Topic: Hardcap ICO is no guarantee that the project will succeed - page 4. (Read 31507 times)
It is no secret that ICO projects without mature concepts will lose and die in competition even though the ICO project touched hardcap. I will not mention which project for example, but we all know what projects fail to survive.. the most difficult part of a project is surviving and developing.
Definitely not lol. So many project that can achieve hardcap but fail on exchange. So many factor on project can succeed or not, and hardcap isn't the main reason. Why you must proud with hardcap if your project didn't get much demand and can't attract investor and trader on exchange? Definitely your project will lose the value right?
There is never a guarantee that your investment is going to bring profit, especially in the crypto industry with an insane level of volatility. Do your own research and look at the product and not at the amount of cash that was raised.
If the ico project gets or reach the hardcap it can be a successful project that can list in good top 10 exchanges so the tokens will be potential and can bring profits to bounty Hunters especially on the investors who invest in the project.
Most of the project today don't reach their HardCap due to the bad image gives by the past Scam ICOs, however if they been really true on their project even the Softcap can be use to developed their Ideas and make some real project and continue to update it later when some real development has been done.
I agree, everything goes back to the concept of the project itself. If the project is good and the developer team uses the money to build and develop the products, I think it will affect investor confidence, but many projects that once the target is achieved, communication is no longer intensive with the community
I've seen great projects and supposedly great developers building great apps, but still the project eventually failed. In fact I was in one such ICO myself, incredible project and escrows, great teams etc. Reputable members. And then we didn't realize 1 of the devs was evil and the escrows refunded us less than half of money, while other stupid ICOs with no product still made a lot of money.
Hardcap is a fraud. Many didn't notice this last year. We all rush into an ico project because the hard cap is getting sold out. What we failed to remember is that people that bought the ico till it reached the hard cap are planning to sell off once the project is listed on an exchange. I remember how dcc ico sold out in a few minutes but look at that project today. Lacking volume and delisted from cmc
Yes i agree there are many ICOs which failed after hardcap and all money gone to scammers.
This is how they continue their luxury.
Team is the key of all ICOs check the team very detailed and decide if they are real and honest.
I haven't done any bounties where the developer ran away after hitting the hardcap. I think that it happens on very rare occasions. This is how they continue their luxury.
Team is the key of all ICOs check the team very detailed and decide if they are real and honest.
Am totally in support of what you just said. Some ICO lack ideas to continue refracturing of their project to move to the moon. They are so adamant to have a clear vision of their goal and target. ICO's takes years to plan to get the team organized for a successful and continuity project
ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this,what about your opinion?
I remembered Greenlink project in 2017,they made millions of dollars from ICO hardcap with ease and they just disappeared into thin air,their website stop working but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this,what about your opinion?
Yes i agree there are many ICOs which failed after hardcap and all money gone to scammers.
This is how they continue their luxury.
Team is the key of all ICOs check the team very detailed and decide if they are real and honest.
This is how they continue their luxury.
Team is the key of all ICOs check the team very detailed and decide if they are real and honest.
it all depends on the concept of the project itself. if it reaches hardcap, but their concept is less interesting, it can even be said that it doesn't develop in the future, it won't affect anything. but if a project is in a good hardcap concept and not of course they will succeed. I gave one example. oyster. they did not reach the selling price of tokens but the concept was good and the project was developed. and the price of their coins soared.
I agree, everything goes back to the concept of the project itself. If the project is good and the developer team uses the money to build and develop the products, I think it will affect investor confidence, but many projects that once the target is achieved, communication is no longer intensive with the community
many investors are careful in investing in an ICO project even though it has reached hardcap but as you say that's it has not determined success. the ICO project is only sweet at the beginning and after that it can end in fraud or become a rubbish coin, and if it is listed on the market the price of a coin is not in accordance with the ICO price.
well, even though ICOs that achieve their hardcap have great potential to develop, but, I think the real development depends on the honesty of the team, and of course their strategy. hardcap projects prove that the project has a concept, and high prospects. but, not a few projet still fail when they reach their hardcap. It seems to me that sometimes the project team is deceiving, about the funds raised, I met projects that collected the maximum amount, but did not take the token for a good exchange, only very bad exchanges, if they had money, everything would be different
good exchanges not only talk listing fee.for binance, they will not list a projects if they have no good quality although they pay alot of bitcoin as listing fee.some projects able to maximize their crowdfunding , but they could not developt projects well.and this is be their main obstacles to list in good exchanges.
It seems to me that sometimes the project team is deceiving, about the funds raised, I met projects that collected the maximum amount, but did not take the token for a good exchange, only very bad exchanges, if they had money, everything would be different
all will depend on team performance. because of whether or not hardcap is achieved, it is no guarantee of success atico. the team can just do a scam and then leave. but if the atim who works in it is solid, not even reaching hardcap can be successful.
ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
we can't see it from that, because in my opinion there are some projects that use ICO but the project is still running and serious to develop the project, so what determines this project seriously and good is the team of project, because even though the project doesn't have ICO but the project has a bad team, so I'm sure the project will fail too and if the project has an ICO but the team from the project is good, then I am sure the project will grow rapidly because this project has additional funds from investors to be able to make the project have a fast progress, therefore I think the project will look serious and good, not from the project having an ICO or not, but the team on the project is good or not.
It was only possible to talk about the hardcap of the company ico about those projects that had conducted the company’s ico before 2018. Over the past year and a half, I almost never came across such projects that at least exceeded Softcap. but in 2017, the projects that collected Kharkov really showed good results in the market, although today these projects are also in a bearish trend.
it all depends on the concept of the project itself. if it reaches hardcap, but their concept is less interesting, it can even be said that it doesn't develop in the future, it won't affect anything. but if a project is in a good hardcap concept and not of course they will succeed. I gave one example. oyster. they did not reach the selling price of tokens but the concept was good and the project was developed. and the price of their coins soared.
Exactly, but most of the project don't really give an assurance that they will have a good future in the crypto world. Getting the hardcap is a big improvement of the project but it doesn't mean that it will provide a good future for us crypto hunters.
The most important thing in the project is not how much money the project has raised, but the most important thing is how the developers treat their project and how it is developed
you are right, after successful sales, what must be considered is their product. whether the product is acceptable and active on the market or not. it is very important, because if there is no product from the platform developed it will be the same as there is no real evidence of the project that has been carried out. Jump to: