Topic: Forum ranks/positions/badges (What do those shiny coins under my name mean?) - page 164. (Read 2754305 times)

There's something fundamentally flawed in your understanding of it. You can only get a max activity of 14 per two week period, so newer members will only rise faster if they've posted in all those those periods and you haven't.

I suspect that there is something fundementally flawed in the activity calculation since new people can rise rapidly to hero status and people who have been here almost a year are stuck with Sr. status.

Ehrm. I guess "Donor" is the correct name, not Donator?

The point was about Bitcoin stiff price back then...

Administrator all ready clear this its unchangeable so if you want to donor you must pay 10 BTC 

34 activity still newbie

Oh, it changed now

It can all change... And change fast!

what rank do you need to allow for pictures?

Let's see what happens in the next month, lol...

It next updates on the 1st and then every two weeks after that.

Have a look at the post above I made a few weeks ago.
This calculation is also in the opening post of this topic.

Can someone please give an example of how the activity is calculated?

I read somewhere that there's a script that would could down to the next activity update, but unfortunately I can't find it anymore.
Can someone give me the link?

35k is about 1/3 of a annual salary in Singapore

Finally a Sr. Member after some 9 months.
I love those coins under our names.

Jr. Member!

thanks for the clarification mate!

Hence the reason he says the current VIP level "just proves neglect." If they intend to use it as any sort of incentive to donate, it would only make sense to adjust it. Forget about pegging it specifically to a BTC amount - we're talking about purchasing power here. The purchasing power of 1 bitcoin today is exponentially higher than it was when they set these requirements. It pays a lot more bills today, that's for sure. It's not as if BTC is just staying steady and beating inflation - when purchasing power has increased so dramatically, it just doesn't make sense.

I don't think anybody is advocating for a correlation with USD or EUR but would anybody really claim it's unfair to lower the requirements for each level? Donating 10 BTC in 2011 is certainly less generous than donating 1 BTC today. In 2011 I could mine 50 BTC/week with GPUs. The logic is certainly flawed here. As it stands now, when I see a donor on the board I just assume they donated back when BTC was cheap and easy to mine.

Their board - their rules, I suppose - just seems senseless. You'd have to be pretty damn generous to give up a typical annual salary as a donation to a bitcoin message board just to get VIP status when the same status could have been had a couple years ago for the price of a cab ride.

It was stated when the ranks were created that they would be pegged to BTC and not USD.  There's a chance different ranks might be created eventually, but that's unlikely.

You need to realise that these prices were set back when BTC had a lot, lot less value than it does today. Now an argument could be made to change the requirements, but theymos has consistently opposed it as current VIPs and Donors feel that it isn't fair to them given that they had to contribute that amount of BTC. Hence the exorbitant price of these account ranks.