Topic: Fuck your vaccines - page 10. (Read 10229 times)

It is useless to convince people that we need in a timely manner to take care of your health. Why persuade? Most important to those who are sick to infect others. But life will put everything in its place.

There are chances they won't make it to that time, you know. Also brainwashed as they are in the communities where they live it's hard to expect they will be able to make their own rational decisions.

I don't know about every case because every particular case is unique, but since it has been proved that vaccines are effective parents shouldn't decide for their children whether to do it or not because people are uneducated mostly.

Believe all you want. Plagues wont be there where there is no dirt fleas rats and malnutrition all around. I dont  want to convince anyone. Vaccinate yoursefl and your child all you want. But please dont scare tactic the ones that doesnt.

Water and sewage was already known in ancient Egypt, but that hasn't stopped the epidemic. I am sure that more effective way to combat the epidemic than the vaccination came up.

Everyone that knows the data and a little knowledge of science can say, that vaccinations have not cure any disease. Most of the deadly diseases were already in decline at the time vaccinations came into existence. The one and the most underpreciated element that prevented huge and deadly plague was invention of sanitation and more commonly used personal hygiene.

Those people that says that its all because of vaccines doesnt know what they are talking about. Children and adults, where almost swimming in sewage before the widespread usage of sanitation in the cities. If you think that people can be healthy in sewage, good luck. Just look at the data folks.

Many plagues was caused by the use of vaccines but you wont hear that dont you?

On the other hand, unless you overvaccinate an infant and those fuckers do, vaccines are almost harmless, but completly unnecessary. There are some rare cases where taking a vaccine would be beneficial, but give me a break with that prevention from the disease. Its a lie to scare people and leave their money to Rotschilds.

Don't forget about the costs of treating these people when they become ill.
Example: You refuse to vaccinate yourself against something common, but deadly, like tuberculosis, and catch it. Who is going to pay for the treatment? If someone wants to take their chances, I won't stand in their way, but be ready to face the consequences.

I think so, what if vaccines save lives then they need to use. All who do not use the vaccine you have that right, but if not vaccinated person infect other, he should compensate the caused damage.

If not the way things are turning out now, Vaccines have turned out to be effective in combating some life threatening diseases after years of extensive research and this has gone a long way in reducing needless death. Over here probably because of the level of advancement in technology still at the low stage we still rely on vaccine a lot. You see pregnant women vaccinated to protect their unborn babies at the same time after birth vaccinated to protect the baby and this has made WHO declared our country POLIO free in 2014. This is an achievement that cannot be faulted in any way...

How many children do you have? In my country, no one forbids, but the majority of families have one child. I believe that it is possible to have children no more than you can contain them well.

From an operational point of view, vaccinations programs are (potentially) more effective.  If you force a policy on people they get suspicious, resentful, and disruptive.  If, OTOH, you use propaganda correctly you can get the peeps to gladly pay the costs and a lot more, and to self-enforce policy upon one another.

Note that from the view of a competent Ecologist, there is little difference between having no kid, or having a kid who itself will not have kids for whatever reason; Incapable, unwilling, etc.  Further, a sufficiently damaged kid can be useful to the controllers in a bunch of ways.  The kid(s) can sap a families resources making the family itself more dependent on the state and less likely to or capable of causing problems.  Certain kinds of damage can also make a person more susceptible to propaganda thus reducing the threat and increasing the utility a generation out.

Eugenics can be made to be quite profitable in addition to addressing the primary goals of the practitioner.  In fact, it works a lot better that way because it enlists the support of people who are not necessarily passionate about eugenics programs in and of themselves.  For every 1 eugenics enthusiast there are 1000 people who just want to get rich and don't care much how they do it.

Now in all civilized countries there is a reduction in fertility. Educated people do not just want to have children and to make their children to live with dignity. The more dodgy the more children they have. And the more it crime.

in that case let's be honest about our intentions and call for a one child policy for indians and africans, more humane and probably more effective way of getting the same result

I think that calls for the blocking of vaccination in the world is nothing but an attempt to reduce the world population. Even if you don't get any disease, concerned people can help.

thats what i was thinking. ive never seen proof that its harmful even if it killed 1 in 10,000 how many would die in an outbreak?


idiots like the op believe anything they read including facebook post or fake news post created by people who want fast revenue.


Even legit news is corrupt, Like the thing about cops killing people the rise of deaths would increase ofcourse every year theirs 6million more people in the us est so... more cops and more disputes the numbers has always been the same and people are making it worse..

when you see nothing but bad news its easy to get upset "cnn" "fox" w/e found their golding niche thats all...

i'm not a cop and don't really care about which side is right or wrong but attacking cops or killing them is just gonna make their job more stressful and these numbers that has always been the same will climb.

which is my point if you are a sheep that will jump on board without proof problems get worse.
If you deny statistics and don't wanna get your child vaccined you put a larger amount at risk.

And why not? People do not unite and fight for their rights. So not so scary for them. If the people rise up against any government they will not keep. Probably not all that bad? A person sells themselves for money and it allows you to do anything with him.

Yes, there area small chips inside all of those who get vaccinated, it's all the deed of those big jewish families who want to bring the NWO, so they're implementing that devices in us and soon, We'll have barcodes on our arms.

everyone gets vaccinated: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs378/en/

with vaccinations rate of 85+% for certain diseases - why the fuck arent we all dead or atleast look like frankenstein?

wait, you prolly got a frankenstein brain; maybe shouldnt have took that polio vaccination

But a competent snake-oil salesman could see an opportunity here.  Especially one who had effective ownership of the media, the research institutes, the government sponsored 'oversight' organizations, the hospitals, the medical trade organizations, etc.

It is not strange that health improves when the population gives up using diluted sewage as the principle beverage.

– Dr. Thurman Rice, 1932

If someone offered me the choice between a mild childhood ailment when every kid got once and I got to take a week off 4th grade, or a lifetime of booster shots and a very good chance of getting mumps at any time anyway (since even the boosters often fail) and a chance of infertility when I did get the disease, I'll take the former.

The ecology of many of these diseases and the interactions with human populations seem to be that the natural profile results in the fewest severe problems.  Chicken-pox seems also to be in this category.  A segment of the younger people seems to be acting as a natural booster for the rest and thus shingles is reduced in older people.  It was theorized even before chicken-pox was added to the vaccination schedule that shingles would become more prevalent, and that's what happened.  The reaction was that big pharma developed a shingles vaccination also.  The trouble (for us peeps) was that it didn't work for shit at detering shingles but it worked fine for big pharma since they made some bucks off it.

Basically, as long as the vaccine manufactures don't have to worry about liability for problems, they can make a ton of money off vaccines, and a much much larger amount of money off people who are sickened by the vaccines when they provoke auto-immune related problems which are skyrocketing.  Better yet, with a system like Obamacare the medical system generally and big pharma in particular can charge anything they wish for 'products and services'.  Even someone without money is a profitable victim because someone with money will pick up the tab.

The big race here between 'the elite' and 'the peeps' seems to be whether us peeps will wise up to the game or die off before we do.  Most people get smart only after they get sick and start researching this stuff, but by that time they are broke and sick and it's harder for them to be effective at making a difference.