Topic: ICO Reviews, trust them or NOT? - page 10. (Read 2296 times)
ICO surveys furnish financial specialists with an assortment of means for research and choice. However, at times those surveys are not by any means objective, the evaluators some of the time carry out the activity, you don't have the foggiest idea about the esteem and limit of the evaluator ... As I would like to think, you depend on into learning, knowledge, network based and consistently screen and dissect data about past activities that at last choose. It is you who is in charge of your choice to contain nobody else.
At the rate where most of her initial coin offerings in the market are scams, it is not wise to trust any of them no matter how attractive the concept of the company is unless they provide you with some technology or proof of concept which is written in the ICO reviews
please try not to only rely a review from others. It is good to see the review, but you yourself must take a research about the project too.
Not every review are 100% true, they are paid, so there is a possibility for being subjective in review. Always do your own research because it
is your money that you want to invest, not others.
Not every review are 100% true, they are paid, so there is a possibility for being subjective in review. Always do your own research because it
is your money that you want to invest, not others.
I trust the ICO rating. But this is not the only criterion of choice.. You get acquainted with the products of this ICO, whether it will be useful, whether it will find application in the world... You look at the team's goals, you get to know the road map...
Always do your own research before investing in any project . remember everyone is fighting for their own pocket
Don't rely on ICO reviews itself as there are possibilities that project team are paying the sites to give them high score in order to catch the attention of investors. Better take a look on the potential of the project itself through your own research.
My personal opinion that we can trust ico reviews, criptocurrency rank websites and etc. However, we need to check several sources of information to find out necessary and more correct information
Eternal trust will be the world’s first blockchain platform for the pending acquisition of goods or services that aren’t yet available, including cloning or the restoration of the human neural network after cryonic preservation – whenever this becomes available both legally and ethically. To ensure this, Eternal Trusts (ET) creates discretionary purpose trusts for their clients, as well as legal structures protecting its clients’ assets.
The projects of the people that are signed with the company are named as trusts and these financial trusts will be stored in the decentralized Blockchain platform.
Join ICO NOW
The projects of the people that are signed with the company are named as trusts and these financial trusts will be stored in the decentralized Blockchain platform.
Join ICO NOW
Well maybe many are being paid to make positive feedbacks to the project paying them but i still believes that this is not 100% ,because there are some sites that making their own research and reviews for the icos just to build their names to this community,though maybe there still accepting payments for public reviews
make your own research, don't trust them. It used to be trusted but at the moment, when a lot of ICO, they can not rate all of ICO correctly.
Now, investing on ICO is like gambling. Just make your own research to reduce rate of loss. See Denaro and Bitpenta before, they got high mark on ICO review, get a lot of fund then run away.
Now, investing on ICO is like gambling. Just make your own research to reduce rate of loss. See Denaro and Bitpenta before, they got high mark on ICO review, get a lot of fund then run away.
I've seen soooo many fake reviews, paid reviews, scammy and deceitful reviews, that I do not trust the reviews at all now. Of course, I check review websites regularly, but I try to filter the information I read and, of course, rely more on whitepapers, techpapers, some information about the developers, etc.
As a first step of my research I am using ICO rating sites only. But I never trusted them. You don't know if they were manipulated. Better to take some time to read the whitepaper, check their website, social media and discussions here in bitcointalk forum. We have to analyze the ICO that we will participate. Just trust your own research. But icobench seems to be good and informative.
I think the reviews can still be used as part of the yardstick or tool to draw your conclusion but you still need to use your own discretion and do not be 100percent reliant on them because some projects still fail despite high ratings.
Hi, Never trust someone else reviews 100%, you should always do your own research to check the facts before you invest money in a project. From my opinion i believe on scidex, it's really great project- fits to market needs perfectly. 
Well, I think we don't have to give our 100% trust to those reviews. Since those knowledge or idea they share are only their thoughts and own research. They just give information for us to know about that campagin but it is our duty to thoroughly research and find fault if the certain ICO if it has.
but do not trust completely. use the analysis and discussion of their own in order to understand about whatever he does. Furthermore, if you only rely on the opinions of others only private of course we will not be able to flourish in the crypto. therefore do not be too trusting with the reviews given.
The well-known fact that most of all reviews on any topic are written by order. Paid reviews are available on any site where there is an opportunity to leave comments. This is Hidden Marketing.
Before investing in the ICO, conduct your own serious analysis in order to make your own decision.
Before investing in the ICO, conduct your own serious analysis in order to make your own decision.
They are certainly helpful. They allow you to pre-evaluate the project. There is never 100% certainty about the reliability of the data contained there. You always have to do your own research on the project, team, innovation etc.
Yeah, and there are multiple places to collect information from, some of them are paid sure but it helps to check the links yourself
Trust is maybe a wrong word for it since everything is biased, but i am trying to collect the facts and form my own opinions.
They are certainly helpful. They allow you to pre-evaluate the project. There is never 100% certainty about the reliability of the data contained there. You always have to do your own research on the project, team, innovation etc.
Jump to: