Topic: ICO Reviews, trust them or NOT? (Read 2296 times)
I think that you should not choose iso from reviews, now they can be incorrect or written specifically to attract people
I don't believe it. but I always visit some websites that focus on ICO rating to see a list of new ICOs.
I am sure only that each person should decide for himself what is important for him for the conclusion and decision on the project and what is not important. You forget that you need to analyze the project individually.
Trust them but make sure that you corroborate the information that they are giving you with some research of your own. That will help you determine if the ico review site is actually giving out good reviews so you can be able to trust them in the future. What I think though is that everyone has a price and if someone paid them well enough, they would have no problem altering reviews
IMO, ICO review websites are good for reading as references when doing investment research. But you have to do your own analysis before deciding whether to invest or not.
Believe it or not, this is your business. That's weird, when on the ico market there was a boom, the forum had units of such thoughts. As the trend changes, crowd opinions change too. This does not seem strange to you.
I only watch Crush Crypto for ico reviews. rest where shillers or paid reviews . invest that have big discount then dumps on their followers
ICO Reviews just serve as a guide. I dont say not to trust them but dont just rely on their reviews. Make an observation by yours for you to say and trust a specific platform. Investing in an ICO is risky so we are not allowed to blame anyone with their failed reviews or whatsoever. Just be prepared to lose and dont just expect to gain.
I think that very few people trust ico trakers and their rating of projects, I myself have repeatedly noticed when a scam gets there, but these trakers can be used to collect information about a project
For now, I don't believe in review sites. because there are indeed many articles that mention that reviews can be bought with money. and of course it is very dangerous because it can make many people fooled
I also don't believe much even now I always follow my heart in choosing ICO.I prefer to believe in myself in investing because if I succeed I will be very happy because of my own results.
For now, I don't believe in review sites. because there are indeed many articles that mention that reviews can be bought with money. and of course it is very dangerous because it can make many people fooled
Such sites and do not believe. You need to apply the information that they contain for their own purposes. In many of these reviews contain information that will help you quickly understand the idea of the project and its financial component. You don't have to spend time learning white paper.
For now, I don't believe in review sites. because there are indeed many articles that mention that reviews can be bought with money. and of course it is very dangerous because it can make many people fooled
I believe ICO reviews, because in my opinion ico's review is important to determine whether I have a good or not, so far I've always followed the reviews of ico and the icon is always successful, it's very useful to choose a quality ico
Not too dependent on any ICO evaluation page. There should be an objective comparison between the ICO rating sites. The ranking information provided by the rating websites that are not included will be of reference value. Larger projection. For large investments or to understand, consider yourself and study it. If you put a lot of money, then they will give you good reviews on the project even if it's a phishing project they will put up with. positive, so sometimes do not trust the evaluation of some people.
I have never trusted ICO reviews from anywhere. it's better to do my personal observation than to trust others. and in my opinion my current ICO Rating cannot be a benchmark for judging that ico is good or not.
This is not what advertising and advertising do all the time, the purpose is to reach consumers, decisions and choices. Never trust someone elses 100% rating, You should always do your own research to check out the facts before you invest money in a project. Most people only do it in cash, even those here to receive bonuses. Your ICO decision must be based on your own research and what you have found out for yourself.
Not eventually we give trust in ICO reviews even a certain project have a high rating with them. Cause it is something there is a sabotage around. Your right, we better check our self and do look feedbacks which could signifies if a certain project is providing good or not.
This is not what advertising and advertising do all the time, the purpose is to reach consumers, decisions and choices. Never trust someone elses 100% rating, You should always do your own research to check out the facts before you invest money in a project. Most people only do it in cash, even those here to receive bonuses. Your ICO decision must be based on your own research and what you have found out for yourself.
I wouldn't trust them. All aggregators are engaged only in the fact that deceive us, ordinary users who want to read about a particular project.
I think the truth is that you have to make your own decision based on your fact finding from those review sites It help ease things up instead of blaming the review site because i dont they can detect some kind of scam even if they do is mostly after like half way so i think best is maybe research and the hold a little
I dont trust any influencer or ico rating website or anything. Only i am trusting my own decisions because of that i learnt too many things about icos i did lots of research about icos and past good performed icos. Now i know too many things about icos and i can decide my own decision. I suggest to everyone . Do not trust any website or influencer. Only trust your own feelings.
Jump to: