that these prices were set back when BTC had a lot, lot less value than it does today. Now an argument could be made to change the requirements, but theymos has consistently opposed it as current VIPs and Donors feel that it isn't fair to them given that they had to contribute that amount of BTC. Hence the exorbitant price of these account ranks.

Hence the reason he says the current VIP level "just proves neglect." If they intend to use it as any sort of incentive to donate, it would only make sense to adjust it. Forget about pegging it specifically to a BTC amount - we're talking about purchasing power here. The purchasing power of 1 bitcoin today is exponentially higher than it was when they set these requirements. It pays a lot more bills today, that's for sure. It's not as if BTC is just staying steady and beating inflation - when purchasing power has increased so dramatically, it just doesn't make sense.

I don't think anybody is advocating for a correlation with USD or EUR but would anybody really claim it's unfair to lower the requirements for each level? Donating 10 BTC in 2011 is certainly less generous than donating 1 BTC today. In 2011 I could mine 50 BTC/week with GPUs. The logic is certainly flawed here. As it stands now, when I see a donor on the board I just assume they donated back when BTC was cheap and easy to mine.

Their board - their rules, I suppose - just seems senseless. You'd have to be pretty damn generous to give up a typical annual salary as a donation to a bitcoin message board just to get VIP status when the same status could have been had a couple years ago for the price of a cab ride.
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1004
Keep it real
Over 15% of the annual household income in the US - extremely stiff. I considered donating until I saw what they consider a reasonable minimum donation.

The VIP level they have set just proves neglect. If I donate $35,000 a half purple coin under my name isn't going to cut it - they better be curing cancer.

You need to realise that these prices were set back when BTC had a lot, lot less value than it does today. Now an argument could be made to change the requirements, but theymos has consistently opposed it as current VIPs and Donors feel that it isn't fair to them given that they had to contribute that amount of BTC. Hence the exorbitant price of these account ranks.

It was stated when the ranks were created that they would be pegged to BTC and not USD.  There's a chance different ranks might be created eventually, but that's unlikely.
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 502
Circa 2010
Over 15% of the annual household income in the US - extremely stiff. I considered donating until I saw what they consider a reasonable minimum donation.

The VIP level they have set just proves neglect. If I donate $35,000 a half purple coin under my name isn't going to cut it - they better be curing cancer.

You need to realise that these prices were set back when BTC had a lot, lot less value than it does today. Now an argument could be made to change the requirements, but theymos has consistently opposed it as current VIPs and Donors feel that it isn't fair to them given that they had to contribute that amount of BTC. Hence the exorbitant price of these account ranks.
hero member
Activity: 490
Merit: 500
The Murraycoin Project ▪ Lead Developer
10 BTC to become a recognised donor is pretty stiff at today's Bitcoin price...

Over 15% of the annual household income in the US - extremely stiff. I considered donating until I saw what they consider a reasonable minimum donation.

The VIP level they have set just proves neglect. If I donate $35,000 a half purple coin under my name isn't going to cut it - they better be curing cancer.
full member
Activity: 448
Merit: 100
10 BTC to become a recognised donor is pretty stiff at today's Bitcoin price...
legendary
Activity: 3430
Merit: 1280
English ⬄ Russian Translation Services
Could someone please comment on my understanding of activity?

The way it's calculated:

time = number of two-week periods in which you've posted since your registration
activity = min(time * 14, posts)

My current activity is 84 and I have 436 posts. This must mean I have been posting 7 two-week periods in total since my registration * 14 which equals 84.
In order to become a full member (activity 120) I just have to post 1 reply every 2 weeks until I have been posting 9 two-week periods, as 9*14 equals 126 which is larger than 120?

Yes, it is so. Look at my activity right now...  Wink

You might actually get the activity of 120 if your post count after 9 two-week periods was only that number (if that was your point, lol) Grin
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
Could someone please comment on my understanding of activity?

The way it's calculated:

time = number of two-week periods in which you've posted since your registration
activity = min(time * 14, posts)

My current activity is 84 and I have 436 posts. This must mean I have been posting 7 two-week periods in total since my registration * 14 which equals 84.
In order to become a full member (activity 120) I just have to post 1 reply every 2 weeks until I have been posting 9 two-week periods, as 9*14 equals 126 which is larger than 120?
Jump to: