One thing that has constantly annoyed and concerned me - why hasn't a high ranking member of the Islam religion (an Imam from Saudi Arabia or another devout Islam country) spoken out against terrorist acts...immediately after they happen? When there is a terrorist act the first thing we hear from a Muslim person is credit (from ISIS/Daesh, etc.)
We NEVER hear an Imam denouncing the acts and reaffirming to the world that the religion is one of peace. That fact is one to be explored and discussed further.
Does the news media report a story about "group of Muslims peacefully attended mosque today!"? No.
The reason you believe Islam is a hate-filled religion is because you're only exposure to the religion is what you hear and see on the news. And the priority of the news is to (mostly) report the tragedies of the world. Ever heard of the news industry phrase "if it bleeds, it leads"?
You say 95% of terrorism is conducted in the name of Islam. This may be true, but I'd love to read the article you're using as a source for that fact.
A more meaningful fact is what percentage of Muslims conduct terrorism? If it was less than 1% would you still think it's a hate-filled religion? Less than 2%? 5%? What threshold is appropriate for the religion to receive that assessment?
I've never read the Koran, but the Islam holy book is THE ONLY true source to answer your question - it will either state tenants that request or suggest hate and violence or it won't, and those are the rules that the religion is lived by.
We are more observers of the behavior of Islamics than anything else. We don't need to read their old books to study their behavior in the world.
And for starters as to "sources," how about we try Wikipedia?