Topic: Intellectual Property - In All Fairness! - page 54. (Read 105875 times)

They have uranium and plutonium. How hard can it be to make one? According to you, if it was legal, everyone would own one.

Typical. Never admit when you're wrong. The true sign of someone that's out of their depth.

Are you saying that if they were legal to own and store in, say, North Korea, and they were able to buy them, those people I mentioned would buy them, because owning a nuke (and losing business from everyone shocked about it) would give them more money and power than running their own businesses?
Is the plan
1) Buy nuke
2)
3) Profit?

"North Korea (officially the Democratic People's Republic of Korea or DPRK) has declared that it has nuclear weapons and is believed by many to have nuclear weapons."

You can be loud-mouthed or ignorant of the facts, but being both is a terrible combination.

That's NK blowing smoke up peoples' asses, but that's entirely another discussion for another thread.


Furthermore, EVEN IF we pretend they have nukes... it doesn't mean they don't regulate them.  The fact that the government owns them doesn't mean it immediately follows that the goverment is willing to sell them to anyone.

Iran doesn't have nukes.  North Korea doesn't have nukes.  China doesn't sell nukes.  So wtf is your point?

You really need to educate yourself.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Korea_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction

If you don't even know that North Korea has nuclear weapons, you really don't need to be calling people "dumb shit" or even engaging in intelligent debates at all.

I'm laughing at the all caps though. You mad, bro?

Take you suitcase of $200,000,000, go to Iran or North Korea, or the Chinese black market, and buy a nuke. Post pictures when you're done. No need to export it or take it anywhere there there are regulations on them. Just buy it where there are no regulations and nuclear materials are available.
Until you do, I'll be laughing at you.

GOD FUCKING DAMNIT!!  THEY DON'T OWN ANY BECAUSE IT'S ILLEGAL!!

BECAUSE THEY'RE REGULATED AND HEAVILY CONTROLLED EVERYWHERE THEY ACTUALLY EXIST, YOU DUMB SHIT.

What part of that don't you understand?  No one can get them because the people that own them regulate them.  It doesn't matter that North Korea or Osama don't regulate them, because the countries that own them do.

Sorry, but your imagination at how to be a supervilain kinda sucks. How many nukes does Rupert Murdoch own? How about the Walton family (of WalMart?) There are way better weapons and systems of control than just blowing everything up indiscriminately.

It *is* a double standard.  You are willing to use force to make me comply with your rules, while you deny me the right to use force to make you comply with my rules.  One standard for you, another for me.  Double standard.  Big difference is you're a hypocrite and I'm not - I say "I will engage in violence to make you comply", and I do, while you say "I will never engage in violence except in defence" but you do.

But this is far too entertaining to stop here.  So, all right, let's suppose I accept your NAP (which is, in and of itself an admirable principle), but I reject your definition of property.  I may therefore rightfully enter, without aggression, what you consider to be your property and claim it as my own.  You may not engage in aggression to eject me.  Correct or incorrect?


Perhaps you don't understand the meaning of the words "responsible" and "honest"...


Oh man, I'm bustin' my sides laughing now.  You couldn't buy comedy this good anywhere.


I gotta quit this thread - it's just too addictive.  These guys just *won't* address the problems put to them 'cos the contradictions are inescapable.


AND THIS     Oh shit, I'm crackin' up... there are literally tears coming out my eyes... I can't even type... you guys have gotta stop typing dudes, every time I hit "post" there are 10 new replies and I'm just breakin' apart reading them...

Actually they can't make the bomb themselves despite a breach of the treaty by Pakistan.  Their difficulty shows how well the system works. 

That is correct. I would hope that in Libertopia, people who wish to stick to those types of courts and screw their wives will eventually have a REALLY difficult time getting wives, and won't have as many children to spread their stupid to. Likewise women who experience this, or see others experiencing this, will hopefully quickly abandon their husbands, even if at a loss, for someone more reasonable.
Obviously if this was going on under a theocratic government, that won't be an option.

I wonder if you realize that places like North Korea aren't part of that? Yet somehow a billionaire couldn't get one.

They aren't regulated everywhere. Yet somehow a billionaire couldn't get one.

Your theory doesn't hold water, sorry.

Umm... well... for the same reason anyone would want to own a nuke: power.

And L O FUCKING L at black ops, media control, and propoganda being cheaper than just buying a nuke and calling it a day.

heavily regulated - read before you reply.

Power.  A nuke gives you ultimate power of life and death over millions and as such the bad and the mad will always want it.

Or that

So you're saying that even if they are readily available nobody would sell them to maniacs? I guess it's not an issue then.