Topic: ICO without whitepaper (Read 7656 times)
you have to know first about the purpose of the ICO, ICO By choosing a method performed by the developer is not without purpose, in fact this is an important moment for developers to further development of the coin were created. and that goal is in their whitepaper they made. so it's clear that ICO without a whitepaper, what they offer, is unclear and scam
Personally , I don't think there should be an ICO without whitepaper. The whitepaper bridges the gap between an investor and a company. Can we say a ICO without a whitepaper is a scam? Or what can you say about an ICO without whitepaper
For me, it's very important it is where you can access everything you need to know about the project, this is why in the service section creating a whitepaper command a good price from freelancers and this is where investors looked to check if the project is worth investing.
I completely agree with you guy, actually whitepaper is considered as the most necessary when it comes to an ICO project. Whitepapers is pretty important in evaluating ICO project as well as Crypto Marketing. Also, it’s a virtually fundamental key to make a project successful. Most important information is covered in whitepaper, such as team, advisors and investors behind the project The more specifics, clearness a whitepaper are, the greater trust that an ICO project can gain, thechance of success is getting higher. A good whitepaper will partially make most investors be more likely to chip in money for a project. That’s the reason why whitepaper is necessarily important.
White paper is the main document judging by which you can understand whether there is a possibility of earning on a particular coin. Now I think that would not pay attention to such a project because I think it is not the best option to make money on it
I definitely do not trust such projects. They seem to me the most fraudulent and I do not even consider them as ICO in which it will be possible to invest heavily. It's probably a very big hoax.
I do believe ICO without whitepaper will be fraudulence. Due to the fact for me personally whitepapers have become crucial. From your whitepaper, we could examine perhaps the venture will be fraudulence or perhaps not necessarily. I do believe the particular accomplishment with the venture can be dependant on the particular whitepaper.
ICOs without whitepaper might be not scam anyway bad idea to invest to them, if they didn't make whitepaper that's mean they have low responsibility level
it's not just a low level of responsibility. without the white paper, you can see that the team has no idea what they are going to do after the fundraiser.
ICO without white paper is bound to be a lot of fake ICO, because someone can't see the flow of the front line as it is, and if an ICO has a miniamal white paper they show the way forward for the project
ICOs without whitepaper might be not scam anyway bad idea to invest to them, if they didn't make whitepaper that's mean they have low responsibility level
Personally , I don't think there should be an ICO without whitepaper. The whitepaper bridges the gap between an investor and a company. Can we say a ICO without a whitepaper is a scam? Or what can you say about an ICO without whitepaper
Check out this article to help choose the right ICOThe Evolution Of ICOs: What’s Changed?
https://medium.com/financex/the-evolution-of-icos-whats-changed-f3171201f7ff
Almost all ICO have whitepaper and roadmap. The lack of one of these dokumentovvyzyvat huge suspicion. I wouldn't begin to participate such project for investments. It is very bad omen, in my opinion. It is necessary to look for such ICO which have these documents.
similarly, I believe that without white paper is a pure fraud. in any case, it should be described what the money is collected, how much the coin is worth and how it will be used Personally , I don't think there should be an ICO without whitepaper. The whitepaper bridges the gap between an investor and a company. Can we say a ICO without a whitepaper is a scam? Or what can you say about an ICO without whitepaper
ico without whitepaper is like a you sell a car without document and you don't know about spec and material.
if any ico without whitepaper, they are making big joke.
so I definite this project are scam.
in my opinion, the whitepaper in the ICO is mandatory because if there is no whitepaper how can we find out more detailed content from the ICO, because in my opinion, the whitepaper contains all the important information about the ICO.
i think that the project without a whitepaper is not a project because it is the main thing of the project and we can directly understand that it is scam.
I dint see any ICO that dont have a white paper but if they theres any i think its a scam. Im doing this for more than 1 yr and i dont see any of ico that dont have white paper
people's rate the ico based on their whitepaper, teams, prospect of the projects, etc. So i think if there's no whitepaper then will simply rate it bad or leave thus ICO
Personally , I don't think there should be an ICO without whitepaper. The whitepaper bridges the gap between an investor and a company. Can we say a ICO without a whitepaper is a scam? Or what can you say about an ICO without whitepaper
Hi,
For me that's a complete nonsense to run an ICO without having previously published a whitepaper.
It's irrespectful of investors ans it's like telling: "I'm not sure my idea is worth investing my time on it, so please first invest your money and then I'll work on it..."
some of them say the whitepaper is the heart of the ico but i am not sure about that because i think you can not name it scam becuase it does not have whitepaper i would follow all the moves it make and then decide for the conclusion.
A Whitepaper is an important aspect of a project especially when the project is running an ICO. It serves as a guideline for the project. This doesn’t also mean an ICO without a Whitepaper is a scam, it may surprise you to know that most of the ICOs with very attractive Whitepapers turn out to be scams. I personally haven’t seen an ICO without a Whitepaper and I don’t think one exists.
Personally , I don't think there should be an ICO without whitepaper. The whitepaper bridges the gap between an investor and a company. Can we say a ICO without a whitepaper is a scam? Or what can you say about an ICO without whitepaper
Most probably around 99% of ICOs without whitepapers are scams. The remaining 1% are probably charity ICOs that just give away tokens for the lols. But based on experience, I find it accurate that ICOs without whitepapers are more likely to be scams.
Personally , I don't think there should be an ICO without whitepaper. The whitepaper bridges the gap between an investor and a company. Can we say a ICO without a whitepaper is a scam? Or what can you say about an ICO without whitepaper
of course projects that do not have documentation, want to leave at the expense of HYIP. And there is no documentation because they do not have it, it is a fraud. Who want to get investors through artificial HYIP. Such projects should be avoided Jump to: