Topic: ICO without whitepaper - page 12. (Read 7656 times)
White paper plays an important role in a project. if a project has no concept and purpose, how will investors believe in investing in it? I personally don't trust ICO without white paper.
The white paper is only a clarification to enable financial specialists to all the more likely comprehend the organization's activities. White paper has incredible essentialness. It is additionally conceivable to see an ICO without a white book as a trick. Yet, a portion of the ICOs they composed were genuinely straightforward yet at the same time especially valued by speculators and increased in value by numerous investigators.
Personally , I don't think there should be an ICO without whitepaper. The whitepaper bridges the gap between an investor and a company. Can we say a ICO without a whitepaper is a scam? Or what can you say about an ICO without whitepaper
I want to make an entry by stating that the possibility of such an event is very low. Especially today, there are many ICO projects and many of them are being used out of purpose. Because it is the case, the projects are now getting more difficult investments and investors are not investing unless there is a quality expectation. This is why a truly researching investor will first want to know about the project, which is the easiest and most accurate way to get it through the whitepaper. If such a document is missing, investors will not be able to obtain information about the project and will not be willing to invest. Why invest for a project that does not already have such a document? That is why I do not think there are any projects that do not have whitepaper. If you come across such a project, do not invest it, very likely it is not real and it has been created with intentional aim.
ICO without whitepaper, seriously?
it's like someone makes an address contract without a purpose so that the token is worthless on the market, it sounds like "airdrop"
it's like someone makes an address contract without a purpose so that the token is worthless on the market, it sounds like "airdrop"
I would never invest in an ico without documents. We must immediately pass by such ico. Everything should be clear: a good product, documents, road map, serious developers.
Whitepaper is mandatory for all ICO, except the company is cocacola or apple. As long as it is genuine,investors may not care because of their track record but we might just want to know how the token/blockchain might be relevant and useful
ICO usually is a new project and whitepaper is mandatory. Without it, no investors will be interested to join. It will different if the project that offers ICO is a well known and already well established company.
Whitepaper is mandatory for all ICO, except the company is cocacola or apple. As long as it is genuine,investors may not care because of their track record but we might just want to know how the token/blockchain might be relevant and useful
I have never seen ICO without whitepaper,because there is a competency and projects need to create quality WP in order to attract new investors and community.
i think the ICOs without whitepaper will be 99,99% scam. the Whitepaper like a bridge which the project's team want to connect the people to their project, the investor will know about technology, product, or something which relate to the project. if without white paper i think nobody invest to the project.
It is very risky to invest in ICO without whitepaper, because whitepaper is the main document where you can find all necessary about the project.
Personally , I don't think there should be an ICO without whitepaper. The whitepaper bridges the gap between an investor and a company. Can we say a ICO without a whitepaper is a scam? Or what can you say about an ICO without whitepaper
It's logic. All ICOs should have a whitepaper before it is considered an ICO. There should always be whitepaper because it dictates there the plan of the ICO and what it's planning in the future. You should never participate in a bounty campaign without a whitepaper.
White paper is very important. We can learn about the project all the necessary information only from the document so if the white paper is not, then this project does not deserve our attention
I am actually yet to meet one. Did you create the thread out of imaginations or you have actually met or seen one. Personally I dont see why there will be an ICO without whitepaper. How would investors understand the idea behind the project. I wouldnt dare to invest in such a project. It only communicates lack of seriousness on the part of the team.
Hello, look at the options mass, well, firstly it is a check on the services of the company's surveyed bounty, also you can study the project in detail, its technical documentation, web site and other constructive documents
ICO without white paper that's to tell you the developers of the coin just wanna scam investors.even ICOs with white paper ain't doing very well right now let alone the one without white paper.
Just run away ,it's a scam coin
Just run away ,it's a scam coin
Personally , I don't think there should be an ICO without whitepaper. The whitepaper bridges the gap between an investor and a company. Can we say a ICO without a whitepaper is a scam? Or what can you say about an ICO without whitepaper
ICOs without a Whitepaper is like investing in a business without have a clue about what the business is all about. It is true that even scams use Whitepaper to take investor's money but having no clue or understanding about the business is not going to make the ICO any better.
.only silly people doing this action. 
Yes, it has been confirmed to be a scam, while many of the ico who use whitepaper are scams, especially ico who has no whitepaper.
By the way, I've never seen ico without a whitepaper
By the way, I've never seen ico without a whitepaper
Personally , I don't think there should be an ICO without whitepaper. The whitepaper bridges the gap between an investor and a company. Can we say a ICO without a whitepaper is a scam? Or what can you say about an ICO without whitepaper
ICOs without a Whitepaper is like investing in a business without have a clue about what the business is all about. It is true that even scams use Whitepaper to take investor's money but having no clue or understanding about the business is not going to make the ICO any better.
If ICO has white paper in it, no one will invest money))) Documents provide an opportunity to understand the essence of the project and its potential. Therefore, the white paper required.
It has become pretty much necessary to have a white paper in this day and age, though I don't think it should be like this. Not every project needs to be explained with a 50 page document most of it discussing how the market is doing shit. I think that a well designed informative website, plus a one pager and pitch deck are often sufficient.
Jump to: