Topic: Hardcap ICO is no guarantee that the project will succeed - page 6. (Read 31507 times)
Hardcap will increase popularity of the project and it's cryptocurrency, but it doesn't mean that it will still have good popularity for long term. If the project create products that is really needed by cryptocurrency users, the project has a high probability of success. There are a lot of success project which they are aim to create tools that very usefull for cryptocurrency users. Crypto wallet and exchange site is good project to invest.
It really doesn't guarantee if it wil succeed. It depends on the motive of that team whether they have dedication on their project even if hardcap wasn't reached. Some projects are still continued and their roadmaps really happen.
Many projects are able to reach hardcap in ICO fund raising but in the end the project failed due to the teams aren't capable enough to lead the project to greater height and there are some projects that have no other aims but to make money from fund raising
I've had several ICO bounty companies that have collected hardcaps but no payouts so far. Not even listing. Maybe hardcap was just "drawn."
More often we deal with fictitious information about fees. Most of the projects raise their fees to attract as many investors as possible, and the total amount can vary greatly.
ICO was never a guarantee of project being successful because ICO means only raising funds for any project.
In fact other things played a part in success like good exchange listing, promotion and hype, good marketmakers, partnerships, marketing of project, raising only required amount of funds, having a working product and real concept based project etc. For a real success you need to keep balance of everything and success does not mean 10x on listing and later dump.
Some projects have no ICO and they are backed by VCs and for community they announce some airdrop to get more people in community. So that can be also good way to go.
But success only comes with how you manage your project and what are your strategies for short term and long term.
In fact other things played a part in success like good exchange listing, promotion and hype, good marketmakers, partnerships, marketing of project, raising only required amount of funds, having a working product and real concept based project etc. For a real success you need to keep balance of everything and success does not mean 10x on listing and later dump.
Some projects have no ICO and they are backed by VCs and for community they announce some airdrop to get more people in community. So that can be also good way to go.
But success only comes with how you manage your project and what are your strategies for short term and long term.
even the crowdfund are raised much money, but still make the project are failed and in other case after ended ICO and raised enough the product they offered are useless or still don't like ecpectation from ICO campaign, between their product offered in ICO and after released are useless
I believe the team and the vision is very important the rest all they don't matter much according to me that is what I feel.
ICO was never a guarantee of project being successful because ICO means only raising funds for any project.
In fact other things played a part in success like good exchange listing, promotion and hype, good marketmakers, partnerships, marketing of project, raising only required amount of funds, having a working product and real concept based project etc. For a real success you need to keep balance of everything and success does not mean 10x on listing and later dump.
Some projects have no ICO and they are backed by VCs and for community they announce some airdrop to get more people in community. So that can be also good way to go.
But success only comes with how you manage your project and what are your strategies for short term and long term.
In fact other things played a part in success like good exchange listing, promotion and hype, good marketmakers, partnerships, marketing of project, raising only required amount of funds, having a working product and real concept based project etc. For a real success you need to keep balance of everything and success does not mean 10x on listing and later dump.
Some projects have no ICO and they are backed by VCs and for community they announce some airdrop to get more people in community. So that can be also good way to go.
But success only comes with how you manage your project and what are your strategies for short term and long term.
I agree, the Hardcap is no guarantee that the project will succeed because I have seen the project get a Hardcap, there is no surprise in the market, prices dropped far and were difficult to rise, I personally rate all depends on the team how they can convince traders to buy coin on the market
That is why the project must require a product so that demand is created when it is marketed later. And I also strongly agree that hardcap is not a guarantee that a future project can succeed or not. Because it all depends on the development of the project in order to be successful in the future. I agree, the Hardcap is no guarantee that the project will succeed because I have seen the project get a Hardcap, there is no surprise in the market, prices dropped far and were difficult to rise, I personally rate all depends on the team how they can convince traders to buy coin on the market
Indeed, everything depends on the project and also the developer team. If the developer team is active and establishes many partnerships with many large companies, the community will expand and prices can rise.
I agree, the Hardcap is no guarantee that the project will succeed because I have seen the project get a Hardcap, there is no surprise in the market, prices dropped far and were difficult to rise, I personally rate all depends on the team how they can convince traders to buy coin on the market
That's totally true and I agree with you. There are most projects which were filled with hype thus achieving Hardcap and till today they are either nowhere to be found or the price is terrible.
What matters in a project is the team and the concept behind the project, thus with the little funds at hand, could be from softcap they will start off while working out ways to further develop their products.
What matters in a project is the team and the concept behind the project, thus with the little funds at hand, could be from softcap they will start off while working out ways to further develop their products.
Sure, attaining hardcap is not a full guarantee that a project will succeed. only a good use case supported with products can help a project succeed in this crypto market. I learnt this very lesson way back in 2017 when there were so many ICOs but most of them are dead now.
If the project is real and it reach its hardcap is good but that doesnt guaranteed its success when the production starts,the project might still fail ,hardcap is not the only thing that makes a project a successful one
i agree its not really about hardcap to make the ico succesful . its about the project development and features. if the coin or token will have demands or you can use it in some platform it can become succesful if they have some solid team behind it.
Lol, you discovered America. I do not see any logic here. Of course, if the project has a hardcap, this does not mean that it is successful. What is important is the project itself, and the amount of money raised.
If they are limited in concept then investors will not support such kind of project, hardcap is very important for me if you have funds the project can move hire great developers market their platform and product, everything very much depends on funding.
who can succeed in an ICO is not only hardcap income, but the developments made after the ICO process, in my opinion the ICO is the beginning of the development of a coin in the market, and hardcap is the initial target for these developments but what keeps coins alive is the continued development in do the developer of the coin which makes people believe that the coins they have the potential to be invested or used by community
yes the most important thing is development after the ICO sales process is complete. we can find developers who cannot process maximum funds from ICO sales and make their projects worse on the market. after being registered it is exchanged many fall and do not move. the developer is silent and can no longer do development. It is unfortunate that with perfect sales they cannot maximize it. 
ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
I agree that if the target is hardcap, there is no guarantee that the price will rise and will be profitable investment. In the early period of 2018, many projects reached the hardcap target with a value of more than $ 30 million but now, the market cap value is not more than $ 1 million.
ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
I agree that if the target is hardcap, there is no guarantee that the price will rise and will be profitable investment. In the early period of 2018, many projects reached the hardcap target with a value of more than $ 30 million but now, the market cap value is not more than $ 1 million.
ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
I've seen a lot of projects that reached hardcap, and yet some of them until now they never distribute the token rewards to their bounty participants. Ans sometimes there are ico's only reached softcap but in the end they've become more successful rather than the project who reached hardcap.
Jump to: