This is one of the reasons its always a good idea to invest in projects with pro teams,whatever challenges that comes they will be ready
With a known team, you can be pretty sure that the project is going to work and they are serious with what they do. Someone who's reputable on this industry will never put his reputation at stake just for the sake of money. Invest wisely and don't be too blind with the promised potential return upon investing into such ICOs. You need to be good at checking ICOs now because many of them has shown the same symptoms on what's good and bad project.
Topic: Hardcap ICO is no guarantee that the project will succeed - page 12. (Read 31507 times)
Absolutely not, I have seen enough examples, where projects have collected 50m+, but did not achieved something even within a year. Some projects are still tradable only on trash exchanges, and some got hacked. There is never a guaranteed result.
If a project gets a hard cap, at least look at this project, because there are very few projects that achieve this today.
I do not understand what role the ICO plays here. Perhaps the possibility that most ICOs can become scams led you to this idea, but the scam is the project itself. Already most of the IEOs can not reach hardcap too. In fact if there are small regulations, we see a more robust market.
Yea it is true that hard card is no guarantee for a successful project, I've seen a project that reaches the hard cap twice and still fails and there are projects that still reach the hard cap and are successful, it is just based on the seriousness of the project and how good the team are.
chances are they spend a few percent of the funds raised to buy necessities and vacations. when the hard stamp is achieved they can do many things to develop the project.
The success of the ICO does not guarantee good project growth in the future. Teams are key to the success of the project after a successful fundraising. Professional teams are needed for the development of the project so that tokens or coins from the project become valuable. So, the team is an important thing that must be examined before joining a project.
Yea it is true that hard card is no guarantee for a successful project, I've seen a project that reaches the hard cap twice and still fails and there are projects that still reach the hard cap and are successful, it is just based on the seriousness of the project and how good the team are.
ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
my opinion ico is raising funds for new or newly created projects and they make a concept so people are interested in investing and getting funds for their projects is different from projects that do not do ico it is a good project and has been trusted by many people or already known and they made tokens to expand their network. but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
Actually it is no guarantee to succeed in the future. All that depends on the seriousness of the project team. If the project is good in ideas and succeeds in ico, but in future developments they can be said to fail, that means the project team is not serious about developing their project.
you are right. making a project that is also needed will be the thing that guarantees that the project can be successful. at this time, there have been several projects that I have seen getting their hardcaps, it's just that not all went well when the project was running.
I know a lot of companies that conducted their ICO,did a hardcap , but did not go to the stock exchange , and there are those that went to the stock exchange , but immediately the price of their tokens fell . The indicator is neither the collection of money, but the team's desire for further development
Actually it is no guarantee to succeed in the future. All that depends on the seriousness of the project team. If the project is good in ideas and succeeds in ico, but in future developments they can be said to fail, that means the project team is not serious about developing their project.
ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
ICO is just a way to find funds from investors, so in my opinion ICO does not guarantee the project is successful or not. but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
The success or failure of the project is seen from developments that are up to date and also transparent and do not exceed the specified time limit.
Yes, reaching hard cap is not a guarantee that the ico project would be successful, however it is the first step that the project has a potential to grow and develop more, even reaching only soft cap, there's a possibility that the ico project would develop.
ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
well yea, this is quite certain, there has been many projects who claimed to reach hardcap but still not doing good in the market. Is is very important to make some proper research on projects before going into them and not just depend on the hype. but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
You are very right to say running a successful ICO (reaching hardcap) is not a guarantee that the project will succeed at the long run. Most especially, it has to do with the real life use case of the project and dedication of the project team to be focused in order to achieve its project aim(s). Projects that didn’t do ICO sometimes are serious because they put in extra effort and personal resources to see how far they can go.
A hard cap does not guarantee the success of the ICO, but not reaching hard cap does not mean a failure. Because sometimes the idea is perfect from a technical side , but the team cannot deliver it to the community.
This is one of the reasons its always a good idea to invest in projects with pro teams,whatever challenges that comes they will be ready
With a known team, you can be pretty sure that the project is going to work and they are serious with what they do. Someone who's reputable on this industry will never put his reputation at stake just for the sake of money. Invest wisely and don't be too blind with the promised potential return upon investing into such ICOs. You need to be good at checking ICOs now because many of them has shown the same symptoms on what's good and bad project.ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
The only thing which guarantees the success of a project is the development team, utility of the project and community itself. If the team is actively working on their project development delingently fulfilling their road map only then can they be successful. but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
Of course, reaching or even surpassing the set hard cap is not a guarantee for the success of a project. It is just an indication for a successful phase of the development of the project and based on the expertise of the team, the amount raised can be squandered on unnecessary aspects which may finally lead the project hanging in the air without yielding any good results.
Lots of factors come to play for the success of a project which include the expertise level of the team, the product of the project, the demand level of the product, the road map, the community of the project etc.
Lots of factors come to play for the success of a project which include the expertise level of the team, the product of the project, the demand level of the product, the road map, the community of the project etc.
This is one of the reasons its always a good idea to invest in projects with pro teams,whatever challenges that comes they will be ready
With a known team, you can be pretty sure that the project is going to work and they are serious with what they do. Someone who's reputable on this industry will never put his reputation at stake just for the sake of money. Invest wisely and don't be too blind with the promised potential return upon investing into such ICOs. You need to be good at checking ICOs now because many of them has shown the same symptoms on what's good and bad project.in the year of 2017 most ico's are legit so it does not matter if thier team is compose of pro people or not but now most ico's these days are unsuccesful so chosing the best team for an ico is a must because that may increase your chances of getting a succesful ico .
aside from checking the team , there are also other factors that we should look when choosing a good ico . few examples would be checking thier road map , checking their white paper , checking thier details , etc ....
Jump to: