Pages:
Author

Topic: How to self exclude from anonymous gambling sites - page 14. (Read 6797 times)

hero member
Activity: 2968
Merit: 687
I also used to use TrustWallet, but so far I'm on Kpler now, actually because it makes me more comfortable to use it than TrustWallet, honestly speaking.
It's still better to use decentralized ones where we have control over our assets.

This is what you should do: choose the one over whom you always have control over all the assets you have; don't take risks that you are not in control,
so that the crypto assets are not in danger.
But diverting our assets to staking to avoid gambling doesn't seem to be 100% successful in making us take a break from gambling while the staking period is in progress. I've experienced this too using TrustWallet for staking... what sucks is that I still bet with the money I allocate for daily meals. Of course the budget has decreased, but it still makes me not stop gambling, even though it is a little less.

This staking method is actually quite effective if we have high discipline in our daily spending behavior. Because I'm sure, gambling will steal other budget allocations to just relieve boredom because weak discipline will still make it difficult to make changes like the ones discussed in this topic.
It's all about patience and control. Someone who doesn't have any patience or self-control cannot be kept away from gambling no matter what they do, even if you stake all their money, give it to someone else to hold it for them, or do anything, you will still find a way to get some money out from somewhere and use that money for your gambling activities just like how you did it with the money that you were supposed to use for your daily meals.

So, if a person is extremely disciplined, have a lot of patience and self-control, then they can stay away from gambling and they wouldn't even need to divert their assets to something else for that to happen because they wouldn't do it even if they have their assets available.
I like the angle you brought this from, it is the same as what the OP of this thread advised, only that yours could be better since the person is probably keeping the money with the trusted fellow and not the company that may even disappear with the money. Regardless, this will solve nothing as the person will not heal but only punish/discipline himself, and this could only be for a while, which makes it ill-advised. Fine, it can work for a while where the person would think that he is now disciplined, but when the money is given back to him, he can continue gambling with it. Not to mention that even after keeping the money with the person or subscribing to the advice of the OP, he may still continue gambling with the additional money seen after the.

This means that the gambler has not healed at all. It is the healing that matters whether you get the money hooked somewhere or not. What we need is to be disciplined and responsible towards gambling, we can do this by cleaning our minds and building strong minds that will have a strong Will to do only what we want and shun what we do not want in gambling. It takes serious psychological fighting for this to be possible and not merely to keep our money anywhere. What if the person we trusted to keep the money is not available anymore or the program suggested by the OP stops? What next? That is why we should get healed from the source of the problem rather than trapping our money somewhere.
Still that hard to trust even if we do speak about trusted fellow because we know that once money is really that getting involved then there are  tons of relationships or friendships that had been broken because of this. When it comes to exclusions then you could really be able to exclude or stop yourself on point. You wont really be needing any kind of staking or locking up your funds because if you are really that serious when it comes  on quitting up gambling or having some break then it would really be something that you would really be doing up on the ways or methods that you could possibly do.
Self control and discipline is something that you would really be needing up to consider because if you are really that not able to do so then this is the time that you would really be doing those alternative ways
on which you do know that it could really be able to help you out on having that break.

Every person does have that different threshold when it comes to risks management and control on which there are ones who are really that good when it comes to control
and there are ones who arent.
jr. member
Activity: 65
Merit: 2
Self-exclusion from anonymous gambling sites can be challenging due to the decentralized nature of some platforms. However, you can take the following steps:

1. Contact Support: Reach out to the customer support team of the gambling site and inquire about their self-exclusion policies. They may have procedures in place to assist you.

2. Utilize Blockchain Features: If the site operates on a blockchain network, explore any self-exclusion features offered by the specific cryptocurrency or blockchain protocol.

3. Seek External Support: Consider reaching out to third-party organizations or support groups specializing in gambling addiction. They may provide guidance or assistance in self-excluding from gambling sites, even anonymous ones.

4. Self-Restriction Methods: Take proactive measures to limit your access to gambling sites, such as installing website blockers or setting up parental controls on your devices.

5. Stay Informed: Stay updated on developments in the field of responsible gambling and anonymity solutions, as new tools and resources may become available over time.
hero member
Activity: 896
Merit: 654
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
I also used to use TrustWallet, but so far I'm on Kpler now, actually because it makes me more comfortable to use it than TrustWallet, honestly speaking.
It's still better to use decentralized ones where we have control over our assets.

This is what you should do: choose the one over whom you always have control over all the assets you have; don't take risks that you are not in control,
so that the crypto assets are not in danger.
But diverting our assets to staking to avoid gambling doesn't seem to be 100% successful in making us take a break from gambling while the staking period is in progress. I've experienced this too using TrustWallet for staking... what sucks is that I still bet with the money I allocate for daily meals. Of course the budget has decreased, but it still makes me not stop gambling, even though it is a little less.

This staking method is actually quite effective if we have high discipline in our daily spending behavior. Because I'm sure, gambling will steal other budget allocations to just relieve boredom because weak discipline will still make it difficult to make changes like the ones discussed in this topic.
It's all about patience and control. Someone who doesn't have any patience or self-control cannot be kept away from gambling no matter what they do, even if you stake all their money, give it to someone else to hold it for them, or do anything, you will still find a way to get some money out from somewhere and use that money for your gambling activities just like how you did it with the money that you were supposed to use for your daily meals.

So, if a person is extremely disciplined, have a lot of patience and self-control, then they can stay away from gambling and they wouldn't even need to divert their assets to something else for that to happen because they wouldn't do it even if they have their assets available.
I like the angle you brought this from, it is the same as what the OP of this thread advised, only that yours could be better since the person is probably keeping the money with the trusted fellow and not the company that may even disappear with the money. Regardless, this will solve nothing as the person will not heal but only punish/discipline himself, and this could only be for a while, which makes it ill-advised. Fine, it can work for a while where the person would think that he is now disciplined, but when the money is given back to him, he can continue gambling with it. Not to mention that even after keeping the money with the person or subscribing to the advice of the OP, he may still continue gambling with the additional money seen after the.

This means that the gambler has not healed at all. It is the healing that matters whether you get the money hooked somewhere or not. What we need is to be disciplined and responsible towards gambling, we can do this by cleaning our minds and building strong minds that will have a strong Will to do only what we want and shun what we do not want in gambling. It takes serious psychological fighting for this to be possible and not merely to keep our money anywhere. What if the person we trusted to keep the money is not available anymore or the program suggested by the OP stops? What next? That is why we should get healed from the source of the problem rather than trapping our money somewhere.
hero member
Activity: 2604
Merit: 816
🐺Spinarium.com🐺 - iGaming casino
Once you do get hooked or having that kind of addiction towards gambling then it would really be something that do talks about having on that difficulty on which if this one would really be just that easy then
we cant really be able to see gambling addicts everywhere or simply this industry wont really be that as much profitable of those owners, but we are seeing the different thing i would say on which
this is really something that opposite on what we are seeing into our own eyes. When it comes to exclusion then this is something which is really that could neither be having or available on some sites
but as a gambler if you are really that serious on stopping out gambling then you could really be able to actually do it on your own or if you do really wanted into.
Becoming addicted to gambling is a big problem that must be cured immediately. Before someone becomes even more addicted, he or she must immediately seek help from the people around him or her who can find a solution. If they want to reduce their gambling activities, they must have strong intentions.

Perhaps not many casinos have a self-exclusion feature so gamblers should try to control themselves. Actually, gamblers can try to learn to reduce their gambling activities so that they don't have to depend on self-exclusion. By continuously learning to control himself, he can restrain himself from gambling.

Gamblers must be able to control themselves and not depend on others. After all, gambling is just entertainment that doesn't need to be taken seriously.
sr. member
Activity: 2604
Merit: 339
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
I personally don't see staying away from gambling as something that requires too much help efforts or advice as long as the individual involved make up their mind to gamble within the set rules and limits, this is very important because everything starts and ends with the gamblers not the casino or anyone else.
That's true, everyone makes their decision individually of becoming a gambler and choose their desiring platform for that, in which in all of these process, no one enforces any decision making process on a gambler, so they are expected to also make an effective use of the gambling avenue for their own good as well as considering gambling in the normal and appropriate manner that suite their standard without complaining.
People should be able to stay away from gambling without difficulty, especially when they only use gambling as a form of entertainment. But the problem is that many people don't realize this so they end up getting involved further in gambling. They can't stop themselves from gambling so they really need self-exclusion. They think that they can do it.

But if using self-exclusion is not accompanied by self-control, it will be useless because they will still return to gambling. They will not notice that they have tried to use self-exclusion but still gamble. That will only make the problem bigger.

Only gamblers can decide to reduce their gambling activities. Self-exclusion will work if there is awareness among gamblers actually to reduce their gambling activities. If not, they will continue to gamble even more often than before.
Once you do get hooked or having that kind of addiction towards gambling then it would really be something that do talks about having on that difficulty on which if this one would really be just that easy then
we cant really be able to see gambling addicts everywhere or simply this industry wont really be that as much profitable of those owners, but we are seeing the different thing i would say on which
this is really something that opposite on what we are seeing into our own eyes. When it comes to exclusion then this is something which is really that could neither be having or available on some sites
but as a gambler if you are really that serious on stopping out gambling then you could really be able to actually do it on your own or if you do really wanted into.
hero member
Activity: 2604
Merit: 816
🐺Spinarium.com🐺 - iGaming casino
I personally don't see staying away from gambling as something that requires too much help efforts or advice as long as the individual involved make up their mind to gamble within the set rules and limits, this is very important because everything starts and ends with the gamblers not the casino or anyone else.
That's true, everyone makes their decision individually of becoming a gambler and choose their desiring platform for that, in which in all of these process, no one enforces any decision making process on a gambler, so they are expected to also make an effective use of the gambling avenue for their own good as well as considering gambling in the normal and appropriate manner that suite their standard without complaining.
People should be able to stay away from gambling without difficulty, especially when they only use gambling as a form of entertainment. But the problem is that many people don't realize this so they end up getting involved further in gambling. They can't stop themselves from gambling so they really need self-exclusion. They think that they can do it.

But if using self-exclusion is not accompanied by self-control, it will be useless because they will still return to gambling. They will not notice that they have tried to use self-exclusion but still gamble. That will only make the problem bigger.

Only gamblers can decide to reduce their gambling activities. Self-exclusion will work if there is awareness among gamblers actually to reduce their gambling activities. If not, they will continue to gamble even more often than before.
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1092
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
I personally don't see staying away from gambling as something that requires too much help efforts or advice as long as the individual involved make up their mind to gamble within the set rules and limits, this is very important because everything starts and ends with the gamblers not the casino or anyone else.

That's true, everyone makes their decision individually of becoming a gambler and choose their desiring platform for that, in which in all of these process, no one enforces any decision making process on a gambler, so they are expected to also make an effective use of the gambling avenue for their own good as well as considering gambling in the normal and appropriate manner that suite their standard without complaining.
You both are right, but would be important for us all to understand that, before a person decides to go into gambling, he or she have the power of decision making, they themselves can decide to start gambling or not to start gambling, and that power is always with the person even when he or she has started gambling, and the power of decision will continue to be with that person for as long as the person continue to gamble within the general rules of gambling.

But then, immediately the person starts gambling overboard and as a result, gets addicted to gambling, that power will start to leave little by little, and depending on what level that addiction has gotten to, the power of decision may completely have left the person, at this stage, it's no longer in the hands of the person to decide whether to gamble or not, for that power have been taken over by the person's addiction to gambling.

So, whenever we come across gamblers who are addicted and complain of their inability to stop gambling, we must do all we can to help them, for it is one thing to be addicted to gambling, it's another thing entirely to have the courage to cry out for help.
hero member
Activity: 2100
Merit: 546
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
I also used to use TrustWallet, but so far I'm on Kpler now, actually because it makes me more comfortable to use it than TrustWallet, honestly speaking.
It's still better to use decentralized ones where we have control over our assets.

This is what you should do: choose the one over whom you always have control over all the assets you have; don't take risks that you are not in control,
so that the crypto assets are not in danger.
But diverting our assets to staking to avoid gambling doesn't seem to be 100% successful in making us take a break from gambling while the staking period is in progress. I've experienced this too using TrustWallet for staking... what sucks is that I still bet with the money I allocate for daily meals. Of course the budget has decreased, but it still makes me not stop gambling, even though it is a little less.

This staking method is actually quite effective if we have high discipline in our daily spending behavior. Because I'm sure, gambling will steal other budget allocations to just relieve boredom because weak discipline will still make it difficult to make changes like the ones discussed in this topic.
It's all about patience and control. Someone who doesn't have any patience or self-control cannot be kept away from gambling no matter what they do, even if you stake all their money, give it to someone else to hold it for them, or do anything, you will still find a way to get some money out from somewhere and use that money for your gambling activities just like how you did it with the money that you were supposed to use for your daily meals.

So, if a person is extremely disciplined, have a lot of patience and self-control, then they can stay away from gambling and they wouldn't even need to divert their assets to something else for that to happen because they wouldn't do it even if they have their assets available.
hero member
Activity: 2604
Merit: 789
When i stopped smoking i just stopped buy cigarettes but i didn`t ask seller not to sell it to me. May be self exclusion can help someone to stop gambling, but i`m sure that he begin to play when it restriction would end. The gambler must decide himself, that he has to stop.
Totally matter about self control and this is something that would really be some crucial or something that you would really be needing to consider on the time that you would really be dealing up with gambling.
It all matters on how you would really be finding yourself to have that kind of discipline because even if how many sites would really be excluding you on playing but you are still not prepared or something not ready
on quitting or stopping gambling then  you would really be finding ways for you to play no matter what and this is something that would really be just that a common problem
specially into those people who are addicted with gambling. If you arent that much prepared about on the things about the risks of losing money or cant be able to accept it out
then you are really that putting up yourself on such big trouble.
The only thing that the gambler must correct is his thoughts. This is the type of addiction that easy enough to fix. But the gambler must be interested in it. He must understand that the gambling is a problem to him and he don`t need to stop if for all the life. He must just correct his life and some time later he can gamble as other gamblers. I smoke today sometimes, it is about 1-2 times per year. Next day i don`t want to repeat.
hero member
Activity: 952
Merit: 555
20BET - Premium Casino & Sportsbook
I personally don't see staying away from gambling as something that requires too much help efforts or advice as long as the individual involved make up their mind to gamble within the set rules and limits, this is very important because everything starts and ends with the gamblers not the casino or anyone else.

That's true, everyone makes their decision individually of becoming a gambler and choose their desiring platform for that, in which in all of these process, no one enforces any decision making process on a gambler, so they are expected to also make an effective use of the gambling avenue for their own good as well as considering gambling in the normal and appropriate manner that suite their standard without complaining.
sr. member
Activity: 2604
Merit: 339
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
Surely it is so. The problem is with gambler and if he has some problems - he must make decision himself. Or, if he can`t  - his friends and family can help him, may be doctor. We don`t close distilleries because someone has  problems with alcohol. The casino just an instrument and only the gambler decides how to use it.
On the time that a gambler would really be coming into a point that you are already that spending up too much on gambling then this is where problems do start to begin and this is something
where things turns out to be messy then this is where you would be making realizations and not before things do happen. If you are really that serious on quitting then you could really actually
quit and if you are tending to have a break then you could actually do it and this is something which is really very that possible and would be basing up on someones self control.

Self exclusion isnt always that available for most gambling sites but you could actually ask or request on blocking or locking up your account but just like been said by
others is that you would really be still playing if you cant really be able to make have that kind of control towards your playing.
When i stopped smoking i just stopped buy cigarettes but i didn`t ask seller not to sell it to me. May be self exclusion can help someone to stop gambling, but i`m sure that he begin to play when it restriction would end. The gambler must decide himself, that he has to stop.
Totally matter about self control and this is something that would really be some crucial or something that you would really be needing to consider on the time that you would really be dealing up with gambling.
It all matters on how you would really be finding yourself to have that kind of discipline because even if how many sites would really be excluding you on playing but you are still not prepared or something not ready
on quitting or stopping gambling then  you would really be finding ways for you to play no matter what and this is something that would really be just that a common problem
specially into those people who are addicted with gambling. If you arent that much prepared about on the things about the risks of losing money or cant be able to accept it out
then you are really that putting up yourself on such big trouble.
hero member
Activity: 2604
Merit: 789
Surely it is so. The problem is with gambler and if he has some problems - he must make decision himself. Or, if he can`t  - his friends and family can help him, may be doctor. We don`t close distilleries because someone has  problems with alcohol. The casino just an instrument and only the gambler decides how to use it.
What a nice analogy. Of course, distilleries can't be closed for drinking issues, even as drinking has its benefits too, and just like the head can't be cut simply because of a headache, it is the solution that should be found for the person having issues in both cases. The context has been the issue of the gamblers in gambling and not gambling itself because no one forces anyone to gamble. If at all people gamble, no one forces them to continue to gamble and not know their limits and the time to stop. So we should blame it on ourselves and not casinos. I have heard many people talking about the ill side of gambling and how the government are turning a deaf ear to the negative effects. I wonder what they want the government to do in adult-related decisions. The government had done its part to ensure that the citizens/residents must be at least 18/21 years of age to gamble believing they would have been mature enough to make good decisions in this regard.

Even the most addicted to gambling I know are far older people than that age limit, which makes it even worse and shameful for them and not the government or the casinos. As an adult, I believe we should be smarter and wiser in decision-making and in handling situations and ourselves, but unfortunately, many are just living their lives like teenagers or even lower age. I don't know how the blame should ever be on the casinos that are neutral and not forcing anyone to play. It is simply our choice, and if we contract issues of emotion/addiction and the waste of money, it is we who should find a lasting solution to it. I, therefore, advise every gambler facing one challenge or another that it is a psychological thing, and when they notice it, they should try to fight it by themselves, but if their self-power fails, they should call for help ASAP.
I think that all the government can do is the same with the other accepted addictions - smoking, alcohol. They can just limit or reject all types of promoting and, probably, increase taxes for casino. I don`t sure about taxes - with the smoking the smoker feel it instantly - the price of cigarettes grow up. But in the gambling the casino mostly decrease RTP. The gambler don`t increase the bet, he only lose more often.


When i stopped smoking i just stopped buy cigarettes but i didn`t ask seller not to sell it to me. May be self exclusion can help someone to stop gambling, but i`m sure that he begin to play when it restriction would end. The gambler must decide himself, that he has to stop.
That's the most important thing and the most crucial one but most addicted gamblers will find it hard to start stopping from themselves.
Self-exclusion system in casino may help but if there is no will from ourselves then it will be useless because we may start moving to other casinos.
If the main question is to do self exclude from fully anonymous casinos, there is no other effective ways except the first point (our own will).
He will gamble in the other casinos and return after self-exclusion will ends. It isn`t decision, the gambler must fix his thoughts firstly.
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 1354
When i stopped smoking i just stopped buy cigarettes but i didn`t ask seller not to sell it to me. May be self exclusion can help someone to stop gambling, but i`m sure that he begin to play when it restriction would end. The gambler must decide himself, that he has to stop.
That's the most important thing and the most crucial one but most addicted gamblers will find it hard to start stopping from themselves.
Self-exclusion system in casino may help but if there is no will from ourselves then it will be useless because we may start moving to other casinos.
If the main question is to do self exclude from fully anonymous casinos, there is no other effective ways except the first point (our own will).

hero member
Activity: 896
Merit: 654
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
I personally don't see staying away from gambling as something that requires too much help efforts or advice as long as the individual involved make up their mind to gamble within the set rules and limits, this is very important because everything starts and ends with the gamblers not the casino or anyone else.
Casinos are out to make revenue/money and that there will act accordingly with the gamblers desires and request, if you control yourself away from gambling excessively it up for you, and if you over gamble also it up for you, so the responsibility to gamble within a set rules is what stands for you at the end and how you best stay off active gambling.
Surely it is so. The problem is with gambler and if he has some problems - he must make decision himself. Or, if he can`t  - his friends and family can help him, may be doctor. We don`t close distilleries because someone has  problems with alcohol. The casino just an instrument and only the gambler decides how to use it.
What a nice analogy. Of course, distilleries can't be closed for drinking issues, even as drinking has its benefits too, and just like the head can't be cut simply because of a headache, it is the solution that should be found for the person having issues in both cases. The context has been the issue of the gamblers in gambling and not gambling itself because no one forces anyone to gamble. If at all people gamble, no one forces them to continue to gamble and not know their limits and the time to stop. So we should blame it on ourselves and not casinos. I have heard many people talking about the ill side of gambling and how the government are turning a deaf ear to the negative effects. I wonder what they want the government to do in adult-related decisions. The government had done its part to ensure that the citizens/residents must be at least 18/21 years of age to gamble believing they would have been mature enough to make good decisions in this regard.

Even the most addicted to gambling I know are far older people than that age limit, which makes it even worse and shameful for them and not the government or the casinos. As an adult, I believe we should be smarter and wiser in decision-making and in handling situations and ourselves, but unfortunately, many are just living their lives like teenagers or even lower age. I don't know how the blame should ever be on the casinos that are neutral and not forcing anyone to play. It is simply our choice, and if we contract issues of emotion/addiction and the waste of money, it is we who should find a lasting solution to it. I, therefore, advise every gambler facing one challenge or another that it is a psychological thing, and when they notice it, they should try to fight it by themselves, but if their self-power fails, they should call for help ASAP.
hero member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 558
dont be greedy
I also used to use TrustWallet, but so far I'm on Kpler now, actually because it makes me more comfortable to use it than TrustWallet, honestly speaking.
It's still better to use decentralized ones where we have control over our assets.

This is what you should do: choose the one over whom you always have control over all the assets you have; don't take risks that you are not in control,
so that the crypto assets are not in danger.
But diverting our assets to staking to avoid gambling doesn't seem to be 100% successful in making us take a break from gambling while the staking period is in progress. I've experienced this too using TrustWallet for staking... what sucks is that I still bet with the money I allocate for daily meals. Of course the budget has decreased, but it still makes me not stop gambling, even though it is a little less.

This staking method is actually quite effective if we have high discipline in our daily spending behavior. Because I'm sure, gambling will steal other budget allocations to just relieve boredom because weak discipline will still make it difficult to make changes like the ones discussed in this topic.
sr. member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 271
DGbet.fun - Crypto Sportsbook
Instead of Atomic wallet, Trustwallet can be used. Trustwallet gives decentralized option while Atomic wallet has its own validator. Trustwallet has many validators and atomic wallet is part of them if they support the staked coin.

I prefer to use Keplr wallet which has been the best that I know. If the wallet support a coin that I want to stake, I prefer the wallet even than Trustwallet.

I can understand you, because gamblers would be discouraged to unstake their coins because the unstaking period can take up to a week or more.

I also used to use TrustWallet, but so far I'm on Kpler now, actually because it makes me more comfortable to use it than TrustWallet, honestly speaking.
It's still better to use decentralized ones where we have control over our assets.

This is what you should do: choose the one over whom you always have control over all the assets you have; don't take risks that you are not in control,
so that the crypto assets are not in danger.
hero member
Activity: 2604
Merit: 789
Surely it is so. The problem is with gambler and if he has some problems - he must make decision himself. Or, if he can`t  - his friends and family can help him, may be doctor. We don`t close distilleries because someone has  problems with alcohol. The casino just an instrument and only the gambler decides how to use it.
On the time that a gambler would really be coming into a point that you are already that spending up too much on gambling then this is where problems do start to begin and this is something
where things turns out to be messy then this is where you would be making realizations and not before things do happen. If you are really that serious on quitting then you could really actually
quit and if you are tending to have a break then you could actually do it and this is something which is really very that possible and would be basing up on someones self control.

Self exclusion isnt always that available for most gambling sites but you could actually ask or request on blocking or locking up your account but just like been said by
others is that you would really be still playing if you cant really be able to make have that kind of control towards your playing.
When i stopped smoking i just stopped buy cigarettes but i didn`t ask seller not to sell it to me. May be self exclusion can help someone to stop gambling, but i`m sure that he begin to play when it restriction would end. The gambler must decide himself, that he has to stop.


Surely it is so. The problem is with gambler and if he has some problems - he must make decision himself. Or, if he can`t  - his friends and family can help him, may be doctor. We don`t close distilleries because someone has  problems with alcohol. The casino just an instrument and only the gambler decides how to use it.
Yeah, casinos have absolutely nothing to do with people getting addicted to gambling, it is already stated that gamblers should gamble responsibly, if anyone in the cause of them being overly greedy to win more money, get addicted to gambling, it is absolutely out of place to blame the casino.

For no one blames cigarettes companies for producing more and more cigarettes not minding the thousand of deaths that are recorded every year around the world out of tuberculosis, or should we talk about those who drink too much alcohol, get drunk, hit the road in their car and die in an accident, alongside some other unlucky victims of the  accident, no body is blaming the brewery companies that produce those alcoholic products.

Why then should anyone be blaming casinos for addicted gamblers? Anyone can get addicted to anything they engage themselves in too much above the normal limit, it's no fault of the platform that provide such service.
Exactly. Everybody must be brave enough to be responsible for his own life at least.
legendary
Activity: 2702
Merit: 1465
It seems to me that the possibility of self-exclusion from gambling for the player himself is in any case a rather difficult, and sometimes even very difficult task. 
If a person decides to completely eliminate gambling from his life, then this is similar to the loss of something valuable in the life of such a person.  And everyone perceives this loss differently.  Some people cope with loss easily, while others have a very hard time.  But this loss, by the way, can always turn into a return to gambling, and this also still depends on the willpower of the player and on how strongly the pleasure of gambling has penetrated the thoughts and brain of the player.  In the broad sense of the word, difficulties with giving up gambling have too wide a range of human psychological reactions.  And here, as it is written in the fate of a particular person, if he is destined to become a gambling addict at the stage of the disease, then this is his fate, probably this is divine providence and he himself will not be able to cope with it.  But fortunately, there is also professional medical help for such people.
sr. member
Activity: 1092
Merit: 342
WOLFBET.COM - Exclusive VIP Rewards
I personally don't see staying away from gambling as something that requires too much help efforts or advice as long as the individual involved make up their mind to gamble within the set rules and limits, this is very important because everything starts and ends with the gamblers not the casino or anyone else.
Casinos are out to make revenue/money and that there will act accordingly with the gamblers desires and request, if you control yourself away from gambling excessively it up for you, and if you over gamble also it up for you, so the responsibility to gamble within a set rules is what stands for you at the end and how you best stay off active gambling.
Gambling is a personal matter so it totally depends on how much one gambles or how much or less one gambles. the more a person gambles, the more he is attracted to gambling and the more he is harmed, so it is his personal responsibility to control himself and save himself from the deep addiction of gambling. And how much of someone's gambling is kept hidden or how much is made public is also a personal matter. But I think it's always better to use a pseudonym while gambling to keep your identity a secret

I agree when you say that the game is personal and that each person should take it as they see fit, if someone wants to keep it a secret, then that's fine with me, whoever wants to make it public then that's fine with me too, everything These types of things are what we must Consider so that things always go in the right direction. As a player and as a trader, I sometimes see that one gets involved in high-risk things and that the risk does not matter how much it is. Things are always done so that I can face it and come out in a good way, that is what I have learned, and above all to take care of our money.

Anyone who is looking for another way to play and be happy because they are free to do so , what should always be done is to find a way not to become Decapitated or fall into Addiction because that does become a major problem for the player and his family.
full member
Activity: 2590
Merit: 228

and sometimes they are bending the rules to favor them? lol that is what made it unfair
in this part but this will also make them looks suspicious and will lessen their supporters and
players.and also even if you are complying to anything but if the site is not worthy of our
trust then that will end for nothing but to favor the site itself.



      -   It seems that what is happening is that there is simple cheating, something that most communities do not want in the field of such games in situations like that.
It's really hard to play a game like that with favoritism to be honest.
well if that is favoritism then that is ok but the problem is that the abuse mate and that is what the most issues most gamblers is facing  and indeed that we should not tolerate that abusing from gambling site.


Quote
Quote
and sometimes they are bending the rules to favor them? lol that is what made it unfair
in this part but this will also make them looks suspicious and will lessen their supporters and
players.and also even if you are complying to anything but if the site is not worthy of our
trust then that will end for nothing but to favor the site itself.

It seems that what is happening is that there is simple cheating, something that most communities do not want in the field of such games in situations like that.
It's really hard to play a game like that with favoritism to be honest.
cheat or abuse or scam what can't  we expect from online gambling mate? it seems that this is a normal scenario nowadays and we must be ready for being accused or to accuse them about those.
Pages:
Jump to: