Topic: FreeBitco.in-$200 FreeBTC⭐Win Lambo🔥0.2BTC DailyJackpot🏆$32,500 Wager Contest - page 1202. (Read 566403 times)

That is a strange train of thought. Running a business without optional government approval equals theft. I'm really not sure how you get there.

Seeing that we are both paid to promote the same Bitcoin mixing service how do you feel about unlicensed money transmitters? When you recently attacked us for being anonymous I thought there was a rather large dollop of hypocrisy but this is even more so. Does ChipMixer steal money by running an unlicensed business? Is ChipMixer untrustworthy because you don't know the real-life identity of the owners and operators?

---

It is always the amateur small-time thieves that complain. If I delete 50,000 accounts that were using a more sophisticated bot that is harder to detect I never get a word of complaint but some obvious pathetic attempt at abuse like this and they cry like a baby.


I know. I usually do ignore the imbecile. He's too stupid to be able to hold a normal conversation with because he just can't understand the points that are made that prove him wrong. Then he just carries on repeating the same falsehood.

---

Welcome back.

Its been a while since I last used this faucet and I forgot that I had a balance on there earning the daily interest and was also earning sats from my referrals so I am back and claiming again and trying to win the lottery as I have never had any luck in the 4 years that I have been trying to win lol. This is still one of the best BTC faucets out there today even after all these years its been online.

BTW,  his link does actually show up in some russian forums and from youtube from earlier this year and late 2017 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qyzxZYOJdMw).  But the likelyhood of them all using the same email address format... near 0 I think lol.  So maybe he has a few legit referrals.  As for the validity of the other emails,  those could either be made up by TheQuack (which I wouldnt put past him to do) or the russian is just playing stupid (which I wouldnt doubt either lol).

If I had to pick which of the thieves has more credibility,  I'd have to pick the russian at this point because I was able to find evidence of his claim.  As for TheQuack,  we have ZERO evidence of his claim that this guy used 364 other emails all with numbers in them and we already know TheQuack has been caught cheating in the "provably fair" claims of the site,  so his claims carry less weight since he cant actually prove anything and he's already a proven cheater where as this new guy MAY be a cheater,  but then again,  he may not be.  So far,  the evidence is in this russian guy's favor that he is actually legit.  But then you also have to remember that most Russians are not legit to begin with especially since the content of this guy's youtube video is a bot that circumvents captcha,  so there is that to consider too hahaha.

I say burn them BOTH at the stake.  One just for being russian,  the other for being a complete liar.

EDIT:  out of curiousity I sent a test email to one of TheQuack's emails that he listed....... and it bounced with user unknown.  I then sent an email to the supposed main account... It didnt bounce.  So take that as you will,  but it seems TheQuack may have just made up the other email accounts.

this is all a fairy tale about the fact that I have more than 350 accounts. Yes,I created several accounts, but certainly not 368. my old accounts are not active, do not work, do not store deposits. I have so many referrals just because I was distributing my referral link.
on my part, there was no theft, most of the bitcoins were deposited there, they stole my bitcoins. I do not see anything funny in this, today they without trial and investigation took from me, tomorrow and the rest will come to the case, the reasons they know how to invent.

Always funny to read stories of people questioning why there account got banned when they forget they create 350+ fake profiles  .

@Thequin don't go into discussion with the troll, it is a neverending story, just ignore him.

Hahahaha there is no honor among thieves.  One thief steals from another thief and then hilarity ensues as they both claim the other was stealing from them!  The funny part is that they are BOTH right,  they were both stealing from each other lol.  Just cant make this shit up LMFAO.

I thought those weren't yours.

I suppose we could have a game of morality but I'm not sure who'd win. 1 thequin is working for someone who literally steals money (an unlicensed casino at the least) 2 you stole from the site. Should've set up automatic withdrawals...

well first of all, do not share my account information, I ask you to delete the email.
and second. I have not distributed my referral link for a long time, and as I said earlier, I have no relation to the above referrals. moreover, I did not find any information on the site that prohibits registering multiple accounts to one person. as well as warnings that you steal all my savings on your site.

Just wow....

So [email protected] shared his referral link and [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]..... and many many more completely unrelated people using devices with the same fingerprints signed up because you shared your referral link with them.

Get real.

maybe there can be some kind of proof? or will you continue to accuse me of something?  I have not created any fake referrals. I shared my referral link and I can not know who is registered on it and for what purpose.

I'd guess he started off being disrespectful because he knows full well he isn't getting his account back because of the 365 fake referrals he was using to cheat us.

If you want help, at least be respectful to the owner/ support.

Do you think Quin's gonna entertain you with such behavior?

I want to tell my story, how I was deceived by the site freebitco.in. like many people I have an account on this site, woke up today, wanted to go to the site, and the account is blocked. restore password is obtained.even in the mail letters do not come.  I kept some bitcoins in my account. you took them ? scammers?
my id 7053807

Yeah, I bought 1,300+ tickets for the latest round after seeing your post, and yet luck wasn't on my side again. This time the guy who won 0.04 BTC probably wasn't buying any tickets at all. He could get  his 168 tickets with free rolls alone.




But, as far as I understand, my win chance was lower than 0.0005%, so it it's not that I was unlucky, but rather I wasn't extremely lucky. Well, maybe next time. Anyway, it's nice to see that at least someone had that luck.

FFS. Still can't understand what I just explained to you? Still can't think of a counter argument because you are too thick to understand what I just explained? So just keep on making the same claim without even addressing that it would not work because the extra tickets increase the prize pool.

Of course you're not.  Because you know I'm right and cant find a way to disprove it LMFAO.  You can try to make it sound as complex as you want,  but the point still remains,  you were paid BTC that was not otherwise yours so that you could pay out a 'prize' to someone else (supposedly,  but we all know thats not what happens MOST of the time).  Nothing you say or do will ever change that simple fact.  The size of the lottery is completely irrelevant.  The only relevancy is that it's not negative nor is it zero.  It's a positive amount and therefore cheating is advantageous to the casino.  So whether the lottery is for 50BTC or 50 sats,  the point still remains,  not all of it was freebitcos to begin with so any amount they can take from it is an advantage to them regardless of how large or small it is.  Maybe a larger lottery makes more people play it with BTC that was not the casinos and this fact could be why the lottery sizes are what they are.  It would benefit the casino to inflate the size of the lottery to make it look more lucrative since they know they dont actually have to pay anything out to begin with.  So you're argument of lottery size is completely irrelevant as it doesnt prove anything at all.

This is why it is best to ignore The Village Idiot. He lacks the ability to understand the arguments put him and carries on as if you hadn't just explained why he was wrong. I should totally ignore him but sometimes he says something so outrageously stupid I can't resist pointing it out.


I just explained it here:


If in the example you give to win your lottery you would need tickets so the prize would increase from $5. When you did not win you would pay out more and that would cancel out what you saved on the occasions you won. I know basic arithmetic and logic is beyond the ability of that peanut that rattles around your skull where a brain should be so I'm not going to repeat this again.

Riiiiiiiiiiiiight.  1000s of people pay tickets to YOU to win a lottery that they cant win (since you win 75-100% of them).  Ya,  there is NO incentive at all to play your own shit lol.  #retard.  It makes a LOT of sense to not have to pay out.  If I were to run a lottery and 10 people paid me $1 each to win a prize of $5,  I'd have $10 profit if I won the "lottery" myself.  I'd only have $5 if I actually let someone else win and paid out the $5.  What idiot doesnt realize this fact lol.  If I then do the same exact thing the next week,  but this time I actually let someone win,  my profit is now 7.5 instead of only $5 because the half I took myself from the previous week covers some of the losses I'd take for actually paying out this week.  This is the oldest gambling scam in the book.  Do just enough to make it seem legit.

You're clown ass reasoning only makes any sense at all if EVERY ticket was purchased by freebitco.  Which it's NOT.  There are plenty of people who buy them with BTC that was not originally yours to begin with.  Therefore your reasoning is complete lunacy.

Who wants to bet that we may see a sudden "surge" of winners in the coming weeks for both the free rolls and the lottery,  and who knows,  maybe even the "jackpot" option in the dice game in some sort of attempt by freebitco to make it seem like "oh! see! hey there are the winners!  we dont cheat!"........  ya whatever.  I can see the future.

The Village Idiot was talking about the lottery which is also provably fair and as I pointed out there would be no cost advantage to us to play it.

The $30,000 wagering contest isn't possible to prove in the same way you can't prove anything to Just-Dice investors. You have to trust any site that you are going to hold crypto on to a certain extent. Looking at it logically $30,000 a month payout for the extra publicity and increase we've seen in turnover makes it a good investment for us we would rather have real winners that might come forward.