Oh dear, that's embarrassing and fortunate for any future court sagas. That's like creating
future liabilities.
Twitter is not a safe place for CSW, looks like he can be easily exposed as the fake he is.
Topic: Hodlonaut Trial - page 2. (Read 3828 times)
Don't know if you guys are following Twitter, but various people are trolling CSW spectacularly by having him call statements he doesn't realize were made by Satoshi as false, lies, ignorance, and so on. And CSW keeps falling for it.
First one: https://nitter.it/jochemin/status/1584538627727831040#m
CSW says that "Your statement means you do not understand bitcoin at all." Twitter user points out that the statement was made by Satoshi. CSW blocks the user and hides the tweet from his profile.
Next one: https://nitter.it/thom_bernhard/status/1586010353372377096#m and here is a screenshot in case CSW deletes it: https://nitter.it/Tak_Horigoshi/status/1585979441981067265#m
CSW says that whoever made that statement is "a fool or a liar". Twitter user points out that the statement was made by Satoshi. Wright then denies the follow up statement, which it turns out, was also made by Satoshi.
And another bonus recent tweet, here is CSW apparently completely unaware of the difference between nodes and mining pools: https://nitter.it/Dr_CSWright/status/1586083965781176320#m
Honestly, whoever is next to be served with one his stupid lawsuits could just present his Twitter account as proof that he isn't Satoshi at this point.
First one: https://nitter.it/jochemin/status/1584538627727831040#m
CSW says that "Your statement means you do not understand bitcoin at all." Twitter user points out that the statement was made by Satoshi. CSW blocks the user and hides the tweet from his profile.
Next one: https://nitter.it/thom_bernhard/status/1586010353372377096#m and here is a screenshot in case CSW deletes it: https://nitter.it/Tak_Horigoshi/status/1585979441981067265#m
CSW says that whoever made that statement is "a fool or a liar". Twitter user points out that the statement was made by Satoshi. Wright then denies the follow up statement, which it turns out, was also made by Satoshi.
And another bonus recent tweet, here is CSW apparently completely unaware of the difference between nodes and mining pools: https://nitter.it/Dr_CSWright/status/1586083965781176320#m
Honestly, whoever is next to be served with one his stupid lawsuits could just present his Twitter account as proof that he isn't Satoshi at this point.
It's still banned, he's just evading the ban-- not like he complies with any other rules...
Now it's possible Elon Musk might get him banned as a new twatter owner, or maybe they will join forces in new shitcoin business endeavor 
I somewhat doubt Wright is going to sue lopp-- he's still got to come up with some lie he can tell his attornies to get them to file the paperwork and he'd have a really hard time. He threatens it as a pure intimidation move. Actually doing it would be pretty stupid.
It's possible this is one more of his stunts, but I see Jameson Lopp is still talking with Faketoshi and talking about courts.Oh and Lopp just asked ElonMusk to unban @geoffgolberg account, so we have first public requests coming.
https://nitter.lacontrevoie.fr/lopp/status/1585856027966476290#m
I feel cringe reading this part.
It is amusing watching him get annihilated on Twitter.Here's my favorite thing he's posted: https://nitter.it/agerhanssen/status/1583923967974203393#m. Could it have been "Half" Finney all along!?
When can we expect the UK trial?
My understanding was it is not expected for another 12 months or so, but I cannot find a source for why I thought that.Edit: This article indeed says "late 2023" for the UK case.
Will Hodlonaut be able to present the same KPMG reports in the UK case? or will he be able
to reference the findings of this recent case?
It looks like the next target of CSW is going to be Jameson Lopp. I guess that this guy doing this shitshow only to travel on others' (Ayre's) money.
https://mobile.twitter.com/lopp/status/1585315567531364352
https://mobile.twitter.com/lopp/status/1585315567531364352
and likewise will Jameson Lopp be able to at least reference the Hodlonaut trial
findings?
I'm not sure if that is a practice, sounds like it could be from movies I saw in the past
but what is the reality I wonder....
It would be nice to imagine for both events being able to reference what happened in one
court of law that it would straight away throw doubt on CSW's claims.
--snip--
Lopp should go to court just to see Craig tell his bullshit and later quote him.
Lopp should go to court just to see Craig tell his bullshit and later quote him.
IMO it's a waste of time. I'd rather see him write another technical blog post[1].
It looks like the next target of CSW is going to be Jameson Lopp. I guess that this guy doing this shitshow only to travel on others' (Ayre's) money.
Oh I can't wait to see this new Faketoshi doom trial and I am sure Jameson Lopp is not going to back down so easy.You made me remember how much money and time he spend to find out who call SWAT team to his house[1]. If faketoshi going too far, i expect Lopp would pursue him.
[1] https://blog.lopp.net/
[2] https://blog.lopp.net/to-swat-a-swatter/
was stuck in a courtroom filled with senile old men and women trying to make sense of how social media works.
Send them back to the typewriters time when everything as analog LOLHopeless generation. They should be spending time with their grand children instead of wasting time of an important position. We are not in 80s anymore.
Does anyone knows who the heck returned and unbanned CSW twitter account, was it new boss Elon Musk, or he bribed or sued someone to unban him? 
It's still banned, he's just evading the ban-- not like he complies with any other rules...I somewhat doubt Wright is going to sue lopp-- he's still got to come up with some lie he can tell his attornies to get them to file the paperwork and he'd have a really hard time. He threatens it as a pure intimidation move. Actually doing it would be pretty stupid.
OTOH suing former Bitcoin developers was also pretty stupid and that didn't stop him.
It looks like the next target of CSW is going to be Jameson Lopp. I guess that this guy doing this shitshow only to travel on others' (Ayre's) money.
Oh I can't wait to see this new Faketoshi doom trial and I am sure Jameson Lopp is not going to back down so easy.Lopp is citizen of United States, so that means new trial would move again like a traveling circus with CSW as a main clown.
Does anyone knows who the heck returned and unbanned CSW twitter account, was it new boss Elon Musk, or he bribed or sued someone to unban him?
I really don't understand how uneducated a court could be. If they do not understand the technology then they need a team who understand it. People paying tax to waste money on those uneducated court people, why?
It just need a bitcoin address to sign the proof of authentication but no one seems to be going to that path. What does these witlessness has to do here. When a technically detailed case handled by a group of politics, history educated people then nothing good can be expected from it.
All waste of time.
It's not uncommon for a ruling body to be this idiotic and still have the cajones to say they are the only ones capable of imposing punishment and/or reward whenever necessary. Just take for example the time when Mark Zuckerberg, a man I do not lean towards in terms of principle and belief but will use as a prime example for my statement, was stuck in a courtroom filled with senile old men and women trying to make sense of how social media works. This is just funny at this point but ultimately sad considering it's us who they are practically fighting against, after all we are all Hodlonaut. It just need a bitcoin address to sign the proof of authentication but no one seems to be going to that path. What does these witlessness has to do here. When a technically detailed case handled by a group of politics, history educated people then nothing good can be expected from it.
All waste of time.
It looks like the next target of CSW is going to be Jameson Lopp. I guess that this guy doing this shitshow only to travel on others' (Ayre's) money.
https://mobile.twitter.com/lopp/status/1585315567531364352
https://mobile.twitter.com/lopp/status/1585315567531364352
He shouldn't "vlaim" to be an expert says the guy who forgot to change dates on his forged documents.
For those who don't remember, Craig set up a fake company named Tulip Trust, with his wife Ramona as a director. Craig "vlaimed" that this company holds his bitcoins and that he cannot prove that because it will take months for a company's courier to give him the private keys. His wife runs the company, but he cannot tell her to give him access to his coins, he has to act through an attorney who communicates with the Trust on his behalf. He also refused to reveal any communication between him and the director of the company because of "spousal privilege". Of course he also refused to reveal any communications with the attorney. Months have passed and Craig did not have any private keys because the courier did not meet the deadline.
Have you ever heard a worse story? I haven't and this dude told it to the judge under oath.
Lopp should go to court just to see Craig tell his bullshit and later quote him.
It looks like the next target of CSW is going to be Jameson Lopp. I guess that this guy doing this shitshow only to travel on others' (Ayre's) money.
https://mobile.twitter.com/lopp/status/1585315567531364352
https://mobile.twitter.com/lopp/status/1585315567531364352
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 508
Go after the goal... Go!!! It is worth getting!
Bitcoin has been making progress since 2009 till date with Satoshi Nakamoto being anonymous, so does CSW think he will make Bitcoin any better if he possibly proves himself to be Satoshi? He should just take the advice that people are giving him on his tweets, probably this one https://twitter.com/Pete_VanDyck/status/1584515110621433856?t=XJeQuvHjmpqEuh8z9BAQ0A&s=19 .
Anyone got a link to this nChain patent which predates BIP 324? Is it just a plagiarized copy of BIP 324 with the name and date changed via a hex editor?
Here are some more specific assertions by Mr. Wright: https://twitter.com/Dr_CSWright/status/1580909523174559745My guess is that he's really enrolled, but since he was remote they let him send photos or something. I've heard claims that e.g. his recent philosophy masters is bullshit (e.g. not actually granted), but it seems privacy rules are preventing people from speaking up.
It's not related with Hodlonaut Trial, but i found out csw decide to claim/attack BIP 151 and 324 this time.
https://nitter.net/Dr_CSWright/status/1584091568536899584
Anyone got a link to this nChain patent which predates BIP 324? Is it just a plagiarized copy of BIP 324 with the name and date changed via a hex editor? https://nitter.net/Dr_CSWright/status/1584091568536899584
-snip-
Surely it should be easy enough to confirm with any of these universities if he is actually enrolled with them? Not sure what any of this proves, though - anyone can enroll in as many courses as they like. But when it comes to actually completing the work? Well... https://medium.com/@paintedfrog/craig-wright-plagiarized-significant-portions-of-his-phd-thesis-and-tried-to-hide-it-80cd8f01459Quote
I know @Dr_CSWright is Satoshi because he has the perfect DNA to be Satoshi.
along with calvyn ayres multiple times saying he thinks CSW is satoshi due to having spoke to CSW family
i call this comedy "proof of mom"
seems calvin only trusts CSW family lineage as proof of CSW claims.
I guess it could be, he doesnt want to say that CSW gave some documents/proof(files/forgeries) to ayres. thus doesnt want authorities seizing his devices. by saying the only 'proof' he has is verbal conversations with people
Quote
I know @Dr_CSWright is Satoshi because he has the perfect DNA to be Satoshi.
along with calvyn ayres multiple times saying he thinks CSW is satoshi due to having spoke to CSW family
i call this comedy "proof of mom"
seems calvin only trusts CSW family lineage as proof of CSW claims.
I guess it could be, he doesnt want to say that CSW gave some documents/proof(files/forgeries) to ayres. thus doesnt want authorities seizing his devices. by saying the only 'proof' he has is verbal conversations with people
I think hodlonaut should involve more people like this guy in the trial.
https://nitter.it/robertauger/status/1220515399856349184
and expose the "credibility" of the Chief 🤡.
Edited:
Some more 🤡 fun, if it's real.
https://twitter.com/FractalEncrypt/status/1584152298862714880
https://nitter.it/robertauger/status/1220515399856349184
and expose the "credibility" of the Chief 🤡.
Edited:
Some more 🤡 fun, if it's real.
https://twitter.com/FractalEncrypt/status/1584152298862714880
It's not related with Hodlonaut Trial, but i found out csw decide to claim/attack BIP 151 and 324 this time.
https://nitter.net/Dr_CSWright/status/1584091568536899584
Wasn't the Satoshi account on that page hacked long before 2014 when that post was published? Somehow I suspect that you did not notice the publication date, but the credibility of that statement is almost zero. The same account last posted at the end of 2021 and not about anything related to Bitcoin.
You're right, it's hard to remember all past event in correct order. I just remember there's discussion which say Satoshi's P2P Foundation account compromised after Satoshi's GMX email address was compromised/re-used after it's inactive.
https://nitter.net/Dr_CSWright/status/1584091568536899584
2. Satoshi said "I am not Dorian Nakamoto." on P2P foundation website[1].
Wasn't the Satoshi account on that page hacked long before 2014 when that post was published? Somehow I suspect that you did not notice the publication date, but the credibility of that statement is almost zero. The same account last posted at the end of 2021 and not about anything related to Bitcoin.
You're right, it's hard to remember all past event in correct order. I just remember there's discussion which say Satoshi's P2P Foundation account compromised after Satoshi's GMX email address was compromised/re-used after it's inactive.
2. Satoshi said "I am not Dorian Nakamoto." on P2P foundation website[1].
Wasn't the Satoshi account on that page hacked long before 2014 when that post was published? Somehow I suspect that you did not notice the publication date, but the credibility of that statement is almost zero. The same account last posted at the end of 2021 and not about anything related to Bitcoin.
I feel cringe reading this part.
It is amusing watching him get annihilated on Twitter.Here's my favorite thing he's posted: https://nitter.it/agerhanssen/status/1583923967974203393#m. Could it have been "Half" Finney all along!?
His picture immediately shows he is completely talking out of his ass.
Jump to: