Topic: How will this change the world of mining?? GTX 1080 / 1070 - page 24. (Read 134124 times)

Quote from: asdalani on July 02, 2016, 08:29:23 AM

I think new 470 is more better to 280x .

Minor comsuption and more power .

That would be similar hash rate, but maybe 50% of the power consumption. 470 could be the best for mining.

But if the 470 comes out next months, it will not be able to ROI if the mining difficulty rises at the current rate.

We already know the difficulty is rising fast. But people (miners) are very confident the price will rise, they are add more miners.

If the difficulty doubles every two months as it did in the last 6 months, even for 480, there will be no ROI.

giagge

legendary

Activity: 1134

Merit: 1001

Quote from: Bokelka on July 02, 2016, 07:38:40 AM

Quote from: Bokelka on July 02, 2016, 07:38:40 AM

I think new 470 is more better to 280x .

Minor comsuption and more power .

That would be similar hash rate, but maybe 50% of the power consumption. 470 could be the best for mining.

But if the 470 comes out next months, it will not be able to ROI if the mining difficulty rises at the current rate.

We already know the difficulty is rising fast. But people (miners) are very confident the price will rise, they are add more miners.

Yes i think so .

asdalani

hero member

Activity: 882

Merit: 500

CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!

I think new 470 is more better to 280x .

Minor comsuption and more power .

That would be similar hash rate, but maybe 50% of the power consumption. 470 could be the best for mining.

But if the 470 comes out next months, it will not be able to ROI if the mining difficulty rises at the current rate.

We already know the difficulty is rising fast. But people (miners) are very confident the price will rise, they are add more miners.

Bokelka

sr. member

Activity: 242

Merit: 250

I think new 470 is more better to 280x .

Minor comsuption and more power .

That would be similar hash rate, but maybe 50% of the power consumption. 470 could be the best for mining.

But if the 470 comes out next months, it will not be able to ROI if the mining difficulty rises at the current rate.

onemd

full member

Activity: 309

Merit: 118

Quote from: mandica on July 01, 2016, 04:29:48 AM

I think new 470 is more better to 280x .

Minor comsuption and more power .

That would be similar hash rate, but maybe 50% of the power consumption. 470 could be the best for mining.

giagge

legendary

Activity: 1134

Merit: 1001

I think new 470 is more better to 280x .

Minor comsuption and more power .

apriyoni

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

Quote from: Mometaskers on June 30, 2016, 11:17:06 AM

Quote from: sanas on June 30, 2016, 02:54:34 AM

Quote from: Zitdadast on June 29, 2016, 10:07:13 AM

Quote from: Mometaskers on June 30, 2016, 11:17:06 AM

As the architecture of shaders is not changed much expected performance is near level of Hawaii with 2304 shader cores multiplied by core clock
If you expect 480 to be faster than Hawaii, then think again

I agree with that. According to the latest mining performance of the 480 RX, it is slower than the R9 390.

Although it is slower, it is more efficient. It depends on your electricity price. If it is high, it is better to use 480.

For the high electricity price people, they should not use graphics to mine. If they invest now, there will be no ROI.

The network hash rate is over 4000G now, that is almost 200,000 of AMD R9 280X/380X. The 480X will also be added.

I think half of that is the 280x or early graphics cards and half of them are the 390 or later graphics cards.

Maybe more than half are 280x or 280. In every DAG change, we can see a big dip in the difficulty level.

These 280x will be used for long term. I think they will be mined to death. That is a very good card.

mandica

hero member

Activity: 693

Merit: 508

Quote from: sanas on June 30, 2016, 02:54:34 AM

Quote from: Zitdadast on June 29, 2016, 10:07:13 AM

Quote from: sanas on June 30, 2016, 02:54:34 AM

As the architecture of shaders is not changed much expected performance is near level of Hawaii with 2304 shader cores multiplied by core clock
If you expect 480 to be faster than Hawaii, then think again

I agree with that. According to the latest mining performance of the 480 RX, it is slower than the R9 390.

Although it is slower, it is more efficient. It depends on your electricity price. If it is high, it is better to use 480.

For the high electricity price people, they should not use graphics to mine. If they invest now, there will be no ROI.

The network hash rate is over 4000G now, that is almost 200,000 of AMD R9 280X/380X. The 480X will also be added.

I think half of that is the 280x or early graphics cards and half of them are the 390 or later graphics cards.

Maybe more than half are 280x or 280. In every DAG change, we can see a big dip in the difficulty level.

Mometaskers

hero member

Activity: 1764

Merit: 584

Quote from: Zitdadast on June 29, 2016, 10:07:13 AM

Quote from: Zitdadast on June 29, 2016, 10:07:13 AM

As the architecture of shaders is not changed much expected performance is near level of Hawaii with 2304 shader cores multiplied by core clock
If you expect 480 to be faster than Hawaii, then think again

I agree with that. According to the latest mining performance of the 480 RX, it is slower than the R9 390.

Although it is slower, it is more efficient. It depends on your electricity price. If it is high, it is better to use 480.

For the high electricity price people, they should not use graphics to mine. If they invest now, there will be no ROI.

The network hash rate is over 4000G now, that is almost 200,000 of AMD R9 280X/380X. The 480X will also be added.

I think half of that is the 280x or early graphics cards and half of them are the 390 or later graphics cards.

sanas

hero member

Activity: 546

Merit: 500

As the architecture of shaders is not changed much expected performance is near level of Hawaii with 2304 shader cores multiplied by core clock
If you expect 480 to be faster than Hawaii, then think again

I agree with that. According to the latest mining performance of the 480 RX, it is slower than the R9 390.

Although it is slower, it is more efficient. It depends on your electricity price. If it is high, it is better to use 480.

For the high electricity price people, they should not use graphics to mine. If they invest now, there will be no ROI.

The network hash rate is over 4000G now, that is almost 200,000 of AMD R9 280X/380X. The 480X will also be added.

Zitdadast

sr. member

Activity: 312

Merit: 250

LTC fan 4ever

As the architecture of shaders is not changed much expected performance is near level of Hawaii with 2304 shader cores multiplied by core clock
If you expect 480 to be faster than Hawaii, then think again

I agree with that. According to the latest mining performance of the 480 RX, it is slower than the R9 390.

Although it is slower, it is more efficient. It depends on your electricity price. If it is high, it is better to use 480.

For the high electricity price people, they should not use graphics to mine. If they invest now, there will be no ROI.

onemd

full member

Activity: 309

Merit: 118

As the architecture of shaders is not changed much expected performance is near level of Hawaii with 2304 shader cores multiplied by core clock
If you expect 480 to be faster than Hawaii, then think again

I agree with that. According to the latest mining performance of the 480 RX, it is slower than the R9 390.

Although it is slower, it is more efficient. It depends on your electricity price. If it is high, it is better to use 480.

mandica

hero member

Activity: 693

Merit: 508