I buy another 2 gigabyte gtx 1070 today , i try mine lbry with windows 10 x64 , driver 372.54 , and use ccminer-rel1.8.1-vc2013 .
Set +100mhz on clock , and -100mhz on memory , Power Limit 70% .
Temperature is 69° celsius and hashrate is 250mhs for board .
But i see the comsumption is high , around 180 watt for board .
Any Help ? , i want 100 watt max for board .
Topic: How will this change the world of mining?? GTX 1080 / 1070 - page 13. (Read 134091 times)
I wrote it before the cards came out.
The 460 has a 128bit bus. (same as the gtx 750ti, 950 and 960 cards)
The 460 has a 128bit bus. (same as the gtx 750ti, 950 and 960 cards)
In a couple of weeks you can buy these 14nm cards from AMD.
Radeon 470
TDP: 110 watt
Retail Price: $159 (4gb)
Etherum classic hashrate stock clocks (23.5MHASH)
Radeon 460
TDP: 75 watt
Retail Price: $99 (2gb)
Etherum classic hashrate stock clocks (23.5MHASH)
2x 1070: $900 (52MHASH etherum classic)
9x 460: $891 (211MHASH etherum classic)
Radeon 470
TDP: 110 watt
Retail Price: $159 (4gb)
Etherum classic hashrate stock clocks (23.5MHASH)
Radeon 460
TDP: 75 watt
Retail Price: $99 (2gb)
Etherum classic hashrate stock clocks (23.5MHASH)
2x 1070: $900 (52MHASH etherum classic)
9x 460: $891 (211MHASH etherum classic)
then ethereum* goes down a bit and you have useless cards.
rx 460 mining etc/eth at 10 mh not 23.5mh
Yup ... 460 is giving me max 11.99mh for ETH
In a couple of weeks you can buy these 14nm cards from AMD.
Radeon 470
TDP: 110 watt
Retail Price: $159 (4gb)
Etherum classic hashrate stock clocks (23.5MHASH)
Radeon 460
TDP: 75 watt
Retail Price: $99 (2gb)
Etherum classic hashrate stock clocks (23.5MHASH)
2x 1070: $900 (52MHASH etherum classic)
9x 460: $891 (211MHASH etherum classic)
Radeon 470
TDP: 110 watt
Retail Price: $159 (4gb)
Etherum classic hashrate stock clocks (23.5MHASH)
Radeon 460
TDP: 75 watt
Retail Price: $99 (2gb)
Etherum classic hashrate stock clocks (23.5MHASH)
2x 1070: $900 (52MHASH etherum classic)
9x 460: $891 (211MHASH etherum classic)
then ethereum* goes down a bit and you have useless cards.
rx 460 mining etc/eth at 10 mh not 23.5mh
For each brand power limiting react differently, so its a bit hard to use same settings, for instance Gainward phenix 1070 with power limit at 85% droping voltage to 0.92v (GPU-z readings) which might be unstable for clock over 1900mhz, even more power limit of 75% will drop it as low as 0.84v
I did some tests with lybr and 85% and 1900mhz is stable, but other light algo might push clock more and restart the PC
For instance MSI 1070 does not drop voltage at all that low with power limit
I did some tests with lybr and 85% and 1900mhz is stable, but other light algo might push clock more and restart the PC
For instance MSI 1070 does not drop voltage at all that low with power limit
The more I use the 1070 the more I think it's not just a 14 nm maxwell card.
Playing with the intensity revealed that some algos prefer a much lower value than, for example, a 970.
There must be something with memory access or, maybe, immature drivers that make higher intensities slower and more "floating" (on some algos only).
Playing with the intensity revealed that some algos prefer a much lower value than, for example, a 970.
There must be something with memory access or, maybe, immature drivers that make higher intensities slower and more "floating" (on some algos only).
Same happened to the early 970 cards with 2x 6 pin power. They trottle if you push them to hard (high intensity). TDP was set at 150Watt, but for the G1 gaming the TDP was 250Watt. and 8pin+6pin. No trottle and 20% faster hashing in most of the algos.
It's not a throttling problem in my case. TDP is set very low.
The more I use the 1070 the more I think it's not just a 14 nm maxwell card.
Playing with the intensity revealed that some algos prefer a much lower value than, for example, a 970.
There must be something with memory access or, maybe, immature drivers that make higher intensities slower and more "floating" (on some algos only).
Playing with the intensity revealed that some algos prefer a much lower value than, for example, a 970.
There must be something with memory access or, maybe, immature drivers that make higher intensities slower and more "floating" (on some algos only).
Same happened to the early 970 cards with 2x 6 pin power. They trottle if you push them to hard (high intensity). TDP was set at 150Watt, but for the G1 gaming the TDP was 250Watt. and 8pin+6pin. No trottle and 20% faster hashing in most of the algos.
The more I use the 1070 the more I think it's not just a 14 nm maxwell card.
Playing with the intensity revealed that some algos prefer a much lower value than, for example, a 970.
There must be something with memory access or, maybe, immature drivers that make higher intensities slower and more "floating" (on some algos only).
Playing with the intensity revealed that some algos prefer a much lower value than, for example, a 970.
There must be something with memory access or, maybe, immature drivers that make higher intensities slower and more "floating" (on some algos only).
Let us know if u discover something interesting
The more I use the 1070 the more I think it's not just a 14 nm maxwell card.
Playing with the intensity revealed that some algos prefer a much lower value than, for example, a 970.
There must be something with memory access or, maybe, immature drivers that make higher intensities slower and more "floating" (on some algos only).
Playing with the intensity revealed that some algos prefer a much lower value than, for example, a 970.
There must be something with memory access or, maybe, immature drivers that make higher intensities slower and more "floating" (on some algos only).
% of your cards TDP.
how do you read power in AB? i can only see a %, but dunno % of how much.
Just press ctrl-f in Afterburner))
For GTX 1070 I can change clock/voltage table as I need. Then by adjusting TDP slider I peek needed range that will be used. Very easy and works without bugs.
Gtx 1070 could use 80 watt and could use 180 watt, hashrates will vary accordingly, what to prefer is up to you ))
Wait, how are you adjusting voltages? Would you mind elaborating? Gtx 1070 could use 80 watt and could use 180 watt, hashrates will vary accordingly, what to prefer is up to you ))
it can do 30MH at 80w or lower, so i find it strange that you need 100w just for 750MH on sia, because when you mine sia only you need 140w for 1.5 giga so for half of that 70w should suffice
therefore the wattage should be 80+70=150w...
therefore the wattage should be 80+70=150w...
yeah thats what im saying no way a 1070 should pull over 150 watt do dual mine SIA if it is then its not worth buying for dual miners. If anything I would perfer 30 eth and 600 sia for 130 watt
it can do 30MH at 80w or lower, so i find it strange that you need 100w just for 750MH on sia, because when you mine sia only you need 140w for 1.5 giga so for half of that 70w should suffice
therefore the wattage should be 80+70=150w...
therefore the wattage should be 80+70=150w...
For GTX 1070 I can change clock/voltage table as I need. Then by adjusting TDP slider I peek needed range that will be used. Very easy and works without bugs.
Gtx 1070 could use 80 watt and could use 180 watt, hashrates will vary accordingly, what to prefer is up to you ))
Gtx 1070 could use 80 watt and could use 180 watt, hashrates will vary accordingly, what to prefer is up to you ))
If the 1070 cannot do 27mhs eth and 700ish sia for under 150 watts its not really worth it for eth mining probbaly better for other coins
180 wats is too high for those hash rates is all i am saying
For GTX 1070 I can change clock/voltage table as I need. Then by adjusting TDP slider I peek needed range that will be used. Very easy and works without bugs.
Gtx 1070 could use 80 watt and could use 180 watt, hashrates will vary accordingly, what to prefer is up to you ))
Gtx 1070 could use 80 watt and could use 180 watt, hashrates will vary accordingly, what to prefer is up to you ))
the 480 does 31MH on ethereum plus 750 on sia? i really doubt this is the case and at 150w...
show proof at least, anyway he pushed it too much, he can adjust the core to consume 150w while maintaining a good compromise
Elivop said his 480 can do that. But he did not show the power usage yet. Only showed the GPUZ displayed 100W. So the true power could be 175 *112% on the wall.
he showed that it can do 31Mh on etheruem only, not 31MH PLUS 750MH on sia
dual mining with 480 is 24/350.. far from 1070
no way with 2200 memory and 100 v undervolt on mem and core I get 26mhs eth and 427 SIA for 150 watts
1070 should not be using 180 watts , the problem with the NVIDIA builds is how do you lower core and memory voltage as easily as you can for AMD
and don't say setting power limit its not the same as lowering the core and memory voltages.
Until that is easy to DO Rx 480 will be still a better build for new miners
the 480 does 31MH on ethereum plus 750 on sia? i really doubt this is the case and at 150w...
show proof at least, anyway he pushed it too much, he can adjust the core to consume 150w while maintaining a good compromise
Elivop said his 480 can do that. But he did not show the power usage yet. Only showed the GPUZ displayed 100W. So the true power could be 175 *112% on the wall.
the 480 does 31MH on ethereum plus 750 on sia? i really doubt this is the case and at 150w...
show proof at least, anyway he pushed it too much, he can adjust the core to consume 150w while maintaining a good compromise
Elivop said his 480 can do that. But he did not show the power usage yet. Only showed the GPUZ displayed 100W. So the true power could be 175 *112% on the wall.
he showed that it can do 31Mh on etheruem only, not 31MH PLUS 750MH on sia
dual mining with 480 is 24/350.. far from 1070
Jump to: