Assume that you have a message.
You can forward the same message to many different people.
But can you do that with bitcoin ? Can you transfer the same bitcoin to many different people ?
Ofcourse not!
I wouldn't say that your theory is absolute shit although I think it is but since you are a newbie I will advice you to read more about bitcoin.
Get a grip of it's basics and learn more about bitcoin for beginners.
Of course yes! Bitcoin is a number. Check what you receive to your bitcoin address - a number. Let's say you received "5". I can transfer the same number to many electronic addresses through many different messaging systems, the same as someone would send you this number through Satoshi's messaging system. In the same sense, I can send the word "Hello" through many messaging systems, but not through Satoshi's one. That's because Satoshi's system is a primitive one - it sends only numbers.
The op makes an... original comparison, I guess, but like others, I disagree with it. If BTC is sent from one wallet to another, the recipient is now the owner. It's even more so than when people use bank accounts, actually, because one could argue that it's technically the banks owning money and the ownership barely gets transferred. Also, SMS is technically private (at least, if I send SMS to someone I know, regular people can't just look it up), whereas Bitcoin transactions are public, one can see the transfer from one address to another all over the world.
If I would send you a number through email messaging system, you as a recipient would become the owner of that number. If I would take a piece of paper and write down a number I would become the owner of that number. Now, the question is, why would someone pay millions of dollars to become a number owner if they can get it for free?
~
BTC is a number. I can get a number in an instant. And I can send
it to you electronically for free. What you are asking is that I send you a number via bitcoin messaging system. And in order to do that
I have to pay for it. That's the bizarre thing I am talking about it the video.
Numbers are free and we don't pay for them. So in order to perform your test
I would have to pay for a number. And that's something I'll never do. I'll never
gave my property for free to someone just to recieve a number through the bitcoin messaging system.
That makes a lot of sense!
Before that, you claimed that bitcoin didn't represent anything like property but now you claim you have to give something of value in order to send something that was free is not free but it is actually free.
I can't even picture how twisted your logic is if you don't realize that in order to send me some bitcoins you have to pay the value of those bitcoins and it will be the same for me when I try to use it, the same stands for your bank account and there is no difference here, the same stand for eveything! Banknotes are just pieces of paper with numbers on them, they are not free, I can print you a xerox copy of one but it won't have the same value just like testnet bitcoins are nearly worthless.
How hard is it for you to understand that if something comes with a cost in order to use that means that's the value of it?
It's a number. I can create numbers out of thin air, and send them to you free of charge.
No, you don't otherwise you would have proved us all wrong and sent each of us a million coins.
Bitcoin is a number. Numbers can be duplicated. Here you go... "100". Now, take a look at the bitcoin address of a guy that bought 100 bitcoins. That what he received is the same thing I just created. For comparison, try to duplicate a Porsche or a diamond that someone recieved after the purchase.
A pretty simple way to prove it.
You can start sending me 10BTC as many times as you wish, I could still buy a Porsche every time you do that.
Bitcoin is a number. If you want to call a number a property, I am fine with that. It's semantics. Essentially, what I have claimed is that I would never traded property that can't be created out of thin air, fot the one that can. Numbers are created out of thin air. Meaning I can get them free of charge whenever I want. However, those that have numbers in their bitcoin addresses, ask money for them. I would never give money for something I can get free of charge. That's the point. So, my logic is pretty clear, simple and sound.
Banknotes represent debt that the banks owe to holders of these banknotes. Watch the video. Debt cannot be created out of thin air. But out of loan contracts, collaterals and bank capital.
Regarding your claim that if something comes with a cost in order to use that means that's the value of it. Bitcoin doesn't come with a cost. A simple code creates it out of thin air. Just because there's a protocol to provide POW before the creation, that doesn't mean the creation is not out of thin air. I can set a protocol that I will send you a number via email system only after you provide me a proof that you traveled around the world in 30 days. Would that mean my number has value equivalent to your traveling costs?