Topic: How will bounties do without Bounty Hunters? - page 25. (Read 3461 times)
indeed, most are only looking for big profits for the bounty hunter, but that must be considered is how we can support a project so that it can be successful.
Bounty campaigns will never exist if there will be no bounty hunters, the same goes to bounty hunter because without bounties, bounty hunters cannot also exist. The two of them just simply coexist to cut it short. Bounty hunter promote bounties and two of them will be just together.
The answer will be very simple, the bounty campaign will not be effective once there are no people who participate on it. Let me answer your question with another questions. How can be it called a bounty without active people participating , who gonna promote the ICO project ? And who gonna take part on the bounty rewards ? Therefore, I conclude that bounty is not effective once there are no active users join with it.
how they don't sell directly, while most projects are late to distribute the stake. it's clear why they immediately sell it because they are very long to get the results of their work
I have read many posts condemning the impatience of bounty hunters who sell off rewards as soon as it is received.
My question is, can bounties run and achieve success on their own without Hunters?
I don't think many will succeed, the bounty hunters are from all over the world, from different backgrounds but promoting the same projectMy question is, can bounties run and achieve success on their own without Hunters?
I don't know but all I know is some of the big investors are on bitcointalk. And I mean there should be a lot of whales here probably.
Bounty hunters are the promoters of a project. Through their promotion on social networks and Bitcointalk, potential investors will get to know about a project. Bounty hunters promotion is very cheap and they deserve to be treated well because projects can't see such cheap services in anywhere.
Some projects can really hold ICO without bounty programs, because they have some guarantees from large investors or some funds, so they are sure that they will raise the necessary funds without any promotions. But most of the projects need advertising and support in all directions, so they run bounty campaigns and allocate funds for this.
I have read many posts condemning the impatience of bounty hunters who sell off rewards as soon as it is received.
My question is, can bounties run and achieve success on their own without Hunters?
My question is, can bounties run and achieve success on their own without Hunters?
I think that ICOs can run successfully without offering bounties, it's just that offering bounties works well as it gives them free publicity within the crypto community, which other promtional channels would struggle to reach.
As for people selling off bounties as soon as they receive them, I think the reason people do this is because prices tend to drop after the coins hit exchanges, which is inevitable if a project doesn't hit hard cap. If it does hit hard cap then there is more demand than supply, which would drive prices up.
Bounty hunters are needed to a project to be promoted. Dumping of hunters affects the project only short term as the bounty allocations are usually 1-2% of the total supply or even less. If there is demand for the tokens these cheap tokens will be grabbed and the price will stabilize quickly.
The benefits of the participants of the Bounty companies are very large. Nevertheless, for the bounty hunters make a lot of problems, so as not to pay the earned tokens. First of all it concerns the provision of personal data using very complex forms.
Such questions are meaningless, because as long as ICO exists, they need to promote their projects, and bounty campains are the cheapest way to promote their plans, nothing is more cost-effective than paying tokens.
Because these tokens are not really worth the money, the cost of the token is almost equal to 0 for the ICO initiator.
But for bounty hunters, the token may mean a lot of income before going public. Of course, when they sell the token, they will find that the price of the token in the market is much lower than the ICO price.
This is also an important reason for the current decline in the attractiveness of all bounty, because if a bounty promised return may be worth $1,000, but in the end it will only be worth $10. LOL.
I believe that all bounty participants have had such a disgusting experience.This will undoubtedly reduce the credibility of the bounty.
Because these tokens are not really worth the money, the cost of the token is almost equal to 0 for the ICO initiator.
But for bounty hunters, the token may mean a lot of income before going public. Of course, when they sell the token, they will find that the price of the token in the market is much lower than the ICO price.
This is also an important reason for the current decline in the attractiveness of all bounty, because if a bounty promised return may be worth $1,000, but in the end it will only be worth $10. LOL.
I believe that all bounty participants have had such a disgusting experience.This will undoubtedly reduce the credibility of the bounty.
Bounty hunters are needed to a project to be promoted. Dumping of hunters affects the project only short term as the bounty allocations are usually 1-2% of the total supply or even less. If there is demand for the tokens these cheap tokens will be grabbed and the price will stabilize quickly.
full member
Activity: 468
Merit: 100
The world’s first Play, Learn and Earn
What a bullshit are you talking about? How bounties can exist without bounty hunters?
To my mind it is impossible. It is silly question.
To my mind it is impossible. It is silly question.
It's practically impossible for bounties to work without the assistance of bounty hunters. Bounty hunters have a lot of work they do in order to make the project a success. But there are lots of hunters who hunt unreasonably. Having multiple accounts all because the want to get extra tokens isn't worth it.
I have read many posts condemning the impatience of bounty hunters who sell off rewards as soon as it is received.
My question is, can bounties run and achieve success on their own without Hunters?
My question is, can bounties run and achieve success on their own without Hunters?
No campaign can be effective without the active participation of the bounty hunters, i think this mouse cat play will continue between the bounty hunters and project owners because both try to out smart eachother, this will continue untill there is some kind of strict rules or escrow service between them.
I agree, bounty hunters are big contribution to the project by promoting it in the market. Campaign bounties would not be successfull without the help of bounty hunters.
Some projects can and some can't.
It is all about connection. Bounty hunters doing a marketing work. And their payment with tokens.
It is all about connection. Bounty hunters doing a marketing work. And their payment with tokens.
My question is, can bounties run and achieve success on their own without Hunters?
I have read many posts condemning the impatience of bounty hunters who sell off rewards as soon as it is received.
My question is, can bounties run and achieve success on their own without Hunters?
My question is, can bounties run and achieve success on their own without Hunters?
This is a very stupid question. How can a bounty campaign be run, if there are no bounty hunters? But right now the bounty campaign managers don't need to worry about that, as there is an over-supply of bounty hunters in the market.
My question is, can bounties run and achieve success on their own without Hunters?
Bounty campaign runs without hunters?!? Bounty for who? And it will be not called Bounty campaign.
And if campaign never runs, what will be called a success?
If your question is: "Can project run and succeed without bounty hunters?". I will answer YES. BUT, bounty campaign is actually a free-money marketing. Because almost they pay by their tokens, and if they fail ICOs, they will lose nothing.
Jump to: