We are lucky to belong in a community like this.
We can do impeccable things... together!
Congrats to hodlonaut and thanks cygan for the update.
Topic: Hodlonaut Trial - page 2. (Read 4276 times)
CSW, the man who claims to be Bitcoin inventor Satoshi Nakamoto, has dropped his appeal in the norwegian court case against Hodlonaut. this means that the verdict, which already went in Hodlonaut's favor in october 2022, is now sealed. the norwegian, who is supported by the Bitcoin community, made this public with this message on twitter:
lets not make the label of CSW 'the man who claims to be'
the copa case already has the judge saying he is not
so use "CSW the fraudster"
and it seems due to the COPA case, CSW's main sponsor(ayres) funding his legal SLAPP suits has stepped/moved away from funding further suits, so now csw is financially bleeding, and with CSW's personal funds frozen, cant keep juggling all the lawyers bills, so we should see a domino effect of cases being dropped where CSW is the instigator/claimant
I just try to point out the probability. If you are me.
Edit: Spellchecker on guys. See if your 100%
Edit: Spellchecker on guys. See if your 100%
Yep. Good news!
Still, Hodlonaut is also sued in UK by CSW. That case too should (hopefully soon) closed/dismissed.
Plus, I think that there are still Bitcoin devs whose cases need to be closed.
All in all, it's steps in (finally!) the right direction, but it's not all over yet.
Still, Hodlonaut is also sued in UK by CSW. That case too should (hopefully soon) closed/dismissed.
Plus, I think that there are still Bitcoin devs whose cases need to be closed.
All in all, it's steps in (finally!) the right direction, but it's not all over yet.
CSW, the man who claims to be Bitcoin inventor Satoshi Nakamoto, has dropped his appeal in the norwegian court case against Hodlonaut. this means that the verdict, which already went in Hodlonaut's favor in october 2022, is now sealed. the norwegian, who is supported by the Bitcoin community, made this public with this message on twitter:
https://twitter.com/hodlonaut/status/1778457284806353177
https://twitter.com/hodlonaut/status/1778457284806353177
today was the last day of hearings in the COPA vs. CSW case
under the following link, you can read the whole process: https://twitter.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1768202295513165911
the judge of course had the final word and said the following:
finally all the bullshit that CSW has been doing has come to an end
under the following link, you can read the whole process: https://twitter.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1768202295513165911
the judge of course had the final word and said the following:
Quote
Judge: I will prepare a fairly long judgement
I have reached the conclusions the evidence is overwhelming
CSW is not the author of the whitepaper
CSW is not satsohi
CSW is not the creator of Bitcoin
CSW did not author the Bitcoin software
I have reached the conclusions the evidence is overwhelming
CSW is not the author of the whitepaper
CSW is not satsohi
CSW is not the creator of Bitcoin
CSW did not author the Bitcoin software
finally all the bullshit that CSW has been doing has come to an end
yesterday wired published the following article about CSW in which it is reported that a judge will soon decide whether the moronic CSW is right to claim to be the real Satoshi Nakamoto...
He can't do jack shit, but he can prolong this circus of lies while his scam shitcoin is getting delisted from all exchanges.COPA still needs to prove that Craig is not Satoshi, and Hodlonaut was doing live blogging stream during the trial, and Wright continued to deny evidence provided by COPA.
https://protos.com/craig-wright-v-copa-judge-threatens-to-pull-livestream-after-hodlonaut-photo/
yesterday wired published the following article about CSW in which it is reported that a judge will soon decide whether the moronic CSW is right to claim to be the real Satoshi Nakamoto...
you can read the full article here: https://www.wired.com/story/craig-wright-satoshi-nakamoto-trial/
and the following tweet:
https://twitter.com/WIRED/status/1753414646378148061
you can read the full article here: https://www.wired.com/story/craig-wright-satoshi-nakamoto-trial/
and the following tweet:
https://twitter.com/WIRED/status/1753414646378148061
"open commercialisation"
ding ding proof CSW is not satoshi
i too thought his settlement terms were a comedy script which declared him a proven nutjob
heck even his word of "database" instead of "ledger"
lets just use googles best top search answer to show how little he understands things
he could have learned so much in 3 seconds but decided to show he is an idiot
ding ding proof CSW is not satoshi
i too thought his settlement terms were a comedy script which declared him a proven nutjob
heck even his word of "database" instead of "ledger"
lets just use googles best top search answer to show how little he understands things
Quote
A database is typically organised into tables, with each table containing records that can be updated or deleted. A ledger, on the other hand, is structured as a series of entries that are added over time and cannot be changed or deleted
he could have learned so much in 3 seconds but decided to show he is an idiot
Can't believe there are 3 good news for Bitcoin and cryptocurrency community within short time interval.
Twice? He really trying hard, which fortunately doesn't result anything.
I stopped reading faketoshi offer after this part. Saying Bitcoin Core ("BTC") is huge disrespect, which reminds me of how BCH community attack BTC in past. Using term "database" also sounds weird to me. In addition, there's no thing such as ABC Bitcoin. Faketoshi doesn't even know he actually refer to eCash (name of the cryptocurrency) where Bitcoin ABC is one of full node software for eCash.
Quote from: https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2024/01/26/uk-supreme-court-refuses-craig-wright-appeal/
"We actually only just found out about it but it was at the end of end of last year, [the] Supreme Court refused permission for Craig Wright's appeal," said Rupert Cowper-Coles, a partner at law firm RPC who represents McCormack. "So they're very pleased that judgment stands - [the] one pound nominal damages award, which Craig has tried to appeal twice unsuccessfully."
Twice? He really trying hard, which fortunately doesn't result anything.
3. In that respect I want to continue to be a force for good by encouraging the open commercialisation of technologies in a competitive and fair market where intellectual property rights are respected and exploited. It is therefore my intention to ensure that the relevant Bitcoin Core ("BTC"), Bitcoin Cash ("BCH") and ABC Bitcoin ("ABC") databases and assets can operate and compete fairly in parallel with BSV, which I hope can compete in the global community going forward.
I stopped reading faketoshi offer after this part. Saying Bitcoin Core ("BTC") is huge disrespect, which reminds me of how BCH community attack BTC in past. Using term "database" also sounds weird to me. In addition, there's no thing such as ABC Bitcoin. Faketoshi doesn't even know he actually refer to eCash (name of the cryptocurrency) where Bitcoin ABC is one of full node software for eCash.
getting back to the hodlonaut case
(the UK one)
https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2024/01/26/uk-supreme-court-refuses-craig-wright-appeal/
CSW last summer was not happy with his £1('here have a lollipop, crybaby') in damages for defamation. and so wanted to appeal...
in december the courts said no
seems the court rejected CSW appeal last month and hodlonauts lawyers didnt hear about it until this week, neither did coindesk check
as for the COPA case
CSW also released a letter pleading to settle the COPA case.. but with conditions that benefit him..
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/dr-craig-wright-issues-settlement-offer-to-copa-members-and-all-parties-in-upcoming-intellectual-property-litigation-302043611.html
that too was rejected by those in COPA
(the UK one)
https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2024/01/26/uk-supreme-court-refuses-craig-wright-appeal/
CSW last summer was not happy with his £1('here have a lollipop, crybaby') in damages for defamation. and so wanted to appeal...
in december the courts said no
seems the court rejected CSW appeal last month and hodlonauts lawyers didnt hear about it until this week, neither did coindesk check
as for the COPA case
CSW also released a letter pleading to settle the COPA case.. but with conditions that benefit him..
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/dr-craig-wright-issues-settlement-offer-to-copa-members-and-all-parties-in-upcoming-intellectual-property-litigation-302043611.html
that too was rejected by those in COPA
Thanks for the update, cygan!
The only exception would be random documents that are real, but prove nothing, but then it would be pointless to submit them.
Surely there has to be some sort of penalty for all of these forgeries. Courts are asking for trouble if there are no consequences for submitting fraudulent evidence. I'm struggling to tell if he's ever submitted a document that isn't a forgery.
I don't see how he can submit anything that isn't forged; how would CSW even own any such evidence in the first place (due to obvious reasons)?The only exception would be random documents that are real, but prove nothing, but then it would be pointless to submit them.
there are new developments in the ongoing saga surrounding CSW, who claims to be Satoshi Nakamoto, the inventor of BTCitcoin. following court document published yesterday provides further evidence that once again calls Wright's claims into question:
https://bitcoindefense.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/2024-01-23-Schedule-of-Dr-Wrights-Further-Forgeries-COPA-v-Wright.pdf
the document states that certain documents submitted by CSW contain technical anomalies.
for example, one document appears to have been created using a version of ms windows photo viewer that was released years after the alleged creation date of the document (allegedly in 2007). the metadata of some documents show signs of manipulation. there are discrepancies in the timestamps that suggest that the documents have been backdated. the use of chatgpt to create documents purporting to be from around 2007 and 2008 is another clear indication of subsequent creation and manipulation...
https://bitcoindefense.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/2024-01-23-Schedule-of-Dr-Wrights-Further-Forgeries-COPA-v-Wright.pdf
the document states that certain documents submitted by CSW contain technical anomalies.
for example, one document appears to have been created using a version of ms windows photo viewer that was released years after the alleged creation date of the document (allegedly in 2007). the metadata of some documents show signs of manipulation. there are discrepancies in the timestamps that suggest that the documents have been backdated. the use of chatgpt to create documents purporting to be from around 2007 and 2008 is another clear indication of subsequent creation and manipulation...
Surely there has to be some sort of penalty for all of these forgeries. Courts are asking for trouble if there are no consequences for submitting fraudulent evidence. I'm struggling to tell if he's ever submitted a document that isn't a forgery.
there are new developments in the ongoing saga surrounding CSW, who claims to be Satoshi Nakamoto, the inventor of BTCitcoin. following court document published yesterday provides further evidence that once again calls Wright's claims into question:
https://bitcoindefense.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/2024-01-23-Schedule-of-Dr-Wrights-Further-Forgeries-COPA-v-Wright.pdf
the document states that certain documents submitted by CSW contain technical anomalies.
for example, one document appears to have been created using a version of ms windows photo viewer that was released years after the alleged creation date of the document (allegedly in 2007). the metadata of some documents show signs of manipulation. there are discrepancies in the timestamps that suggest that the documents have been backdated. the use of chatgpt to create documents purporting to be from around 2007 and 2008 is another clear indication of subsequent creation and manipulation...
https://bitcoindefense.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/2024-01-23-Schedule-of-Dr-Wrights-Further-Forgeries-COPA-v-Wright.pdf
the document states that certain documents submitted by CSW contain technical anomalies.
for example, one document appears to have been created using a version of ms windows photo viewer that was released years after the alleged creation date of the document (allegedly in 2007). the metadata of some documents show signs of manipulation. there are discrepancies in the timestamps that suggest that the documents have been backdated. the use of chatgpt to create documents purporting to be from around 2007 and 2008 is another clear indication of subsequent creation and manipulation...
Here is the Snowden exchange: https://nitter.it/Snowden/status/1587107349038252034
Arthur van Pelt has helpfully put together a bunch of CSW's fails in to a handy graphic, including the two I linked to earlier in this thread: https://nitter.it/Arthur_van_Pelt/status/1587117094130356232
And now this one is just plain hilarious: https://nitter.it/tmsbtc/status/1586336795251601409
"Bophides" is a meme, created to set up the line "Bophides/Both of these nuts". Bophides is not, and never was, a real person. CSW simply falling for a stupid internet meme would be nothing special, but his narcissism means he actually tries to lecture this Twitter user about Bophides. He states he was a warrior, not a philosopher, and that "There is a reason nobody bothers teaching his work". He has no work because he isn't real! It's a meme! If you type "Bophides" in to Google, the first result is from Urban Dictionary stating him to be a strong warrior from Ancient Greece, but if you click on it you are shown the full "Bophides nuts" joke. Did CSW literally just do a Google search, read a single sentence from the search results without even clicking on the link, and decide he was now an expert on this made up character and start lecturing people on Twitter about it!? This is embarrassing for CSW, and doubly embarrassing for anyone who honestly thinks he could possibly be Satoshi.
What a moron.
Arthur van Pelt has helpfully put together a bunch of CSW's fails in to a handy graphic, including the two I linked to earlier in this thread: https://nitter.it/Arthur_van_Pelt/status/1587117094130356232
And now this one is just plain hilarious: https://nitter.it/tmsbtc/status/1586336795251601409
"Bophides" is a meme, created to set up the line "Bophides/Both of these nuts". Bophides is not, and never was, a real person. CSW simply falling for a stupid internet meme would be nothing special, but his narcissism means he actually tries to lecture this Twitter user about Bophides. He states he was a warrior, not a philosopher, and that "There is a reason nobody bothers teaching his work". He has no work because he isn't real! It's a meme! If you type "Bophides" in to Google, the first result is from Urban Dictionary stating him to be a strong warrior from Ancient Greece, but if you click on it you are shown the full "Bophides nuts" joke. Did CSW literally just do a Google search, read a single sentence from the search results without even clicking on the link, and decide he was now an expert on this made up character and start lecturing people on Twitter about it!? This is embarrassing for CSW, and doubly embarrassing for anyone who honestly thinks he could possibly be Satoshi.
What a moron.
Hilarious retorts to Craig Wright from Snowden on twitter today. Worth looking into if you haven’t seen it yet. I also saw something else that made me laugh. Someone posted a twist on the saying, “We are all satoshi, except Craig Wright.” Instead in replay to someone who claimed to be Craig Wright they said, “We are all Craig Wright, except satoshi.” 
Twitter is not a safe place for CSW, looks like he can be easily exposed as the fake he is.
Public discussion in general is not a safe place for CSW. Anywhere people can speak freely and share verifiable evidence, such as in multiple different courts in multiple different countries, on Twitter, on any social media platform, on this forum, on GitHub, in public, and so on, and CSW is easily exposed for the fraud that he is. It is only when he can carefully control the situation and the narrative, such as in private "signing" sessions in a location he chose with a laptop his team provided in the presence of a carefully selected people and performed in an specific way, can he fool anyone in to believing his charade. Whenever he has to have an unscripted interaction, such as right now on Twitter, he repeatedly shoots himself in the foot in the most basic of ways. 
Oh dear, that's embarrassing and fortunate for any future court sagas. That's like creating
future liabilities.
Twitter is not a safe place for CSW, looks like he can be easily exposed as the fake he is.
future liabilities.
Twitter is not a safe place for CSW, looks like he can be easily exposed as the fake he is.
Don't know if you guys are following Twitter, but various people are trolling CSW spectacularly by having him call statements he doesn't realize were made by Satoshi as false, lies, ignorance, and so on. And CSW keeps falling for it.
First one: https://nitter.it/jochemin/status/1584538627727831040#m
CSW says that "Your statement means you do not understand bitcoin at all." Twitter user points out that the statement was made by Satoshi. CSW blocks the user and hides the tweet from his profile.
Next one: https://nitter.it/thom_bernhard/status/1586010353372377096#m and here is a screenshot in case CSW deletes it: https://nitter.it/Tak_Horigoshi/status/1585979441981067265#m
CSW says that whoever made that statement is "a fool or a liar". Twitter user points out that the statement was made by Satoshi. Wright then denies the follow up statement, which it turns out, was also made by Satoshi.
And another bonus recent tweet, here is CSW apparently completely unaware of the difference between nodes and mining pools: https://nitter.it/Dr_CSWright/status/1586083965781176320#m
Honestly, whoever is next to be served with one his stupid lawsuits could just present his Twitter account as proof that he isn't Satoshi at this point.
First one: https://nitter.it/jochemin/status/1584538627727831040#m
CSW says that "Your statement means you do not understand bitcoin at all." Twitter user points out that the statement was made by Satoshi. CSW blocks the user and hides the tweet from his profile.
Next one: https://nitter.it/thom_bernhard/status/1586010353372377096#m and here is a screenshot in case CSW deletes it: https://nitter.it/Tak_Horigoshi/status/1585979441981067265#m
CSW says that whoever made that statement is "a fool or a liar". Twitter user points out that the statement was made by Satoshi. Wright then denies the follow up statement, which it turns out, was also made by Satoshi.
And another bonus recent tweet, here is CSW apparently completely unaware of the difference between nodes and mining pools: https://nitter.it/Dr_CSWright/status/1586083965781176320#m
Honestly, whoever is next to be served with one his stupid lawsuits could just present his Twitter account as proof that he isn't Satoshi at this point.
Jump to: