Hodlonaut Trial - page 2. | Bitcointalksearch.org

cygan

legendary

Activity: 3304

Merit: 8633

Crypto Swap Exchange

today was the last day of hearings in the COPA vs. CSW case
under the following link, you can read the whole process: https://twitter.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1768202295513165911
the judge of course had the final word and said the following:

Quote

Judge: I will prepare a fairly long judgement

I have reached the conclusions the evidence is overwhelming

CSW is not the author of the whitepaper
CSW is not satsohi
CSW is not the creator of Bitcoin
CSW did not author the Bitcoin software

finally all the bullshit that CSW has been doing has come to an end

dkbit98

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 7064

Quote from: cygan on February 03, 2024, 06:09:50 AM

yesterday wired published the following article about CSW in which it is reported that a judge will soon decide whether the moronic CSW is right to claim to be the real Satoshi Nakamoto...

He can't do jack shit, but he can prolong this circus of lies while his scam shitcoin is getting delisted from all exchanges.
COPA still needs to prove that Craig is not Satoshi, and Hodlonaut was doing live blogging stream during the trial, and Wright continued to deny evidence provided by COPA.
https://protos.com/craig-wright-v-copa-judge-threatens-to-pull-livestream-after-hodlonaut-photo/

cygan

legendary

Activity: 3304

Merit: 8633

Crypto Swap Exchange

yesterday wired published the following article about CSW in which it is reported that a judge will soon decide whether the moronic CSW is right to claim to be the real Satoshi Nakamoto...
you can read the full article here: https://www.wired.com/story/craig-wright-satoshi-nakamoto-trial/

and the following tweet:

https://twitter.com/WIRED/status/1753414646378148061

franky1

legendary

Activity: 4410

Merit: 4766

"open commercialisation"
ding ding proof CSW is not satoshi

i too thought his settlement terms were a comedy script which declared him a proven nutjob

heck even his word of "database" instead of "ledger"
lets just use googles best top search answer to show how little he understands things

Quote

A database is typically organised into tables, with each table containing records that can be updated or deleted. A ledger, on the other hand, is structured as a series of entries that are added over time and cannot be changed or deleted

he could have learned so much in 3 seconds but decided to show he is an idiot

ABCbits

legendary

Activity: 2870

Merit: 7490

Crypto Swap Exchange

Can't believe there are 3 good news for Bitcoin and cryptocurrency community within short time interval.

Quote from: https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2024/01/26/uk-supreme-court-refuses-craig-wright-appeal/

"We actually only just found out about it but it was at the end of end of last year, [the] Supreme Court refused permission for Craig Wright's appeal," said Rupert Cowper-Coles, a partner at law firm RPC who represents McCormack. "So they're very pleased that judgment stands - [the] one pound nominal damages award, which Craig has tried to appeal twice unsuccessfully."

Twice? He really trying hard, which fortunately doesn't result anything.

Quote from: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/dr-craig-wright-issues-settlement-offer-to-copa-members-and-all-parties-in-upcoming-intellectual-property-litigation-302043611.html

3. In that respect I want to continue to be a force for good by encouraging the open commercialisation of technologies in a competitive and fair market where intellectual property rights are respected and exploited. It is therefore my intention to ensure that the relevant Bitcoin Core ("BTC"), Bitcoin Cash ("BCH") and ABC Bitcoin ("ABC") databases and assets can operate and compete fairly in parallel with BSV, which I hope can compete in the global community going forward.

I stopped reading faketoshi offer after this part. Saying Bitcoin Core ("BTC") is huge disrespect, which reminds me of how BCH community attack BTC in past. Using term "database" also sounds weird to me. In addition, there's no thing such as ABC Bitcoin. Faketoshi doesn't even know he actually refer to eCash (name of the cryptocurrency) where Bitcoin ABC is one of full node software for eCash.

franky1

legendary

Activity: 4410

Merit: 4766

getting back to the hodlonaut case

(the UK one)
https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2024/01/26/uk-supreme-court-refuses-craig-wright-appeal/

CSW last summer was not happy with his £1('here have a lollipop, crybaby') in damages for defamation. and so wanted to appeal...
in december the courts said no

seems the court rejected CSW appeal last month and hodlonauts lawyers didnt hear about it until this week, neither did coindesk check

as for the COPA case
CSW also released a letter pleading to settle the COPA case.. but with conditions that benefit him..
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/dr-craig-wright-issues-settlement-offer-to-copa-members-and-all-parties-in-upcoming-intellectual-property-litigation-302043611.html

that too was rejected by those in COPA

n0nce

hero member

Activity: 882

Merit: 5834

not your keys, not your coins!

Thanks for the update, cygan!

Quote from: DooMAD on January 24, 2024, 09:15:55 AM

Surely there has to be some sort of penalty for all of these forgeries. Courts are asking for trouble if there are no consequences for submitting fraudulent evidence. I'm struggling to tell if he's ever submitted a document that isn't a forgery.

I don't see how he can submit anything that isn't forged; how would CSW even own any such evidence in the first place (due to obvious reasons)?
The only exception would be random documents that are real, but prove nothing, but then it would be pointless to submit them.

DooMAD

legendary

Activity: 3948

Merit: 3191

Leave no FUD unchallenged

Quote from: cygan on January 24, 2024, 07:29:34 AM

there are new developments in the ongoing saga surrounding CSW, who claims to be Satoshi Nakamoto, the inventor of BTCitcoin. following court document published yesterday provides further evidence that once again calls Wright's claims into question:
https://bitcoindefense.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/2024-01-23-Schedule-of-Dr-Wrights-Further-Forgeries-COPA-v-Wright.pdf

the document states that certain documents submitted by CSW contain technical anomalies.
for example, one document appears to have been created using a version of ms windows photo viewer that was released years after the alleged creation date of the document (allegedly in 2007). the metadata of some documents show signs of manipulation. there are discrepancies in the timestamps that suggest that the documents have been backdated. the use of chatgpt to create documents purporting to be from around 2007 and 2008 is another clear indication of subsequent creation and manipulation...

Surely there has to be some sort of penalty for all of these forgeries. Courts are asking for trouble if there are no consequences for submitting fraudulent evidence. I'm struggling to tell if he's ever submitted a document that isn't a forgery.

cygan

legendary

Activity: 3304

Merit: 8633

Crypto Swap Exchange

there are new developments in the ongoing saga surrounding CSW, who claims to be Satoshi Nakamoto, the inventor of BTCitcoin. following court document published yesterday provides further evidence that once again calls Wright's claims into question:
https://bitcoindefense.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/2024-01-23-Schedule-of-Dr-Wrights-Further-Forgeries-COPA-v-Wright.pdf

the document states that certain documents submitted by CSW contain technical anomalies.
for example, one document appears to have been created using a version of ms windows photo viewer that was released years after the alleged creation date of the document (allegedly in 2007). the metadata of some documents show signs of manipulation. there are discrepancies in the timestamps that suggest that the documents have been backdated. the use of chatgpt to create documents purporting to be from around 2007 and 2008 is another clear indication of subsequent creation and manipulation...

cygan

legendary

Activity: 3304

Merit: 8633

Crypto Swap Exchange

o_e_l_e_o

legendary

Activity: 2268

Merit: 18711

Here is the Snowden exchange: https://nitter.it/Snowden/status/1587107349038252034

Arthur van Pelt has helpfully put together a bunch of CSW's fails in to a handy graphic, including the two I linked to earlier in this thread: https://nitter.it/Arthur_van_Pelt/status/1587117094130356232

And now this one is just plain hilarious: https://nitter.it/tmsbtc/status/1586336795251601409
"Bophides" is a meme, created to set up the line "Bophides/Both of these nuts". Bophides is not, and never was, a real person. CSW simply falling for a stupid internet meme would be nothing special, but his narcissism means he actually tries to lecture this Twitter user about Bophides. He states he was a warrior, not a philosopher, and that "There is a reason nobody bothers teaching his work". He has no work because he isn't real! It's a meme! If you type "Bophides" in to Google, the first result is from Urban Dictionary stating him to be a strong warrior from Ancient Greece, but if you click on it you are shown the full "Bophides nuts" joke. Did CSW literally just do a Google search, read a single sentence from the search results without even clicking on the link, and decide he was now an expert on this made up character and start lecturing people on Twitter about it!? This is embarrassing for CSW, and doubly embarrassing for anyone who honestly thinks he could possibly be Satoshi.

What a moron.

OgNasty

donator

Activity: 4760

Merit: 4323

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Hilarious retorts to Craig Wright from Snowden on twitter today. Worth looking into if you haven’t seen it yet. I also saw something else that made me laugh. Someone posted a twist on the saying, “We are all satoshi, except Craig Wright.” Instead in replay to someone who claimed to be Craig Wright they said, “We are all Craig Wright, except satoshi.” Cheesy

o_e_l_e_o

legendary

Activity: 2268

Merit: 18711

Quote from: aoluain on October 30, 2022, 02:25:28 AM

Twitter is not a safe place for CSW, looks like he can be easily exposed as the fake he is.

Public discussion in general is not a safe place for CSW. Anywhere people can speak freely and share verifiable evidence, such as in multiple different courts in multiple different countries, on Twitter, on any social media platform, on this forum, on GitHub, in public, and so on, and CSW is easily exposed for the fraud that he is. It is only when he can carefully control the situation and the narrative, such as in private "signing" sessions in a location he chose with a laptop his team provided in the presence of a carefully selected people and performed in an specific way, can he fool anyone in to believing his charade. Whenever he has to have an unscripted interaction, such as right now on Twitter, he repeatedly shoots himself in the foot in the most basic of ways.

aoluain

legendary

Activity: 2436

Merit: 1362

Oh dear, that's embarrassing and fortunate for any future court sagas. That's like creating
future liabilities.

Twitter is not a safe place for CSW, looks like he can be easily exposed as the fake he is.

o_e_l_e_o

legendary

Activity: 2268

Merit: 18711

Don't know if you guys are following Twitter, but various people are trolling CSW spectacularly by having him call statements he doesn't realize were made by Satoshi as false, lies, ignorance, and so on. And CSW keeps falling for it.

First one: https://nitter.it/jochemin/status/1584538627727831040#m
CSW says that "Your statement means you do not understand bitcoin at all." Twitter user points out that the statement was made by Satoshi. CSW blocks the user and hides the tweet from his profile. Grin

Next one: https://nitter.it/thom_bernhard/status/1586010353372377096#m and here is a screenshot in case CSW deletes it: https://nitter.it/Tak_Horigoshi/status/1585979441981067265#m
CSW says that whoever made that statement is "a fool or a liar". Twitter user points out that the statement was made by Satoshi. Wright then denies the follow up statement, which it turns out, was also made by Satoshi. Grin

And another bonus recent tweet, here is CSW apparently completely unaware of the difference between nodes and mining pools: https://nitter.it/Dr_CSWright/status/1586083965781176320#m

Honestly, whoever is next to be served with one his stupid lawsuits could just present his Twitter account as proof that he isn't Satoshi at this point.

dkbit98

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 7064

Quote from: gmaxwell on October 26, 2022, 08:45:43 PM

It's still banned, he's just evading the ban-- not like he complies with any other rules...

Now it's possible Elon Musk might get him banned as a new twatter owner, or maybe they will join forces in new shitcoin business endeavor Wink

Quote from: gmaxwell on October 26, 2022, 08:45:43 PM

I somewhat doubt Wright is going to sue lopp-- he's still got to come up with some lie he can tell his attornies to get them to file the paperwork and he'd have a really hard time. He threatens it as a pure intimidation move. Actually doing it would be pretty stupid.

It's possible this is one more of his stunts, but I see Jameson Lopp is still talking with Faketoshi and talking about courts.
Oh and Lopp just asked ElonMusk to unban @geoffgolberg account, so we have first public requests coming.

https://nitter.lacontrevoie.fr/lopp/status/1585856027966476290#m

aoluain

legendary

Activity: 2436

Merit: 1362

Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on October 24, 2022, 03:43:20 AM

Quote from: ABCbits on October 23, 2022, 07:09:58 AM

I feel cringe reading this part.

It is amusing watching him get annihilated on Twitter.

Here's my favorite thing he's posted: https://nitter.it/agerhanssen/status/1583923967974203393#m. Could it have been "Half" Finney all along!? Cheesy

Quote from: TheBeardedBaby on October 23, 2022, 05:41:54 PM

When can we expect the UK trial?

My understanding was it is not expected for another 12 months or so, but I cannot find a source for why I thought that.
Edit: This article indeed says "late 2023" for the UK case.

Will Hodlonaut be able to present the same KPMG reports in the UK case? or will he be able
to reference the findings of this recent case?

Quote from: NeuroticFish on October 26, 2022, 12:12:07 PM

It looks like the next target of CSW is going to be Jameson Lopp. I guess that this guy doing this shitshow only to travel on others' (Ayre's) money.
https://mobile.twitter.com/lopp/status/1585315567531364352

and likewise will Jameson Lopp be able to at least reference the Hodlonaut trial
findings?

I'm not sure if that is a practice, sounds like it could be from movies I saw in the past
but what is the reality I wonder....

It would be nice to imagine for both events being able to reference what happened in one
court of law that it would straight away throw doubt on CSW's claims.

ABCbits

legendary

Activity: 2870

Merit: 7490

Crypto Swap Exchange

Quote from: coolcoinz on October 26, 2022, 02:46:57 PM

--snip--

Lopp should go to court just to see Craig tell his bullshit and later quote him.

IMO it's a waste of time. I'd rather see him write another technical blog post[1].

Quote from: dkbit98 on October 26, 2022, 04:07:42 PM

Quote from: NeuroticFish on October 26, 2022, 12:12:07 PM

It looks like the next target of CSW is going to be Jameson Lopp. I guess that this guy doing this shitshow only to travel on others' (Ayre's) money.

Oh I can't wait to see this new Faketoshi doom trial and I am sure Jameson Lopp is not going to back down so easy.

You made me remember how much money and time he spend to find out who call SWAT team to his house[1]. If faketoshi going too far, i expect Lopp would pursue him.

[1] https://blog.lopp.net/
[2] https://blog.lopp.net/to-swat-a-swatter/

AB de Royse777

legendary

Activity: 2464

Merit: 3878

Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com

Quote from: panganib999 on October 26, 2022, 04:01:05 PM

was stuck in a courtroom filled with senile old men and women trying to make sense of how social media works.

Send them back to the typewriters time when everything as analog LOL
Hopeless generation. They should be spending time with their grand children instead of wasting time of an important position. We are not in 80s anymore.

gmaxwell

staff

Activity: 4284

Merit: 8808

Quote from: dkbit98 on October 26, 2022, 04:07:42 PM

Does anyone knows who the heck returned and unbanned CSW twitter account, was it new boss Elon Musk, or he bribed or sued someone to unban him? Tongue

It's still banned, he's just evading the ban-- not like he complies with any other rules...

I somewhat doubt Wright is going to sue lopp-- he's still got to come up with some lie he can tell his attornies to get them to file the paperwork and he'd have a really hard time. He threatens it as a pure intimidation move. Actually doing it would be pretty stupid.

OTOH suing former Bitcoin developers was also pretty stupid and that didn't stop him.

Topic: Hodlonaut Trial - page 2. (Read 4198 times)