Topic: Hardcap ICO is no guarantee that the project will succeed - page 5. (Read 31507 times)
The most important thing in the project is not how much money the project has raised, but the most important thing is how the developers treat their project and how it is developed
yes I agree with you, the quality of an ICO project is very difficult to assess, even though the ico project managed to reach a hardcap, it does not mean that the price of coins distributed will go up in the market, even the coins will drop dramatically after entering the exchange
yes, because the one who determines the value or price of a coin on an exchange is the investor or user. even though the project succeeded in reaching a hardcap but the price of an unstable coin will also affect the development of coins in the future. so now many projects are repeating their programs to attract new investors so that the price of coins remains stable in the market.
ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
Actually, gone are the days you judge the success of a project by its ability to reach Hardcap. Even sparkster reached its ICO sale Hardcap but did x-100 on listing on IDEX and it was delisted in less than two weeks. I belive the team makeup, as well as token allocation has alot to more offer towards the success of any project in my opinion
yes I agree with you, the quality of an ICO project is very difficult to assess, even though the ico project managed to reach a hardcap, it does not mean that the price of coins distributed will go up in the market, even the coins will drop dramatically after entering the exchange
it all depends on the concept of the project itself. if it reaches hardcap, but their concept is less interesting, it can even be said that it doesn't develop in the future, it won't affect anything. but if a project is in a good hardcap concept and not of course they will succeed. I gave one example. oyster. they did not reach the selling price of tokens but the concept was good and the project was developed. and the price of their coins soared.
Cryptocurrency projects, most especially ICOs now hardly reach hardcap, but when it comes to IEO, everything can be sold off within seconds, depending on the exchange on which it is held.
Reaching hardcap is actually a good thing, because genuine projects will be able to utilize the fund to meet up with the project development.
Reaching hardcap is actually a good thing, because genuine projects will be able to utilize the fund to meet up with the project development.
If the project reaches hardcap it is actually very good. Because they can develop and run a project roadmap. But most projects cannot even run their projects, even though the project gets a lot of funding from the ICO. That's why hardcap is no guarantee that the project will succeed.
i dont get them . why would they postpone the project even if they already have the funds to keep the project going ? are the freaking lazy or they are just scamming thier investors ? but i see that some ico's have a money back guarantee offer which means investors gets a refund if something bad happens but the one that will suffer are the bounty hunters because they dont get anything from thier hardwork if ever the project only promise to pay a token after the completion dates .
ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
That's right, after all some projects also use fake hardcaps where the investment is made by the developer themselves.but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
In my opinion the making of ICO aims to be more attractive to investors from cryptocurrency users so that the goal range is slightly wider. Then regarding if the project uses ICO and doesn't use ICO, who more seriously? it depends on who the developer is, and I don't think its the main thing to say that project is serious or not.
Without money ico projects can work up. So many of ico turn to ieo to gain up some money and reach soft cap to hardcap because other says once they reach hardcap the projects goes successful. But until now they can reach hardcap unless the project is not good in futher ways because of many scam ico projects and investors are worried to invest up sometimes.
There is no guarantee at all and it does not matter how much money was raised in the token sale. The only thing that matters is the product and the team, that will lead this project. Moreover, token usability and acceptance plays a great role as well.
if we are taking the latest trend of IEOs and then we can take a lot of information about the IEO trend have changed the people's mind. You said that how much is not giving guarantee but remember if the project needs only a small money and it can bring a lot of room for the price of token to grow. The trend has already changed and the usability becomes the long term speculation for buyers. But they need funding, they are holding crowdfunding because they want funds to get their platform set if they reach the soft cap I believe the success of the project will follow because they already had funding coming from their investors which will become the first supporters of their project.
if you look at a number of projects in the past year, there are many projects that even reach hardcaps, and now the price of their coins is like garbage with very low value. I don't think if I invest in a project like that. I have to receive a big loss, of course, if I invest in a project like that. ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
But they need funding, they are holding crowdfunding because they want funds to get their platform set if they reach the soft cap I believe the success of the project will follow because they already had funding coming from their investors which will become the first supporters of their project.
Cryptocurrency projects, most especially ICOs now hardly reach hardcap, but when it comes to IEO, everything can be sold off within seconds, depending on the exchange on which it is held.
Reaching hardcap is actually a good thing, because genuine projects will be able to utilize the fund to meet up with the project development.
Reaching hardcap is actually a good thing, because genuine projects will be able to utilize the fund to meet up with the project development.
Now almost all new projects choose the IEO as a way to sell tokens and get funds. It's easier and more practical for the developer team because everything is handled by the exchanger. Many ICOs have achieved hardcap targets in 2017 and 2018 but now, it is very difficult to reach ICO targets because the trend has changed to the IEO
You right about hard cap an ICOs is not guarantee the project is success, many ICOs have raised of hard cap but always have lower price after listing on exchange market.
That's what I often see, even though the funds have gotten a lot but the price remains low and it must really be action from the team or buyback.
Cryptocurrency projects, most especially ICOs now hardly reach hardcap, but when it comes to IEO, everything can be sold off within seconds, depending on the exchange on which it is held.
Reaching hardcap is actually a good thing, because genuine projects will be able to utilize the fund to meet up with the project development.
Reaching hardcap is actually a good thing, because genuine projects will be able to utilize the fund to meet up with the project development.
There is one campaign i joined before and still got no exchange listing until now.
The team are not talking much on telegram group also.
STP or BITGOALS is the one project i am talking about and they are a sold-out project.
They have a betting platform but until now the tokens are still can be use on their platform and nothing more.
no listing also, the team is hard to be talk t=with.
The team are not talking much on telegram group also.
STP or BITGOALS is the one project i am talking about and they are a sold-out project.
They have a betting platform but until now the tokens are still can be use on their platform and nothing more.
no listing also, the team is hard to be talk t=with.
Perhaps the projects do not conduct ICO because they secured the support of funds or they already had money received from non-cryptocurrency activities. And what about those projects that have (at the moment) only an idea and a development plan? My answer is to go for ICO or IEO (if they are interesting for exchanges).
I do not like the story with ICO that some projects continue to collect dentgs(if they have not reached the hardcup) after the end of tokensale.
I do not like the story with ICO that some projects continue to collect dentgs(if they have not reached the hardcup) after the end of tokensale.
yes, since the era of crowdfunding in crypto began to popular in 2017, hardcap is not a guarantee and many hardcap revenues were misused by the project team for personal interests, there were many people who were very hype if there was a project they followed / hardcap but now the hype is fading because it doesn't have any effect.
Thats true, hardcap is not guarantee. Now token price price form ICO project increase is depending on the development and performance of the project.
But if people see that the project is bad, they will not invest in it and hardcap will not assemble the project, I think that hardcap shows that the project is at least good
Thats true, hardcap is not guarantee. Now token price price form ICO project increase is depending on the development and performance of the project.
The hardcap will is just a word and no guarantee that a project will succeed and it definitely does not depend on money that they raised the project will develop as the team has the full control in the way they manage their project. There were some teams that collected 80 million USD and failed to make a good project and the only thing that they dis is to make their project not that useful.
Jump to: