Topic: Hardcap ICO is no guarantee that the project will succeed - page 10. (Read 31507 times)
Any project that is able to achieve a hardcap actually shows it already has the support and trust from the community, if it fails to succeed it should be the fault of the developers, either that they that they were out to scam or had lost the community trust that everyone decided to sell and dump
It is true that the project will reached the hardcap is no guarantee in the future, but a project which reach hardcap actually will develop because if you reach the hardcap its means its good project and the investors or the hunters that supported this project will be benefited.
This Hardcap thing is just a goal created by the founder or by the team of the ICO for the creation of the project. When an ICO reached it's hardcap it should more likely have a complete fund for them to follow their road map. Since ICOs are most likely greedy now, some ICO members sell off their coins instead of supporting it.
I do not pay attention to Hardcap ICO. But first of all, I pay attention to the project team and the goals that they set for themselves. So how exactly the competence of the team helps the project to achieve positive results.
It does not matter at all, because without a working product, healthy community and good exchanges with great trading volume, you can forget about success in this industry, especially on such an unstable market.
even when the project reaches the hardcap it is not a guarantee of project success in the real market. products must be clearly developed and accepted in the market. if not, I'm sure in one year the project has been lost. in 2018 we can see there are several projects like that.
It does not matter at all, because without a working product, healthy community and good exchanges with great trading volume, you can forget about success in this industry, especially on such an unstable market.
You have a point here in the sense that a project hitting hardcap in ICO doesn't necessarily mean they will do well in the long run. Some pay influencers and create great hype around the project making it sell out fast. Then after the ICO, investors start regretting when they don't deliver what was promised before and during ICO. nevertheless, it's not so in all situations, some projects hit hardcap and still excel, some just manage to hit softcap and still do well. The most annoying is projects which fake hardcap, such projects are just after the money.
ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
If they have limited in concept and there's a possibility that the coin will not take off, then why investors support this coin in the first place, reaching the hardcap is a good sign and the first step in making the project a success, because investors will not support a project that will not guaranty them profit and no usage in the community, investors are wiser now.
Yes, I also agree with your opinion. ICO that reaches the hardcap certainly already has the trust of investors and also the community. Strong investors and communities make the ICO project a big success.
In some cases, projects "draw" getting a hardcap so you need to be careful. Very few projects have actually received the hard cap recently, but after the listing of their coins are still falling.
ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
If they reached the hard cap then they have the funds to develop their project, and market their platform, reaching a hardcap is the main goal of any crowdfunding project, to be able to deliver what's on their whitepaper and roadmap, it's something that can guaranty a project.
hardcap only shows that investors believed in that particular project. but this trust doesn't guarantee that developers will succeed in the future.
ICO project can turn into a scam although reaching hardcap. Meanwhile, some other projects may fail in the next process which causes the project to not be able to reach the exchange and eventually have to refund their investors. Indeed, hardcap is a good sign for the future of a project, but it doesn't always end with a good story.
Of course, there are many projects out there who have reached their hard cap but released a crappy project. All whitepapers are sugar coated and used the imagination of the whitepaper's author.
The hardcap of an ICO might not be a guarantee for the success of such project, but it is necessary and at least one of the criteria for solid and genuine projects to be able to deliver their promises to later.
Well, there is no guarantee for the success of the projects but it indicates that there is a high chance for the project to be successful. By reaching the hardcap, it means many investors join the project. It tells us that the project has something special to run and will lead to a good future.
The hardcap of an ICO might not be a guarantee for the success of such project, but it is necessary and at least one of the criteria for solid and genuine projects to be able to deliver their promises to later.
Most of the projects that stopped at softcap or managed to make it, are still struggling with the development of their products.
Most of the projects that stopped at softcap or managed to make it, are still struggling with the development of their products.
This is the hard truth of ICOs, after reaching hardcap some of them stil failed. One reason is the usage of the cryptocurrency token itself in todays system. There were ICOs that did not have any significant uses. It may be that the there are better cryptocurrency with similar functions. So it something about utilization of the coin.
Sure, ive seen many hardcap token/coin price drop almost 95% after ico, and sometime project without ico turn to valueble coin/token after listed at the market. But if project reach hardcap it will give the project better chance to developing their project on schedule because they have much money in reserve to spend at anything they need
Yes I agree with you
Hardcap successes are evidences that the project attracted large number of investors but not necessarily success
There’s still need for the developer team to work towards the success of such projects
Hardcap successes are evidences that the project attracted large number of investors but not necessarily success
There’s still need for the developer team to work towards the success of such projects
Agree with your opinion , successfully ICO not just about already reached hardcap on their token sale or ICO sale.
But there's another important point beside that , like the product of their projects , if they had MVP.. you can check it and rate it by yourself.
Also , if their projects has a something different than other ICO projects.. I think its a plus value for them.
In my opinion too , if their ICO projects already reach hardcap on sale.. Its mean they has a enough funds to make their roadmap plan must successfully happen
But there's another important point beside that , like the product of their projects , if they had MVP.. you can check it and rate it by yourself.
Also , if their projects has a something different than other ICO projects.. I think its a plus value for them.
In my opinion too , if their ICO projects already reach hardcap on sale.. Its mean they has a enough funds to make their roadmap plan must successfully happen
ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
I agree with your opinion, because indeed there are very many examples of ICO altcoins that have succeeded even though they have for so long gone down in price, some have even died, but at least by reaching the hardcap the founders can maintain the continuity of the altcoin that is run. with capital from hardcap achievement. but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
Jump to: