This is one of the reasons its always a good idea to invest in projects with pro teams,whatever challenges that comes they will be ready
With a known team, you can be pretty sure that the project is going to work and they are serious with what they do. Someone who's reputable on this industry will never put his reputation at stake just for the sake of money. Invest wisely and don't be too blind with the promised potential return upon investing into such ICOs. You need to be good at checking ICOs now because many of them has shown the same symptoms on what's good and bad project.
Topic: Hardcap ICO is no guarantee that the project will succeed - page 13. (Read 31507 times)
This is very true. The fact that a project meets its Hardcap does not automatically means it will succeed on the exchange and because a project didn't meet the Hardcap doesn't automatically mean it won't succeed on the exchange. It all depends on the exchange it lists and the demand for the project tokens.
Truth is that
Most icos do not even reach softcap; not mention hardcap
They only make the news announcement to drive the desired hypes
Sell on fomoers on exchange listing and exit away
Most icos do not even reach softcap; not mention hardcap
They only make the news announcement to drive the desired hypes
Sell on fomoers on exchange listing and exit away
When a project hits hardcap, it's a good sign but never a guarantee that it's a good project or will do well. Some projects exit scam even after hitting hardcap, some fake the hardcap, some do not hit hardcap but still do well. I've seen a project which barely hit softcap and listed very fast on a decent exchange.
yes you right, project with hardcap is not proof that project will success.
the first time i think is what that project is real project or just scam, then if that token or coin lauch what it will survive when Bounty hunter dump and when it survive in market what it have a good progress to build up that token.
we must extra becareful about choose what the best for me.
the first time i think is what that project is real project or just scam, then if that token or coin lauch what it will survive when Bounty hunter dump and when it survive in market what it have a good progress to build up that token.
we must extra becareful about choose what the best for me.
ico's hardcap has become not really a determinant associated with achievement, it is important may be the team's overall performance the way the group can function difficult therefore the bridal party has been in trade nevertheless possess great costs and never the rip-off. We regard for that accomplishment associated with softcaps, however, the group is effective, instead of attaining hardcap, however, the group does the useless as well as hazy work, lastly rip-off.
This is one of the reasons its always a good idea to invest in projects with pro teams,whatever challenges that comes they will be ready
With a known team, you can be pretty sure that the project is going to work and they are serious with what they do. Someone who's reputable on this industry will never put his reputation at stake just for the sake of money. Invest wisely and don't be too blind with the promised potential return upon investing into such ICOs. You need to be good at checking ICOs now because many of them has shown the same symptoms on what's good and bad project. ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
That's right man, since most of ICO project are scam and not a legit , they just collecting money from investors by means of selling their coin then they will disappear completely .
And some legit coins are go directly to the exchange then they sale it for very low price .
This is one of the reasons its always a good idea to invest in projects with pro teams,whatever challenges that comes they will be ready
Yeah, but projects that raised hardcap are statistically more success than projects that had problem to raise soft cap.
Plus more money means competitive advantagem
I agree that meeting hard cap is not always a guarantee that the project will success as what I have experience, I don't know what is the real reason behind but hopefully not all team on every project will do that kind of attitude as it will only destroy the image of crypto currency and it will lessen investors until such time that no one wants to invest on this crypto market. Plus more money means competitive advantagem
Yeah, but projects that raised hardcap are statistically more success than projects that had problem to raise soft cap.
Plus more money means competitive advantagem
Plus more money means competitive advantagem
Projects that do not collect enough funds have almost no chance of continued existence, because new investors will not be interested in this project. However, there are exceptions, projects such as Grin, made from scratch without external investment.
Yeah, but projects that raised hardcap are statistically more success than projects that had problem to raise soft cap.
Plus more money means competitive advantagem
Plus more money means competitive advantagem
There are many of such projects, the never had the intentions or the know how to execute the project. They only perfected the Whitepaper which was enough to convince investors and at the end nothing to show for the millions they raised.
Its not like this is any different from IPOs in regular life. Many companies that get funding still fail. The rule for venture capitalists is only 1/10 of the companies your invest in will be very successful.
Hardcap is just an idea of how well people were convinced about the project and how effective the project pr has been, It doesn't justify the project being legitimate, not being scam, or just shitty project that will no longer function after a few months.
If an ICO project raises the maximum amount of funds, which is rarely the case now, it shows that the project is in demand and can be invested in it
Absolutely right Hardcap of ICO project is not always guaranteed for the success of ICO, many project could raised of hard cap but failed after listing on exchange market with lower price than ICO.
ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
hardcap is the ultimate target of an ICO project .. so of course they are successful in running the project because they have achieved hardcap in selling tokens ... and many projects that don't reach hardcap or they can only get Softcap from token sales ... but they can be successful too ... so the ICO or not ICO method has no effect on the success of a project ... but it is very influential from the CEOs and Founders of each project that is executed ...
We cant say icos hard cap will reach and keep changing as per the market price so if we buy icos coins better to study potential development coins
Reaching the hardcap is not the main factor to whether or not a project will succeed. Success will greatly depend on the TEAM. A well structured and organized team with the mindset of achieving success is the main factor for which success will be met. Heck, a team like this will still be able to reach their goal even with just a softcap! In business, even with just a small capital, a determined and optimistic team will surely claim victory!
Jump to: