Pages:
Author

Topic: Hardcap ICO is no guarantee that the project will succeed - page 7. (Read 31507 times)

sr. member
Activity: 714
Merit: 251
If the project is real and it reach its hardcap is good but that doesnt guaranteed its success when the production starts,the project might still fail ,hardcap is not the only thing that makes a project a successful one

The indicator of reaching Hardcap can be a good start to success because it shows the project appeals to many cryptocurrency investors and enthusiasts and that its why they invested. The rest of the work has to be done by the team to ensure final succeed else it fails
full member
Activity: 770
Merit: 100
yes, very hardcap is not a guarantee for the success of a project, but we also don't forget that hardcap is also a way to success.
but the most important thing in the success of the project is the consistency and professionalism of the team, this is the main requirement.
sr. member
Activity: 1190
Merit: 253
Like other traditional business, projects are like businesses that needs investors and marketing team. Since the marketing and did a great job, investors were attracted to the said project and the project became successful because of the development team. But on the other hand, when the development team did not perform well, then the success of the project will not ne guaranteed.
sr. member
Activity: 602
Merit: 254
🔰FERRUM NETWORK🔰
ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?

Neither HARDCAP nor SOFTKAP is a guarantee of project success. In order for the project to grow several times after the release of tokens on the stock exchanges, many reasons are needed, the main of which is high popularity. Let us recall the OCEAN protocol, which all successfully collected but after a year and a half came out with a big loss ... There are a lot of such examples!
legendary
Activity: 2450
Merit: 1047
ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?

If they are limited in concept then investors will not support such kind of project, hardcap is very important for me if you have funds the project can move hire great developers market their platform and product, everything very much depends on funding.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 251
Futurov
Yes, It solely depends on the developers whether or not the project will succeed. Reaching hardcap is not the only factor that determines a successful project, because there are some projects who do not focus on the development of the promised technology. Some projects stop there which will result to a rather faulty technology. Though based on my experience, those that i have participated in have mostly become successful, whther or not they have reached hardcap. Take Lympo as an example, as well as adbank.
hero member
Activity: 2492
Merit: 542
I saw a project last year collected $100m almost reaching its hardcap this company is Envion for specific, investors on this ICO are totally rekt big loss million dollars I know has not been refunded to investors on my last news last year I dont know if there are some updates now regarding this company this is one of the best example that collecting huge amount of money is not a guarantee to success.  
sr. member
Activity: 1554
Merit: 250
Making Smart Money Work
I don't see any project achieving hardcap at all lately, but even if it does, it's a great indicator that the project is good

That's not true, some projects reach hardcap in minutes or even seconds. But they did not use the ICO method but instead participated in the IEO.
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1001
From 2018 to now, many ICO projects raised the hardcap but they did nothing in development. Rather many low cap projects did far better than that hard cap reached projects. The Online ICO, Cryptassist ICO, Shivom, and many more projects raised the hardcap last year, in CMC, you can see that they don't have even 100K USD trading volume, no development in the core zone!
All of those ICOs you said are fake and scam ICOs. The are scamming their investor and bounty hunter by collected investor's money and do nothing with their project. Even though they have paid their bounty hunter, it's still worthless since the price is far below than their ICO price
sr. member
Activity: 645
Merit: 266
When bitcoin price hit all time high in end of 2017, people create so many Scam with ICO method, they can pay site like ICO review to give that ICO good rating then the ICO buyer interest into the project.
full member
Activity: 652
Merit: 103
Yeah you're right. I've joined some bounties and invested my money in some ico. I invested in ico which is reached the hardcap. But, the products can't be found anywhere. and the price is drop 300% from ico price after listed in some exchangers.
copper member
Activity: 376
Merit: 1
Nothing is absolutely guaranteed in this space, that what I have come to understand but achieving a hardcap for an ICO shows a very serious adoption and acceptance by the community, any project that was able to achieve this and token is fairly distrusted but eventually fails has the large part of the blame to the team, right now a lot projects do not organize any ICO but they still eventually come out successful
sr. member
Activity: 686
Merit: 255
I don't see any project achieving hardcap at all lately, but even if it does, it's a great indicator that the project is good
BCNEX is one of the projects that has now reached Hardcap they are able to do that because it is supported by many communities and also large investors.
sr. member
Activity: 1400
Merit: 273
The project is only as successful as the people who compose the development team. Regardless of whether the hard cap is reached or not, for as long as the team has enough knowledge and brilliance they will definitely move forward. ICO outcome might simply be all about excellent marketing. After the marketing is done and the coin offering is finished, the real work takes place. A team that can provide a product wins.
member
Activity: 266
Merit: 10
For a project to be successful, it involves a lot and not only hard cap. The idea behind the project, the team, the technology and the experience of the team members also contributes to this success of the project. The hard cap is also necessary since financial backing is also required for a project to be successful.
member
Activity: 714
Merit: 10
Living is easy with eyes closed ...
Of course, each project, whether it is ICO, STO or IEO, should be differentiated. Failure of IEO projects can happen, and vice versa, ICO projects from which no one expected anything can present a revolutionary idea that will gild investors. Although, I agree, recently the ICO projects have been bringing more frustration. And if you look at the success of the IEO projects at Binance Lunchpad, then you can follow the conclusion that the main trend in the years 2019-2020 will be the conduct of IEOs. And achieving their hardcap is almost guaranteed to bring profit to early investors.
full member
Activity: 346
Merit: 100
https://bmy.guide
I don't see any project achieving hardcap at all lately, but even if it does, it's a great indicator that the project is good
jr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 1
If am not always concerned with the amount raised by a project team on their project, although it could be something to take note of.
My main concern is, whatever amount that is raised, how effective will the team use it. Mismanagement and misappropriation of funds has been a serious issue about some projects team.
full member
Activity: 644
Merit: 117
swing!
It takes quite some time to see how thing goes, and usually they are masked by PR, or simply the quality of work might not be what you expecting, i would its definitely better to invest in company that have a big bank to keep going, rather than tiny startup that give you a hardship time which most of the people wouldn't be enduring. You could actually weight the process by reading their commits and stuff, not just solely on news if you want to have a greater picture.
member
Activity: 798
Merit: 17
Cryptoknowmics - World's First Decentralized Media
I've been in the bounty for years. And as I noticed, hardcap is not an indicator of success, and in General, the main, in my opinion, the indicator is the finished product. And yet, when the company enters the stock exchange, its tokens lose a decent price because of the bounty. Which, for the most part, try to quickly drain the tokens, which significantly reduces the price.

Not true that the lose of price is the bounty participants . If you take a look at the projects that lock bounty tokens for months or even years then you will see that price drops even without bounty sellers Smiley And there is alot of projects that got really good price movement up even with bounty particiants tokens without lock Smiley If the project is really good and got really nice exchanges then there always be traders and to dump the price would be really hard .
And it is difficult for bounty hunters to roll the price to the floor. They have only 1-3%. Basically it is possible, for those who entered at the very first stage and received a powerful discount, but this is payment, because they risked the most
Pages:
Jump to: